Preference cohesion and bargaining satisfaction among Southern EU member states: a comparative perspective

References

• Aksoy, Deniz. (2010). ‘It Takes a Coalition: Coalition Potential and Legislative Decision Making’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 35:4, 519–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aksoy, Deniz. (2012). ‘Institutional Arrangements and Logrolling: Evidence from the European Union’, American Journal of Political Science, 56:3, 538–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arel-Bundock, Vincent. (2022). ‘Modelsummary: Data and Model Summaries in R’, Journal of Statistical Software, 103:1, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arregui, Javier. (2008). ‘Shifting Policy Positions in the European Union’, European Journal of Political Research, 47:6, 852–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arregui, Javier. (2016). ‘Determinants of Bargaining Satisfaction across Policy Domains in the European Union Council of Ministers’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 54:5, 1105–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arregui, Javier, and Clément Perarnaud (2022). ‘A New Dataset on Legislative Decision-Making in the European Union: The DEU III Dataset’, Journal of European Public Policy, 29:1, 12–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arregui, Javier, and Robert Thomson (2009). ‘States’ Bargaining Success in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy, 16:5, 655–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailer, Stefanie. (2004). ‘Bargaining Success in the European Union: The Impact of Exogenous and Endogenous Power Resources’, European Union Politics, 5:1, 99–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, Martin, and Robert Sala (2015). Southern Europe? Italy, Spain, Greece and Portugal from the 1950s to the Present Day. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• BBC News. (2017). Pablo Iglesias: “No queremos ser una colonia de Alemania”, available at https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias/2014/05/140527_espana_entrevista_pablo_iglesias_az.
   Google Scholar
• Black, Duncan. (1958). The Theory of Committees and Democracy. London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and Frans Stokman (1994). European Community Decision Making: Models, Applications and Comparisons. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, James S. (1988). ‘Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital’, American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120. volume
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, Anthony. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• El País. (2014). Norte y sur, ricos y pobres: donde Pablo Iglesias se equivoca sobre Europa, available at https://blogs.elpais.com/cafe-steiner/2014/07/norte-y-sur-ricos-y-pobres-donde-pablo-iglesias-se-equivoca.html
   Google Scholar
• Euractiv. (2022). Italy’s Far-Right Meloni Tells Europe ‘Fun is Over’, available at https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/short_news/italys-far-right-meloni-tells-europe-fun-is-over/
   Google Scholar
• Ferrera, Maurizio. (1996). ‘The “Southern Model” of Welfare in Social Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy, 6:1, 17–37.
   Google Scholar
• Golub, Jonathan. (2012). ‘How the European Union Does Not Work: National Bargaining Success in the Council of Ministers’, Journal of European Public Policy, 19:9, 1294–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häge, Frank M. (2013). ‘Coalition Building and Consensus in the Council of the European Union’, British Journal of Political Science, 43:3, 481–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes-Renshaw, Fiona, and Harriet Wallace (1997). The Council of Ministers. London: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hix, Simon. (1999). ‘Dimensions and Alignments in European Union Politics: Cognitive Constraints and Partisan Responses’, European Journal of Political Research, 35:1, 69–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huhe, Narisong, Daniel Naurin, and Robert Thomson (2018). ‘The Evolution of Political Networks: Evidence from the Council of the European Union’, European Union Politics, 19:1, 25–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huhe, Narisong, Robert Thomson, Javier Arregui, and Daniel Naurin (2022). ‘Intergovernmental Cooperation Networks, National Policy Positions and Partisan Ideologies: Longitudinal Evidence from the Council of the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy, 29:1, 78–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirpsza, Adam. (2020). ‘Better Together? Explaining Poland’s and Germany’s Bargaining Success in EU Lawmaking’, Comparative European Politics, 18:5, 729–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirpsza, Adam. (2023). ‘Quid Pro Quo: The Effect of Issue Linkage on Member States’Bargaining Success in European Union Lawmaking’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 61:2, 323–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krotz, Ulrich, and Joachim Schild (2013). Shaping Europe: France, Germany, and Embedded Bilateralism from the Elysée Treaty to Twenty-First Century Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leuffen, Dirk, Hanno Degner, and Kerstin Radtke (2012). ‘Which Mechanics Drive the “Franco-German Engine”? An Analysis of How and Why France and Germany Have Managed to Shape Much of Today’s EU’, L'Europe en Formation, 366:4, 45–83.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Jeffrey. (2010). ‘How Institutional Environments Facilitate Cooperative Negotiation Styles in EU Decision-Making’, Journal of European Public Policy, 17:5, 648–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgren, Magnus, Stefanie Bailer, Lisa M. Dellmuth, Jonas Tallberg, and Silvana Tarlea (2019). ‘Bargaining Success in the Reform of the Eurozone’, European Union Politics, 20:1, 65–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariano, Nathan, and Christina J. Schneider (2022). ‘Euroscepticism and Bargaining Success in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy, 29:1, 61–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, Andrew. (1995). ‘Liberal Intergovernmentalism and Integration: A Rejoinder’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 33:4, 611–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naurin, Daniel. (2007). ‘Network Capital and Cooperation Patterns in the Working Groups of the Council of the EU’, EUI Working Papers, European University Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Naurin, Daniel. (2015). ‘Generosity in Intergovernmental Negotiations: The Impact of State Power, Pooling and Socialisation in the Council of the European Union’, European Journal of Political Research, 54:4, 726–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naurin, Daniel, and Rutger Lindahl (2008). ‘East–North–South: Coalition-Building in the Council before and after Enlargement’, in Daniel Naurin and Helen Wallace (eds.), Unveiling the Council of the European Union: Games Governments Play in Brussels. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 64–78.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro, Vicente, and Leiyu Shi (2001). ‘The Political Context of Social Inequalities and Health’, Social Science & Medicine, 52:3, 481–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nedergaard, Peter. (2007). ‘Blocking Minorities: Networks and Meaning in the Opposition against the Proposal for a Directive on Temporary Work in the Council of Ministers of the European Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 45:3, 695–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2020). Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes – Supplementary Peer Review Report, Phase 2, Cyprus, available at https://www.oecd.org/countries/cyprus/jurisdictions-committed-to-improving-transparency-and-establishing-effective-exchange-of-information-in-tax-matters.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Oxfam. (2017). Oxfam iLibrary, available at https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10546/620383/bn-blacklist-whitewash-tax-havens-eu-281117-en.pdf?sequence=9&isAllowed=y.
   Google Scholar
• Perarnaud, Clément, and Javier Arregui (2022). ‘Do Member States’ Permanent Representations Matter for Their Bargaining Success? Evidence from the EU Council of Ministers’, Journal of European Public Policy, 29:1, 97–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, John. (1995). ‘Decision-Making in the European Union: Towards a Framework for Analysis’, Journal of European Public Policy, 2:1, 69–93.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, Mark A. (1994). ‘Creeping Competence: The Expanding Agenda of the European Community’, Journal of Public Policy, 14:2, 95–145.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, Robert D. (1993). Making Democracy Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selck, Torsten J., and Michael Kaeding (2004). ‘Divergent Interests and Different Success Rates: France, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom in EU Legislative Negotiations’, French Politics, 2:1, 81–95.
   Google Scholar
• Selck, Torsten J., and Sanneke Kuipers (2005). ‘Shared Hesitance, Joint Success: Denmark, Finland, and Sweden in the European Union Policy Process’, Journal of European Public Policy, 12:1, 157–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Economist. (2022). Southern Europe is reforming itself, available at https://www.economist.com/europe/2022/02/03/southern-europe-is-reforming-itself.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, Robert. (2009). ‘Actor Alignments in the European Union before and after Enlargement’, European Journal of Political Research, 48:6, 756–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, Robert. (2011). Resolving Controversy in the European Union: Legislative Decision- Making Before and After Enlargement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, Robert, Javier Arregui, Dirk Leuffen, Rory Costello, James Cross, Robin Hertz, and Thomas Jensen (2012). ‘A New Dataset on Decision-Making in the European Union before and after the 2004 and 2007 Enlargements’, Journal of European Public Policy, 19:4, 604–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, Robert, Jovanka Boerefijn, and Frans Stokman (2004). ‘Actor Alignments in European Union Decision Making’, European Journal of Political Research, 43:2, 237–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, Robert, and Frans Stokman (2006). ‘Research Design: Measuring Actors’ Positions, Saliences, and Capabilities’, in Robert Thomson, Frans Stokman & Christopher H. Achen (eds.), The European Union Decides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 25–53.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, Robert, Frans Stokman, Christopher H. Achen, and Thomas König (2006). The European Union Decides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warntjen, Andreas. (2017). ‘Do Votes Matter? Voting Weights and the Success Probability of Member State Requests in the Council of the European Union’, Journal of European Integration, 39:6, 673–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar