Understanding MPs’ perceptions of party voters’ opinion in Western democracies

References

• Andeweg, Rudy B. (2014). ‘Roles in Legislatures’, in Shane Martin, Thomas Saalfeld, and Kaare W. Strøm (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 267–85.
   Google Scholar
• Andeweg, Rudy B., and Jacques Thomassen (2011). ‘Pathways to Party Unity: Sanctions, Loyalty, Homogeneity and Division of Labour in the Dutch Parliament’, Party Politics, 17:5, 655–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, Frank, and Brian Jones (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bélanger, Éric, and Bonnie M. Meguid (2008). ‘Issue Salience, Issue Ownership and Issue-Based Vote Choice’, Electoral Studies, 27:3, 477–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belchior, Ana Maria (2014). ‘Explaining MPs’ Perceptions of Voters’ Positions in a Party-Mediated Representation System: Evidence from the Portuguese Case’, Party Politics, 20:3, 403–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellucci, Paolo (2006). ‘Tracing the Cognitive and Affective Roots of “Party Competence”: Italy and Britain, 2001’, Electoral Studies, 25:3, 548–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, Shaun (2017). ‘Trustees, Delegates, and Responsiveness in Comparative Perspective’, Comparative Political Studies, 50:6, 766–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, Shaun, and David M. Farrell (1995). ‘The Organizing of the European Parliament: Committees, Specialization and Co-ordination’, British Journal of Political Science, 25:2, 219–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broockman, David E., and Christopher Skovron (2018). ‘Bias in Perceptions of Public Opinion among Political Elites’, American Political Science Review, 112:3, 542–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian, and Dennis Farlie (1983). ‘Party Competition – Selective Emphasis or Direct Confrontation? An Alternative View with Data’, in Daalder Hans and Peter Mair (eds.), West European Party Systems. Continuity and Change. London: Sage, 267–305.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Daniel M., and David W. Nickerson (2011). ‘Can Learning Constituency Opinion Affect How Legislators Vote? Results from a Field Experiment’, Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 6:1, 55–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clausen, Aage R. (1977). ‘The Accuracy of Leader Perceptions of Constituency Views’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 2:4, 361–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clausen, Aage R., Soren Holmberg, and Lance deHaven-Smith (1983). ‘Contextual Factors in the Accuracy of Leader Perceptions of Constituents’ Views’, The Journal of Politics, 45:2, 449–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Converse, Philip E., and Roy Pierce (1986). Political Representation in France. Boston: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Damgaard, Erik (1995). ‘How Parties Control Committee Members’, in Herbert Döring (ed.), Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, 308–25.
   Google Scholar
• Dolezal, Martin, Laurenz Ennser-Jedenastik, Wolfgang C. Müller, and Anna Katharina Winkler (2014). ‘How Parties Compete for Votes: A Test of Saliency Theory’, European Journal of Political Research, 53:1, 57–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudzińska, Agnieszka, Corentin Poyet, Olivier Costa, and Bernhard Wessels (2014). ‘Representational Roles’, in Kris Deschouwer and Sam Depauw (eds.), Representing the People. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 19–38.
   Google Scholar
• Dunning, David (2011). ‘The Dunning-Kruger Effect: On Being Ignorant of One’s Own Ignorance’, in James M. Olson and Mark P. Zanna (eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York, NY: Elsevier, 247–96.
   Google Scholar
• Eichenberger, Steven, and André Mach (2017). ‘Formal Ties between Interest Groups and Members of Parliament: Gaining Allies in Legislative Committees’, Interest Groups & Advocacy, 6:1, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichenberger, Steven, Frédéric Varone, and Luzia Helfer (2021). ‘Do Interest Groups Bias MPs’ Perception of Party Voters’ Preferences?’, Party Politics. Retrieved from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068821997079
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, Robert S., Norman S. Luttbeg, and William V. Holloway (1975). ‘Knowing One’s District: How Legislators Predict Referendum Voting’, American Journal of Political Science, 19:2, 231–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esaiasson, Peter, and Sören Holmberg (1996). Representation from Above: Members of Parliament and Representative Democracy in Sweden. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Esaiasson, Peter, and Christopher Wlezien (2017). ‘Advances in the Study of Democratic Responsiveness: An Introduction’, Comparative Political Studies, 50:6, 699–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenno, Richard F. (1973). Congressmen and Committees. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Matthew, and Frank C. Keil (2016). ‘The Curse of Expertise: When More Knowledge Leads to Miscalibrated Explanatory Insight’, Cognitive Science, 40:5, 1251–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilligan, Thomas W., and Keith Krehbiel (1987). ‘Collective Decisionmaking and Standing Committees: An Informational Rationale for Restrictive Amendment Procedures’, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 3, 287–335.
   Google Scholar
• Grandberg, Donald (1985). ‘An Anomaly in Political Perception’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 504–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, Jane, and Will Jennings (2012). ‘The Dynamics of Issue Competence and Vote for Parties in and out of Power: An Analysis of Valence in Britain, 1979–1997’, European Journal of Political Research, 51:4, 469–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, Christoffer, and Peter B. Mortensen (2010). Issue Competition and Election Campaigns: Avoidance and Engagement. Aarhus: Aarhus University.
   Google Scholar
• Hedlund, Ronald D., and H. Paul Friesema (1972). ‘Representatives’ Perceptions of Constituency Opinion’, The Journal of Politics, 34:3, 730–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander, Matteo Mildenberger, and Leah C. Stokes (2019). ‘Legislative Staff and Representation in Congress’, American Political Science Review, 113:1, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmberg, Sören (1999). ‘Wishful Thinking among European Parliamentarians’, in Hermann Schmitt and Jacques Thomassen (eds.), Political Representation and Legitimacy in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 235–50.
   Google Scholar
• Kalla, Joshua L., and Ethan Porter (2020). ‘Correcting Bias in Perceptions of Public Opinion among American Elected Officials: Results from Two Field Experiments’, British Journal of Political Science. Retrieved from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712341900071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachat, Romain (2014). ‘Issue Ownership and the Vote: The Effects of Associative and Competence Ownership on Issue Voting’, Swiss Political Science Review, 20:4, 727–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakens, Daniel (2013). ‘Calculating and Reporting Effect Sizes to Facilitate Cumulative Science: A Practical Primer for t-Tests and ANOVAs’, Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 863. Retrieved from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lax, Jeffrey R., and Justin H. Phillips (2012). ‘The Democratic Deficit in the States’, American Journal of Political Science, 56:1, 148–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manin, Bernard, Adam Przeworski, and Susan C. Stokes (1999). ‘Elections and Representation’, in Przeworski Adam (ed.), Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 29–54.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, Jane (2003). ‘Rethinking Representation’, American Political Science Review, 97:4, 515–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Lanny V., and Georg Vanberg (2011). Parliaments and Coalitions: The Role of Legislative Institutions in Multiparty Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Shane, and Tim A. Mickler (2019). ‘Committee Assignments: Theories. Causes and Consequences’, Parliamentary Affairs, 72:1, 77–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattson, Ingvar, and Kaare W. Strøm (1995). ‘Parliamentary Committees’, in Herbert Döring (ed.), Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, 249–307.
   Google Scholar
• Mickler, Tim A. (2017). ‘Committee Autonomy in Parliamentary Systems - Coalition Logic or Congressional Rationales?’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 23:3, 367–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Warren E., and Donald E. Stokes (1963). ‘Constituency Influence in Congress’, American Political Science Review, 57:1, 45–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeters, Jeroen, Peter Van Aelst, and Stiene Praet (2019). ‘Party Ownership or Individual Specialization? A Comparison of Politicians’ Individual Issue Attention across Three Different Agendas’, Party Politics, 27:4, 692–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, Miguel M. (2021). ‘Understanding and Reducing Biases in Elite Beliefs About the Electorate’, American Political Science Review. Retrieved from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305542100037X
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, Miguel M., and Patrik Öhberg (2021). ‘The Expertise Curse: How Policy Expertise Can Hinder Responsiveness’. Working paper, available at https://www.dropbox.com/s/a5g4be4t892pmp7/PereiraOhberg_Expertise_v7.pdf?dl=0 (accessed 27 May 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Petrocik, John R. (1996). ‘Issue Ownership and Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study’, American Journal of Political Science, 40:3, 825–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrocik, John R., William L. Benoit, and Glenn J. Hansen (2003). ‘Issue Ownership and Presidential Campaigning, 1952–2000’, Political Science Quarterly, 118:4, 599–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkin, Hanna (1967). The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosset, Jan, Nathalie Giger, and Julian Bernauer (2017). ‘I the People? Self-Interest and Demand for Government Responsiveness’, Comparative Political Studies, 50:6, 794–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovny, Jan (2012). ‘Who Emphasizes and Who Blurs? Party Strategies in Multidimensional Competition’, European Union Politics, 13:2, 269–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saalfeld, Thomas, and Kaare W. Strøm (2014). ‘Political Parties and Legislators’, in Shane Martin, Thomas Saalfeld, and Kaare W. Strøm (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 371–98.
   Google Scholar
• Searing, Donald D. (1987). ‘New Roles for Postwar British Politics: Ideologues, Generalists. Specialists, and the Progress of Professionalization in Parliament’, Comparative Politics, 19:4, 431–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeberg, Henrik Bech (2020). ‘How Political Parties’ Issue Ownerships Reduce to Spatial Proximity’, West European Politics, 43:6, 1238–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevenans, Julie, Stefaan Walgrave, Arno Jansen, Karolin Soontjens, Stefanie Bailer, Nathalie Brack, Christian Breunig, et al. (2021). ‘Projection in Politicians’ Perceptions of Public Opinion’, unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Sieberer, Ulrich (2010). ‘Behavioral Consequences of Mixed Electoral Systems: Deviating Voting Behavior of District and List MPs in the German Bundestag’, Electoral Studies, 29:3, 484–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigel, Roberta S., and H. Paul Friesema (1965). ‘Urban Community Leaders’ Knowledge of Public Opinion’, The Western Political Quarterly, 18:4, 881–95.
   Google Scholar
• Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Barry R. Weingast (1982). ‘Institutionalizing Majority Rule: A Social Choice Theory with Policy Implications’, The American Economic Review, 72, 367–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, Stuart N., and Christopher Wlezien (2010). Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion, and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stimson, James A., Michael B. Mackuen, and Robert S. Erikson (1995). ‘Dynamic Representation’, American Political Science Review, 89:3, 543–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strøm, Kaare W. (1990). ‘A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties’, American Journal of Political Science, 34:2, 565–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strøm, Kaare W. (1998). ‘Parliamentary Committees in European Democracies’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 4:1, 21–59.
   Google Scholar
• Tresch, Anke (2009). ‘Politicians in the Media: Determinants of Legislators’ Presence and Prominence in Swiss Newspapers’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 14:1, 67–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, Stefaan, Jonas Lefevere, and Anke Tresch (2012). ‘The Associative Dimension of Issue Ownership’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 76:4, 771–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, Stefaan, Anke Tresch, and Jonas Lefevere (2015). ‘The Conceptualisation and Measurement of Issue Ownership’, West European Politics, 38:4, 778–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, Stefaan, Arno Jansen, Julie Sevenans, Karolin Soontjens, Stefanie Bailer, Nathalie Brack, Christian Breunig, Luzia Helfer, Peter Loewen, Toni van der Meer, Jean-Benoit Pilet, Lior Sheffer, Frédéric Varone and Rens Vliegenthart (2021). ‘Inaccurate Politicians. Elected Representatives’ Estimations of Public Opinion in Four Countries’, unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Wlezien, Christopher, and Stuart N. Soroka (2012). ‘Political Institutions and the Opinion-Policy Link’, West European Politics, 35:6, 1407–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar