Are citizens responsive to interest groups? A field experiment on lobbying and intended citizen behaviour

References

• Aarøe, Lene (2011). ‘Investigating Frame Strength: The Case of Episodic and Thematic Frames’, Political Communication, 28:2, 207–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, Icek, and Martin Fishbein (1977). ‘Attitude–Behavior Relations: A Theoretical Analysis and Review of Empirical Research’, Psychological Bulletin, 84:5, 888–918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, Frank R., Jeffrey M. Berry, Marie Hojnacki, David C. Kimball, and Beth L. Leech (2009). Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beyers, Jan, and Iskander De Bruycker (2018). ‘Lobbying Makes (Strange) Bedfellows: Explaining the Formation and Composition of Lobbying Coalitions in EU Legislative Politics’, Political Studies, 66:4, 959–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broockman, David, and Joshua Kalla (2016). ‘Durably Reducing Transphobia: A Field Experiment on Door-to-Door Canvassing’, Science, 352:6282, 220–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crepaz, Michele, Wiebke Marie Junk, Marcel Hanegraaff, and Joost Berkhout (2022). Viral Lobbying: Strategies, Access and Influence during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• De Bruycker, Iskander (2019). ‘Blessing or Curse for Advocacy? How News Media Attention Helps Advocacy Groups to Achieve Their Policy Goals’, Political Communication, 36:1, 103–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruycker, Iskander, and Jan Beyers (2019). ‘Lobbying Strategies and Success: Inside and outside Lobbying in European Union Legislative Politics’, European Political Science Review, 11:1, 57–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, James N. (2001). ‘On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame?’, The Journal of Politics, 63:4, 1041–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwidar, Maraam A. (2022). ‘Diverse Lobbying Coalitions and Influence in Notice-and-Comment Rulemaking’, Policy Studies Journal, 50:1, 199–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dür, Andreas (2019). ‘How Interest Groups Influence Public Opinion: Arguments Matter More than the Sources’, European Journal of Political Research, 58:2, 514–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eady, Gregory, and Anne Rasmussen (2022). ‘The Unequal Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Political Interest Representation’, Political Behavior, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-022-09842-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, Alan S., and Donald P. Green (2012). Field Experiments: Design, Analysis and Interpretation. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Gilens, Martin (2012). Affluence and Influence, Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grose, Christian R., Pamela Lopez, Sara Sadhwani, and Antoine Yoshinaka (2022). ‘Social Lobbying’, The Journal of Politics, 84:1, 367–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanegraaff, Marcel, and Andrea Pritoni (2019). ‘United in Fear: Interest Group Coalition Formation as a Weapon of the Weak?’, European Union Politics, 20:2, 198–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkins, Stephen G., and Richard E. Petty (1981). ‘Effects of Source Magnification of Cognitive Effort on Attitudes: An Information-Processing View’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40:3, 401–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkins, Stephen G., and Richard E. Petty (1987). ‘Information Utility and the Multiple Source Effect’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52:2, 260–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman, Todd K., and Christopher R. Weber (2009). ‘Who Said What? The Effects of Source Cues in Issue Frames’, Political Behavior, 31:4, 537–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaney, Michael, and Philip Leifeld (2018). ‘Contributions by Interest Groups to Lobbying Coalitions’, The Journal of Politics, 80:2, 494–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hojnacki, Marie (1997). ‘Interest Groups’ Decisions to Join Alliances or Work Alone’, American Journal of Political Science, 41:1, 61–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holyoke, Thomas (2014). ‘Why Lobbyists for Competing Interests Often Cooperate’, in Matt Grossmann (ed.), New Directions in Interest Group Research. New York: Routledge, 105–21.
   Google Scholar
• Hula, Kevin W. (1999). Lobbying Together: Interest Group Coalitions in Legislative Politics. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jungherr, Andreas, Alexander Wuttke, Matthias Mader, and Harald Schoen (2021). ‘A Source like Any Other? Field and Survey Experiment Evidence on How Interest Groups Shape Public Opinion’, Journal of Communication, 71:2, 276–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junk, Wiebke Marie (2019). ‘When Diversity Works: The Effects of Coalition Composition on the Success of Lobbying Coalitions’, American Journal of Political Science, 63:3, 660–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junk, Wiebke Marie (2020). ‘Synergies in Lobbying? Conceptualising and Measuring Lobbying Coalitions to Study Interest Group Strategies, Access, and Influence’, Interest Groups & Advocacy, 9:1, 21–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junk, Wiebke Marie, and Anne Rasmussen (2019). ‘Framing by the Flock: Collective Issue Definition and Advocacy Success’, Comparative Political Studies, 52:4, 483–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalla, Joshua L., and David E. Broockman (2022). ‘“Outside Lobbying” over the Airwaves: A Randomized Field Experiment on Televised Issue Ads’, American Political Science Review, 116:3, 1126–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüver, Heike (2011). ‘The Contextual Nature of Lobbying: Explaining Lobbying Success in the European Union’, European Union Politics, 12:4, 483–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koetsenruijter, A. Willem M. (2011). ‘Using Numbers in News Increases Story Credibility’, Newspaper Research Journal, 32:2, 74–82.
   Google Scholar
• Kollman, Ken (1998). Outside Lobbying: Public Opinion and Interest Group Strategies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, Hanspeter (2009). ‘Political Mobilisation, Political Participation and the Power of the Vote’, in Klaus H Goetz, Peter Mair, and Gordon Smith (eds.), European Politics: Past, Presents, Futures. London: Routledge, 147–68.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, Martin V., and Asmus L. Olsen (2020). ‘Reducing Bias in Citizens’ Perception of Crime Rates: Evidence from a Field Experiment on Burglary Prevalence’, Journal of Politics, 82:2, 747–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeper, Thomas J., and Rune Slothuus (2020). ‘How the News Media Persuades: Framing Effects and Beyond’, in Elizabeth Suhay, Bernard Grofman, and Alexander H. Trechsel (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Persuasion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leeper, Thomas L. (2013). ‘Interest Groups and Political Attitudes’, Working paper, https://s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/tjl-sharing/assets/InterestGroupsAndPoliticalAttitudes.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lupia, Arthur (1994). ‘Shortcuts versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections’, American Political Science Review, 88:1, 63–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, Christine (2008). Brussels versus the Beltway: Advocacy in the United States and the European Union. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malhotra, Neil, Benoit Monin, and Michael Tomz (2019). ‘Does Private Regulation Preempt Public Regulation?’, American Political Science Review, 113:1, 19–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloney, William A., Grant Jordan, and M. McLaughlin Andrew (1994). ‘Interest Groups and Public Policy: The Insider/Outsider Model Revisited’, Journal of Public Policy, 14:1, 17–38.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, George E. (2000). ‘Emotions in Politics’, Annual Review of Political Science, 3:1, 221–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, Catherine (1985). ‘Back on the Bandwagon: The Effect of Opinion Polls on Public Opinion’, British Journal of Political Science, 15:1, 51–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEntire, Kyla Jo, Michele Leiby, and Matthew Krain (2015). ‘Human Rights Organizations as Agents of Change: An Experimental Examination of Framing and Micromobilization’, American Political Science Review, 109:3, 407–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight, David, and Mitchell Hobbs (2013). ‘Public Contest through the Popular Media: The Mining Industry’s Advertising War against the Australian Labor Government’, Australian Journal of Political Science, 48:3, 307–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mérola, Vittorio, and Matthew P. Hitt (2016). ‘Numeracy and the Persuasive Effect of Policy Information and Party Cues’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 80:2, 554–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe, Terry M. (1981). ‘Toward a Broader View of Interest Groups’, The Journal of Politics, 43:2, 531–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monroe, Alan D. (1998). ‘Public Opinion and Public Policy, 1980–1993’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 62:1, 6–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, Benjamin I., Robert Y. Shapiro, and Glenn R. Dempsey (1987). ‘What Moves Public Opinion?’, American Political Science Review, 81:1, 23–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, Richard E., and John T. Cacioppo (1984). ‘The Effects of Involvement on Responses to Argument Quantity and Quality: Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46:1, 69–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phinney, Robin (2017). Strange Bedfellows: Interest Group Coalitions, Diverse Partners, and Influence in American Social Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, Anne, Lars K. Mäder, and Stefanie Reher (2018). ‘With a Little Help from the People? The Role of Public Opinion in Advocacy Success’, Comparative Political Studies, 51:2, 139–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, Anne, Anne S. Binderkrantz, and Heike Klüver (2021). ‘Organised Interests in the Media and Policy Congruence: The Contingent Impact of the Status Quo’, European Journal of Political Research, 60:4, 975–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, Anne, and Stefanie Reher (2023). ‘(Inequality in) Interest Group Involvement and the Legitimacy of Policy Making’, British Journal of Political Science, 53:1, 45–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, Anne, Stefanie Reher, and Dimiter Toshkov (2019). ‘The Opinion–Policy Nexus in Europe and the Role of Political Institutions’, European Journal of Political Research, 58:2, 412–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeberg, Henrik B., Rune Slothuus, and Rune Stubager (2017). ‘Do Voters Learn? Evidence That Voters Respond Accurately to Changes in Political Parties’ Policy Positions’, West European Politics, 40:2, 336–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slothuus, Rune (2008). ‘More than Weighting Cognitive Importance: A Dual-Process Model of Issue Framing Effects’, Political Psychology, 29:1, 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slothuus, Rune (2016). ‘Assessing the Influence of Political Parties on Public Opinion: The Challenge from Pretreatment Effects’, Political Communication, 33:2, 302–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slothuus, Rune, and Claes H. de Vreese (2010). ‘Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Issue Framing Effects’, The Journal of Politics, 72:3, 630–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Mark A. (2000). American Business and Political Power: Public Opinion, Elections, and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strolovitch, Dara Z. (2007). Affirmative Advocacy: Race, Class, and Gender in Interest Group Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thrall, Trevor A. (2006). ‘The Myth of the outside Strategy: Mass Media News Coverage of Interest Groups’, Political Communication, 23:4, 407–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, Christopher, Johanna Dunaway, and Tyler Johnson (2012). ‘It’s All in the Name: Source Cue Ambiguity and the Persuasive Appeal of Campaign Ads’, Political Behavior, 34:3, 561–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaller, John R. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar