Don’t think it’s a good idea! Four building sites of the ‘ideas school’

References

• Anstead, Nick (2018). ‘The Idea of Austerity in British Politics, 2003–2013’, Political Studies, 66:2, 287–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ban, Cornel (2015). ‘Austerity versus Stimulus? Understanding Fiscal Policy Change at the International Monetary Fund since the Great Recession’, Governance, 28:2, 167–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ban, Cornel (2016). Ruling Ideas: How Global Economic Paradigms Go Local. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, Frank (2016). ‘John Kingdon and the Evolutionary Approach to Public Policy and Agenda Setting’, in N. Zahariadis (ed.), Handbook of Public Policy Agenda Setting. Cheltenham: Elgar, 53–65.
   Google Scholar
• Béland, Daniel (2019). How Ideas and Institutions Shape the Politics of Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Béland, Daniel, and Robert H. Cox, eds. (2011). Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Béland, Daniel, Robert H. Cox, (2016). ‘Ideas as Coalition Magnets: Coalition Building, Policy Entrepreneurs, and Power Relations’, Journal of European Public Policy, 23:3, 428–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, Sheri (2013). ‘Ideational Theorizing in the Social Sciences since “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State”’, Governance, 26:2, 217–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth, Mark (2013). Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boussaguet, Laurie, Sophie Jacquot, and Pauline Ravinet, eds. (2015). Une “French Touch” Dans L’analyse de Politiques Publiques? Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
   Google Scholar
• Brunnermeier, Markus, Harold James, and Jean-Pierre Landau (2016). The Euro and the Battle of Ideas. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, Paul (2019). Understanding Public Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, John L. (1998). ‘Institutional Analysis and the Role of Ideas in Political Economy’, Theory and Society, 27:3, 377–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, John L, and Ove K. Pedersen (2014). The National Origins of Policy Ideas. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cino Pagliarello, Marina (2021). ‘Unpacking Ambiguity in Ideational Change: The Polysemy of the “Europe of Knowledge”’, West European Politics. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.1918429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clift, Ben (2018). The IMF and the Politics of Austerity in the Wake of the Global Financial Crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eleveld, Anja (2016). ‘The Role of Ideas in Policy and Institutional Change: A Comparison of the Open Functional Approach, Constructivism and Discourse Theory’, Political Studies, 64:1_suppl, 70–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, Henry, and John Quiggin (2017). ‘Consensus, Dissensus and Economic Ideas: Economic Crisis and the Rise and Fall of Keynesianism’, International Studies Quarterly, 61:2, 269–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fourcade, Marion (2010). Economists and Societies: Discipline and Profession in the United States, Britain and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franchino, Fabio (2020). ‘In Search of the Ideational Foundations of EU Fiscal Governance: Standard Ideas’, Journal of European Integration, 42:2, 179–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glazer, Jacob, and Ariel Rubinstein (2016). Models of Bounded Rationality and Mechanism Design. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Peter (1989). The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism Across Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Peter (1993). ‘Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State: The Case of Economic Policy-Making in Britain’, Comparative Politics, 25:3, 275–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabko, Nicolas (2019). ‘Contested Governance: The New Repertoire of the Eurozone Crisis’, Governance, 32:3, 493–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabko, Nicolas, and Sebastian Schmidt (2021). ‘Making Sense of Gold and Governance: The Importance of Practices and Repertoires’, West European Politics. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.1900662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., and Paul A. Sabatier (1994). ‘Evaluating the Advocacy Coalition Framework’, Journal of Public Policy, 14:2, 175–203.
   Google Scholar
• Jobert, Bruno, and Pierre Muller (1987). L’État en Action. Politiques Publiques et Corporatismes. Paris: Puf.
   Google Scholar
• John, Peter (2018). ‘Theories of Policy Change and Variation Reconsidered: A Prospectus for Political Economy and Public Policy’, Policy Sciences, 51:1, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Brian (2017). ‘Behavioral Rationality as a Foundation for Public Policy Studies’, Cognitive Systems Research, 43, 63–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamkhaji, Jonathan C., and Claudio M. Radaelli (2017). ‘Crisis, Learning and Policy Change in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy, 24:5, 714–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon, John W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Klosko, George, ed. (2011). The Oxford Handbook of the History of Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lachman, Roy, Janet L. Lachman, and Earl C. Butterfield (1979). Cognitive Psychology and Information Processing: An Introduction. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lesch, Matthew, and Heather Millar (2021). ‘Crisis, Uncertainty and Urgency: processes of Learning and Emulation in Tax Policy Making’, West European Politics. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.1949681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, David (2009). ‘Keeping Ideas in Their Place: In Praise of Thin Constructivism’, Australian Journal of Political Science, 44:4, 679–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthijs, Matthias, and Mark Blyth (2018). ‘When is It Rational to Learn the Wrong Lessons? Technocratic Authority, Social Learning, and Euro Fragility’, Perspectives on Politics, 16:1, 110–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, Kathleen R. (1998). The Currency of Ideas: Monetary Politics in the European Union. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, Philip and Dieter Plehwe, eds. (2009). The Road From Mont Pelerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, P. (1995). ‘Les Politiques Publiques Comme Construction D’un Rapport au Monde. La Construction du Sens Dans Les Politiques Publiques’, in A. Faure, G. Pollet and P. Warin (eds.), Débats Autour de la Notion de Référentiel. Paris: L’Harmattan, 153–79.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, P. (2000). ‘L’analyse Cognitive Des Politiques Publiques: vers Une Sociologie Politique de L’action Publique’, Revue Française de Science Politique, 50:2, 189–208.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, P. (2005). ‘Esquisse D’une Théorie du Changement Dans L’action Publique: Structures, Acteurs et Cadres Cognitifs’, Revue Française de Science Politique, 55:1, 155–87.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, P. (2015). ‘Mise en Perspective/Une Théorie Des Cycles D’action Publique Pour Penser le Changement Systémique’, in L. Boussaguet, S. Jacquot, and P. Ravinet (eds.), Une “French Touch” Dans L’analyse de Politiques Publiques? Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, 405–35.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, Craig (2007). How to Map Arguments in Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pouliot, Vincent (2015). ‘Pratice Tracing’, in Andrew Bennet and Jeffrey C. Checkel (eds.), Process-Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 237–59.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Vivien A. (2008). ‘Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse’’, Annual Review of Political Science, 11: 303–326.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Vivien A., and Mark Thatcher, eds. (2013). Resilient Liberalism in Europe’s Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, Herbert A. (1957). Models of Man; Social and Rational. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Swinkels, Marij (2020). ‘How Ideas Matter in Public Policy: A Review of the Literature’, International Review of Public Policy, 2:3, 281–316.
   Google Scholar
• Teles, Steven M. (2008). The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement: The Battle for Control of the Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trein, Philipp, and Thenia Vagionaki (2021). ‘Learning Heuristics, Issue Salience and Polarization in the Policy Process’, West European Politics. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.1878667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vail, Mark I. (2020). ‘National Liberalisms in a Neoliberal Age: Ideas and Economic Adjustment in Contemporary France and Germany’, Comparative European Politics, 18:2, 109–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Esch, Femke A. W. J. (2014). ‘Exploring the Keynesian–Ordoliberal Divide. Flexibility and Convergence in French and German Leaders’ Economic Ideas during the Euro-Crisis’, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 22:3, 288–302.
   Google Scholar
• Van Esch, Femke A. W. J., and Marij Swinkels (2015). ‘How Europe’s Political Leaders Made Sense of the Euro Crisis: The Influence of Pressure and Personality’, West European Politics, 38:6, 1203–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar