Assembly dissolution powers and incumbency advantages in coalition formation

References

• Alcantara, Christopher, and J. Roy (2012). ‘The Election Timing Advantage: Empirical Fact or Fiction?’, Electoral Studies, 31:4, 774–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, Josephine T., and Robert W. Jackman (2005). ‘Strategic Fools: Electoral Rule Choice under Extreme Uncertainty’, Electoral Studies, 24:1, 65–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelrod, Robert (1970). Conflict of Interest. Chicago, IL: Markham.
   Google Scholar
• Bäck, Hanna, and Patrick Dumont (2007). ‘Combining Large-n and Small-n Strategies: The Way Forward in Coalition Research’, West European Politics, 30:3, 467–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäck, Hanna, and Patrick Dumont (2008). ‘Making the First Move: A Two-Stage Analysis of the Role of Formateurs in Parliamentary Government Formation’, Public Choice, 135:3–4, 353–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassi, Anna (2013). ‘A Model of Endogenous Government Formation’, American Journal of Political Science, 57:4, 777–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher, Michael, Sylvain Brouard, and Isabelle Guinaudeau (2017). ‘Prime Ministers and the Electoral Cost of Using the Confidence Vote in Legislative Bargaining: Evidence from France’, West European Politics, 40:2, 252–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher, Michael, and Flemming Juul Christiansen (2015). ‘Dissolution Threats and Legislative Bargaining’, American Journal of Political Science, 59:3, 641–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman, Torbjörn (1993). ‘Constitutional Design and Government Formation: The Expected Consequences of Negative Parliamentarism’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 16:4, 285–304.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, Torbjörn, Svante Ersson, and Johan Hellström (2015). ‘Government Formation and Breakdown in Western and Central Eastern Europe’, Comparative European Politics, 13:3, 345–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucur, Cristina, and José Antonio Cheibub (2017). ‘Presidential Partisanship in Government Formation: Do Presidents Favor Their Parties When They Appoint the Prime Minister?’, Political Research Quarterly, 70:4, 803–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian, and Hans Keman (1990). Parties and Democracy: Coalition Formation and Government Functioning in Twenty States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian (2000). ‘Expert Judgements of Party Policy Positions: Uses and Limitations in Political Research’, European Journal of Political Research, 37:1, 103–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceron, Andrea (2016). ‘Inter-Factional Conflicts and Government Formation’, Party Politics, 22:6, 797–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, Abdur R. (1993). ‘Political Surfing over Economic Waves: Parliamentary Election Timing in India’, American Journal of Political Science, 37:4, 1100–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, William Roberts, Matt Golder, and Sona N. Golder (2012). Principles of Comparative Politics. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, Gary W. (1987). The Efficient Secret: The Cabinet and the Development of Political Parties in Victorian England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Swaan, A. (1973). Coalition Theories and Government Formation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, Catherine E., and Kees van Kersbergen (2007). ‘Interests, Identity and Political Allegiance in the European Union’, Acta Politica, 42:2–3, 307–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diermeier, Daniel, and Antonio Merlo (2000). ‘Government Turnover in Parliamentary Democracies’, Journal of Economic Theory, 94:1, 46–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diermeier, Daniel, and Peter Van Roozendaal (1998). ‘The Duration of Cabinet Formation Processes in Western Multi-Party Democracies’, British Journal of Political Science, 28:4, 609–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döring, Holger, and Philip Manow (2016). ‘Parliaments and Governments Database (ParlGov): Information on Parties, Elections and Cabinets in Modern Democracies’, Development Version.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, Jon (1995). ‘Forces and Mechanisms in the Constitution-Making Process’, Duke Law Journal, 45:2, 364–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, Mark N., and Thomas T. Mackie (1983). ‘Familiarity and Inertia in the Formation of Governing Coalitions in Parliamentary Democracies’, British Journal of Political Science, 13:3, 275–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzese, Robert, and Karen Jusko (2006). ‘Political-Economic Cycles’, in Donald Wittman and Barry Weingast (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 545–64.
   Google Scholar
• Frye, Timothy (2010). Building States and Markets after Communism: The Perils of Polarized Democracy. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, Michael, Michael Laver, and Peter Mair (2011). Representative Government in Modern Europe. 5th ed. London: McGRaw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, William A. (1961). ‘A Theory of Coalition Formation’, American Sociological Review, 26:3, 373–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasgow, Garrett, Matt Golder, and Sona N. Golder (2011). ‘Who “Wins”? Determining the Party of the Prime Minister’, American Journal of Political Science, 55:4, 937–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasgow, Garrett, Matt Golder, and Sona N. Golder (2012). ‘New Empirical Strategies for the Study of Parliamentary Government Formation’, Political Analysis, 20:2, 248–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasgow, Garrett, and Sona N. Golder (2015). ‘A New Approach to the Study of Parties Entering Government’, British Journal of Political Science, 45:4, 739–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golder, Sona N. (2005). ‘Pre-electoral Coalitions in Comparative Perspective: A Test of Existing Hypotheses’, Electoral Studies, 24:4, 643–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goplerud, Max, and Petra Schleiter (2016). ‘An Index of Assembly Dissolution Powers’, Comparative Political Studies, 49:4, 427–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grofman, Bernard, and Peter Van Roozendaal (1994). ‘Toward a Theoretical Explanation of Premature Cabinet Termination: With Application to Post-War Cabinets in The Netherlands’, European Journal of Political Research, 26:2, 155–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grofman, Bernard, and Peter Van Roozendaal (1997). ‘Modelling Cabinet Durability and Termination’, British Journal of Political Science, 27:3, 419–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, John D. (1996). ‘The Vote of Confidence in Parliamentary Democracies’, American Political Science Review, 90:2, 269–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, Takatoshi (1990). ‘The Timing of Elections and Political Business Cycles in Japan’, Journal of Asian Economics, 1:1, 135–56.
   Google Scholar
• Kayser, Mark Andreas (2005). ‘Who Surfs, Who Manipulates? The Determinants of Opportunistic Election Timing and Electorally Motivated Economic Intervention, The American Political Science Review, 99:1, 17–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayser, Mark Andreas (2006). ‘Trade and the Timing of Elections’, British Journal of Political Science, 36:3, 437–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keman, Hans (2011). ‘Parties and Government: Incumbency and Representation in Parliamentary Democracies’, Acta Politica, 46:1, 3–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, Anthony, and Nicholas Allen (2010). ‘Off with Their Heads’: British Prime Ministers and the Power to Dismiss’, British Journal of Political Science, 40:2, 249–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, Michael (1998). ‘Models of Government Formation’, Annual Review of Political Science, 1:1, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, Michael, and Norman Schofield (1990). Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leiserson, Michael (1968). ‘Factions and Coalitions in One-Party Japan: An Interpretation Based on the Theory of Games’, American Political Science Review, 62:3, 770–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linz, Juan J. (1994). ‘Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy: Does It Make a Difference?’, in Juan J. Linz and Arturo Valenzuela (eds.), The Failure of Presidential Democracy: The Case of Latin America. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 3–87.
   Google Scholar
• Lupia, Arthur, and Kaare Strøm (1995). ‘Coalition Termination and the Strategic Timing of Parliamentary Elections’, American Political Science Review, 89:3, 648–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, Philip, and Richard Whitaker (2013). ‘Where There Is Discord, Can They Bring Harmony? Managing Intra-Party Dissent on European Integration in the Conservative Party’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 15:3, 317–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Lanny W., and Randolph T. Stevenson (2001). ‘Government Formation in Parliamentary Democracies’, American Journal of Political Science, 45:1, 33–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Lanny W., and Randolph T. Stevenson (2010). ‘The Conditional Impact of Incumbency on Government Formation’, American Political Science Review, 104:3, 503–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, Daniel (1974). ‘Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior’, in P. Zarembka (ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics. New York: Academic Press, 105–42.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Wolfgang C., and Kaare Strøm (2000). ‘Coalition Governments in Western Europe: An Introduction’, in Wolfgang C. Müller and Kaare Strøm (eds.), Coalition Governments in Western Europe. New York: Oxford University Press, 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, Harvey D., and Guy D. Whitten (2000). ‘Government Competence, Economic Performance and Endogenous Election Dates’, Electoral Studies, 19:2–3, 413–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, G. Bingham (2000). Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rajan, Raghuram G., and Luigi Zingales (1998). ‘Financial Dependence and Growth’, The American Economic Review, 88:3, 559–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riker, W. (1962). The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Robert, and Rhodri Walters (2015). How Parliament Works. 7th ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schleiter, Petra, and Edward Morgan-Jones (2009). ‘Constitutional Power and Competing Risks: Monarchs, Presidents, Prime Ministers, and the Termination of East and West European Cabinets’, American Political Science Review, 103:3, 496–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleiter, Petra, and Margit Tavits (2016). ‘The Electoral Benefits of Opportunistic Election Timing’, The Journal of Politics, 78:3, 836–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleiter, Petra, and Margit Tavits (2018). ‘Voter Reactions to Incumbent Opportunism’, The Journal of Politics, 80:4, 1183–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, Min, and Jakob Svensson (2006). ‘Political Budget Cycles: Do They Differ across Countries and Why?’, Journal of Public Economics, 90:8–9, 1367–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shugart, Matthew Søberg, and Martin P. Wattenberg, eds. (2001). Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Alastair (2003). ‘Election Timing in Majoritarian Parliaments’, British Journal of Political Science, 33:3, 397–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strøm, Kaare (1990). Minority Government and Majority Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strøm, Kaare, Ian Budge, and Michael Laver (1994). ‘Constraints on Cabinet Formation in Parliamentary Democracies’, American Journal of Political Science, 38:2, 303–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strøm, Kaare, and Stephen M. Swindle (2002). ‘Strategic Parliamentary Dissolution’, American Political Science Review, 96:3, 575–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavits, Margit (2008). ‘The Role of Parties’ Past Behavior in Coalition Formation’, American Political Science Review, 102:4, 495–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkens, Andrea, Pola Lehmann, Theres Matthieß, Nicolas Merz, Sven Regel, and Annika Werner (2016). The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/Sozialforschung, CMP/MARPOR). Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin Für Sozialforschung (WZB).
   Google Scholar
• Warwick, Paul V. (1996). ‘Coalition Government Membership in West European Parliamentary Democracies’, British Journal of Political Science, 26:4, 471–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar