The (a)symmetric effects of income and unemployment on popular demand for redistribution

References

• Abadie, Alberto (2005). ‘Semiparametric Difference-in-Differences Estimators’, The Review of Economic Studies, 72:1, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, Paul D. (2019). ‘Asymmetric Fixed-Effects Models for Panel Data’, Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 5, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Alt, James, and Torben Iversen (2017). ‘Inequality, Labor Market Segmentation, and Preferences for Redistribution’, American Journal of Political Science, 61:1, 21–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ares, Macarena (2020). ‘Changing Classes, Changing Preferences: A Longitudinal Analysis of How Class Mobility Affects Economic Preferences’, West European Politics, 43:6, 1211–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attewell, David (2021). ‘Deservingness Perceptions, Welfare State Support and Vote Choice in Western Europe’, West European Politics, 44:3, 611–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beramendi, Pablo, and Philipp Rehm (2016). ‘Who Gives, Who Gains? Progressivity and Preferences’, Comparative Political Studies, 49:4, 529–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, Clem, and Jeff Manza (2006). ‘Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies’, American Sociological Review, 71:3, 474–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brüderl, Josef, and Volker Ludwig (2015). ‘Fixed-Effects Panel Regression’, in Henning Best and Christof Wolf (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Regression Analysis and Causal Inference. Los Angeles: SAGE Reference, 327–57.
   Google Scholar
• Bullock, John G. (2021). ‘Education and Attitudes toward Redistribution in the United States’, British Journal of Political Science, 51:3, 1230–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corneo, Giacamo, and Hans P. Grüner (2002). ‘Individual Preferences for Political Redistribution’, Journal of Public Economics, 83:1, 83–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusack, Thomas, Torben Iversen, and Philipp Rehm (2006). ‘Risks at Work: The Demand and Supply Sides of Government Redistribution’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22:3, 365–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Chaisemartin, Clément, and Xavier D’Haultfoeuille (2020). ‘Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects’, American Economic Review, 110:9, 2964–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, Daniel, Alan S. Gerber, and Donald P. Green (2006). ‘Personal Income and Attitudes toward Redistribution: A Study of Lottery Winners’, Political Psychology, 27:3, 441–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwert, Felix (2013). ‘Graphical Causal Models’, in Stephen L. Morgan (ed.), Handbook of Causal Analysis for Social Research. Dordrecht: Springer, 245–73.
   Google Scholar
• Engelhardt, Carina, and Andreas Wagener (2018). ‘What Do Germans Think and Know about Income Inequality? A Survey Experiment’, Socio-Economic Review, 16:4, 743–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Albertos, José, and Alexander Kuo (2018). ‘Income Perception, Information, and Progressive Taxation: Evidence from a Survey Experiment’, Political Science Research and Methods, 6:1, 83–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franko, William, Caroline J. Tolbert, and Christopher Witko (2013). ‘Inequality, Self-Interest, and Public Support for “Robin Hood” Tax Policies’, Political Research Quarterly, 66:4, 923–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gangl, Markus (2015). ‘Matching Estimators for Treatment Effects’, in Henning Best and Christof Wolf (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Regression Analysis and Causal Inference. Los Angeles: SAGE Reference, 251–76.
   Google Scholar
• Gelepithis, Margarita, and Marco Giani (2020). ‘Inclusion Without Solidarity: Education, Economic Security, and Attitudes Toward Redistribution’, Political Studies. Retrived from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720933082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidron, Noam, and Jonathan J. B. Mijs (2019). ‘Do Changes in Material Circumstances Drive Support for Populist Radical Parties? Panel Data Evidence from The Netherlands during the Great Recession, 2007–2015’, European Sociological Review, 35:5, 637–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haffert, Lukas, and Timur Ergen (2019). ‘The Symmetric Fallacy: The Dangers of Symmetric Reasoning in the Social Sciences’, CES Open Forum Series, Center for European Studies, Harvard University, available at https://issuu.com/ces.harvard/docs/working_paper_pdf_-_the_symmetric_f (accessed 6 August 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, Jens (2012). ‘Entropy Balancing for Causal Effects: A Multivariate Reweighting Method to Produce Balanced Samples in Observational Studies’, Political Analysis, 20:1, 25–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, Daniel E., Kosuke Imai, Gary King, and Elizabeth A. Stuart (2007). ‘Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference’, Political Analysis, 15:3, 199–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai, Kosuke, and In S. Kim (2021). ‘On the Use of Two-Way Fixed Effects Regression Models for Causal Inference with Panel Data’, Political Analysis, 29:3, 405–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, Ronald F. (2008). ‘Changing Values among Western Publics from 1970 to 2006’, West European Politics, 31:1-2, 130–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iversen, Torben, and David Soskice (2001). ‘An Asset Theory of Social Policy Preferences’, American Political Science Review, 95:4, 875–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keele, Luke (2015). ‘The Statistics of Causal Inference: A View from Political Methodology’, Political Analysis, 23:3, 313–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kölln, Ann-Kristin (2018). ‘Political Sophistication Affects How Citizens’ Social Policy Preferences Respond to the Economy’, West European Politics, 41:1, 196–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechner, Michael (2010). ‘The Estimation of Causal Effects by Difference-in-Difference Methods’, Foundations and Trends in Econometrics, 4:3, 165–224.
   Google Scholar
• Liebeson, Stanley (1985). Making It Count: The Improvement of Social Research and Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luebker, Malte (2014). ‘Income Inequality, Redistribution, and Poverty: Contrasting Rational Choice and Behavioral Perspectives’, Review of Income and Wealth, 60:1, 133–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magni, Gabriele (2020). ‘Economic Inequality, Immigrants and Selective Solidarity: From Perceived Lack of Opportunity to in-Group Favoritism’, British Journal of Political Science. Retrieved from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123420000046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margalit, Yotam (2013). ‘Explaining Social Policy Preferences: Evidence from the Great Recession’, American Political Science Review, 107:1, 80–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margalit, Yotam (2019). ‘Political Responses to Economic Shocks’, Annual Review of Political Science, 22:1, 277–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltzer, Allan H., and Scott F. Richard (1981). ‘A Rational Theory of the Size of Government’, Journal of Political Economy, 89:5, 914–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moene, Karl O., and Michael Wallerstein (2001). ‘Inequality, Social Insurance, and Redistribution’, American Political Science Review, 95:4, 859–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, Stephen L., and Christopher Winship (2015). Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Naumann, Elias, Christopher Buss, and Johannes Bähr (2016). ‘How Unemployment Experience Affects Support for the Welfare State: A Real Panel Approach’, European Sociological Review, 32:1, 81–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neundorf, Anja, and Stuart Soroka (2018). ‘The Origins of Redistributive Policy Preferences: Political Socialisation with and without a Welfare State’, West European Politics, 41:2, 400–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Grady, Tom (2019). ‘How Do Economic Circumstances Determine Preferences? Evidence from Long-Run Panel Data’, British Journal of Political Science, 49:4, 1381–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, Lindsay A., and David S. Pedulla (2014). ‘Material Welfare and Changing Political Preferences: The Case of Support for Redistributive Social Policies’, Social Forces, 92:3, 1087–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahontu, Raluca (2021). ‘Divisive Jobs: Three Facets of Risk, Precarity, and Redistribution’, Political Science Research and Methods. Retrieved from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2021.45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehm, Philipp (2009). ‘Risks and Redistribution’, Comparative Political Studies, 42:7, 855–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehm, Philipp (2011). ‘Social Policy by Popular Demand’, World Politics, 63:2, 271–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romer, Thomas (1975). ‘Individual Welfare, Majority Voting, and the Properties of a Linear Income Tax’, Journal of Public Economics, 4:2, 163–85.
   Google Scholar
• Rueda, David, and Daniel Stegmueller (2019). Who Wants What? Redistribution Preferences in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwander, Hanna (2019). ‘Labor Market Dualization and Insider–Outsider Divides: Why This New Conflict Matters’, Political Studies Review, 17:1, 14–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shayo, Moses (2009). ‘A Model of Social Identity with an Application to Political Economy: Nation, Class, and Redistribution’, American Political Science Review, 103:2, 147–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, Stuart (2014). Negativity in Democratic Politics: Causes and Consequences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wehl, Nadja (2019). ‘The (Ir)relevance of Unemployment for Labour Market Policy Attitudes and Welfare State Attitudes’, European Journal of Political Research, 58:1, 141–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar