Selecting party leaders

References

• Abney, Ronni, James Adams, Michael Clark, Malcolm Easton, Lawrence Ezrow, Spyros Kosmidis, and Anja Neundorf (2013). ‘When Does Valence Matter? Heightened Valence Effects for Governing Parties during Election Campaigns’, Party Politics, 19:1, 61–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, Josephine T., and Robert W. Jackman (2008). ‘If Winning Isn’t Everything, Why Do They Keep Score? Consequences of Electoral Performance for Party Leaders’, British Journal of Political Science, 38:4, 657–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astudillo, Javier, and Ignacio Lago (2021). ‘Primaries through the Looking Glass: The Electoral Effects of Opening the Selection of Top Candidates’, British Journal of Political Science, 51:4, 1550–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astudillo, Javier, and Klaus Detterbeck (2020). ‘Why Sometimes, Primaries? Intraparty Democratization as a Default Selection Mechanism in German and Spanish Mainstream Parties’, Party Politics, 26:5, 594–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astudillo, Javier (2015). ‘Loser’s Second Chances and Control of the Party Machine: Aspirant Premieres in Regional Spain’, South European Society and Politics, 20:2, 181–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aylott, Nicholas, and Niklas Bolin (2017). ‘Managed Intra-Party Democracy: Precursory Delegation and Party Leader Selection’, Party Politics, 23:1, 55–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aylott, Nicholas (2002). ‘Let’s Discuss This Later: Party Responses to Euro-Division in Scandinavia’, Party Politics, 8:4, 441–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, David J (2017). ‘The Effect of Observable Party Cohesion on Voter Choice in Liberal Democracies’, PhD thesis, Trinity College Dublin.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, John M., and John Polga-Hecimovich (2006). ‘Primary Elections and Candidate Strength in Latin America’, The Journal of Politics, 68:3, 530–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carsey, Thomas, and William Berry (2014). ‘What’s a Losing Party to Do? The Calculus of Contesting State Legislative Elections’, Public Choice, 160:1–2, 251–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, Gary W (1997). Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, William P., and André Blais (2012). Politics at the Centre: The Selection and Removal of Party Leaders in the Anglo Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, William P., Ofer Kenig, Scott Pruysers, and Gideon Rahat (2016). The Promise and Challenge of Party Primaries Elections: A Comparative Perspective. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Detterbeck, Klaus (2013). ‘The Rare Event of Choice: Party Primaries in German Land Parties’, German Politics, 22:3, 270–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennser-Jedenastik, Laurenz, and Wolfgang C. Müller (2015). ‘Intra-Party Democracy, Political Performance and the Survival of Party Leaders: Austria, 1945–2011’, Party Politics, 21:6, 930–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golder, Matt (2006). ‘Presidential Coattails and Legislative Fragmentation’, American Journal of Political Science, 50:1, 34–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, Zachary, and Matthias Haber (2015). ‘The Consequences of Appearing Divided: An Analysis of Party Evaluations and Vote Choice’, Electoral Studies, 37, 15–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, Zachary, and Matthias Haber (2016). ‘Leadership Competition and Disagreement at Party National Congresses’, British Journal of Political Science, 46:3, 611–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber, Oliver, William Cross, Scott Pruysers, and Tim Bale (2015). ‘The End of the Affair: A Comparative Study of How Party Leadership Terms End’, in William P. Cross and Jean Benoit Pilet (eds.), The Politics of Party Leadership: A Cross-National Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 128–48.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, Gary Marks, Arjan H. Schakel, Sandra C. Osterkatz, Sara Niedzwiecki, and Sarah Shair-Rosenfield (2016). Measuring Regional Authority: A Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance, Volume I. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jäger, Kai (2021). ‘When Do Party Supporters Abandon the Party Leader? The Intraparty Conflict of the Alternative for Germany’, Party Politics, 27:3, 478–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenig, Ofer, Gideon Rahat, Or Tuttnauer, and Jean-Benoit (2015). ‘Competitiveness of Party Leadership Selection Processes’, in William P. Cross (ed.), The Politics of Party Leadership: A Cross-National Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 50–72.
   Google Scholar
• Kenig, Ofer (2009). ‘Democratization of Party Leadership Selection: Do Wider Selectorates Produce More Competitive Contests?’ Electoral Studies, 28:2, 240–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert (1989). ‘The Internal Politics of Parties: The Law of Curvilinear Disparity Revisited’, Political Studies, 37:3, 400–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laakso, Markku, and Rein Taagepera (1979). ‘Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Applications to West Europe’, Comparative Political Studies, 12:1, 3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maravall, José Maria (2008). ‘The Political Consequences of Internal Party Democracy’, in José María Maravall and Ignacio Sánchez-Cuenca (eds.), Controlling Governments: Voters, Institutions and Accountability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 157–201.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Wolfgang (2000). ‘Political Parties in Parliamentary Democracies: Making Delegation and Accountability Work’, European Journal of Political Research, 37, 309–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, Brenda, Scott Pruysers, and David K. Stewart (2021). ‘Glass Cliffs or Partisan Pressure? Examining Gender and Party Leader Tenures and Exits’, Political Studies, 69:2, 257–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilet, Jean-Benoit, and William P. Cross (2014). The Selection of Political Party Leaders in Contemporary Parliamentary Democracies: A Comparative Study. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, Adam, Michael E. Alvarez, José Antonio Cheibub, and Fernando Limongi (2000). Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950-1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rahat, Gideon, and Assaf Shapira (2017). ‘An Intra-Party Democracy Index: Theory, Design and a Demonstration’, Parliamentary Affairs, 70:1, 84–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahat, Gideon, Reuven Y. Hazan, and Richard S. Katz (2008). ‘Democracy and Political Parties: On the Uneasy Relationship between Participation, Competition and Representation’, Party Politics, 14:6, 663–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandri, Giulia, Antonella Seddone, and Fulvio Venturino, eds. (2015). Party Primaries in Comparative Perspective. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Scarrow, Susan (2021). ‘Intra-Party Democracy and Party Unity: Varied Rules, Varied Consequences’, Representation, 57:1, 41–57.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, Gijs, and Nathaie Giger (2017). ‘Who Leads the Party? On Membership Size, Selectorates, and Party Oligarchy’, Political Studies, 65:1_suppl, 162–81.
   Google Scholar
• So, Florence (2021). ‘Don’t Air Your Dirty Laundry: Party Leadership Contests and Parliamentary Election Outcomes’, European Journal of Political Research, 60:1, 3–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorlakson, Lori (2009). ‘Patterns of Party Integration, Influence and Autonomy in Seven Federations’, Party Politics, 15:2, 157–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar