271
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Mummy’s girls, daddy’s boys: the gendered transmission of political engagement in families

, &

References

  • Acock, Alan C., and Vern L. Bengtson (1980). ‘Socialization and Attribution Processes: Actual versus Perceived Similarity among Parents and Youth’, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42:3, 501–15.
  • Aldous, Joan, and Ruben Hill (1965). ‘Social Cohesion, Lineage Type, and Intergenerational Transmission’, Social Forces, 43:4, 471–82.
  • Arens, A. Katrin, and Rainer Watermann (2017). ‘Political Efficacy in Adolescence: Development, Gender Differences, and Outcome Relations’, Developmental Psychology, 53:5, 933–48.
  • Bandura, Albert (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
  • Bandura, Albert, and Dale H. Schunk (1981). ‘Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest through Proximal Self-Motivation’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41:3, 586–98.
  • Beaumont, Elizabeth (2011). ‘Promoting Political Agency, Addressing Political Inequality: A Multilevel Model of Internal Political Efficacy’, The Journal of Politics, 73:1, 216–31.
  • Beckwith, Karen (1986). American Women and Political Participation. New York: Greenwood Press.
  • Bennett, Linda L. M., and Stephen Earl Bennett (1989). ‘Enduring Gender Differences in Political Interest. The Impact of Socialisation and Political Dispositions’, American Politics Quarterly, 17:1, 105–22.
  • Bhatti, Yosef, and Kasper M. Hansen (2012). ‘Leaving the Nest and the Social Act of Voting: Turnout among First-Time Voters’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 22:4, 380–406.
  • Bos, Angela L., Jill S. Greenlee, Mirya R. Holman, Zoe M. Oxley, and J. Celeste Lay (2022). ‘This One’s for the Boys: How Gendered Political Socialization Limits Girls’ Political Ambition and Interest’, American Political Science Review, 116:2, 484–501.
  • Burns, Nancy, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Sidney Verba (2001). The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality, and Political Participation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Campbell, David E., and Christina Wolbrecht (2006). ‘See Jane Run: Women Politicians as Role Models for Adolescents’, The Journal of Politics, 68:2, 233–47.
  • Carlson, Daniel L., and Chris Knoester (2011). ‘Family Structure and the Intergenerational Transmission of Gender Ideology’, Journal of Family Issues, 32:6, 709–34.
  • Chen, Chen, Gerhard Sonnert, and Philip M. Sadler (2020). ‘The Effect of First High School Science Teacher’s Gender and Gender Matching on Students’ Science Identity in College’, Science Education, 104:1, 75–99.
  • Chung, Jennifer (2015). ‘International Comparison and Educational Policy Learning: Looking North to Finland’, A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 45:3, 475–9.
  • Dahlgaard, Jens Olav (2018). ‘Trickle-Up Political Socialization: The Causal Effect on Turnout of Parenting a Newly Enfranchised Voter’, American Political Science Review, 112:3, 698–705.
  • Dalton, Russell J. (1982). ‘The Pathways of Parental Socialization’, American Politics Quarterly, 10:2, 139–57.
  • Dinas, Elias (2014). ‘Why Does the Apple Fall Far from the Tree? How Early Political Socialization Prompts Parent-Child Dissimilarity’, British Journal of Political Science, 44:4, 827–52.
  • Eurostat (2019). How Do Women and Men Use Their Time – Statistics, available at https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=How_do_women_and_men_use_their_time_-_statistics&oldid=463738 (accessed 20 July 2023).
  • Faircloth, Charlotte (2014). ‘Intensive Parenting and the Expansion of Parenting’, in Ellie Lee, Jennie Bristow, Charlotte Faircloth and Jan Macvarish (eds.), Parenting Culture Studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 25–50.
  • Filler, Nicole, and M. Kent Jennings (2015). ‘Familial Origins of Gender Role Attitudes’, Politics & Gender, 11:01, 27–54.
  • Fox, Richard L. (1997). Gender Dynamics in Congressional Elections. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Fox, Richard L., and Jennifer L. Lawless (2005). ‘To Run or Not to Run for Office: Explaining Nascent Political Ambition’, American Journal of Political Science, 49:3, 642–59.
  • Frazer, Elizabeth, and Kenneth MacDonald (2003). ‘Sex Differences in Political Knowledge in Britain’, Political Studies, 51:1, 67–83.
  • Gidengil, Elisabeth, Janine Giles, and Melanee Thomas (2008). ‘The Gender Gap in Self-Perceived Understanding of Politics in Canada and the United States’, Politics & Gender, 4:04, 535–61.
  • Gidengil, Elisabeth, Brenda O'Neill, and Lisa Young (2010). ‘Her Mother’s Daughter? The Influence of Childhood Socialization on Women’s Political Engagement’, Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 31:4, 334–55.
  • Glass, Jennifer, Vern L. Bengtson, and Charlotte C. Dunham (1986). ‘Attitude Similarity in Three-Generation Families: Socialization, Status Inheritance, or Reciprocal Influence?’, American Sociological Review, 51:5, 685–98.
  • Hatemi, Peter K., and Rose McDermott (2012). ‘The Genetics of Politics: Discovery, Challenges, and Progress’, Trends in Genetics: TIG, 28:10, 525–33.
  • Hatemi, Peter K., and Christopher Ojeda (2021). ‘The Role of Child Perception and Motivation in Political Socialization’, British Journal of Political Science, 51:3, 1097–118.
  • Hess, Diana, and Paula McAvoy (2014). The Political Classroom: Evidence and Ethics in Democratic Education. New York: Routledge.
  • Hess, Robert, and Judith Torney (1967). The Development of Political Attitudes in Children. Chicago: Aldine.
  • Hill, John P., and Mary E. Lynch (1983). ‘The Intensification of Gender–Related Role Expectations during Early Adolescence’, in Jeanne Brooks–Gunn and Anne C. Petersen (eds.), Girls at Puberty: Biological and Psychological Perspectives. New York: Plenum Press, 201–28.
  • Hooghe, Marc, and Dietlind Stolle (2004). ‘Good Girls Go to the Polling Booth, Bad Boys Go Everywhere: Gender Differences in Anticipated Political Participation among American Fourteen-Year-Olds’, Women & Politics, 26:3-4, 1–23.
  • Hoskins, Bryony, Gema García-Albacete, and Agnès Hubert (2023). Gender Gap in Confidence to Get Involved in Politics. YOUNG-IN Network, Policy Brief No. 5, available at https://www.tlu.ee/sites/default/files/Young-In/Policy_brief_05_v6.pdf (accessed 19 July 2023).
  • Jacobs, Janis E., Stephanie Lanza, D. Wayne Osgood, Jacquelynne S. Eccles, and Allan Wigfield (2002). ‘Changes in Children’s Self-Competence and Values: Gender and Domain Differences across Grades One through Twelve’, Child Development, 73:2, 509–27.
  • Jennings, M. Kent, Laura Stoker, and Jake Bowers (2009). ‘Politics across Generations: Family Transmission Reexamined’, The Journal of Politics, 71:3, 782–99.
  • Kahn, Kim Fridkin (1993). ‘Gender Differences in Campaign Messages: The Political Advertisements of Men and Women Candidates for U.S. Senate’, Political Research Quarterly, 46:3, 481–502.
  • Karv, Thomas, Marina Lindell, and Lauri Rapeli (2022). ‘How Context Matters: The Significance of Political Homogeneity and Language for Political Efficacy’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 45:1, 46–67.
  • Kosunen, Sonja, Venla Bernelius, Piia Seppänen, and Miina Porkka (2020). ‘School Choice to Lower Secondary Schools and Mechanisms of Segregation in Urban Finland’, Urban Education, 55:10, 1461–88.
  • Lay, J. Celeste, Mirya R. Holman, Angela L. Bos, Jill S. Greenlee, Zoe M. Oxley, and Allison Buffett (2021). ‘TIME for Kids to Learn Gender Stereotypes: Analysis of Gender and Political Leadership in a Common Social Studies Resource for Children’, Politics & Gender, 17:1, 1–22.
  • Mansbridge, Jane (1999). ‘Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent “Yes”’, The Journal of Politics, 61:3, 628–57.
  • Marsh, Herbert W., Ulrich Trautwein, Oliver Lüdtke, Olaf Köller, and Jürgen Baumert (2005). ‘Academic Self-Concept, Interest, Grades, and Standardized Test Scores: Reciprocal Effects Models of Causal Ordering’, Child Development, 76:2, 397–416.
  • McDewitt, Michael, and Steven Chaffée (2002). ‘From Top-Down to Trickle-Up Influence: Revisiting Assumptions about the Family in Political Socialization’, Political Communication, 19:3, 281–301.
  • Møller, Line Christmas, Ulla Agerskov, and Anna Rosenberg (2021). Nordic Gender Equality in Figures 2021. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.
  • Mondak, Jeffrey J., and Mary R. Anderson (2004). ‘The Knowledge Gap: A Reexamination of Gender-Based Differences in Political Knowledge’, The Journal of Politics, 66:2, 492–512.
  • Neundorf, Anja, Kaat Smets, and Gema M. Garcia-Albacete (2013). ‘Homemade Citizens: The Development of Political Interest during Adolescence and Young Adulthood’, Acta Politica, 48:1, 92–116.
  • Nielsen, Linda (2011). ‘Divorced Fathers and Their Daughters: A Review of Recent Research’, Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 52:2, 77–93.
  • Niemi, Richard G., Stephen C. Craig, and Franco Mattei (1991). ‘Measuring Internal Political Efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study’, American Political Science Review, 85:4, 1407–13.
  • O’Bryan, Megan, Harold D. Fishbein, and P. Neal Ritchey (2004). ‘Intergenerational Transmission of Prejudice, Sex-Role Stereotyping, and Intolerance’, Adolescence, 39:155, 407–26.
  • O’Grady, Tom (2023). ‘Is Ideological Polarisation by Age Group Growing in Europe?’, European Journal of Political Research, 62:4, 1389–1402.
  • Ojeda, Christopher, and Peter K. Hatemi (2015). ‘Accounting for the Child in the Transmission of Party Identification’, American Sociological Review, 80:6, 1150–74.
  • Oxley, Zoe M. (2017). ‘Gender and the Socialization of Party Identification’, in Angela L. Bos, and Monica C. Schneider (eds.), The Political Psychology of Women in US Politics. London: Routledge, 15–33.
  • Phillips, Joseph (2022). ‘Affective Polarization: Over Time, through the Generations, and during the Lifespan’, Political Behavior, 44:3, 1483–508.
  • Prior, Markus (2010). ‘You’ve Either Got It or You Don’t? The Stability of Political Interest over the Life Cycle’, The Journal of Politics, 72:3, 747–66.
  • Quintelier, Ellen (2015). ‘Engaging Adolescents in Politics: The Longitudinal Effect of Political Socialization Agents’, Youth & Society, 47:1, 51–69.
  • Raley, Sara, and Suzanne Bianchi (2006). ‘Sons, Daughters, and Family Processes: Does Gender of Children Matter?’, Annual Review of Sociology, 32:1, 401–21.
  • Roest, Annette M. C., Judith Semon Dubas, and Jan R. M. Gerris (2010). ‘Value Transmissions between Parents and Children: Gender and Developmental Phase as Transmission Belts’, Journal of Adolescence, 33:1, 21–31.
  • Sapiro, Virginia (2004). ‘Not Your Parents’ Political Socialization: Introduction for a New Generation’, Annual Review of Political Science, 7:1, 1–23.
  • Sayer, Liana C., Suzanne M. Bianchi, and John P. Robinson (2004). ‘Are Parents Investing Less in Children? Trends in Mothers’ and Fathers’ Time with Children’, American Journal of Sociology, 110:1, 1–43.
  • Shulman, Hillary C., and David C. DeAndrea (2014). ‘Predicting Success: Revisiting Assumptions about Family Political Socialization’, Communication Monographs, 81:3, 386–406.
  • Siegel-Stechler, Kelly (2021). ‘Parent Encouragement and Young Adult Voting Behavior: A Potential Outcomes Approach’, Youth & Society, 53:5, 764–83.
  • Sohl, Sofia, and Cecilia Arensmeier (2015). ‘The School’s Role in Youths’ Political Efficacy: Can School Provide a Compensatory Boost to Students’ Political Efficacy?’, Research Papers in Education, 30:2, 133–63.
  • Statistics Finland (2021). Pupils in Comprehensive Schools, 2020–2021, available at https://graf2.stat.fi/PxWeb/pxweb/en/StatFin/StatFin__opiskt/statfin_opiskt_pxt_133w.px/. (accessed 19 July 2023).
  • Swers, Michele L. (2002). The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M., and Roseanna Michelle Heath (2003). ‘Do Women Legislators Have Different Policy Priorities Than Their Male Colleagues?’, Women & Politics, 24:4, 77–101.
  • Thomas, Melanee (2012). ‘The Complexity Conundrum: Why Hasn’t the Gender Gap in Subjective Political Efficacy Closed?’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 45:2, 337–58.
  • UN Human Rights (2023). Gender Equality and Gender Backlash, available at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/special-procedures/wg-women-and-girls/gender-equality-and-gender-backlash. (accessed 4 August 2023).
  • Vecchione, Michele, and Gian V. Caprara (2009). ‘Personality Determinants of Political Participation: The Contribution of Traits and Self–Efficacy Beliefs’, Personality and Individual Differences, 46:4, 487–92.
  • Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Nancy Burns (2005). ‘Family Ties: Understanding the Intergenerational Transmission of Political Participation’, in Alan S. Zuckerman (ed.), The Social Logic of Politics: Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 95–114.
  • Walsh, Katherine Cramer (2002). ‘Enlarging Representation: Women Bringing Marginalized Perspectives to Floor Debate in the House of Representatives’, in Cindy Simon Rosenthal (ed.), Women Transforming Congress. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 370–96.
  • Warren, Ron, and Rober H. Wicks (2011). ‘Political Socialization: Modeling Teen Political and Civic Engagement’, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88:1, 156–75.
  • Weiss, Julia (2023). ‘Intergenerational Transmission of Left-Right Ideology: A Question of Gender and Parenting Style?’, Frontiers in Political Science, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2023.1080543
  • Wolak, Jennifer (2020). ‘Self-Confidence and Gender Gaps in Political Interest, Attention, and Efficacy’, The Journal of Politics, 82:4, 1490–501.
  • Wolbrecht, Christina, and David E. Campbell (2007). ‘Leading by Example: Female Members of Parliament as Political Role Models’, American Journal of Political Science, 51:4, 921–39.
  • Wray-Lake, Laura (2019). ‘How Do Young People Become Politically Engaged?’, Child Development Perspectives, 13:2, 127–32.
  • Zaff, Jonathan F., Kei Kawashima-Ginsberg, Emily S. Lin, Michael Lamb, Aida Balsano, and Richard M. Lerner (2011). ‘Developmental Trajectories of Civic Engagement across Adolescence: Disaggregation of an Integrated Construct’, Journal of Adolescence, 34:6, 1207–20.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.