Who benefits from the retrospective vote? Bringing in new parties

References

• Abedi, Amir (2002). ‘Challenges to Established Parties: The Effects of Party System Features on the Electoral Fortunes of Anti-Political-Establishment Parties’, European Journal of Political Research, 41:4, 551–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Algan, Yann, Sergei Guriev, Elias Papaioannou, and Evgenia Passari (2017). ‘The European Trust Crisis and the Rise of Populism’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2017:2, 309–400.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Christopher J. (1996). ‘Economics, Politics, and Foreigners: Populist Party Support in Denmark and Norway’, Electoral Studies, 15:4, 497–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Christopher J., and Yuliya V. Tverdova (2003). ‘Corruption, Political Allegiances, and Attitudes toward Governmnent in Contemporary Democracies’, American Journal of Political Science, 47:1, 91–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anduiza, Eva, Aina Gallego, and Jordi Muñoz (2013). ‘Turning a Blind Eye: Experimental Evidence of Partisan Bias in Attitudes toward Corruption’, Comparative Political Studies, 46:12, 1664–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armingeon, Klaus, and Kai Guthmann (2014). ‘Democracy in Crisis? The Declining Support for National Democracy in European Countries, 2007–2011’, European Journal of Political Research, 53:3, 423–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arzheimer, Kai (2009). ‘Contextual Factors and the Extreme Right Vote in Western Europe, 1980-2002’, American Journal of Political Science, 53:2, 259–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arzheimer, Kai, and Elisabeth Carter (2006). ‘Political Opportunity Structures and Right-Wing Extremist Party Success’, European Journal of Political Research, 45:3, 419–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bågenholm, Andreas, and Nicholas Charron (2014). ‘Do Politics in Europe Benefit from Politicising Corruption?’, West European Politics, 37:5, 903–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bélanger, Eric (2004). ‘Antipartysm and Third Party Vote Choice’, Comparative Political Studies, 37:9, 1054–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bochsler, Daniel (2009). ‘Are Mixed Electoral Systems the Best Choice for Central and Eastern Europe or the Reason for Defective Party Systems?’, Politics & Policy, 37:4, 735–67.
   Google Scholar
• Bochsler, Daniel, and Miriam Hänni (2019). ‘The Three Stages of the Anti-incumbency Vote: Retrospective Economic Voting in Young and Established Democracies’, European Journal of Political Research, 58:1, 30–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, Shaun, and Jeffrey A. Karp (2004). ‘Politicians, Scandals, and Trust in Government’, Political Behavior, 26:3, 271–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreras, Miguel (2017). ‘Institutions, Governmental Performance and the Rise of Political Newcomers’, European Journal of Political Research, 56:2, 364–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, Alberto, Ana L. De La O, Dean Karlan, and Leonard Wantchekon (2015). ‘Does Corruption Information Inspire the Fight of Quash the Hope? A Field Experiment in Mexico on Voter Turnout, Choice, and Party Identification’, The Journal of Politics, 77:1, 55–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crabtree, Charles, and Matt Golder (2017). ‘Party System Volatility in Post-Communist Europe’, British Journal of Political Science, 47:1, 229–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisp, Brian F., Santiago Olivella, Joshua D. Potter, and William Mishler (2014). ‘Elections as Instruments for Punishing Bad Representatives and Selecting Good Ones’, Electoral Studies, 34, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, Cesi, Philip E. Keefer, and Carlos Scartascini (2016). Database of Political Institutions Codebook, 2015 Update. Inter-American Development Bank, available at https://publications.iadb.org/en/database-political-institutions-2015-dpi2015 (accessed 14 November 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Curini, Luigi (2018). Corruption, Ideology, and Populism. Houndmills: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Dassonneville, Ruth, and Michael S. Lewis-Beck (2014). ‘Macroeconomics, Economic Crisis and Electoral Outcomes: A National European Pool’, Acta Politica, 49:4, 372–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, Catherine E., and Hector Solaz (2017). ‘The Electoral Consequences of Corruption’, Annual Review of Political Science, 20:1, 391–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgie, Robert (2016). Semipresidentialism, 2016 available at semipresidentialism.com/?p=1053 (accessed 1 October 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Emanuele, Vincenzo, and Alessandro Chiaramonte (2019). ‘Explaining the Impact of New Parties in the Western European Party Systems’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 29:4, 490–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enelow, James M., and Melvin J. Hinich (1982). ‘Nonspatial Candidate Characteristics and Electoral Competition’, The Journal of Politics, 44:1, 115–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engler, Sarah (2016). ‘Corruption and Electoral Support for New Political Parties in Central and Eastern Europe’, West European Politics, 39:2, 278–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engler, Sarah (2020). ‘Centrist Anti-Establishment Parties and Their Protest Voters: More than a Superficial Romance?’, European Political Science Review, 12:3, 307–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Vázquez, Pablo, Pablo Barberá, and Gonzalo Rivero (2016). ‘Rooting out Corruption or Rooting for Corruption? The Heterogeneous Electoral Consequences of Scandals’, Political Science Research and Methods, 4:2, 379–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorina, Morris (1981). Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanley, Seán, and Allan Sikk (2016). ‘Economy, Corruption or Floating Voters? Explaining the Breakthroughs of anti-Establishment Reform Parties in Eastern Europe’, Party Politics, 22:4, 522–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmel, Robert, and John D. Robertson (1985). ‘Formation and Success of New Parties. A Cross-National Analysis’, International Political Science Review, 6:4, 501–23.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, Andrew, and Neil Malhotra (2013). ‘Retrospective Voting Reconsidered’, Annual Review of Political Science, 16:1, 285–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellwig, Timothy, and David Samuels (2008). ‘Electoral Accountability and the Variety of Democratic Regimes’, British Journal of Political Science, 38:1, 65–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez, Enrique, and Hanspeter Kriesi (2016). ‘The Electoral Consequences of the Financial and Economic Crisis in Europe’, European Journal of Political Research, 55:2, 203–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, Sara B., and James Tilley (2016). ‘Fleeing the Centre: The Rise of Challenger Parties in the Aftermath of the Euro Crisis’, West European Politics, 39:5, 971–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hug, Simon (2001). Altering Party Systems. Strategic Behaviour and the Emergence of New Political Parties in Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert (2014). Democratic Accountability and Linkages Project. Duke University, available at https://sites.duke.edu/democracylinkage/ (accessed 14 November 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Klašnja, Marko, and Joshua A. Tucker (2013). ‘The Economy, Corruption, and the Vote: Evidence from Experiments in Sweden and Moldova’, Electoral Studies, 32:3, 536–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurer, Thomas (2020). ‘The Declining Middle: Occupational Change, Social Status, and the Populist Right’, Comparative Political Studies, 53:10-11, 1798–835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, Jan-Erik, and Svante Ersson (2007). ‘Party System Instability in Europe: Persistent Differences in Volatility between West and East?’, Democratization, 14:1, 92–110.
   Google Scholar
• Lavezzolo, Sebastián, and Luis Ramiro (2018). ‘Stealth Democracy and the Support for New and Challenger Parties’, European Political Science Review, 10:2, 267–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, Michael S. (1986). ‘Comparative Economic Voting: Britain, France, Germany, Italy’, American Journal of Political Science, 30:2, 315–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Mary Stegmaier (2000). ‘Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes’, Annual Review of Political Science, 3:1, 183–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Mary Stegmaier (2008). ‘The Economic Vote in Transitional Democracies’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 18:3, 3, 303–323.
   Google Scholar
• Lubbers, Marcel, Mérove Gijsberts, and Peer Scheepers (2002). ‘Extreme Right-Wing Voting in Western Europe’, European Journal of Political Research, 41:3, 345–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, Scott, Carlos Gervasoni, and Annabella España-Najera (2017). ‘Extra- and within-System Electoral Volatility’, Party Politics, 23:6, 623–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, Scott, and Edurne Zoco (2007). ‘Political Sequences and the Stabilization of Interparty Competition. Electoral Volatility in Old and New Democracies’, Party Politics, 13:2, 155–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcos-Marne, Hugo, Carolina Plaza-Colodro, and Tina Freyburg (2020). ‘Who Votes for New Parties? Economic Voting, Political Ideology and Populist Attitudes’, West European Politics, 43:1, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melgar, Natalia, Máximo Rossi, and Tom W. Smith (2010). ‘The Perception of Corruption’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22:1, 120–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkel, Wolfgang, et al. (2018). Democracy Barometer. Methodology. Version 5. Zentrum für Demokratie. Retrieved from www.democracybarometer.org.
   Google Scholar
• Mishler, William, and John P. Willerton (2003). ‘The Dynamics of Presidential Popularity in Post-Communist Russia: Cultural Imperative versus Neo-Institutional Choice?’, The Journal of Politics, 65:1, 111–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadeau, Richard, Michael S. Lewis-Beck, and Éric Bélanger (2013). ‘Economics and Elections Revisited’, Comparative Political Studies, 46:5, 551–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, John G., and Susan Welch (1980). ‘The Effects of Charges of Corruption on Voting Behavior in Congressional Elections’, American Political Science Review, 74:3, 697–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, Eleanor Neff, and Joshua A. Tucker (2014). ‘Revisiting Electoral Volatility in Post-Communist Countries: New Data, New Results and New Approaches’, British Journal of Political Science, 44:1, 123–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, Eleanor Neff, and Joshua A. Tucker (2017). ‘Little Is Known about Party System Volatility in Post-Communist Europe, but We Have Interesting New Methods and Data for Studying It’, British Journal of Political Science, 47:1, 235–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przeworski, Adam (1996). ‘Public Support for Economic Reforms in Poland’, Comparative Political Studies, 29:5, 520–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remmer, Karen L. (1991). ‘The Political Impact of Economic Crisis in Latin America in the 1980s’, American Political Science Review, 85:3, 777–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rico, Guillem, and Eva Anduiza (2019). ‘Economic Correlates of Populist Attitudes: An Analysis of Nine European Countries in the Aftermath of the Great Recession’, Acta Politica, 54:3, 371–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, Andrew (2008). ‘Hyperaccountability: Economic Voting in Central and Eastern Europe’, Electoral Studies, 27:3, 533–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruth, Saskia (2014). ‘The Quality of Representation in Latin America: Linking Citizens with Political Parties’, PhD thesis, University of Cologne.
   Google Scholar
• Schleiter, Petra, and Alisa M. Voznaya (2014). ‘Party System Competitiveness and Corruption’, Party Politics, 20:5, 675–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikk, Allan (2005). ‘How Unstable? Volatility and the Genuinely New Parties in Eastern Europe’, European Journal of Political Research, 44:3, 391–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikk, Allan (2012). ‘Newness as a Winning Formula for New Political Parties’, Party Politics, 18:4, 465–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanig, Piero (2013). ‘Political Polarization in Retrospective Economic Evaluations during Recessions and Recoveries’, Electoral Studies, 32:4, 729–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavits, Margit (2005). ‘The Development of Stable Party Support: Electoral Dynamics in Post-Communist Europe’, American Journal of Political Science, 49:2, 283–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavits, Margit (2006). ‘Party System Change. Testing a Model of New Party Entry’, Party Politics, 12:1, 99–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavits, Margit (2007). ‘Clarity of Responsibility and Corruption’, American Journal of Political Science, 51:1, 218–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavits, Margit (2008). ‘Party Systems in the Making: The Emergence and Success of New Parties in New Democracies’, British Journal of Political Science, 38:1, 113–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The PRS Group (2013). International Country Risk Guide 2013 available at https://epub.prsgroup.com/products/icrg/international-country-risk-guide-icrg (accessed 1 June 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Transparency International (2013). Corruption Perceptions Index 2012: Technical Methodology Note 2012, available at http://www.transparency.org/files/content/pressrelease/2012_CPITechnicalMethodologyNote_EMBARGO_EN.pdf (accessed 14 November 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Van de Wardt, Marc, Joost Berkhout, and Floris Vermeulen (2021). ‘Survival of the Fittest. Comparing Entry and Exit among Niche and Mainstream Parties in Advanced Democracies, 1945-2011’, Electoral Studies, 69, 102261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal, Guillem (2018). ‘Challenging Business as Usual? The Rise of New Parties in Spain in Times of Crisis’, West European Politics, 41:2, 261–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winters, Matthew S., and Rebecca Weitz-Shapiro (2013). ‘Lacking Information or Condoning Corruption? When Do Voters Support Corrupt Politicans’, Comparative Politics, 45:4, 418–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank (2018). ‘World Bank Data’, available at https://data.worldbank.org/ (accessed 14 November 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Zechmeister, Elizabeth J., and Daniel Zizumbo-Colunga (2013). ‘The Varying Political Toll of Concerns about Corruption in Good versus Bad Economic Times’, Comparative Political Studies, 46:10, 1190–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar