From asylum to labour: track change in German migration policy

References

• Anderson, Bridget (2015). ‘‘‘Heads I Win. Tails You Lose”: Migration and the Worker Citizen’, Current Legal Problems, 68:1, 179–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, Thomas (2018). ‘Spurwechsel und Punktesystem gibt es längst’, FAZ-Einspruch, 9 December.
   Google Scholar
• Bhagwati, Jagdish (2004). In Defense of Globalization. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boswell, Christina, and James Hampshire (2017). ‘Ideas and Agency in Immigration Policy’, European Journal of Political Research, 56:1, 133–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boucher, Anna, and Justin Gest (2017). ‘The Market Model: Immigration Regime Variation and Convergence in 30 Countries’, Unpublished manuscript (in author`s possession).
   Google Scholar
• Boucher, Anna, and Justin Gest (2018). Crossroads: Comparative Immigration Regimes in a World of Demographic Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• CDU/CSU (2023). Für Humanität und Ordnung in der Asyl- und Flüchtlingspolitik. Berlin: CDU/CSU Fraktion im Bundestag.
   Google Scholar
• Chauvin, Sébastien, and Blanca Garcés-Mascareñas (2012). ‘Beyond Informal Citizenship: The New Moral Economy of Migrant Illegality’, International Political Sociology, 6:3, 241–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauvin, Sébastien, and Blanca Garcés-Mascareñas (2014). ‘Becoming Less Illegal: Deservingness Frames and Undocumented Migrant Incorporation’, Sociology Compass, 8:4, 422–32.
   Google Scholar
• Chauvin, Sébastien, Blanca Garcés-Mascareñas, and Albert Kraler (2013). ‘Working for Legality: Employment and Migrant Regularization in Europe’, International Migration, 51:6, 118–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consterdine, Erica, and James Hampshire (2020). ‘Convergence, Capitalist Diversity, or Political Volatility? Immigration Policy in Western Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy, 27:10, 1487–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dancygier, Rafaela, and Yotam Margalit (2020). ‘The Evolution of the Immigration Debate’, Comparative Political Studies, 53:5, 734–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauvergne, Catherine (2016). The New Politics of Immigration and the End of Settler Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eule, Tobias, Lisa Marie Borrelli, Annika Lindberg, and Anna Wyss (2019). Migrants Before the Law: Contested Migration Control in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fontanari, Elena (2022). ‘Germany, Year 2020: The Tension between Asylum Right, Border Control, and Economy, through the Imperative of Deservingness’, Migration Studies, 10:4, 766–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel (2007). Security, Territory, Population. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel (2008). The Birth of Biopolitics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, Nancy (2017). ‘The End of Progressive Neoliberalism’, Dissent. https://www.dissentmagazine.org/online_articles/progressive-neoliberalism-reactionary-populism-nancy-fraser/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerstle, Gary (2022). The Rise and Fall of the Neoliberal Order. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, Neil (2002). Transformation of the Welfare State. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, Hein de, Katharina Natter, and Simona Vezzoli (2018). ‘Growing Restrictiveness or Changing Selection? The Nature and Evolution of Migration Policies’, International Migration Review, 52:2, 324–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampshire, James, and Tim Bale (2015). ‘New Administration, New Immigration Regime: Do Parties Matter After All? A UK Case Study’, West European Politics, 38:1, 145–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handler, Joel (2004). Social Citizenship and Workfare in the United States and Western Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helbling, Marc, and Dorina Kalkum (2018). ‘Migration Policy Trends in OECD Countries’, Journal of European Public Policy, 25:12, 1779–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollifield, James F., et al., eds. (2022). Controlling Immigration (4th ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jonitz, Elina, and Arjen Leerkes (2022). ‘Making Asylum Work? Civic Stratification and Labour-Related Regularization among Rejected Asylum Seekers in Germany’, Law & Policy, 44:1, 23–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joppke, Christian (2007). ‘Beyond National Models: Civic Integration Policies for Immigrants in Western Europe’, West European Politics, 30:1, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joppke, Christian (2017). ‘Civic Integration in Europe: Three Debates’, West European Politics, 40:6, 1153–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joppke, Christian (2021). Neoliberal Nationalism: Immigration and the Rise of the Populist Right. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, Holger (2023). ‘Integration für alle sofort? Grundsätzliches angesichts eines Wertungswiderspruchs im Chancenaufenthaltsgesetz’, Zeitschrift für Ausländerrecht (ZAR), 60, 60–3.
   Google Scholar
• Kymlicka, Will (1998). Finding Our Way. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langenfeld, Christine (2018). ‘Die “singuläre” deutsche Flüchtlingspolitik’, in Roman Lehner and Friederike Wapler (eds.), Die herausgeforderte Rechtsordnung. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Luft, Stefan (2023). ‘Das Verschwinden des Pluralismus: Hegemoniale Diskurse in der Migrationsforschung und die Wissenschaftsfreiheit’, Zeitschrift für Politik, Sonderheft 10, 131–45. (Wissenschaftsfreiheit, edited by Sandra Kostner).
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, Niklas (1986). Ökologische Kommunikation. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Marchetti, Chiara, et al. (2020). ‘(Un)Deserving Refugees’, in E.M. Goździak (ed.), Europe and the Refugee Response. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Messina, Anthony (1989). Race and Party Competition in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, Lydia (2003). ‘Managing Contradiction: Civic Stratification and Migrants’ Rights’, International Migration Review, 37:1, 74–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, Lydia (2016). ‘Squaring the Circle: Domestic Welfare, Migrants Rights, and Human Rights’, Citizenship Studies, 20:6-7, 693–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natter, Katharina, Mathias Czaika, and Hein de Haas (2020). ‘Political Party Ideology and Immigration Policy Reforms’, Political Research Exchange, 2:1, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa (2005). Radical Right. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2022). International Migration Outlook 2022. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Ruhs, Martin (2013). The Price of Rights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, Caroline, et al. (2021). ‘Explaining the Immigration Policy Mix: Countries’ Relative Openness to Asylum and Labour Migration’, European Journal of Political Research, 60, 763–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shachar, Ayelet (2006). ‘The Race for Talent: High-Skilled Migrants and Competitive Immigration Regimes’, New York University Law Review, 81, 148–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, Wolfgang (2013). Gekaufte Zeit. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• SVR (Sachverständigenrat deutscher Stiftungen für Integration und Migration) (2017a). Papiertiger oder Meilenstein? Die Integrationsgesetze der Bundesländer im Vergleich. Berlin: SVR.
   Google Scholar
• SVR (2017b). ‘Spurwechsel’ aus der Asyl- in die Erwerbsmigration. Berlin: SVR.
   Google Scholar
• SVR (2019). Stellungnahme zum Entwurf eines Gesetzes über Duldung bei Ausbildung und Beschäftigung. Berlin: SVR.
   Google Scholar
• SVR (2022). Chancen-Aufenthaltsrecht: Stichtagsregelung honoriert Integrationsleistungen von Geduldeten. Berlin: SVR.
   Google Scholar
• Thym, Daniel (2022). Stellungnahme. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag. (Drucksache 20(4)/43A).
   Google Scholar
• Torpey, John (2000). The Invention of the Passport. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar