A theory of external judicial politics: the ECJ as cautious gatekeeper in external relations

References

• Alter, K.J. (1996). ‘The European Court’s Political Power’ , West European Politics, 19:3, 458–87.
   Google Scholar
• Alter, K.J. (2001). Establishing the Supremacy of European Law: The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe, Oxford Studies in European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alter, K.J. (2009). The European Court’s Political Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alter, K.J. (2014). The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alter, K.J., E.M.Hafner-Burton, and L.Helfer (2019). ‘Theorizing the Judicialization of International Relations’ , International Studies Quarterly, 63:3, 449–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blauberger, M., and R.D.Kelemen (2017). ‘Can Courts Rescue National Democracy? Judicial Safeguards against Democratic Backsliding in the EU’ , Journal of European Public Policy, 24:3, 321–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blauberger, M., and S.K.Schmidt (2017). ‘The European Court of Justice and Its Political Impact’ , West European Politics, 40:4, 907–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burley, A.-M., and W.Mattli (1993). ‘Europe before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration’ , International Organization, 47:1, 41–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrubba, C.J., and M.J.Gabel (2014). International Courts and the Performance of International Agreements: A General Theory with Evidence from the European Union, Comparative Constitutional Law and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• CJEU (2014). Opinion 2/13 of the Court [WWW Document], available at https://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?num=C-2/13 (accessed 19 May 2021).
   Google Scholar
• de Witte, B. (2010). ‘European Union Law: How Autonomous is Its Legal Order?’ , Zeitschrift für Öffentliches Recht, 65:1, 141–55.
   Google Scholar
• Garret, G., and B.Weingast (1993). ‘Ideas, Interests, and Institutions: Constructing the European Commnity’s Internal Market’ , in J.Goldstein and R.Keohane (eds.), The Role of Ideas in Foreign Policy. Ithaca.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, G. (1995). ‘The Politics of Legal Integration in the European Union’ , International Organization, 49:1, 171–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, J., M.Kahler, R.O.Keohane, and A.-M.Slaughter (2000). ‘Introduction: Legalization and World Politics’ , International Organization, 54:3, 385–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., and G.Marks (2009). ‘A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus’ , British Journal of Political Science, 39:1, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassoti, E., and J.Odermatt (2020). The principle of autonomy and international investment arbitration: Reflections on Opinion 1/17. Questions of International Law 73.
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R.D. (2012). ‘The Political Foundations of Judicial Independence in the European Union’ , Journal of European Public Policy, 19:1, 43–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R.D., and T.Pavone (2018). ‘The Political Geography of Legal Integration: Visualizing Institutional Change in the European Union’ , World Politics, 70:3, 358–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutrakos, P. (2019). ‘The Autonomy of EU Law and International Investment Arbitration’ , Nordic Journal of International Law, 88:1, 41–64.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, O., and D.Naurin (2016). ‘Judicial Independence and Political Uncertainty: How the Risk of Override Affects the Court of Justice of the EU’ , International Organization, 70:2, 377–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leijon, K. (2021). ‘National Courts and Preliminary References: Supporting Legal Integration, Protecting National Autonomy or Balancing Conflicting Demands?’ , West European Politics, 44:3, 510–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenaerts, K. (2019). The autonomy of European Union Law. Post AISDUE 1.
   Google Scholar
• Mavroidis, P., and C.Cantore (2018). Another One BITes the Dust: The Distance between Luxembourg and the World Is Growing after Achmea. European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, Global Governance Programme Working Paper No. RSCAS 2018/47.
   Google Scholar
• Odermatt, J. (2016). When a Fence Becomes a Cage: The Principle of Autonomy in EU External Relations Law. EUI Working Paper 2016/17.
   Google Scholar
• Pavone, T., and D.Kelemen (2019). ‘The Evolving Judicial Politics of European Integration: The European Court of Justice and National Courts Revisited’ , European Law Journal, 25:4, 352–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C.C. (2008). Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond, Illustrated edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raustiala, K., and D.G.Victor (2004). ‘The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources’ , International Organization, 58:2, 277–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosas, A. (2017). ‘The EU and International Dispute Settlement*’ , Europe and the World: A Law Review.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. (2006). ‘Competition and Community: Constitutional Courts, Rhetorical Action, and the Institutionalization of Human Rights in the European Union’ , Journal of European Public Policy, 13:8, 1247–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaughter, A.-M. (1994). ‘A Typology of Transjudicial Communication’ , University of Richmond Law Review, 29, 99–137.
   Google Scholar
• Sweet, A., and T.Brunell (1998). ‘Constructing a Supranational Constitution: Dispute Resolution and Governance in the European Community’ , American Political Science Review, 92:1, 63–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweet, A.S., and T.Brunell (2012). ‘The European Court of Justice, State Noncompliance, and the Politics of Override’ , American Political Science Review, 106:1, 204–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomann, E., and M.Maggetti (2020). ‘Designing Research with Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Approaches, Challenges, and Tools’ , Sociological Methods & Research, 49:2, 356–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vajda, C. (2019). Achmea and the Autonomy of the EU Legal Order. LAwTTIPWorkingPapers.
   Google Scholar
• Voeten, E. (2010). ‘Borrowing and Nonborrowing among International Courts’ , The Journal of Legal Studies,39:2, 547–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiler, J.H.H. (1994). ‘A Quiet Revolution: The European Court of Justice and Its Interlocutors’ , Comparative Political Studies, 26:4, 510–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar