2,112
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Taking back control of the welfare state: Brexit, rational-imaginaries and welfare chauvinism

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Ampofo, Lawrence, Simon Collister, Ben O’Loughlin, and Andrew Chadwick (2015). ‘Text Mining and Social Media: When Quantitative Meets Qualitative and Software Meets People’, in Peter Halfpenny and Rob Procter (eds.), Innovations in Digital Research Methods. London: Sage, 161–92.
  • Andersen, Jørgen Goul, and Tor Bjørklund (1990). ‘Structural Changes and New Cleavages: The Progress Parties in Denmark and Norway’, Acta Sociologica, 33:3, 195–217.
  • Anderson, Benedict (2006). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Revised ed. London: Verso.
  • Bacchi, Carol (2009). Analysing Policy: What’s the Problem Represented to Be? Frenchs Forest: Pearson Education.
  • Béland, Daniel and André Lecours (2013). Nationalism and Social Policy: The Politics of Territorial Solidarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Berezin, Mabel (2013). ‘The Normalization of the Right in Post-Security Europe’, in Wolfgang Streeck and Armin Schäfer (eds.), Politics in the Age of Austerity. Cambridge: Polity, 216–38.
  • Betz, Hans-Georg, and Carol Johnson (2004). ‘Against the Current—Stemming the Tide: The Nostalgic Ideology of the Contemporary Radical Populist Right’, Journal of Political Ideologies, 9:3, 311–27.
  • Borren, Marieke (2013). ‘A Sense of the World’: Hannah Arendt’s Hermeneutic Phenomenology of Common Sense’, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 21:2, 225–55.
  • Browning, Christopher (2018). ‘Brexit, Existential Anxiety and Ontological (In)Security’, European Security, 27:3, 336–55.
  • Careja, Romana, Christian Elmelund-Praestekaer, Michael Baggesen Klitgaard, and Erik Gahner Larsen (2016). ‘Direct and Indirect Welfare Chauvinism as Party Strategies: An Analysis of the Danish People’s Party’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 39:4, 435–57.
  • Chong, Dennis, and James N. Druckman (2007). ‘Framing Theory’, Annual Review of Political Science, 10:1, 103–26.
  • Conservative Party (2021). “The Party of Business”, available at https://www.conservatives.com/business (accessed 16 May 2021).
  • Dijk, Teun A. van (1993). Elite Discourse and Racism. London: Sage.
  • Dijk, Teun A. van (2006). ‘Discourse and Manipulation’, Discourse & Society, 17:3, 359–83.
  • Donoghue, Matthew (2018). ‘Beyond Hegemony: Elaborating on the Use of Gramscian Concepts in Critical Discourse Analysis for Political Studies’, Political Studies, 66:2, 392–408.
  • Druckman, James N. (2001). ‘On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame?’, The Journal of Politics, 63:4, 1041–66.
  • Dupuis, Ann, and David C. Thorns (1998). ‘Home, Home Ownership and the Search for Ontological Security’, The Sociological Review, 46:1, 24–47.
  • Eger, Maureen A., and Nate Breznau (2017). ‘Immigration and the Welfare State: A Cross-Regional Analysis of European Welfare Attitudes’, International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 58:5, 440–63.
  • Elgot, Jessica (2016). ‘How David Cameron’s Language on Refugees Has Provoked Anger’. The Guardian, January 27. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/jan/27/david-camerons-bunch-of-migrants-quip-is-latest-of-several-such-comments
  • Ennser‐Jedenastik, Laurenz (2018). ‘Welfare Chauvinism in Populist Radical Right Platforms: The Role of Redistributive Justice Principles’, Social Policy & Administration, 52:1, 293–314.
  • Entman, Robert M. (1993). ‘Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm’, Journal of Communication, 43:4, 51–8.
  • Farage, Nigel (2017). ‘Why We Must Vote LEAVE in the EU Referendum’. Daily Express, June 21. Retrieved from https://www.express.co.uk/comment/expresscomment/681776/nigel-farage-eu-referendum-brexit-vote-leave-independence-ukip
  • Farnsworth, K. (2017). ‘Taking Back Control or Empowering Big Business? New Risks to the Welfare State in the post-Brexit Competition for Investment’, Journal of Social Policy, 46:4, 699–718.
  • Fitzgerald, Des, Amy Hinterberger, John Narayan, and Ros Williams (2020). ‘Brexit as Heredity Redux: Imperialism, Biomedicine and the NHS in Britain’, The Sociological Review, 68:6, 1161–78.
  • Giddens, Anthony (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Glynos, Jason, Robin Klimecki, and Hugh Willmott (2012). ‘Cooling out the Marks’, Journal of Cultural Economy, 5:3, 297–320.
  • Goodhart, David (2004). ‘Too Diverse?’ Prospect, 85.
  • Grant, Harriet, and Amelia Gentleman (2020). ‘Calls to Scrap “Unfair” NHS Surcharge for All Migrant Workers’. The Guardian, May 22, sec. UK news. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/22/calls-scrap-unfair-nhs-surcharge-all-migrant-workers
  • James, Scott, and Lucia Quaglia (2019). ‘Brexit, the City and the Contingent Power of Finance’, New Political Economy, 24:2, 258–71.
  • Kenny, Michael (2017). ‘Back to the Populist Future?: Understanding Nostalgia in Contemporary Ideological Discourse’, Journal of Political Ideologies, 22:3, 256–73.
  • Keskinen, Suvi (2016). ‘From Welfare Nationalism to Welfare Chauvinism: Economic Rhetoric, the Welfare State and Changing Asylum Policies in Finland’, Critical Social Policy, 36:3, 352–70.
  • Koster, Willem de, Peter Achterberg, and Jeroen van der Waal (2013). ‘The New Right and the Welfare State: The Electoral Relevance of Welfare Chauvinism and Welfare Populism in The Netherlands’, International Political Science Review, 34:1, 3–20.
  • Kuisma, Mikko (2013). ‘Good” and “Bad” Immigrants: The Economic Nationalism of the True Finns’ Immigration Discourse’, in Umut Korkut, Gregg Bucken-Knapp, Aidan McGarry, Jonas Hinnfors, and Helen Drake (eds.), The Discourses and Politics of Migration in Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 93–108.
  • Kyriakides, Christopher, and Satnam Virdee (2003). ‘Migrant Labour, Racism and the British National Health Service’, Ethnicity & Health, 8:4, 283–305.
  • Lynch, Philip, and Richard Whitaker (2013). ‘Where There Is Discord, Can They Bring Harmony? Managing Intra-Party Dissent on European Integration in the Conservative Party’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 15:3, 317–39.
  • McKeever, Anna (2020). Immigration Policy and Right-Wing Populism in Western Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Menon, Anand, Rachel Minto, and Daniel Wincott (2016). ‘Introduction: The UK and the European Union’, The Political Quarterly, 87:2, 174–8.
  • Menon, Anand, and Alan Wager (2020). ‘Taking Back Control: Sovereignty as Strategy in Brexit Politics’, Territory, Politics, Governance, 8:2, 279–84.
  • Mudde, Cas (2019). The Far Right Today. Cambridge: Polity.
  • NatCen (2020). ‘Fairness and Justice in Britain’, British Social Attitudes Survey, 37, 22.
  • Newman, Christy E., Rebecca Gray, Loren Brener, L. Clair Jackson, Priscilla Johnson, Veronica Saunders, Magdalena Harris, Phyllis Butow, and Carla Treloar (2013). ‘One Size Fits All? The Discursive Framing of Cultural Difference in Health Professional Accounts of Providing Cancer Care to Aboriginal People’, Ethnicity & Health, 18:4, 433–47.
  • Newton, Kenneth (2007). ‘The New Liberal Dilemma: Social Trust in Mixed Societies.’ Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Helsinki, 7–12 May.
  • Norocel, Ov Cristian (2016). ‘Populist Radical Right Protectors of the Folkhem: Welfare Chauvinism in Sweden’, Critical Social Policy, 36:3, 371–90.
  • Portes, Jonathan (2016). ‘Immigration, Free Movement and the EU Referendum’, National Institute Economic Review, 236:1, 14–22.
  • Reeskens, Tim, and Wim van Oorschot (2012). ‘Disentangling the “New Liberal Dilemma”: On the Relation between General Welfare Redistribution Preferences and Welfare Chauvinism’, International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 53:2, 120–39.
  • Rosenthal, Cindy Simon (2008). ‘Sports Talk: How Gender Shapes Discursive Framing of Title IX’, Politics & Gender, 4:01, 65–92.
  • Sum, Ngai-Ling, and Bob Jessop (2013). Towards a Cultural Political Economy: Putting Culture in Its Place in Political Economy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Talani, Leila Simona (2012). Globalization, Hegemony and the Future of the City of London. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Talani, Leila Simona (2019). ‘“Pragmatic Adaptation” and the Future of the City of London: Between Globalization and Brexit’, in Colin Hay and Daniel Baily (eds.), Diverging Capitalisms: Britain, the City of London and Europe, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 43–72.
  • Thompson, Helen (2017). ‘How the City of London Lost at Brexit: A Historical Perspective’, Economy and Society, 46:2, 211–28.
  • Van Der Waal, Jeroen, Willem De Koster, and Wim Van Oorschot (2013). ‘Three Worlds of Welfare Chauvinism? How Welfare Regimes Affect Support for Distributing Welfare to Immigrants in Europe’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 15:2, 164–81.
  • Wright, Matthew, and Tim Reeskens (2013). ‘Of What Cloth Are the Ties That Bind? National Identity and Support for the Welfare State across 29 European Countries’, Journal of European Public Policy, 20:10, 1443–63.
  • Zafarani, Reza, Mohammad Ali Abbasi, and Huan Liu (2014). Social Media Mining: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.