The broad-appeal strategy and policy representation

References

• Bawn, Kathleen, and Frances Rosenbluth (2006). ‘Short Versus Long Coalitions: Electoral Accountability and the Size of the Public Sector’, American Journal of Political Science, 50:2, 251–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman, Matthew E., and Henry Flatt (2021). ‘Broad-Appeal Agendas: Issue Diversity and the Centre-Right’s Electoral Success’, Electoral Studies, 70:102272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clasen, Jochen, and Nico A. Siegel (2007). Investigating Welfare State Change: The ‘Dependent Variable Problem’ in Comparative Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fortunato, David, Lanny W. Martin, and Georg Vanberg (2019). ‘Committee Chairs and Legislative Review in Parliamentary Democracies’, British Journal of Political Science, 49:2, 785–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, Zachary (2016). ‘Competing on the Issues: How Experience in Government and Economic Conditions Influence the Scope of Parties’ Policy Messages’, Party Politics, 22:6, 809–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, Kyung Joon (2021). ‘Who Refuses Ambiguity? Voters’ Issue Salience and the Electoral Effect of Party Position Ambiguity’, Comparative European Politics, 20:1, 73–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, Alexander, and Carsten Jensen (2017). ‘When and Why Politicians Do Not Keep Their Welfare Promises’, European Journal of Political Research, 56:2, 381–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Richard I. Hofferbert, and Ian Budge (1994). Parties, Policies, and Democracy. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lefevere, Jonas (2023). ‘Is There Clarity in Ambiguity? A Literature Review of Party’s Positional Ambiguity’, Party Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688231151906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, Roni, and Nick Lin (2020). ‘Everything to Everyone? Not When You Are Internally Divided’, Party Politics, 26:6, 783–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Nick, and Roni Lehrer (2021). ‘Everything to Everyone and the Conditioning Effect of Intraparty Cohesion: A Replication in a Cross-National Context’, Party Politics, 27:5, 909–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Lanny W., and Georg Vanberg (2014). ‘Parties and Policymaking in Multiparty Governments: The Legislative Median, Ministerial Autonomy, and the Coalition Compromise’, American Journal of Political Science, 58:4, 979–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthieß, Theres (2020). ‘Retrospective Pledge Voting: A Comparative Study of the Electoral Consequences of Government Parties’ Pledge Fulfilment’, European Journal of Political Research, 59:4, 774–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, Michael D., and Ian Budge (2005). Elections, Parties, Democracy: Conferring the Median Mandat. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, Michael D., Silvia M. Mendes, and Ian Budge (2004). ‘What Are Elections for? Conferring the Median Mandate’, British Journal of Political Science, 34:1, 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasr, Mohamed (2022). ‘Varieties of Ambiguity: How Do Voters Evaluate Ambiguous Policy Statements?’, Comparative Political Studies, 56:6, 759–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naurin, Elin, Terry J. Royed, and Robert Thomson (eds.) (2019). Party Mandates and Democracy: Making, Breaking, and Keeping Election Pledges in Twelve Countries. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin, Hanna (1967). The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, G. Bingham (2000). Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, G. Bingham (2006). ‘Election Laws and Representative Governments: Beyond Votes and Seats’, British Journal of Political Science, 36:2, 291–315.
   Google Scholar
• Praprotnik, Katrin, and Laurenz Ennser-Jedenastik (2023). ‘Ambiguity and Vagueness in Party Competition’, Party Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688231195272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovny, Jan (2012). ‘Who Emphasizes and Who Blurs? Party Strategies in Multidimensional Competition’, European Union Politics, 13:2, 269–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scruggs, Lyle (2022). ‘Comparative Welfare Entitlements Project Data Set, Version 2022-01’, http://cwep.us/.
   Google Scholar
• Somer-Topcu, Zeynep (2015). ‘Everything to Everyone: The Electoral Consequences of the Broad-Appeal Strategy in Europe’, American Journal of Political Science, 59:4, 841–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, Robert, Terry Royed, Elin Naurin, Joaqín Artés, Rory Costello, Laurenz Ennser-Jedenastik, Mark Ferguson, Petia Kostadinova, Catherine Moury, François Pétry, and Katrin Praprotnik (2017). ‘The Fulfillment of Parties’ Election Pledges: A Comparative Study on the Impact of Power Sharing’, American Journal of Political Science, 61:3, 527–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Heck, Sjoerd (2018). ‘Appealing Broadly or Narrowing down? The Impact of Government Experience and Party Organization on the Scope of Parties’ Issue Agendas’, Party Politics, 24:4, 347–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Eijk, Cees (2001). ‘Measuring Agreement in Ordered Rating Scales’, Quality and Quantity, 35:3, 325–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar