The challenge populist governments pose for the process and theory of European integration

References

• Ágh, Attila (2018). ‘Decline of Democracy in the ECE and the Core-Periphery Divide: Rule of Law Conflicts of Poland and Hungary with the EU’, Journal of Comparative Politics, 11:2, 30–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arato, Andrew, and Jean L. Cohen (2017). ‘Civil Society, Populism and Religion’, Constellations, 24:3, 283–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backlund, Anders, and Ann-Cathrine Jungar (2019). ‘Populist Radical Right Party-Voter Policy Representation in Western Europe’, Representation, 55:4, 393–413.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, Ryan, Seth Jolly, and Jonathan Polk (2020). ‘Multidimensional Incongruence, Political Disaffection, and Support for Anti-Establishment Parties’, Journal of European Public Policy, 27:2, 292–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartha, Attila, Zsolt Boda, and Dorottya Szikra (2020). ‘When Populist Leaders Govern: Conceptualising Populism in Policy Making’, Politics and Governance, 8:3, 71–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batory, Agnes (2016). ‘Populists in Government? Hungary’s “System of National Cooperation’, Democratization, 23:2, 283–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bátory, Ágnes, and Sara Svensson (2019). ‘The Use and Abuse of Participatory Governance by Populist Governments’, Policy & Politics, 47:2, 227–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkhout, Joost, Marcel Hanegraaff, and Patrick Statsch (2021). ‘Explaining the Patterns of Contacts between Interest Groups and Political Parties: Revising the Standard Model for Populist Times’, Party Politics, 27:3, 418–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann, Felix, Nina Guérin, Stefan Jagdhuber, Berthold Rittberger, and Moritz Weiss (2019). ‘Political (Non-)Reform in the Euro Crisis and the Refugee Crisis: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Explanation’, Journal of European Public Policy, 26:2, 246–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bíró-Nagy, András, and Laki Gergely (2019). Policy Solutions. Budapest: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, available at https://www.policysolutions.hu/userfiles/Policy_Solutions_15_ev_utan_EU_es_a_magyar_tarsadalom.pdf (accessed 1 October 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Bogaards, Matthijs (2018). ‘De-Democratization in Hungary: Diffusely Defective Democracy’, Democratization, 25:8, 1481–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, Tanja A., and Thomas Risse (2018). ‘From the Euro to the Schengen Crises: European Integration Theories, Politicization, and Identity Politics’, Journal of European Public Policy, 25:1, 83–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, Tanja A., and Thomas Risse (2019). ‘Litmus Tests for European Intergration Theories’, in Antje Wiener, Tanja A. Börzel, and Thomas Risse (eds.), European Integration Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 237–55.
   Google Scholar
• Bozóki, András, and Daniel Hegedűs (2018). ‘An Externally Constrained Hybrid Regime: Hungary in the European Union’, Democratization, 25:7, 1173–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canovan, Margaret (1999). ‘Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy’, Political Studies, 47:1, 2–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramani, Daniele (2017). ‘Will vs. Reason: The Populist and Technocratic Forms of Political Representation and Their Critique to Party Government’, American Political Science Review, 111:1, 54–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, Thomas (2020). ‘The EU’s New Normal: Consolidating European Integration in an Era of Populism and Geo‐Economics’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 58:S1, 13–27.
   Google Scholar
• Cianetti, Licia, James Dawson, and Seán Hanley (2018). ‘Rethinking “Democratic Backsliding” in Central and Eastern Europe – Looking beyond Hungary and Poland’, East European Politics, 34:3, 243–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csehi, Robert (2019). ‘Neither Episodic, nor Destined to Failure? The Endurance of Hungarian Populism after 2010’, Democratization, 26:6, 1011–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csehi, Robert, and Edit Zgut (2021). ‘We Won’t Let Brussels Dictate Us’: Eurosceptic Populism in Hungary and Poland’, European Politics and Society, 22:1, 53–16.
   Google Scholar
• Ezrow, Lawrence, Catherine E. de Vries, Marco Steenbergen, and Erica Edwards (2011). ‘Mean Voter Representation and Partisan Constituency Representation: Do Parties Respond to the Mean Voter Position or to Their Supporters?’, Party Politics, 17:3, 275–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzymala-Busse, Anna (2019). ‘How Populists Rule: The Consequences for Democratic Governance’, Polity, 51:4, 707–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinisch, Reinhard, and Carsten Wegscheider (2020). ‘Disentangling How Populism and Radical Host Ideologies Shape Citizens’ Conceptions of Democratic Decision-Making’, Politics and Governance, 8:3, 32–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henke, Marina, and Richard Maher (2021). ‘The Populist Challenge to European Defense’, Journal of European Public Policy, 28:3, 389–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hix, Simon (2018). ‘When Optimism Fails: Liberal Intergovernmentalism and Citizen Representation’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 56:7, 1595–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, Dermot, and Uwe Puetter (2019). ‘The European Union in Disequilibrium: New Intergovernmentalism, Postfunctionalism and Integration Theory in the Post-Maastricht Period’, Journal of European Public Policy, 26:8, 1153–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holesch, Adam, and Anna Kyriazi (2021). ‘Democratic Backsliding in the European Union: The Role of the Hungarian-Polish Coalition’, East European Politics, 1–20. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2020.1865319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks (2009). ‘A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science, 39:1, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks (2019a). ‘Grand Theories of European Integration in the Twenty-First Century’, Journal of European Public Policy, 26:8, 1113–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks (2019b). ‘Is Liberal Intergovernmentalism Regressive? A Comment on Moravcsik (2018)’, Journal of European Public Policy, 27:4, 501–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, Robert A., and Saskia P. Ruth (2017). ‘Mind the Gap! Populism, Participation and Representation in Europe’, Swiss Political Science Review, 23:4, 462–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, Robert A., and Christian H. Schimpf (2016). ‘Friend or Foe? Testing the Influence of Populism on Democratic Quality in Latin America’, Political Studies, 64:4, 872–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Press Institute, European Federation of Journalists, Reporters Without Borders, Free Press Unlimited, Committee to Protect Journalists and European Center for Press & Media Freedom (2019). Conclusions of the Joint International Press freddom Mission to Hungary, available at https://www.article19.org/resources/hungary-conclusions-of-the-joint-international-press-freedom-mission-to-hungary/ (accessed 3 December 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Ivaldi, Gilles, and Oscar Mazzoleni (2020). ‘Economic Populism and Sovereigntism: The Economic Supply of European Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties’, European Politics and Society, 21:2, 202–18.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Erik (2019). ‘Populism in Europe: What Scholarship Tells Us’, Survival, 61:4, 7–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira (2012). ‘The Ambivalence of Populism: Threat and Corrective for Democracy’, Democratization, 19:2, 184–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R. Daniel (2017). ‘Europe’s Other Democratic Deficit: National Authoritarianism in Europe’s Democratic Union’, Government and Opposition, 52:2, 211–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R. Daniel (2020). ‘The European Union’s Authoritarian Equilibrium’, Journal of European Public Policy, 27:3, 481–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovács, János Mátyás and Balázs Trencsényi (Eds.). (2019). Brave New Hungary - Mapping the “System of National Cooperation”. London: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Theresa (2019). ‘Grand Theories of European Integration Revisited: Does Identity Politics Shape the Course of European Integration?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 26:8, 1213–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, Ernesto (2005). On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Leonárd, Máriás, Zsófia Nagy, Gábor Polyák, Petra Szávai, and Ágnes Urbán (2020). Mérték Booklets. Vol. 18, available at https://mertek.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/MertekFuzetek18.pdf (accessed 1 October 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, Matthew (2018). ‘Right-Wing Populism and the Climate Change Agenda: Exploring the Linkages’, Environmental Politics, 27:4, 712–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchlewska, Marta, Aleksandra Cichocka, Orestis Panayiotou, Kevin Castellanos, and Jude Batayneh (2018). ‘Populism as Identity Politics: Perceived in-Group Disadvantage, Collective Narcissism, and Support for Populism’, Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9:2, 151–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meunier, Sophie, and Milada Anna Vachudova (2018). ‘Liberal Intergovernmentalism, Illiberalism and the Potential Superpower of the European Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 56:7, 1631–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffitt, Benjamin, and Simon Tormey (2014). ‘Rethinking Populism: Politics, Mediatisation and Political Style’, Political Studies, 62:2, 381–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molnár, Virág (2019). ‘Civil Society in an Illiberal Democracy - Government-Friendly NGOs, “Foreign Agents”, and Uncivil Publics’, in J. M. Kovács and B. Trencsényi (eds.), Brave New Hungary - Mapping the “System of National Cooperation”. London: Lexington Books, 51–72.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, Andrew (2018). ‘Preferences, Power and Institutions in 21st-Century Europe’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 56:7, 1648–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, Andrew, and Frank Schimmelfennig (2019). ‘Liberal Intergovernmentalism’, in A. Wiener, T. A. Börzel, and T. Risse (eds.), European Integration Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Chap. 4, 64–84.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas (2004). ‘The Populist Zeitgeist’, Government and Opposition, 39:4, 541–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas (2021). ‘Populism in Europe: An Illiberal Democratic Response to Undemocratic Liberalism (the Government and Opposition/Leonard Schapiro Lecture 2019)’, Government and Opposition, 56:4, 577–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser (2012). ‘Populism and Liberal Democracy: A Framework for Analysis’, in C. Mudde and C. R. Kaltwasser (eds.), Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser (2018). ‘Studying Populism in Comparative Perspective: Reflections on the Contemporary and Future Research Agenda’, Comparative Political Studies, 51:13, 1667–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, Axel (2019). ‘The Meaning of ‘Populism’, Philosophy & Social Criticism, 45:9–10, 1025–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, Jan-Werner (2014). ‘“The People Must Be Extracted from within the People”: Reflections on Populism’, Constellations, 21:4, 483–93.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Jan-Werner (2016). What Is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Niemann, Arne, and Demosthenes Ioannou (2015). ‘European Economic Integration in Times of Crisis: A Case of Neofunctionalism?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 22:2, 196–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappas, Takis S. (2019). ‘Populists in Power’, Journal of Democracy, 30:2, 70–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, Robert D. (1988). ‘Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games’, International Organization, 42:3, 427–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risse, Thomas (2019). ‘Social Constructivism and European Integration’, in A. Wiener, T. A. Börzel, and T. Risse (eds.), European Integration Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 128–47.
   Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, Matthijs (2019). ‘State of the Field: How to Study Populism and Adjacent Topics? A Plea for Both More and Less Focus’, European Journal of Political Research, 58:1, 362–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rueda, Daniel (2021). ‘Is Populism a Political Strategy? A Critique of an Enduring Approach’, Political Studies, 69:2, 167–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rummens, Stefan (2017). ‘Populism as a Threat to Liberal Democracy’, in C. R. Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. O. Espejo, and P. Ostiguy (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 554–70.
   Google Scholar
• Rupnik, Jacques (2007). ‘From Democracy Fatigue to Populist Backlash’, Journal of Democracy, 18:4, 17–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, Frank (2014). ‘European Integration in the Euro Crisis: The Limits of Postfunctionalism’, Journal of European Integration, 36:3, 321–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, Frank (2015). ‘Liberal Intergovernmentalism and the Euro Area Crisis’, Journal of European Public Policy, 22:2, 177–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Vivien A. (2019). ‘Politicization in the EU: Between National Politics and EU Political Dynamics’, Journal of European Public Policy, 26:7, 1018–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher, Gijs, and Kees van Kersbergen (2016). ‘Do Mainstream Parties Adapt to the Welfare Chauvinism of Populist Parties?’, Party Politics, 22:3, 300–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharon, Assaf (2019). ‘Populism and Democracy: The Challenge for Deliberative Democracy’, European Journal of Philosophy, 27:2, 359–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, Ben (2008). ‘The Thin Ideology of Populism’, Journal of Political Ideologies, 13:1, 95–110.
   Google Scholar
• Strøby Jensen, Carsten (2019). ‘Neo-Functionalism’, in M. Cini and N. Pérez-Solórzano Borragán (eds.), European Union Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press 55–68.
   Google Scholar
• Urbinati, Nadia (2017). ‘Populism and the Principle of Majority’, in C. R. Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. O. Espejo, and P. Ostiguy (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 571–89.
   Google Scholar
• Urbinati, Nadia (2019a). ‘Liquid Parties, Dense Populism’, Philosophy & Social Criticism, 45:9–10, 1069–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbinati, Nadia (2019b). ‘Political Theory of Populism’, Annual Review of Political Science, 22:1, 111–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vachudova, Milada Anna (2019). ‘From Competition to Polarization in Central Europe: How Populists Change Party Systems and the European Union’, Polity, 51:4, 689–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vachudova, Milada Anna (2021). ‘Populism, Democracy, and Party System Change in Europe’, Annual Review of Political Science, 24:1, 471–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeek, Bertjan, and Andrej Zaslove (2015). ‘The Impact of Populist Radical Right Parties on Foreign Policy: The Northern League as a Junior Coalition Partner in the Berlusconi Governments’, European Political Science Review, 7:4, 525–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdun, Amy (2015). ‘A Historical Institutionalist Explanation of the EU’s Responses to the Euro Area Financial Crisis’, Journal of European Public Policy, 22:2, 219–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyland, Kurt (2017). ‘Populism: A Political-Strategy Approach’, in C. R. Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. O. Espejo, and P. Ostiguy (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 48–72.
   Google Scholar
• Zaslove, Andrej, Bram Geurkink, Kristof Jacobs, and Agnes Akkerman (2020). ‘Power to the People? Populism, Democracy, and Political Participation: A Citizen’s Perspective’, West European Politics, 44:4, 727–751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar