Platform affordances and political participation: how social media reshape political engagement

References

• Aelst, Peter, and Stefaan Walgrave (2001). ‘Who is That (Wo)Man in the Street? From the Normalisation of Protest to the Normalisation of the Protester’, European Journal of Political Research, 39:4, 461–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäck, Hanna, Jan Teorell, and Anders Westholm (2011). ‘Explaining Modes of Participation: A Dynamic Test of Alternative Rational Choice Models’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 34:1, 74–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, Samuel H., Klaus R. Allerbeck, Barbara G. Farah, Felix J. Heunks, Ronald F. Inglehart, M. Kent Jennings, Hans Dieter Klingemann, Alan Marsh, and Leopold Rosenmayr (1979). Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bastos, Marco T., Dan Mercea, and Arthur Charpentier (2015). ‘Tents, Tweets, and Events: The Interplay between Ongoing Protests and Social Media’, Journal of Communication, 65:2, 320–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bimber, Bruce, Andrew Flanagin, and Cynthia Stohl (2012). Collective Action in Organizations: Interaction and Engagement in an Era of Technological Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bimber, Bruce, and Homero Gil de Zúñiga (2020). ‘The Unedited Public Sphere’, New Media and Society, 22:4, 700–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank, Grant (2017). ‘The Digital Divide among Twitter Users and Its Implications for Social Research’, Social Science Computer Review, 35:6, 679–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boczkowski, Pablo J., Mora Matassi, and Eugenia Mitchelstein (2018). ‘How Young Users Deal with Multiple Platforms: The Role of Meaning-Making in Social Media Repertoires’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23:5, 245–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, Leticia (2017). ‘Closing the Gap: Gender Parity in Political Engagement on Social Media’, Information, Communication and Society, 20:4, 587–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borbath, Endre, Swen Hutter, and Arndt Leininger (2022). ‘Introduction: Polarisation and Participation in Western Europe’, unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Bossetta, Michael (2018). ‘The Digital Architectures of Social Media: Comparing Political Campaigning on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat in the 2016 U.S’, Election’, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 95:2, 471–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulianne, Shelley (2019). ‘Revolution in the Making? Social Media Effects across the Globe’, Information, Communication and Society, 22:1, 39–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulianne, Shelley, Karolina Koc-Michalska, and Bruce Bimber (2020). ‘Mobilizing Media: Comparing TV and Social Media Effects on Protest Mobilization’, Information, Communication and Society, 23:5, 642–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammaerts, Bart, Michael Bruter, and Shakuntala Banaji et al. (2009). ‘The Myth of Youth Apathy: Young Europeans’ Critical Attitudes Toward Democratic Life’, American Behavioral Scientist, 58:5, 645–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casas, Andreu, and Nora Webb Williams (2019). ‘Images That Matter: Online Protests and the Mobilizing Role of Pictures’, Political Research Quarterly, 72:2, 360–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comrey, Andrew L., and Howard B. Lee (2016). A First Course in Factor Analysis (2nd edition). London: Routledge/Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conroy, Meredith, Jessica T. Feezell, and Mario Guerrero (2012). ‘Facebook and Political Engagement: A Study of Online Political Group Membership and Offline Political Engagement’, Computers in Human Behavior, 28:5, 1535–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland, Lauren, and Jessica T. Feezell (2017). ‘The Influence of Citizenship Norms and Media Use on Different Modes of Political Participation in the US’, Political Studies, 65:4, 805–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Moor, Joost (2017). ‘Lifestyle Politics and the Concept of Political Participation’, Acta Politica, 52:2, 179–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggan, Maeve, and Aaron Smith (2016). The Political Environment on Social Media. Washington, DC: Pew Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, Jennifer, and Katrina Kimport (2011). Digitally Enabled Social Change: Activism in the Internet Age. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finch, W. Holmes, and Brian F. French (2015). Latent Variable Modeling with R. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, Stuart (2014). ‘Is It Time to Update the Definition of Political Participation? Political Participation in Britain: The Decline and Revival of Civic Culture’, Parliamentary Affairs, 67:2, 495–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, Rachel, and Marta Cantijoch (2013). ‘Conceptualizing and Measuring Participation in the Age of the Internet: Is Online Political Engagement Really Different to Offline?’, The Journal of Politics, 75:3, 701–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil De Zúñiga, Homero, Lauren Copeland, and Bruce Bimber (2014). ‘Political Consumerism: Civic Engagement and the Social Media Connection’, New Media & Society, 16:3, 488–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, Homero, Nakwon Jung, and Sebastián Valenzuela (2012). ‘Social Media Use for News and Individuals’ Social Capital, Civic Engagement and Political Participation’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17:3, 319–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, Tarleton (2010). ‘The Politics of ‘Platforms’, New Media & Society, 12:3, 347–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guadagnoli, Edward, and Wayne F. Velicer (1988). ‘Relation of Sample Size to the Stability of Component Patterns’, Psychological Bulletin, 103:2, 265–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, Joseph F., William C. Black, Bill Black, Barry J. Babin, and Rolph E. Anderson (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis. Seventh Ed. London: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, Daniel, Sebastián Valenzuela, and James E. Katz (2017). ‘We Face, I Tweet: How Different Social Media Influence Political Participation through Collective and Internal Efficacy’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22:6, 320–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirzalla, Fadi, and Liesbet van Zoonen (2011). ‘Beyond the Online/Offline Divide: How Youth’s Online and Offline Civic Activities Converge’, Social Science Computer Review, 29:4, 481–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, Kristoffer, Adam Shehata, Jesper Strömbäck, and Elisabet Ljungberg (2013). ‘Age and the Effects of News Media Attention and Social Media Use on Political Interest and Participation: Do Social Media Function as Leveller?’, European Journal of Communication, 28:1, 19–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, Henry (2006). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jungherr, Andreas, Gonzalo Rivero, and Daniel Gayo-Avello (2020). Retooling Politics: How Digital Media Are Shaping Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, Michael W. (2017). ‘Interpersonal Goals and Political Uses of Facebook’, Communication Research Reports, 34:2, 106–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Dam Hee, and Nicole Ellison (2021). ‘From Observation on Social Media to Offline Political Participation: The Social Media Affordances Approach’, New Media and Society. Available Online at, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461444821998346
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Yunhwan, Silvia Russo, and Erik Amnå (2017). ‘The Longitudinal Relation between Online and Offline Political Participation among Youth at Two Different Developmental Stages’, New Media & Society, 19:6, 899–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koc-Michalska, Karolina, Gibson Rachel, and Thierry Vedel (2017). Social Media and French Society. Internet and Social Media during the 2017 French Presidential Election: A Comparative Perspective (No. 44). Paris: CEVIPOF Sciences-Po.
   Google Scholar
• Koc-Michalska, Karolina, Anya Schiffrin, Anamaria Lopez, Shelley Boulianne, and Bruce Bimber (2021). ‘From Online Political Posting to Mansplaining: The Gender Gap and Social Media in Political Discussion’, Social Science Computer Review, 39:2, 197–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopmans, Ruud (1996). ‘New Social Movements and Changes in Political Participation in Western Europe’, West European Politics, 19:1, 28–50.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, Daniel S., Slgi S. Lee, Fan Liang, Dam Hee Kim, Liwei Shen, Brian E. Weeks, and Nojin Kwak (2019). ‘Social Media Expression and the Political Self’, Journal of Communication, 69:1, 49–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindner, Ralf, and Ulrich Riehm (2011). ‘Broadening Participation through E-Petitions? An Empirical Study of Petitions to the German Parliament’, Policy & Internet, 3:1, 63–85.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, Nic, Richard Fletcher, Antonis Kalogeropoulos, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen (2019). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2019. Oxford: Reuters.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, Nic, Richard Fletcher, Antonis Kalogeropoulos, David A. L. Levy, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen (2017). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2017. Oxford. Retrieved from: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Digital News Report 2017 web_0.pdf?utm_source=digitalnewsreport.organdutm_medium=referral.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa (2002). Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa, Stefaan Walgrave, and Peter Van Aelst (2005). ‘Who Demonstrates? Antistate Rebels, Conventional Participants, or Everyone?’, Comparative Politics, 37:2, 189–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohme, Jakob, Claes H. de Vreese, and Erik Albaek (2018). ‘From Theory to Practice: How to Apply Van Deth’s Conceptual Map in Empirical Political Participation Research’, Acta Politica, 53:3, 367–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, Jason W., Anna B. Costello, and J. Thomas Kellow (2008). ‘Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis’, in Jason Osborne (ed.), Best Practices in Quantitative Methods. New York: Sage, 86––102.
   Google Scholar
• Östman, Johan (2012). ‘Information, Expression, Participation: How Involvement in User- Generated Content Relates to Democratic Engagement among Young People’, New Media & Society, 14:6, 1004–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry, Geraint, George Moyser, and Neil Day (1992). Political Participation and Democracy in Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center (2020). ‘Differences in How Democrats and Republicans Behave on Twitter’. Retrieved from: https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2020/10/15/differences-in-how-democrats-and-republicans-behave-on-twitter/.
   Google Scholar
• Pickard, Sarah (2019). Politics, Protest and Young People: Political Participation and Dissent in 21st Century Britain. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Revelle, William R. (2018). Psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Yves (2012). ‘Lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modelinge Human Forearm during Rythmic Exercise’, Journal of Statistical Software, 48:2, 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rueß, Christina, Christian Pieter Hoffmann, Shelley Boulianne, and Katharina Heger (2021). ‘Online Political Participation – the Evolution of a Concept’, Information Communication and Society, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, Dhavan V., Jaeho Cho, Seungahn Nah, Melissa R. Gotlieb, Hyunseo Hwang, Nam-Jin Lee, Rosanne M. Scholl, and Douglas M. McLeod (2007). ‘Campaign Ads, Online Messaging, and Participation: Extending the Communication Mediation Model’, Journal of Communication, 57:4, 676–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shane-Simpson, Christina, Adriana Manago, Naomi Gaggi, and Kristen Gillespie-Lynch (2018). ‘Why Do College Students Prefer Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram? Site Affordances, Tensions between Privacy and Self-Expression, and Implications for Social Capital’, Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 276–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Aaron W., Laura Silver, Courtney Johnson, Kyle Taylor, and Jingjing Jiang (2019). Publics in Emerging Economies Worry Social Media Sow Division, Even as They Offer New Chances for Political Engagement. Washington, DC: Pew Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Stolle, Dietlind., Marc Hooghe, and Michele Micheletti (2005). ‘Politics in the Supermarket: Political Consumerism as a Form of Political Participation’, International Political Science Review, 26:3, 245–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, Barbara G., Linda S. Fidell, and Jodie B. Ullman (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Teorell, Jan, and Mariano Torcal (2007). ‘Political Participation: Mapping the Terrain’, in Jan W. Van Deth, José Ramón Montero, and Anders Westholm (eds.), Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies: A Comparative Analysis. London: Routledge, 334–57.
   Google Scholar
• Theocharis, Yannis (2015). ‘The Conceptualization of Digitally Networked Participation’, Social Media and Society, 1:2, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theocharis, Yannis, Ana Cardenal, Soyeon Jin, Toril Aalberg, David Nicolas Hopmann, Jesper Strömbäck, Laia Castro, Frank Esser, Peter Van Aelst, Claes de Vreese, Nicoleta Corbu, Karolina Koc-Michalska, Joerg Matthes, Christian Schemer, Tamir Sheafer, Sergio Splendore, James Stanyer, Agnieszka Stępińska, and Václav Štětka (2021). ‘Does the Platform Matter? Social Media and COVID-19 Conspiracy Theory Beliefs in 17 Countries’, New Media and Society, 1–26. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/14614448211045666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theocharis, Yannis, Joost Moor, and Jan W. Deth (2021). ‘Digitally Networked Participation and Lifestyle Politics as New Modes of Political Participation’, Policy & Internet, 13:1, 30–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theocharis, Yannis, and Ellen Quintelier (2016). ‘Stimulating Citizenship or Expanding Entertainment? The Effect of Facebook on Adolescent Participation’, New Media & Society, 18:5, 817–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theocharis, Yannis, and Jan W. van Deth (2018). ‘The Continuous Expansion of Citizen Participation: A New Taxonomy’, European Political Science Review, 10:1, 139–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theocharis, Yannis, and Jan W. van Deth (2018). Political Participation in a Changing World: Conceptual and Empirical Challenges in the Study of Citizen Engagement. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Towner, Terri L., and Caroline Lego Muñoz (2018). ‘Baby Boom or Bust? The New Media Effect on Political Participation’, Journal of Political Marketing, 17:1, 32–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaccari, Cristian, and Augusto Valeriani (2021). Outside the Bubble: Social Media and Political Participation in Western Democracies. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Deth, Jan W. (2001a). Studying Political Participation: Towards a Theory of Everything?. ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Grenoble.
   Google Scholar
• Van Deth, Jan W. (2001b). Studying Political Participation: Towards a Theory of Everything? Joint Sessions of Workshops of the European Consortium for Political Research, Grenoble.
   Google Scholar
• Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Henry E. Brady (1995). Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verba, Sidney, and Normon H. Nie (1972). Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vissers, Sara, and Dietlind Stolle (2012). ‘Spill-over Effects between Facebook and on/Offline Political Participation? Evidence from a Two-Wave Panel Study’, Canadian Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Panel: New Media Use among Citizens and Parties, Edmonton.
   Google Scholar
• Vitak, Jessica, Paul Zube, Andrew Smock, Caleb T. Carr, Nicole Ellison, and Cliff Lampe (2011). ‘It’s Complicated: Facebook Users’ Political Participation in the 2008 Election’, Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14:3, 107–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vráblíková, Kateřina (2016). What Kind of Democracy? Participation, Inclusiveness and Contestation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vromen, Ariadne, Brian D. Loader, Michael A. Xenos, and Francesco Bailo (2016). ‘Everyday Making through Facebook Engagement: Young Citizens Political Interactions in Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States’, Political Studies, 64:3, 513–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellman, Barry, Anabel Quan-Haase, Jeffrey Boase, Wenhong Chen, Keith Hampton, Isabel Díaz, and Kakuko Miyata (2006). ‘The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8:3, 0
   Google Scholar
• Wojcik, Stefan, and Adam Hughes (2019). Sizing up Twitter Users. Washington, DC: Pew Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, Rebecca Ping (2016). ‘The Relationship between Passive and Active Non-Political Social Media Use and Political Expression on Facebook and Twitter’, Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 413–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zukin, Cliff, Scott Keeter, Molly Andolina, Krista Jenkins, and Michael X. Delli Carpini (2006). A New Engagement? Political Participation, Civic Life, and the Changing American Citizen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar