The technocratic side of populist attitudes: evidence from the Spanish case

References

• Ackerman, Maya, Kathrin Ackermann, and Markus Freitag (2019). ‘The Personality of Stealth Democrats: How Traits Shape Attitudes towards Expert-Based Governments’, West European Politics, 42:3, 573–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkerman, Agnes, Cas Mudde, and Andrej Zaslove (2014). ‘How Populist Are the People? Measuring Populism in Voters’, Comparative Political Studies, 47:9, 1324–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkerman, Agnes, Andrej Zaslove, and Bram Spruyt (2017). ‘‘We the People’ or ‘We the Peoples’? A Comparison of Support for the Populist Radical Right and Populist Radical Left in The Netherlands’, Swiss Political Science Review, 23:4, 377–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexiadou, Despina (2020). ‘Technocrats in Cabinets and Their Policy Effects’, in Eri Bertsou and Daniele Caramani (eds.), The Technocratic Challenge to Democracy. London: Routledge, 131–47.
   Google Scholar
• Bersch, Katherine (2016). ‘The Merits of Problem-Solving over Powering: Governance Reforms in Brazil and Argentina’, Comparative Politics, 48:2, 205–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertsou, Eri (2021). ‘Bring in the Experts? Citizen Preferences for Independent Experts in Political Decision-Making Processes’, European Journal of Political Research, 61:1, 255–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertsou, Eri, and Daniele Caramani (2020a). ‘People Haven’t Had Enough of Experts: Technocratic Attitudes among Citizens in Nine Democracies’, American Journal of Political Science, 66:1, 5–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertsou, Eri, and Daniele Caramani (2020b). The Technocratic Challenge to Democracy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bertsou, Eri, and Giulia Pastorella (2017). ‘Technocratic Attitudes: A Citizens’ Perspective of Expert Decision-Making’, West European Politics, 40:2, 430–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickerton, Christopher, and Carlo Invernizzi Accetti (2017). ‘Populism and Technocracy’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 20:2, 186–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickerton, Christopher, and Carlo Invernizzi Accetti (2018). ‘‘‘Techno-Populism” as a New Party Family: The Case of the Five Star Movement and Podemos’, Contemporary Italian Politics, 10:2, 132–50.
   Google Scholar
• Bickerton, Christopher, and Carlo Invernizzi Accetti (2021). Technopopulism: The New Logic of Democratic Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Canovan, Margaret (1999). ‘Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy’, Political Studies, 47:1, 2–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramani, Daniele (2017). ‘Will vs. Reason: The Populist and Technocratic Forms of Political Representation and Their Critique to Party Government’, American Political Science Review, 111:1, 54–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castaldo, Antonino, and Luca Verzichelli (2020). ‘Technocratic Populism in Italy after Berlusconi: The Trendsetter and His Disciples’, Politics and Governance, 8:4, 485–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castanho Silva, Bruno, Federico Vegetti, and Levente Littvay (2017). ‘The Elite Is up to Something: Exploring the Relation between Populism and Belief in Conspiracy Theories’, Swiss Political Science Review, 23:4, 423–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castanho Silva, Bruno, et al. (2018). ‘Public Opinion Surveys: A New Scale’, in Kirk Hawkins, Ryan E. Carlin, Levente Littvay, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser (eds.), The Ideational Approach to Populism. London: Routledge, 150–178.
   Google Scholar
• Castanho Silva, Bruno, Sebastian Jungkunz, Marc Helbling, and Levente Littvay (2020). ‘An Empirical Comparison of Seven Populist Attitudes Scales’, Political Research Quarterly, 73:2, 409–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centeno, Miguel Ángel (1993). ‘The New Leviathan: The Dynamics and Limits of Technocracy’, Theory and Society, 22:3, 307–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centeno, Miguel Ángel (1994). Democracy within Reason: Technocratic Revolution in Mexico. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christmann, Pablo, and Mariano Torcal (2017). ‘The Political and Economic Causes of Satisfaction with Democracy in Spain – A Twofold Panel Study’, West European Politics, 40:6, 1241–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIS (2021). Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, available at http://www.cis.es/cis/opencms/ES/11_barometros/Indicadores_PI/documentos/serPol.html (accessed 10 October 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell J. (1984). ‘Cognitive Mobilization and Partisan Dealignment in Advanced Industrial Democracies’, The Journal of Politics, 46:1, 264–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell J. (2000). ‘The Decline of Party Identification’, in Russell J. Dalton and Martin Wattenberg (eds.), Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 19–36.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell J. (2007). ‘Partisan Mobilization, Cognitive Mobilization and the Changing American Electorate’, Electoral Studies, 26:2, 274–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dargent, Eduardo (2015). Technocracy and Democracy in Latin America: The Experts Running Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fabrigar, Leandre R., and Duane T. Wegener (2012). Exploratory Factor Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, Frank (1990). Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise. Newbury Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ganuza, Ernesto, and Joan Font (2020). ‘Experts in Government: What for? Ambiguities in Public Opinion towards Technocracy’, Politics and Governance, 8:4, 520–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ​Gerring, John (2004). ‘What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good for?’, American Political Science Review, 98:2, 341–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Reino, Margarita, and Iván Llamazares (2016). ‘From Working-Class Anticapitalism to Populism: Theoretical Developments and Political Choices in the Birth of Podemos’, Paper presented at the Team Populism Conference ‘Explaining Populism’ Brigham Young University, Provo.
   Google Scholar
• Guasti, Petra, and Lenka Bustíkova (2020). ‘A Marriage of Convenience: Responsive Populists and Responsible Experts’, Politics and Governance, 8:4, 468–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagenaars, Jacques A., and Loek C. Halman (1989). ‘Searching for Ideal Types: The Potentialities of Latent Class Analysis’, European Sociological Review, 5:1, 81–96.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, Kirk, and Levente Littvay (2019). Contemporary U.S. Populism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, Kirk, Scott Riding, and Cas Mudde (2012). ‘Measuring Populist Attitudes’, Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series. No. 55. http://www.conceptsmethods.org/Files/WorkingPaper/PC_55_Hawkins_Riding_Mudde.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Heyne, Lea, and Marina Costa Lobo (2021). ‘Technocratic Attitudes and Voting Behaviour Ten Years after the Eurozone Crisis: Evidence from the 2019 EP Elections’, Electoral Studies, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbing, John R., and Elizabeth Theiss-Morse (2002). Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs about How Government Should Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joignant, Alfredo (2011). ‘The Politics of Technopols: Resources, Political Competence and Collective Leadership in Chile, 1990–2010’, Journal of Latin American Studies, 43:3, 517–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Vanguardia. (2014). ‘Las propuestas económicas de Podemos’, lavanguardia.com 27/11/2014, available at https://www.lavanguardia.com/politica/20141127/54420821051/propuestas-economicas-podemos.html (accessed 10 October 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Lavezzolo, Sebastián, and Luis Ramiro (2018). ‘Stealth Democracy and the Support for New and Challenger Parties’, European Political Science Review, 10:2, 267–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavezzolo, Sebastián, Luis Ramiro, and Pablo Fernández-Vázquez (2021). ‘The Will for Reason: Voter Demand for Experts’, West European Politics, 44:7, 1506–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magidson, Jay, and Jeroen Vermunt (2004). ‘Latent Class Models’, in David Kaplan (ed.), The Sage Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences. London: Sage, 549–53.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, Peter (2009). ‘Representative versus Responsible Government’, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne, Working Paper 09/8. http://www.mpifg.de/pu/workpap/wp09-8.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mair, Peter (2013). Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Meynaud, Jean (1969). Technocracy. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas (2004). ‘The Populist Zeitgeist’, Government and Opposition, 39:4, 541–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, eds. (2012). Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective to Democracy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser (2013). ‘Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America’, Government and Opposition, 48:2, 147–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser (2017). Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser (2018). ‘Studying Populism in Comparative Perspective: Reflections on the Contemporary and Future Research Agenda’, Comparative Political Studies, 51:13, 1667–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, J. Eric, and Wendy Rahn (2016). ‘Rise of Trumpenvolk: Populism in the 2016 Election’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 667:1, 189–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perottino, Michel, and Petra Guasti (2020). ‘Technocratic Populism À La Française? The Roots and Mechanisms of Emmanuel Macron’s Success’, Politics and Governance, 8:4, 545–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquer, Jose, and Anton M. Jäger (2020). ‘After the Cartel Party: ‘Extra-Party’ and ‘Intra-Party’ Techno-Populism’, Politics and Governance, 8:4, 533–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Público (2014). ‘Pablo Iglesias: "Vamos a hacer el Gobierno de los mejores"’, available at https://www.publico.es/politica/pablo-iglesias-gobierno-mejores.html (accessed 20 January 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, Robert D. (1977). ‘Elite Transformation in Advanced Industrial Societies: An Empirical Assessment of the Theory of Democracy’, Comparative Political Studies, 10:3, 383–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramiro, Luis, and Raúl Gomez (2017). ‘Radical-Left Populism during the Great Recession: Podemos and Its Competition with the Established Radical Left’, Political Studies, 65:1_suppl, 108–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rico, Guillem, and Eva Anduiza (2019). ‘Economic Correlates of Populist Attitudes: An Analysis of Nine European Countries in the Aftermath of the Great Recession’, Acta Politica, 54:3, 371–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal, Paul Taggart, Paulina Ochoa Espejo and Pierre Ostiguy, eds. (2017). The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sáinz, Jorge (2016). ‘Ciudadanos quiere que un consejo asesor nombre a los presidentes de los reguladores’, El Español 24/11/2016, available at https://www.elespanol.com/espana/politica/20161123/172983377_0.html (accessed 10 October 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, Anne, Philipp Müller, Christian Schemer, Dominique Stefanie Wirz, Martin Wettstein, and Werner Wirth (2018). ‘Measuring Populist Attitudes on Three Dimensions’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 30:2, 316–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taggart, Paul (2000). Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hauwaert, Steven, and Stijn Van Kessel (2018). ‘Beyond Protest and Discontent: A Cross-National Analysis of the Effect of Populist Attitudes and Issue Positions on Populist Party Support’, European Journal of Political Research, 57:1, 68–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar