Creating compliance in crisis: messages, messengers, and masking up in Britain

References

• Allcott, Hunt, Levi Boxell, Jacob C. Conway, Matthew Gentzkow, Michael Thaler, and David Y. Yang (2020). ‘Polarization and Public Health: Partisan Differences in Social Distancing during the Coronavirus Pandemic’, NBER Working Paper 26946.
   Google Scholar
• Altiparmakis, Argyrios, Abel Bojar, Sylvain Brouard, Martial Foucault, Hanspeter Kriesi, and Richard Nadeau (2021). ‘Pandemic Politics: Policy Evaluations of Government Responses to COVID-19’, West European Politics, 44:5-6, 1159–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Christopher J. (2022). ‘Citizens and the State during Crisis: Public Authority, Private Behavior, and the Covid-19 Pandemic in France’, European Journal of Political Research. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Christopher J., Silvia M. Mendes, and Yuliya V. Tverdova (2004). ‘Endogenous Economic Voting: Evidence from the 1997 British Election’, Electoral Studies, 23:4, 683–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, Jack (2019). ‘The Fact Remains: Party ID Moderates How Voters Respond to Economic Change’, Electoral Studies, 61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertsou, Eri, and Giulia Pastorella (2017). ‘Technocratic Attitudes: A Citizens’ Perspective of Expert Decision-Making’, West European Politics, 40:2, 430–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, Michael H., and Steven E. Stegner (1979). ‘Source Credibility in Social Judgment: Bias, Expertise, and the Judge’s Point of View’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37:1, 48–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisgaard, Martin, and Rune Slothuus (2018). ‘Partisan Elites as Culprits? How Party Cues Shape Partisan Perceptual Gaps’, American Journal of Political Science, 62:2, 456–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bol, Damien, Marco Giani, André Blais, and Peter John Loewen (2021). ‘The Effect of COVID-19 Lockdowns on Political Support: Some Good News for Democracy?’, European Journal of Political Research, 60:2, 497–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolleyer, Nicole, and Orsolya Salát (2021). ‘Parliaments in Times of Crisis: COVID-19, Populism and Executive Dominance’, West European Politics, 44:5-6, 1103–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broockman, David E., and Daniel M. Butler (2017). ‘The Causal Effects of Elite Position-Taking on Voter Attitudes: Field Experiments with Elite Communication’, American Journal of Political Science, 61:1, 208–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case, Chandler, Christopher Eddy, Rahul Hemrajani, Christopher Howell, Daniel Lyons, Yu-Hsien Sung, and Elizabeth C. Connors (2021). ‘The Effects of Source Cues and Issue Frames during COVID-19’, Journal of Experimental Political Science, 1–10. doi:10.1017/XPS.2021.3
   Google Scholar
• Daoust, Jean-François (2020). ‘Elderly People and Responses to COVID-19 in 27 Countries’, PLoS One, 15:7, e0235590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daoust, Jean-François, Richard Nadeau, Ruth Dassonneville, Erick Lachapelle, Éric Bélanger, Justin Savoie, and Clifton van der Linden (2021a). ‘How to Survey Citizens’ Compliance with COVID-19 Public Health Measures? Evidence from Three Survey Experiments’, Journal of Experimental Political Science, 8:3, 310–7.
   Google Scholar
• Daoust, Jean-François, Éric Bélanger, Ruth Dassonneville, Erick Lachapelle, Richard Nadeau, Michael Becher, Sylvain Brouard, Martial Foucault, Christoph Hönnige, and Daniel Stegmueller (2021b). ‘A Guilt-Free Strategy Increases Self-Reported Non-Compliance with COVID-19 Preventive Measures: Experimental Evidence from 12 Countries’, PLoS One, 16:4, e0249914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, Darren W., and Brian D. Silver (2004). ‘Civil Liberties vs. Security: Public Opinion in the Context of the Terrorist Attacks on America’, American Journal of Political Science, 48:1, 28–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, Catherine E., Bert N. Bakker, Sara Hobolt, and Kevin Arceneaux (2021). ‘Crisis Signaling: How Italy’s Coronavirus Lockdown Affected Incumbent Support in Other European Countries’, Political Science Research and Methods, 9:3, 451–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, Catherine E., Sara B. Hobolt, and James Tilley (2018). ‘Facing up to the Facts: What Causes Economic Perceptions?’, Electoral Studies, 51, 115–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, James N., (2001). ‘On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame?’, The Journal of Politics, 63:4, 1041–1066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellickson, Robert C (2001). ‘The Market for Social Norms’, American Law and Economics Review, 3:1, 1–49.
   Google Scholar
• Engler, Sarah, Palmo Brunner, Romane Loviat, Tarik Abou-Chadi, Lucas Leemann, Andreas Glaser, and Daniel Kübler (2021). ‘Democracy in Times of the Pandemic: Explaining the Variation of COVID-19 Policies across European Democracies’, West European Politics, 44:5-6, 1077–1102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, Geoffrey, and Robert Andersen (2006). ‘The Political Conditioning of Economic Perceptions’, Journal of Politics, 68:1, 194–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadarian, Shana Kushner, Sara Wallace Goodman, and Thomas B. Pepinsky (2021). ‘Partisanship, Health Behavior, and Policy Attitudes in the Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic’, PLoS One, 16:4, e0249596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galasso, Vincenzo, Vincent Pons, Paola Profeta, Michael Becher, Sylvain Brouard, and Martial Foucault (2020). ‘Gender Differences in COVID-19 Attitudes and Behavior: Panel Evidence from Eight Countries’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117:44, 27285–27291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilens, Martin, and Naomi Murakawa (2002). ‘Elite Cues and Political Decision-Making’, Research in Micropolitics, 6, 15–49.
   Google Scholar
• Greitens, Sheena Chestnut. (2020). ‘Surveillance, security, and liberal democracy in the post-COVID world’, International Organization, 74:1, 169–190.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, Guy, Soojong Kim, Jonah M. Rexer, and Harsha Thirumurthy (2020). ‘Political Partisanship Influences Behavioral Responses to Governors’ Recommendations for Covid-19 Prevention in the United States’, Available at SSRN 3578695.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, Thomas, Noam Angrist, Rafael Goldszmidt, Beatriz Kira, Anna Petherick, Toby Phillips, Samuel Webster et al. (2021). ‘A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker)’, Nature Human Behaviour, 5:4, 529–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, Sara B., Thomas J. Leeper, and James Tilley (2021). ‘Divided by the Vote: Affective Polarization in the Wake of the Brexit Referendum’, British Journal of Political Science, 51:4, 1476–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, Martin, Michael Bang Petersen, and Jacob Nyrup (2020). ‘Do Survey Estimates of the Public’s Compliance with COVID-19 Regulations Suffer from Social Desirability Bias?’, Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 3:2, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Lenz, Gabriel S. (2013). Follow the Leader? How Voters Respond to Politicians’ Policies and Performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levi, Margaret (1997). Consent, Dissent and Patriotism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lupia, Arthur, and Mathew D. McCubbins (1998). The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merkley, Eric, Aengus Bridgman, Peter John Loewen, Taylor Owen, Derek Ruths, and Oleg Zhilin (2020). ‘A Rare Moment of Cross-Partisan Consensus: Elite and Public Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Canada’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 53:2, 311–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merolla, Jennifer L., and Elizabeth J. Zechmeister (2009). Democracy at Risk: How Terrorist Threats Affect the Public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, Stephen P. (2012). ‘Polarizing Cues’, American Journal of Political Science, 56:1, 52–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paek, Hye-Jin, and Thomas Hove (2017). ‘Risk Perceptions and Risk Characteristics’, In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schraff, Dominik (2021). ‘Political Trust during the Covid-19 Pandemic: Rally around the Flag or Lockdown Effects?’, European Journal of Political Research, 60:4, 1007–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, Tom R. (1980). ‘Impact of Directly and Indirectly Experienced Events: The Origin of Crime-Related Judgments and Behaviors’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39:1, 13–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, Tom R., and Fay L. Cook (1984). ‘The Mass Media and Judgments of Risk: Distinguishing Impact on Personal and Societal Level Judgments’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47:4, 693–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, Tom R., and Yuen J. Huo (2002). Trust in the Law: Encouraging Public Cooperation with the Police and Courts. New York: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Linden, Clifton, and Justin Savoie (2020). ‘Does Collective Interest or Self-Interest Motivate Mask Usage as a Preventive Measure against COVID-19?’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 53:2, 391–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenham, Clare, Julia Smith, and Rosemary Morgan (2020). ‘COVID-19: The Gendered Impacts of the Outbreak’, The Lancet, 395:10227, 846–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westwood, Sean J., Shanto Iyengar, Stefaan Walgrave, Rafael Leonisio, Luis Miller, and Oliver Strijbis (2018). ‘The Tie That Divides: Cross-National Evidence of the Primacy of Partyism’, European Journal of Political Research, 57:2, 333–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaller, John R. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar