The Brexit puzzle: polity attack and external rebordering

References

• Altiparmakis, Argyrios, Joseph Ganderson, Anna Kyriazi, and Joan Miró (2022). ‘Forging Unity: Salience, Politicization and the EU’s Brexit Negotiating Position’, West European Politics.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard, Catherine (2017). ‘Brexit and the EU Internal Market’, in Federico Fabbrini (ed.), The Law and Politics of Brexit. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 201–18.
   Google Scholar
• Barnier, Michel (2021). My Secret Brexit Diary. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartolini, Stefano (2005). Restructuring Europe: Centre Formation, System Building, and Political Structuring between the Nation State and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, Derek, and Rasmus Brun Pedersen (2019). Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, Felix, and Stefan Jagdhuber (2022). ‘Take It and Leave It! A Postfunctionalist Bargaining Approach to the Brexit Negotiations’, West European Politics, 45:4, 793–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boin, Arjen, Paul t’Hart, Eric Stern, and Bengt Sundelius (2016). The Politics of Crisis Management: Public Leadership under Pressure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bressanelli, Edoardo, Christel Koop, and Christine Reh (2020). ‘EU Actors Under Pressure: Politicisation and Depoliticisation as Strategic Responses’, Journal of European Public Policy, 27:3, 329–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Wen, Bart Los, Philip McCann, Raquel Ortega-Argilés, Mark Thissen, and Frank Van Oort (2018). ‘The Continental Divide? Economic Exposure to Brexit in Regions and Countries on Both Sides of the Channel’, Papers in Regional Science, 97:1, 25–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopin, Thierry, and Christian Lequesne (2021). ‘Disintegration Reversed: Brexit and the Cohesiveness of the EU27’, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 29:3, 419–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, Harold, Matthew Goodwin, and Paul Whiteley (2017). Brexit: Why Britain Voted to Leave the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, Catherine (2017). ‘Benchmarking Brexit: How the British Decision to Leave Shapes EU Public Opinion’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 55:S1, 38–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, Geoffrey, and Anand Menon (2017). Brexit and British Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Felbermayr, Gabriel, Clemens Fuest, Hans Gersbach, Albrecht Ritschl, Marcel Thum, and Martin Braml (2019). ‘Hard Brexit Ahead: Breaking the Deadlock’, EconPol Policy Brief, 12/2019, available at https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/EconPol_Policy_Brief_12_Brexit.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ferrara, Federico Maria, and Hanspeter Kriesi (2022). ‘Crisis Pressures and European Integration’, Journal of European Public Policy, 29:9, 1351–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glencross, Andrew (2019). ‘The Impact of the Article 50 Talks on the EU: Risk Aversion and the Prospects for Further EU Disintegration’, European View, 18:2, 186–93.
   Google Scholar
• Grey, Chris (2021). Brexit Unfolded: How No One Got What They Wanted (And Why They Were Never Going to). London: Biteback Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Grynberg, Charlotte, Stefanie Walter, and Fabio Wasserfallen (2020). ‘Expectations, Vote Choice and Opinion Stability Since the 2016 Brexit Referendum’, European Union Politics, 21:2, 255–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillion, Christophe (2018). ‘Withdrawal Under Art. 50 TEU: An Integration-Friendly Process’, Common Market Law Review, 55:Special Issue, 29–56.
   Google Scholar
• Hix, Simon (2018). ‘Brexit: Where Is the EU-UK Relationship Heading?’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 56:S1, 11–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, Sara, Thomas Leeper, and James Tilley (2021). ‘Divided by the Vote: Affective Polarization in the Wake of the Brexit Referendum’, British Journal of Political Science, 51:4, 1476–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollande, Francois (2016). ‘France’s European Vision’, available at https://institutdelors.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/franceeuropeanvision-hollande-jdi-oct16.pdf (accessed 6 October 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks (2009). ‘A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science, 39:1, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks (2019). ‘Grand Theories of European Integration in the Twenty-First Century’, Journal of European Public Policy, 26:8, 1113–1133.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, Mads Dagnis, and Holly Snaith (2016). ‘When Politics Prevails: The Political Economy of a Brexit’, Journal of European Public Policy, 23:9, 1302–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jupille, Joseph, James A. Caporaso, and Jeffrey T. Checkel (2003). ‘Integrating Institutions: Rationalism, Constructivism, and the Study of the European Union’, Comparative Political Studies, 36:1-2, 7–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler, Wilhelm, and Gernot Müller (2017). ‘Brexit, the Four Freedoms, and the Indivisibility Dogma’, VoxEU, November 8, available at https://voxeu.org/article/brexit-four-freedoms-and-indivisibility-dogma (accessed 6 October 2022).
   Google Scholar
• König, Thomas (2018). ‘Still the Century of Intergovernmentalism? Partisan Ideology, Two-Level Bargains and Technocratic Governance in the post-Maastricht Era’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 56:6, 1240–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laffan, Brigid (2019). ‘How the EU27 Came to Be’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 57:S1, 13–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latorre, Maria, Zoryana Olekseyuk, Hidemichi Yonezawa, and Sherman Robinson (2019). ‘Brexit: Everyone Loses, but Britain Loses the Most’, Peterson Institute for International Economics Working Paper, No. 19-5, available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3345244 (accessed 6 October 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Martill, Benjamin (2022). ‘Prisoners of Their Own Device: Brexit as a Failed Negotiating Strategy’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 24:4, 582–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miró, Joan, Argyrios Altiparmakis, and Chendi Wang (2022). ‘From the “Domino Effect” Hypothesis to a Remote Conflict? Eurosceptic Framings of Brexit in the EU-27’, West European Politics.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, Andrew (1998). The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, Andrew (2016). ‘The Great Brexit Kabuki – A Masterclass in Political Theatre’, Financial Times, 8 April.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, Andrew (2018). ‘Preferences, Power and Institutions in 21st-Century Europe’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 56:7, 1648–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, John (1970). ‘Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson’, American Political Science Review, 64:1, 18–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, Iver (1999). Uses of the Other: ‘The East’ in European Identity Formation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, Kevin (2018). A Short History of Brexit: From Brentry to Backstop. London: Pelican.
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics (2016). ‘UK Perspectives. Trade with the EU and Beyond’, available at http://visual.ons.gov.uk/uk-perspectives-2016-trade-with-the-eu-and-beyond/ (accessed 6 October 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, Paul (1996). ‘The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis’, Comparative Political Studies, 29:2, 123–163.
   Google Scholar
• Rokkan, Stein (1974). ‘Entries, Voices, Exits: Towards a Possible Generalization of the Hirschman Model’, Social Science Information, 13:1, 39–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, Frank (2014). ‘European Integration in the Euro Crisis: The Limits of Postfunctionalism’, Journal of European Integration, 36:3, 321–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, Frank (2018). ‘Brexit: Negotiating Differentiated Disintegration in the EU’, Journal of European Public Policy, 25:8, 1154–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, Frank (2021). ‘Rebordering Europe: External Boundaries and Integration in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy, 28:3, 311–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, Frank, and Thomas Winzen (2020). ‘Differentiated EU Integration: Maps and Modes’, EUI RSCAS, 2020/24, http://hdl.handle.net/1814/66880.
   Google Scholar
• Sczepanski, Ronja (2022). ‘European By Action? How Voting Re-Shapes Nested Identities’, Unpublished paper, PhD dissertation, ETH Zurich.
   Google Scholar
• Springford, John (2021). ‘The Cost of Brexit: October 2021’, Center for European Reform, available at https://www.cer.eu/sites/default/files/insight_JS_costbrexit_oct_13.12.21.pdf (accessed 6 October 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Walter, Stefanie (2021a). ‘Brexit Domino? The Political Contagion Effects of Voter-Endorsed Withdrawals from International Institutions’, Comparative Political Studies, 54:13, 2382–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, Stefanie (2021b). ‘EU-27 Public Opinion on Brexit’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 59:3, 569–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, Stefani, and Steven Blockmans (2016). ‘The EU Deal to Avoid Brexit: Take It or Leave’, CEPS Special Report 131. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar