The impact of radical right parties on family benefits

References

• Abou-Chadi, Tarik, and Werner Krause (2020). ‘The Causal Effect of Radical Right Success on Mainstream Parties’ Policy Positions: A Regression Discontinuity Approach’, British Journal of Political Science, 50:3, 829–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afonso, Alexandre (2015). ‘Choosing Whom to Betray: Populist Right-Wing Parties, Welfare State Reforms and the Trade-off between Office and Votes’, European Political Science Review, 7:2, 271–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkerman, Tjitske (2012). ‘Comparing Radical Right Parties in Government: Immigration and Integration Policies in Nine Countries (1996–2010)’, West European Politics, 35:3, 511–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkerman, Tjitske (2015). ‘Gender and the Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis of Policy Agendas’, Patterns of Prejudice, 49:1-2, 37–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armingeon, Klaus, Sarah Engler, and Lucas Leemann (2019). Comparative Political Data Set 1960–2018, available at www.cpds-data.org
   Google Scholar
• Bale, Tim, Christoffer Green‐Pedersen, André Krouwel, Kurt Richard Luther, and Nick Sitter (2010). ‘If You Can’t Beat Them, Join Them? Explaining Social Democratic Responses to the Challenge from the Populist Radical Right in Western Europe’, Political Studies, 58:3, 410–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandau, Frank, and Leo Ahrens (2020). ‘The Impact of Partisanship in the Era of Retrenchment: Insights from Quantitative Welfare State Research’, Journal of European Social Policy, 30:1, 34–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandiera, Oriana, Myra Mohnen, Imran Rasul, and Martina Viarengo (2019). ‘Nation-Building through Compulsory Schooling during the Age of Mass Migration’, The Economic Journal, 129:617, 62–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boer, Max De, Nathanael Hausmann, Miriam Mendelberg, and Daniela Stammbach (2019). ‘Cameron’s pre-Brexit Settlement for the UK within the European Union: Failure or Missed Opportunity?’, European Journal of International Management, 13:5, 662–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolzendahl, Catherine (2011). ‘Beyond the Big Picture: Gender Influences on Disaggregated and Domain-Specific Measures of Social Spending, 1980–1999’, Politics & Gender, 7:01, 35–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brambor, Thomas, William Roberts Clark, and Matt Golder (2006). ‘Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses’, Political Analysis, 14:1, 63–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratton, Kathleen A., and Leonard P. Ray (2002). ‘Descriptive Representation, Policy Outcomes, and Municipal Day-Care Coverage in Norway’, American Journal of Political Science, 46:2, 428–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruter, Michael, and Sarah Harrison (2011). Mapping Extreme Right Ideology: An Empirical Geography of the European Extreme Right. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cappelen, Cornelius, and Tor Midtbø (2016). ‘Intra-EU Labour Migration and Support for the Norwegian Welfare State’, European Sociological Review, 32:6, 691–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Careja, Romana, Christian Elmelund-Praestekaer, Michael Baggesen Klitgaard, and Erik Gahner Larsen (2016). ‘Direct and Indirect Welfare Chauvinism as Party Strategies: An Analysis of the Danish People’s Party’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 39:4, 435–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chueri, Juliana (2020). ‘Social Policy Outcomes of Government Participation by Radical Right Parties’, Party Politics. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068820923496
   Google Scholar
• Cinelli, Carlos, and Chad Hazlett (2020). ‘Making Sense of Sensitivity: Extending Omitted Variable Bias’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 82:1, 39–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lange, Sarah L. (2007). ‘A New Winning Formula? The Programmatic Appeal of the Radical Right’, Party Politics, 13:4, 411–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lange, Sarah L., and Liza M. Mügge (2015). ‘Gender and Right-Wing Populism in the Low Countries: ideological Variations across Parties and Time’, Patterns of Prejudice, 49:1-2, 61–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennser-Jedenastik, Laurenz (2016). ‘A Welfare State for Whom? A Group‐Based Account of the Austrian Freedom Party’s Social Policy Profile’, Swiss Political Science Review, 22:3, 409–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennser-Jedenastik, Laurenz (2017). ‘How Women’s Political Representation Affects Spending on Family Benefits’, Journal of Social Policy, 46:3, 563–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennser-Jedenastik, Laurenz (2018). ‘Welfare Chauvinism in Populist Radical Right Platforms: The Role of Redistributive Justice Principles’, Social Policy & Administration, 52:1, 293–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennser-Jedenastik, Laurenz (2020). ‘The FPÖ’s Welfare Chauvinism’, Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 49:1, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Erzeel, Silvia, and Ekaterina R. Rashkova (2017). ‘Still Men’s Parties? Gender and the Radical Right in Comparative Perspective’, West European Politics, 40:4, 812–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eydal, Guðný Björk, and Tine Rostgaard (2011). ‘Gender Equality Revisited–Changes in Nordic Childcare Policies in the 2000s’, Social Policy & Administration, 45:2, 161–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenger, Menno (2018). ‘The Social Policy Agendas of Populist Radical Right Parties in Comparative Perspective’, Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 34:3, 188–209.
   Google Scholar
• Garritzmann, Julian L., and Kilian Seng (2020). ‘Party Effects on Total and Disaggregated Welfare Spending: A Mixed‐Effects Approach’, European Journal of Political Research, 59:3, 624–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier, Anne H. (2007). ‘The Impact of Family Policies on Fertility in Industrialized Countries: A Review of the Literature’, Population Research and Policy Review, 26:3, 323–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gemenis, Kostas (2012). ‘Proxy Documents as a Source of Measurement Error in the Comparative Manifestos Project’, Electoral Studies, 31:3, 594–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber, Oliver, Astrid Mattes, and Jeremias Stadlmair (2016). ‘Die meritokratische Neugestaltung der österreichischen Integrationspolitik zwischen Rhetorik und Policy’, Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 45:1, 65–79.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, Martin Ejnar (2008). ‘Back to the Archives? A Critique of the Danish Part of the Manifesto Dataset’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 31:2, 201–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harteveld, Eelco, Wouter Van Der Brug, Stefan Dahlberg, and Andrej Kokkonen (2015). ‘The Gender Gap in Populist Radical-Right Voting: Examining the Demand Side in Western and Eastern Europe’, Patterns of Prejudice, 49:1-2, 103–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häusermann, Silja (2018). ‘The Multidimensional Politics of Social Investment in Conservative Welfare Regimes: Family Policy Reform between Social Transfers and Social Investment’, Journal of European Public Policy, 25:6, 862–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hieda, Takeshi (2013). ‘Politics of Childcare Policy beyond the Left–Right Scale: Post‐Industrialisation, Transformation of Party Systems and Welfare State Restructuring’, European Journal of Political Research, 52:4, 483–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjorth, Frederik (2016). ‘Who Benefits? Welfare Chauvinism and National Stereotypes’, European Union Politics, 17:1, 3–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Immerzeel, Tim, Hilde Coffé, and Tanja Van der Lippe (2015). ‘Explaining the Gender Gap in Radical Right Voting: A Cross-National Investigation in 12 Western European Countries’, Comparative European Politics, 13:2, 263–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javornik, Jana (2014). ‘Measuring State de-Familialism: Contesting Post-Socialist Exceptionalism’, Journal of European Social Policy, 24:3, 240–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketola, Markus, and Johan Nordensvard (2018). ‘Reviewing the Relationship between Social Policy and the Contemporary Populist Radical Right: Welfare Chauvinism, Welfare Nation State and Social Citizenship’, Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 34:3, 172–87.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, Carly R., and Mary C. Brinton (2017). ‘One Egalitarianism or Several? Two Decades of Gender-Role Attitude Change in Europe’, American Journal of Sociology, 122:5, 1485–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kootstra, Anouk (2016). ‘Deserving and Undeserving Welfare Claimants in Britain and The Netherlands: Examining the Role of Ethnicity and Migration Status Using a Vignette Experiment’, European Sociological Review, 32:3, 325–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krizsán, Andrea, and Birte Siim (2018). ‘Gender Equality and Family in European Populist Radical-Right Agendas: European Parliamentary Debates 2014’, in Trudie Knijn and Manuela Naldini (eds.), Gender and Generational Division in EU Citizenship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 39–59.
   Google Scholar
• Leitner, Sigrid (2003). ‘Varieties of Familialism: The Caring Function of the Family in Comparative Perspective’, European Societies, 5:4, 353–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenaerts, Koen, and Tinne Heremans (2006). ‘Contours of a European Social Union in the Case-Law of the European Court of Justice’, European Constitutional Law Review, 2:1, 101–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lleras-Muney, Adriana, and Allison Shertzer (2015). ‘Did the Americanization Movement Succeed? An Evaluation of the Effect of English-Only and Compulsory Schooling Laws on Immigrants’, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7:3, 258–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmann, Henning, and Hannah Zagel (2016). ‘Family Policy in Comparative Perspective: The Concepts and Measurement of Familization and Defamilization’, Journal of European Social Policy, 26:1, 48–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luci-Greulich, Angela, and Olivier Thévenon (2013). ‘The Impact of Family Policies on Fertility Trends in Developed Countries’, European Journal of Population / Revue Européenne de Démographie, 29:4, 387–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lührmann, Anna, Nils Düpont, Masaaki Higashijima, Yaman Berker Kavasoglu, Kyle L. Marquardt, Michael Bernhard, Holger Döring, et al. (2020). ‘Varieties of Party Identity and Organization (V-Party) Dataset V1’. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. Retrieved from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23696/vpartydsv1
   Google Scholar
• Melhuish, Edward, Katharina Ereky-Stevens, Konstantinos Petrogiannis, Anamaria Ariescu, Efthymia Penderi, Konstantina Rentzou, Alice Tawell, et al. (2015). A Review of Research on the Effects of Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) upon Child Development. Utrecht: EU CARE Project.
   Google Scholar
• Minkenberg, Michael (2001). ‘The Radical Right in Public Office: Agenda‐Setting and Policy Effects’, West European Politics, 24:4, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkenberg, Michael (2013). ‘From Pariah to Policy-Maker? The Radical Right in Europe, West and East: Between Margin and Mainstream’, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 21:1, 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Moffitt, Benjamin (2017). ‘Liberal Illiberalism? The Reshaping of the Contemporary Populist Radical Right in Northern Europe’, Politics and Governance, 5:4, 112–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas (2007). Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambride: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas (2013). ‘Three Decades of Populist Radical Right Parties in Western Europe: So What?’, European Journal of Political Research, 52:1, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norocel, Ov Cristian (2010). ‘Constructing Radical Right Populist Resistance: Metaphors of Heterosexist Masculinities and the Family Question in Sweden’, NORMA: Nordic Journal for Masculinity Studies, 5:2, 170–83.
   Google Scholar
• Norocel, Ov Cristian (2016). ‘Populist Radical Right Protectors of the Folkhem: Welfare Chauvinism in Sweden’, Critical Social Policy, 36:3, 371–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (2015). Indicators of Immigrant Integration 2015. Settling in. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Oesch, Daniel, and Line Rennwald (2018). ‘Electoral Competition in Europe’s New Tripolar Political Space: Class Voting for the Left, Centre‐Right and Radical Right’, European Journal of Political Research, 57:4, 783–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otjes, Simon (2019). ‘What is Left of the Radical Right? The Economic Agenda of the Dutch Freedom Party 2006-2017’, Politics of the Low Countries, 1:2, 81–102.
   Google Scholar
• PVV (2012). Hún Brussels, óns Nederland. Verkiezingsprogramma 2012-2017. Partij voor de Vrijheid.
   Google Scholar
• Rashkova, Ekaterina R., and Emilia Zankina (2017). ‘Are (Populist) Radical Right Parties Männerparteien? Evidence from Bulgaria’, West European Politics, 40:4, 848–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathgeb, Philip (2021). ‘Makers against Takers: The Socio-Economic Ideology and Policy of the Austrian Freedom Party’, West European Politics, 44:3, 635–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, Matthijs, Stijn Van Kessel, Caterina Froio, Andrea Pirro, Sarah de Lange, Daphne Halikiopoulou, and Paul Lewis, et al. (2019). The PopuList: An Overview of Populist, Far Right, Far Left and Eurosceptic Parties in Europe, available at www.popu-list.org
   Google Scholar
• Röth, Leonce, Alexandre Afonso, and Dennis C. Spies (2018). ‘The Impact of Populist Radical Right Parties on Socio-Economic Policies’, European Political Science Review, 10:3, 325–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovny, Jan (2013). ‘Where Do Radical Right Parties Stand? Position Blurring in Multidimensional Competition’, European Political Science Review, 5:1, 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saraceno, Chiara (2016). ‘Varieties of Familialism: Comparing Four Southern European and East Asian Welfare Regimes’, Journal of European Social Policy, 26:4, 314–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saraceno, Chiara, and Wolfgang Keck (2010). ‘Can we Identify Intergenerational Policy Regimes in Europe?’, European Societies, 12:5, 675–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schain, Martin A. (2006). ‘The Extreme-Right and Immigration Policy-Making: Measuring Direct and Indirect Effects’, West European Politics, 29:2, 270–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher, Gijs, and Kees van Kersbergen (2016). ‘Do Mainstream Parties Adapt to the Welfare Chauvinism of Populist Parties?’, Party Politics, 22:3, 300–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spierings, Niels, and Andrej Zaslove (2015). ‘Conclusion: Dividing the Populist Radical Right between ‘Liberal Nativism’ and Traditional Conceptions of Gender’, Patterns of Prejudice, 49:1-2, 163–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundström, Aksel, and Daniel Stockemer (2015). ‘What Determines Women’s Political Representation at the Local Level? A Fine-Grained Analysis of the European Regions’, International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 56:3-4, 254–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swank, Duane, and Georg Betz (2019). ‘Do Radical Right Populist Parties Matter? The Case of the European Welfare State’. Paper prepared for presentation at the 2019 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 29 August–1 September, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations (2019). ‘International Migrant Stock 2019’, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, available at https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/content/international-migrant-stock
   Google Scholar
• Van Kersbergen, Kees, and Anton Hemerijck (2012). ‘Two Decades of Change in Europe: The Emergence of the Social Investment State’, Journal of Social Policy, 41:3, 475–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oorschot, Wim (2006). ‘Making the Difference in Social Europe: Deservingness Perceptions among Citizens of European Welfare States’, Journal of European Social Policy, 16:1, 23–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oorschot, Wim (2008). ‘Solidarity towards Immigrants in European Welfare States’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 17:1, 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser, Jelle (2019). ICTWSS Database, version 6.1. Amsterdam: Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies (AIAS), University of Amsterdam, available at https://www.ictwss.org
   Google Scholar
• Whiteley, Paul, Erik, Larsen Matthew, Goodwin Harold and Clarke (2019). ‘Party Activism in the Populist Radical Right: The Case of the UK Independence Party’, Party Politics. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819880142
   Google Scholar