Does affective polarisation increase turnout? Evidence from Germany, The Netherlands and Spain

References

• Abramowitz, Alan I. (2010). The Disappearing Center. New Heaven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abramowitz, Alan I., and Kyle L. Saunders (2008). ‘Is Polarization a Myth?’, The Journal of Politics, 70:2, 542–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abramowitz, Alan I., and Walter J. Stone (2006). ‘The Bush Effect: Polarization, Turnout, and Activism in the 2004 Presidential Election’, Presidential Studies Quarterly, 36:2, 141–54.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, James, and Samuel Merrill III (2003). ‘Voter Turnout and Candidate Strategies in American Elections’, The Journal of Politics, 65:1, 161–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, James, Jay Dow, and Samuel Merrill III (2006). ‘The Political Consequences of Alienation-Based and Indifference-Based Voter Abstention: Applications to Presidential Elections’, Political Behavior, 28:1, 65–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béjar, Sergio, Juan A. Moraes, and Santiago López-Cariboni (2020). ‘Elite Polarisation and Voting Turnout in Latin America, 1993–2010’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 30:1, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, Kenneth, Thomas Bräuninger, and Marc Debus (2009). ‘Challenges for Estimating Policy Preferences: Announcing an Open Access Archive of Political Documents’, German Politics, 18:3, 441–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, André, and Agnieszka Dobrzynska (1998). ‘Turnout in Electoral Democracies’, European Journal of Political Research, 33:2, 239–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, André, Shane Singh, and Delia Dumitrescu (2014). ‘Political Institutions, Perceptions of Representation, and the Turnout Decision’, in Jacques Thomassen (ed.), Elections and Democracy: Representation and Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 99–112.
   Google Scholar
• Borbáth, Enre, Swen Hutter, and Arndt Leininger (2022). ‘Cleavage Politics, Polarisation and Participation in Western Europe’, West European Politics.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boxell, L., M. Gentzkow, and J. M. Shapiro (forthcoming). ‘Cross-country Trends in Affective Polarization’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01160.
   Google Scholar
• Braconnier, Céline, Jean-Yves Dormagen, and Vincent Pons (2017). ‘Voter Registration Costs and Disenfranchisement: Experimental Evidence from France’, American Political Science Review, 111:3, 584–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callander, Steven, and Catherine H. Wilson (2007). ‘Turnout, Polarisation, and Duverger’s Law’, The Journal of Politics, 69:4, 1047–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes (1960). The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caruana, N. J., R. M. McGregor, and L. B. Stephenson (2015). ‘The Power of the Dark Side: Negative Partisanship and Political Behaviour in Canada’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 48:4, 771–89.
   Google Scholar
• Claassen, Christopher (2016). ‘Group Entitlement, Anger and Participation in Intergroup Violence’, British Journal of Political Science, 46:1, 127–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crepaz, Markus M. L. (1990). ‘The Impact of Party Polarisation and Postmaterialism on Voter Turnout: A Comparative Study of 16 Industrial Democracies’, European Journal of Political Research, 18:2, 183–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crepaz, Markus M. L., Jonathan Polk, Ryan Bakker, and Shane P. Singh (2014). ‘Trust Matters: The Impact of Ingroup and Outgroup Trust on Nativism and Civicness’, Social Science Quarterly, 95:4, 938–959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell (2008). ‘The Quantity and the Quality of Party Systems: Party System Polarisation, Its Measurement, and Its Consequences’, Comparative Political Studies, 41:7, 899–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell (2021). ‘The Representation Gap and Political Sophistication: A Contrarian Perspective’, Comparative Political Studies, 54:5, 889–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dassonneville, Ruth, and Samih Çakır (2021). ‘Party System Polarisation and Electoral Behavior’, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. https://doi.org/10.93/Acrefore/9780190228637.013.1979.
   Google Scholar
• Diermeier, Daniel, and Christoper Li (2019). ‘Partisan Affect and Elite Polarisation’, American Political Science Review, 113:1, 277–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinas, Elias (2014). ‘Does Choice Bring Loyalty? Electoral Participation and the Development of Party Identification’, American Journal of Political Science, 58:2, 449–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, Anthony (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, James, and Matthew Levendusky (2019). ‘What Do We Measure When We Measure Affective Polarisation?’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 83:1, 114–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edlin, Aaron, Andrew Gelman, and Noah Kaplan (2007). ‘Voting as a Rational Choice: Why and How People Vote to Improve the Well-Being of Others’, Rationality and Society, 19:3, 293–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, Adam M., and Miles T. Armaly (2019). ‘The Differential Effects of Actual and Perceived Polarisation’, Political Behavior, 41:3, 815–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorina, Morris P., Samuel A. Abrams, and Jeremy C. Pope (2008). ‘Polarisation in the American Public: Misconceptions and Misreadings’, The Journal of Politics, 70:2, 556–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, Mark N. (2004). Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geys, Benny (2006). ‘Explaining Voter Turnout: A Review of Aggregate-Level Research’, Electoral Studies, 25:4, 637–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidron, Noam, James Adams, and Will Horne (2020). American Affective Polarisation in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, Steven (2004). ‘Social Identity Theory and Party Identification’, Social Science Quarterly, 85:1, 136–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, Martin, and Marc Debus (2018). ‘Does EU Regional Policy Increase Parties’ Support for European Integration?’, West European Politics, 41:3, 594–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helbling, Marc, and Sebastian Jungkunz (2020). ‘Social Divides in the Age of Globalization’, West European Politics, 43:6, 1187–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez, Enrique, Eva Anduiza, and Guillem Rico (2021). ‘Affective Polarisation and the Salience of Elections’, Electoral Studies, 69, 102203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetherington, Marc J. (2008). ‘Turned off or Turned on? How Polarisation Affects Political Engagement’, Red and Blue Nation, 2, 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Holbein, John B., and Marcos A. Rangel (2020). ‘Does Voting Have Upstream and Downstream Consequences? Regression Discontinuity Tests of the Transformative Voting Hypothesis’, The Journal of Politics, 82:4, 1196–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbein, John B., Marcos A. Rangel, Raeal Moore, and Michelle Croft (2021). ‘Is Voting Transformative? Expanding and Meta-Analyzing the Evidence’, Political Behavior.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddy, Leonie, Lilliana Mason, and Lene Aarøe (2015). ‘Expressive Partisanship: Campaign Involvement, Political Emotion, and Partisan Identity’, American Political Science Review, 109:1, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, Shanto, Yphtach Lelkes, Matthew Levendusky, Neil Malhotra, and Sean J. Westwood (2019). ‘The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarisation in the United States’, Annual Review of Political Science, 22:1, 129–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, Shanto, Gaurav Sood, and Yphtach Lelkes (2012). ‘Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarisation’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 76:3, 405–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Philip Edward, Lindsay H. Hoffman, and Dannagal G. Young (2013). ‘Online Emotional Appeals and Political Participation: The Effect of Candidate Affect on Mass Behavior’, New Media & Society, 15:7, 1132–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachat, Romain (2008). ‘The Impact of Party Polarisation on Ideological Voting’, Electoral Studies, 27:4, 687–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachat, Romain (2015). ‘The Role of Party Identification in Spatial Models of Voting Choice’, Political Science Research and Methods, 3:3, 641–58.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, S. J. (2017). ‘How Negative Partisanship Affects Voting Behavior in Europe: Evidence from an Analysis of 17 European Multi-Party Systems with Proportional Voting’, Research & Politics, 4:1, https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168016686636.
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, Mike, and Alain Noël (2014). ‘The Forgotten Side of Partisanship: Negative Party Identification in Four Anglo-American Democracies’, Comparative Political Studies, 47:7, 1022–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith, Marc (2009). ‘Persistence in Political Participation’, Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 4:3, 187–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moral, Mert (2017). ‘The Bipolar Voter: On the Effects of Actual and Perceived Party Polarisation on Voter Turnout in European Multiparty Democracies’, Political Behavior, 39:4, 935–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moral, Mert, and Andrei Zhirnov (2018). ‘Issue Voting as a Constrained Choice Problem’, American Journal of Political Science, 62:2, 280–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullainathan, Sendhil, and Ebonya Washington (2009). ‘Sticking with Your Vote: Cognitive Dissonance and Political Attitudes’, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1:1, 86–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murias Muñoz, Maria, and Bonnie M. Meguid (2021). ‘Does Party Polarisation Mobilize or De-Mobilize Voters? The Answer Depends on Where Voters Stand’, Electoral Studies, 70, 102–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemčok, Miroslav, Constantin Manuel Bosancianu, Olga Leshchenko, and Alena Kluknavská (2022). ‘Softening the Corrective Effect of Populism: Populist Parties’ Impact on Political Interest, Not Turnout, among Individuals’, West European Politics. doi:10.1080/01402382.2022.2089963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr, Lilla V., and Gregory A. Huber (2020). ‘The Policy Basis of Measured Partisan Animosity in the United States’, American Journal of Political Science, 64:3, 569–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiljan, Andres (2020). ‘Fear and Loathing across Party Lines’ (also) in Europe: Affective Polarisation in European Party Systems’, European Journal of Political Research, 59:2, 376–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riker, William H., and Peter C. Ordeshook (1968). ‘A Theory of the Calculus of Voting’, American Political Science Review, 62:1, 25–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogowski, Jon C. (2014). ‘Electoral Choice, Ideological Conflict, and Political Participation’, American Journal of Political Science, 58:2, 479–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogowski, Jon C., and Joseph L. Sutherland (2016). ‘How Ideology Fuels Affective Polarisation’, Political Behavior, 38:2, 485–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sciarini, Pascal, and Andreas C. Goldberg (2016). ‘Turnout Bias in Postelection Surveys: Political Involvement, Survey Participation, and Vote Overreporting’, Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 4:1, 110–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smets, Kaat, and Carolien Van Ham (2013). ‘The Embarrassment of Riches? A Meta-Analysis of Individual-Level Research on Voter Turnout’, Electoral Studies, 32:2, 344–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, Nils D., and Christian W. Martin (2012). ‘Economic Integration, Party Polarisation and Electoral Turnout’, West European Politics, 35:2, 238–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torcal, Mariano, Andrés Santana, Emily Carty, and Josep Maria Comellas (2020). ‘Political and Affective Polarisation in a Democracy in Crisis: The E-Dem Panel Survey Dataset (Spain, 2018–2019)’, Data in Brief, 32, 106059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentino, Nicholas A., and Fabian G. Neuner (2017). ‘Why the Sky Didn’t Fall: Mobilizing Anger in Reaction to Voter ID Laws’, Political Psychology, 38:2, 331–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentino, Nicholas A., Ted Brader, Eric W. Groenendyk, Krysha Gregorowicz, and Vincent L. Hutchings (2011). ‘Election Night’s Alright for Fighting: The Role of Emotions in Political Participation’, The Journal of Politics, 73:1, 156–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, Markus (2021). ‘Affective Polarisation in Multiparty Systems’, Electoral Studies, 69, 102–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, Dalton G., and Margit Tavits (2019). ‘How Partisan Affect Shapes Citizens’ Perception of the Political World’, Electoral Studies, 60, 102045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitz-Shapiro, Rebecca, and Matthew S. Winters (2017). ‘Can Citizens Discern? Information Credibility, Political Sophistication, and the Punishment of Corruption in Brazil’, The Journal of Politics, 79:1, 60–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westfall, Jacob, John R. Leaf Van Boven, John R. Chambers, and Charles M. Judd (2015). ‘Perceiving Political Polarization in the United States: Party Identity Strength and Attitude Extremity Exacerbate the Perceived Partisan Divide’, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10:2, 145–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westwood, Sean J., Shanto Iyengar, Stefaan Walgrave, Rafael Leonisio, Luis Miller, and Oliver Strijbis (2018). ‘The Tie That Divides: Cross-National Evidence of the Primacy of Partyism’, European Journal of Political Research, 57:2, 333–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilford, Allan M. (2017). ‘Polarisation, Number of Parties, and Voter Turnout: Explaining Turnout in 26 OECD Countries’, Social Science Quarterly, 98:5, 1391–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar