When does the parliamentary opposition take to the streets? Social protest against government COVID-19 policy

References

• Aminzade, Ronald R., Jack A. Goldstone, Doug McAdam, Elizabeth J. Perry, William H. Sewell, Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly (2001). Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berg-Scholosser, Dirk, Gisèle De Meur, Benoît Rihoux, and Charles C. Ragin (2009). ‘Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) as an Approach’, in Benoît Rihoux and Charles C. Ragin (eds.), Configurational Comparative Methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Blondel, Jean (1997). ‘Political Opposition in the Contemporary World’, Government and Opposition, 32:4, 462–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boin, Arjen, Allan McConnell, and Paul’t Hart (2021). Governing the Pandemic: The Politics of Navigating a Mega-Crisis. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bolleyer, Nicole, and Orsolya Salát (2021). ‘Parliaments in Times of Crisis: COVID-19, Populism and Executive Dominance’, West European Politics, 44:5–6, 1103–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brack, Nathalie, and Sharon Weinblum (2011). ‘Political Opposition: Towards a Renewed Research Agenda’, Interdisciplinary Political Studies, 1, 69–79. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1870985
   Google Scholar
• Caiani, Manuela, and Paolo Graziano (2022). ‘The Three Faces of Populism in Power: Polity, Policies and Politics’, Government and Opposition, 57:4, 569–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert (1966). ‘Patterns of Opposition’, in Robert A. Dahl (ed.), Political Opposition in Western Democracies. New Haven: Yale University Press, 332–47.
   Google Scholar
• De Giorgi, Elisabetta, and Gabriella Ilonszki (2018). Opposition Parties in European Legislatures: Conflict or Consensus? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eberl, Jakob-Moritz, Robert A. Huber, and Esther Greussing (2021). ‘From Populism to the “Plandemic”: Why Populists Believe in COVID-19 Conspiracies’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 31:supp 1, 272–84.
   Google Scholar
• Galais, Carol, and Marc Guinjoan (2022). ‘The Ideological Slant of COVID-19-Related Conspiracies: A New Niche for the Far-Right?’, Representation, 59:2, 347–56.
   Google Scholar
• Galanopoulos, Antonis, and Giorgos Venizelos (2022). ‘Anti-Populism and Populist Hype during the COVID-19 Pandemic’, Representation, 58:2, 251–68.
   Google Scholar
• Garritzmann, Julian (2017). ‘How Much Power Do Oppositions Have? Comparing the Opportunity Structures of Parliamentary Oppositions in 21 Democracies’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 23:1, 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilljam, Mikael, Mikael Persson, and David Karlsson (2012). ‘Representatives’ Attitudes toward Citizen Protests in Sweden: The Impact of Ideology, Parliamentary Position, and Experiences’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 37:2, 251–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Protest Tracker (2021). ‘Carnegie Endowment for International Peace’, available at https://carnegieendowment.org/publications/interactive/protest-tracker#.
   Google Scholar
• Grzymala-Busse, Anna, and Michael McFaul (2020a). ‘“Votes for Populists” Database’, Global Populisms Project, Stanford University, available at https://fsi.stanford.edu/global-populisms/content/vote-populists.
   Google Scholar
• Grzymala-Busse, Anna, and Michael McFaul (2020b). ‘Votes for Populists’ Codebook’, Global Populisms Project, Stanford University, available at https://fsi-live.s3.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/votes_for_populists_codebook_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, Muhammad Ahmad (2018). ‘Protesting on the Streets While in Parliament? Exploring Extra-Parliamentary Activity on the within-System Political Party in Pakistan’, M.A. Thesis. Central European University, Department of Political Science, available at https://www.etd.ceu.edu/2018/hassan_muhammad.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, Kirk, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser (2017). ‘The Ideational Approach to Populism’, Latin American Research Review, 52:4, 513–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helms, Ludger (2023). ‘Political Oppositions in Democratic and Authoritarian Regimes: A State-of-the-Field(s) Review’, Government and Opposition, 58:2, 391–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohendorf, Lucas, Thomas Saalfeld, and Ulrich Sieberer (2021). ‘Veto Power Fosters Cooperative Behaviour: Institutional Incentives and Government-Opposition Voting in the German Bundestag’, West European Politics, 44:4, 921–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunger, Sophia, and Fred Paxton (2022). ‘What’s in a Buzzword? A Systematic Review of the State of Populism Research in Political Science’, Political Science Research and Methods, 10:3, 617–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilonszki, Gabriella, Francesco Marangoni, and Anna M. Palau (2021). ‘Can Opposition Parties Be Responsible?’, Parliamentary Affairs, 74:3, 722–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imhoff, Roland, Felix Zimmer, Olivier Klein, João H. C. António, Maria Babinska, Adrian Bangerter, Michal Bilewicz, et al. (2022). ‘Conspiracy Mentality and Political Orientation across 26 Countries’, Nature Human Behaviour, 6:3, 392–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inter Parliamentary Union (1999). Guidelines on the Rights and Duties of the Opposition in Parliament. Geneva: Inter Parliamentary Union, http://archive.ipu.org/dem-e/opposition.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Küppers, Anne, and Marion Reiser (2022). ‘Ideological Extremism or Far-Right Attitudes? The Role of Ideology for COVID-19 Scepticism’, Representation, 58:4, 481–99.
   Google Scholar
• Louwerse, Tom, Ulrich Sieberer, Or Tuttnauer, and Rudy B. Andeweg (2021). ‘Opposition in Times of Crisis: COVID-19 in Parliamentary Debates’, West European Politics, 44:5–6, 1025–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeda, Ko (2015). ‘Determinants of Opposition Fragmentation: Parliamentary Rules and Opposition Strategies’, Party Politics, 21:5, 763–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, Doug, Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly (2001). Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McClean, Charles (2021). ‘The Element of Surprise: Election Timing and Opposition Preparedness’, Comparative Political Studies, 54:11, 1984–2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijers, Maurits J., and Andrej Zaslove (2020). ‘Populism and Political Parties Expert Survey 2018 (POPPA)’, Harvard Dataverse, V2, UNF:6:yluUOQd + XF9eaKPExGQAEA== [fileUNF]
   Google Scholar
• Meijers, Maurits J., and Andrej Zaslove (2021). ‘Measuring Populism in Political Parties: Appraisal of a New Approach’, Comparative Political Studies, 54:2, 372–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meka, Eltion (2022). ‘How Much Opposition? Political Fragmentation and Changes in Democracy’, Contemporary Politics, 28:5, 517–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelle, Silvia R., and Nicoletta C. Pasquale (2021). ‘The Lasting Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Support for anti-Democratic Political Systems: A Six-Month Longitudinal Study’, Social Science Quarterly, 102, 2285–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkenberg, Michael (2007). ‘The Radical Right in Public Office: Agenda-Setting and Policy Effects’, West European Politics, 24:4, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas (2004). ‘The Populist Zeitgeist’, Government and Opposition, 39:4, 541–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas (2007). Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas (2019). The Far-Right Today. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Melanie, and Pascal D. König (2021). ‘Timing in Opposition Party Support under Minority Government’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 44:2, 220–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa (2020). ‘Global Party Survey, 2021’, Harvard Dataverse, V3, UNF:6:ZJDKjnJskyudaqjUu98PPw==. [fileUNF].
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa (2020a). ‘Measuring Populism Worldwide’, Party Politics, 26:6, 697–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa, Richard W. Frank, and Ferrán Martínez i Coma (eds.) (2015). Contentious Elections. From Ballots to Barricades. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa, and Ronald Inglehart (2019). Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Authoritarian-Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, Philip (2008). ‘Making Sense of Opposition’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 14:1–2, 236–50.
   Google Scholar
• Paxton, Fred (2022). ‘With a Little Help from Their Friends: The Consequences of Populists in National Government for Policymaking in Local Government’, Government and Opposition, 57:4, 630–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirro, Andrea (2022). ‘Performing (during) the Coronavirus Crisis: The Italian Populist Radical Right between National Opposition and Subnational Government’, Government and Opposition, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2022.28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PRECEDE (2021). ‘Populism’s Roots: Economic and Cultural Explanations in Democracies of Europe (PRECEDE). Research Agenda, Concepts, and Data’, Working Paper and Publications, available at https://precede.eu/index.php/working-paper-publications/.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, Charles (1987). The Comparative Method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, Charles (2006). ‘The Limitations of the Net-Effects Thinking’, in Benoît Rihoux and Heike Grimm (eds.), Innovative Comparative Methods for Policy Analysis. Beyond the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide. New York: Springer, 13–42.
   Google Scholar
• Reicher, Stephen, and Clifford Stott (2020). ‘On Order and Disorder during the COVID-19 Pandemic’, The British Journal of Social Psychology, 59:3, 694–702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rihoux, Benoît, and Charles Ragin (eds.) (2009). Configurational Comparative Methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Rihoux, Benoît, and Axel Marx (2013). ‘Qualitative Comparative Analysis at 25: State of Play and Agenda’, Political Research Quarterly, 66:1, 167–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohlfing, Ingo (2020). ‘The Choice between Crisp and Fuzzy Sets in Qualitative Comparative Analysis and the Ambiguous Consequences for Finding Consistent Set Relations’, Field Methods, 32:1, 75–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, Matthijs (2019). ‘The PopuList: An Overview of Populist, Far Right, Far Left and Eurosceptic Parties in Europe’, available at https://www.popu-list.org.
   Google Scholar
• Rydgren, Jens (2018). ‘The Radical Right: An Introduction’, in Jens Rydgren (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right. New York: Oxford University Press, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, Giovanni (1976). Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwalbach, Jan (2022). ‘Going in Circles? The Influence of the Electoral Cycle on the Party Behaviour in Parliament’, European Political Science Review, 14:1, 36–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, Carsten Q., and Claudius Wagemann (2012). Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Serban, Ruxandra (2022). ‘How Are Prime Ministers Held to Account? Exploring Procedures and Practices in 31 Parliamentary Democracies’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 28:2, 155–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taggart, Paul (2002). ‘Populism and the Pathology of Representative Politics’, in Yves Mény and Surel Yves (eds.), Democracies and the Populist Challenge. London: Palgrave MacMillan, 62–80.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, Sidney (2011). Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tuttnauer, Or (2018). ‘If You Can Beat Them, Confront Them: Party-Level Analysis of Opposition Behavior in European National Parliaments’, European Union Politics, 19:2, 278–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venice Commission (2019). ‘Parameters on the Relationship between the Parliamentary Majority and the Opposition in a Democracy: A Checklist’, available at https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-AD(2019)015-e.
   Google Scholar
• Wegmann, Simone (2022). ‘Policy-Making Power of Opposition Players: A Comparative Institutional Perspective’, Journal of Legislative Studies, 28:1, 1–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wondreys, Jakub, and Cass Mudde (2022). ‘Victims of the Pandemic? European Far-Right Parties and COVID’, Nationalities Papers, 50:1, 86–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar