The legal mobilisation of EU market freedoms: strategic action or random noise?

References

• 11KBW (2019). ‘We Pay Tribute to Our Friend and Colleague Adrian Lynch KC’, available at https://www.11kbw.com/knowledge-events/news/adrian-lynch-qc-2/ (accessed 15 September 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Agell Advokatbyrå (n.d). ‘Employment Law Firm in Stockholm’, available at https://agell.se/in-english/ (accessed 15 September 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Arnholtz, Jens, and Nathan Lillie (2019). ‘European Integration and the Reconfiguration of National Industrial Relations’, in Jens Arnholtz and Nathan Lillie (eds.), Posted Work in the European Union. London: Routledge, 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Azoulai, Loïc (2008). ‘The Court of Justice and the Social Market Economy’, Common Market Law Review, 45:5, 1335–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard, Catherine (2008). ‘Viking and Laval: An Introduction’, Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 10, 463–92.
   Google Scholar
• Barnard, Catherine (2014). ‘More Posting’, Industrial Law Journal, 43:2, 194–211.
   Google Scholar
• Barnard, Catherine (2016). ‘The Calm after the Storm: Time to Reflect on EU (Labour) Law Scholarship’, in Alan Bogg, Cathryn Costello, and Anne C. L. Davies (eds.), Research Handbook on EU Labour Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 337–62.
   Google Scholar
• Bayer, Walter, and Thomas Hoffmann (2018). ‘Das „Erzberger-Portfolio“ und das Mitbestimmungs-Screening der deutschen AG-Landschaft’, Die Aktiengesellschaft, 63:23, r336–r341.
   Google Scholar
• Behlau, Catrin (2019). ‘Axel Springer setzt sich mit Hengeler gegen Erzberger durch’, juve.de, 16.05.2019.
   Google Scholar
• Behme, Caspar (2013). ‘Kurzkommentar zu LG Landau in der Pfalz, Beschluss vom 18.9.2013, HK O 27/13’, Entscheidungen zum Wirtschaftsrecht, 2013:24, 787–8.
   Google Scholar
• Behme, Caspar (n.d). ‘Zur Person’, available at https://cbehme.eu/person (accessed 15 September 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Behrens, Sonja (2014). ‘Orrick erzielt Einschränkung der Mindestlohnregelung’, juve.de 19.09.2014.
   Google Scholar
• Blauberger, Michael (2012). ‘With Luxembourg in Mind … the Remaking of National Policies in the Face of ECJ Jurisprudence’, Journal of European Public Policy, 19:1, 109–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogg, Alan, Cathryn Costello, and Anne C. L. Davies (2016). ‘‘Editors’ Introduction’, in Alan Bogg, Cathryn Costello, and Anne C. L. Davies (eds.), Research Handbook on EU Labour Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Brandhoff Obermüller Partner (n.d). ‘Dr. Caspar Behme’, available at https://bop.legal/team/dr-caspar-behme/ (accessed 9 March 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Caporaso, James A., and Sidney Tarrow (2009). ‘Polanyi in Brussels: Supranational Institutions and the Transnational Embedding of Markets’, International Organization, 63:4, 593–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers and Partners (n.d). ‘Lawyer Profile: Wolfram Krohn’, available at https://chambers.com/lawyer/wolfram-krohn-europe-7:1400119 (accessed 15 September 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Cichowski, Rachel A. (2007). The European Court and Civil Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conant, Lisa (2002). Justice Contained. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conant, Lisa, Andreas Hofmann, Dagmar Soennecken, and Lisa Vanhala (2018). ‘Mobilizing European Law’, Journal of European Public Policy, 25:9, 1376–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielsson, Anna (2005). ‘Svenskt Näringsliv backar upp lettiska Laval’, Svenska Dagbladet 14.05.2005.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Anne C. L., Alan Bogg, and Cathryn Costello (2016). ‘The Role of the Court of Justice in Labour Law’, in Alan Bogg, Cathryn Costello, and Anne C. L. Davies (eds.), Research Handbook on EU Labour Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 114–49.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Gareth T., and Dion Kramer (2021). ‘The Posting of Workers’, SSRN Electronic Journal, available at https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3939196 (accessed 2 December 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Dermine, Elise, Vanessa de Greef, and Pascale Vielle (2020). ‘Dossier: Hommage à Eliane Vogel-Polsky’, e-legal: Revue de droit et de criminologie de l'Université libre de Bruxelles, 3.
   Google Scholar
• DGB Rechtsschutz (n.d). ‘Das Gewerkschaftliche Centrum für Revision und Europäisches Recht’, available at https://www.dgbrechtsschutz.de/wir/organisation/gewerkschaftliches-centrum/ (accessed 15 September 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Eklund, Ronnie (2008). ‘A Swedish Perspective on Laval’, Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 29:4, 551–72.
   Google Scholar
• Emmert, R. Betsy (2018). ‘The Corporate Clique in the Courtroom’, University of Cincinnati Law Review, 87:1, 227–50.
   Google Scholar
• Esslinger, Detlef (2017). ‘Weg da!’, Sueddeutsche Zeitung, 23.01.2017, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Evans Case, Rhonda, and Terri E. Givens (2010). ‘Re-Engineering Legal Opportunity Structures in the European Union?’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48:2, 221–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evju, Stein (2014). ‘Norway’, in Mark Freedland and Jeremias Prassl (eds.), Viking, Laval and Beyond. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 211–28.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, David L. (2009). ‘What Kind of Business-Friendly Court’, Santa Clara Law Review, 49:4, 1019–61.
   Google Scholar
• Freedland, Mark, and Jeremias Prassl, eds. (2014). Viking, Laval and Beyond. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Galanter, Marc (1974). ‘Why the “Haves” Come out Ahead’, Law & Society Review, 9:1, 95–160.
   Google Scholar
• Garben, Sacha (2017). ‘The Constitutional (Im)Balance between ‘the Market’ and ‘the Social’ in the European Union’, European Constitutional Law Review, 13:1, 23–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, Geoffrey, and Barry R. Weingast (1993). ‘‘Ideas, Interests, and Institutions: Constructing the European Community’s Internal Market’, in Judith Goldstein and Robert O. Keohane (eds.), Ideas and Foreign Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 173–206.
   Google Scholar
• Hassel, Anke, Jette Steen Knudsen, and Bettina Wagner (2016). ‘Winning the Battle or Losing the War: The Impact of European Integration on Labour Market Institutions in Germany and Denmark’, Journal of European Public Policy, 23:8, 1218–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellsten, Jari (2015). ‘Das Urteil Sahkoalojen Ammattiliitto’, Arbeit und Recht, 2015:7, 262–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hellsten, Jari (2017). ‘Trade Unions in Action for Workers in EU Case­Law’, in Bastian Brackelmann, Rudolf Buschmann, Julia El-Kassem, Thomas Heller, Karsten Jessolat, Angelika Kapeller, Andrea Rühl, and Manuela Scheidt (eds.), Völker, hört die Centrale für Revision und Europäisches Recht. Düsseldorf: DGB Rechtsschutz, 76–81.
   Google Scholar
• Hellwig, Hans-Jürgen, and Caspar Behme (2009). ‘Gemeinschaftsrechtliche Probleme der deutschen Unternehmensmitbestimmung’, Die Aktiengesellschaft, 54:8, 261–78.
   Google Scholar
• Hermansen, Silje Synnøve, Tommaso Pavone, and Louisa Boulaziz (2023). Leveling and Spotlighting: How International Courts Refract Private Litigation to Build Institutional Legitimacy. Available at SSRN: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4361479.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, Roman, and Lüdiger Gerken (2008). ‘Stoppt den Europäischen Gerichtshof’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 8 September 2008, 8.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, Andreas (2019). ‘Left to Interest Groups? On the Prospects for Enforcing Environmental Law in the European Union’, Environmental Politics, 28:2, 342–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, Andreas, and Daniel Naurin (2021). ‘Explaining Interest Group Litigation in Europe’, Governance, 34:4, 1235–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander, Charles (2021). A Hundred Years of Brick Court. Liss: Wilton Publishing Services.
   Google Scholar
• Höpner, Martin (2011). ‘Der Europäische Gerichtshof als Motor der Integration’, Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 21:2, 203–29.
   Google Scholar
• Höpner, Martin (2018). ‘Curbing Negative Integration’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 25:2, 246–59.
   Google Scholar
• Höpner, Martin, and Armin Schäfer (2010). ‘A New Phase of European Integration: Organised Capitalisms in Post-Ricardian Europe’, West European Politics, 33:2, 344–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höpner, Martin, and Armin Schäfer (2012). ‘Embeddedness and Regional Integration: Waiting for Polanyi in a Hayekian Setting’, International Organization, 66:3, 429–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höpner, Martin, and Susanne K. Schmidt (2020). ‘Can We Make the European Fundamental Freedoms Less Constraining?’, Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 22, 182–204.
   Google Scholar
• Irigoien Domínguez, Alazne (2022). ‘Éliane Vogel-Polsky, Advocate for a Social Europe’, European Legal Studies Research Paper in Law, 2022, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Jacquot, Sophie, and Tommaso Vitale (2014). ‘Law as Weapon of the Weak?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 21:4, 587–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, Robert A. (2003). Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahler, Miles (2000). ‘Conclusion: The Causes and Consequences of Legalization’, International Organization, 54:3, 661–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R. Daniel (2011). Eurolegalism: The Transformation of Law and Regulation in the European Union. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lejeune, Aude, and Julie Ringelheim (2019). ‘Workers with Disabilities between Legal Changes and Persisting Exclusion’, Law & Society Review, 53:4, 983–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis, Julien (2022a). ‘The Judicialisation of European Trade Union Confederation Action’, ETUI Research Paper – Working Paper, 2022:13.
   Google Scholar
• Louis, Julien (2022b). ‘Litigation Strategies and the Political Framing of EU Law’, in Antoine Vauchez, Fernanda Nicola and Mikael Rask Madsen (eds.), Researching the European Court of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 105–30.
   Google Scholar
• Malmberg, Jonas, and Tore Sigeman (2008). ‘Industrial Actions and EU Economic Freedoms’, Common Market Law Review, 45:4, 1115–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neergaard, Ulla, and Ruth Nielsen (2010). ‘Blurring Boundaries: From the Danish Welfare State to the European Social Model?’, European Labour Law Journal, 1:4, 434–88.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, Michael J., and Lee Epstein (2022). ‘Human Capital in Court: The Role of Attorney Experience in US Supreme Court Litigation’, Journal of Law and Courts, 10:1, 61–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NHO (n.d). ‘Kurt Weltzien’, available at https://www.nho.no/kontakt-nho/ansattoversikt/ansatte/k-o/kurt-weltzien/ (accessed 15 September 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Nic Shuibhne, Niamh (2010). ‘Settling Dust? Reflections on the Judgments in Viking and Laval’, European Business Law Review, 21:5, 681–703.
   Google Scholar
• Örnerborg, Elisabet (2020). ‘Dan Holke slutar på LO-TCO Rättsskydd:” 25 år får räcka!”’, Lag & Avtal, 30.01.2020.
   Google Scholar
• Passalacqua, Virginia (2020). Altruism, Euro-Expertise and Open EU Legal Opportunity Structure.
   Google Scholar
• Passalacqua, Virginia (2022). ‘Who Mobilizes the Court?’ Migrant Rights Defenders Before the Court of Justice of the EU, Law and Development Review, 15:2, 381–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavone, Tommaso (2022). The Ghostwriters: Lawyers and the Politics behind the Judicial Construction of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pijnenburg, Annick, and Kris van der Pas (2022). ‘Strategic Litigation against European Migration Control Policies’, European Journal of Migration and Law, 24:3, 401–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prassl, Jeremias (2013). ‘Freedom of Contract as a General Principle of EU Law?’, Industrial Law Journal, 42:4, 434–46.
   Google Scholar
• Prassl, Jeremias (2014). ‘Three Dimensions of Heterogeneity: An Overview of Member State Experiences’, in Mark Freedland and Jeremias Prassl (eds.), Viking, Laval and Beyond. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 113–23.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, Morten (2021). ‘Agents of Constitutionalism: The Quest for a Constitutional Breakthrough in European Law’, in Marcus M. Payk and Kim Christian Priemel (eds.), Crafting the International Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 249–76.
   Google Scholar
• Refslund, Bjarke, Karen Jaehrling, Mathew Johnson, Aristea Koukiadaki, Trine Pernille Larsen, and Christin Stiehm (2020). ‘Moving in and out of the Shadow of European Case Law: The Dynamics of Public Procurement in the Post-Post-Rüffert Era’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 58:5, 1165–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiners, Konstantin, and Esther Versluis (2022). ‘NGOs as New Guardians of the Treaties?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 30:8, 1518–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieble, Volker, ed. (2005). Zukunft der Unternehmensmitbestimmung. München: ZAAR Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Rönnmar, Mia (2008). ‘Free Movement of Services versus National Labour Law and Industrial Relations Systems’, Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 10, 493–523.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, Gerald (1991). The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rüffert Rechtsanwälte (n.d). ‘Rüffert Rechtsanwälte’, available at https://rueffert-rae.de/ (accessed 15 September 2023).
   Google Scholar
• SAK (2015). ‘EU-domstolen: Kollektivavtal ska gälla utländska arbetstagare i Finland’, available at https://www.sak.fi/sv/aktuellt/nyheter/eu-domstolen-kollektivavtal-ska-galla-utlandska-arbetstagare-i-finland (accessed 15 September 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Sarat, Austin, and Stuart A. Scheingold (2001). Cause Lawyering and the State in a Global Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, Fritz W. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, Fritz W. (2008). ‘The Only Solution Is the Refuse to Comply with ECJ Rulings’, Social Europe Journal, 4:1, 16–21.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, Fritz W. (2010). ‘The Asymmetry of European Integration, or Why the EU Cannot Be a ‘Social Market Economy’, Socio-Economic Review, 8:2, 211–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Susanne K. (2012). ‘Who Cares about Nationality? The Path-Dependent Case Law of the ECJ from Goods to Citizens’, Journal of European Public Policy, 19:1, 8–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze, Christina (2015). ‘Mindestlohn-Forderung der Lindenau-Mandanten zulässig’, juve.de 18.11.2015.
   Google Scholar
• Seawright, Jason, and John Gerring (2008). ‘Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research’, Political Research Quarterly, 61:2, 294–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seikel, Daniel (2015). ‘Class Struggle in the Shadow of Luxembourg: The Domestic Impact of the European Court of Justice’s Case Law on the Regulation of Working Conditions’, Journal of European Public Policy, 22:8, 1166–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SPD Geschichtswerkstatt (n.d). ‘Rudolf Buschmann’, available at https://www.spd-geschichtswerkstatt.de/wiki/Rudolf_Buschmann (accessed 15 September 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Stone Sweet, Alec, and Thomas L. Brunell (1998). ‘Constructing a Supranational Constitution’, American Political Science Review, 92:1, 63–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svenskt Näringsliv (n.d). ‘Varför engagerar sig Svenskt Näringsliv i Vaxholmsfallet?’, available at https://www.svensktnaringsliv.se/bilder_och_dokument/gwhxb6_de-viktigaste-omstandigheterna-i-laval-arendet-och-svenskt-naring_1016964.html/BINARY/De%20viktigaste%20omst%C3%A4ndigheterna%20i%20Laval-%C3%A4rendet%20och%20Svenskt%20N%C3%A4ringslivs%20inst%C3%A4llning%20till%20dessa%20fr%C3%A5gor.pdf (accessed 9 March 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Szmer, John, Donald R. Songer, and Jennifer Bowie (2016). ‘Party Capability and the US Courts of Appeals’, Journal of Law and Courts, 4:1, 65–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Töller, Annette Elisabeth (2021). ‘Driving Bans for Diesel Cars in German Cities: The Role of ENGOs and Courts in Producing an Unlikely Outcome’, European Policy Analysis, 7:2, 486–507.
   Google Scholar
• Tornau, Joachim F. (2015). ‘Beschluss mit Fallstricken’, Mitbestimmung, 2015:7 + 8, 34–6.
   Google Scholar
• Vanhala, Lisa (2011). Making Rights a Reality? Disability Rights Activists and Legal Mobilization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vauchez, Antoine (2015). Brokering Europe: Euro-Lawyers and the Making of a Transnational Polity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Werner, Benjamin (2017). ‘National Responses to the European Court of Justice Case Law on Golden Shares’, Journal of European Public Policy, 24:7, 989–1005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZAAR (n.d.-a). ‘Geschäftsführung’, available at https://www.zaar.uni-muenchen.de/organisation/geschaeftfuehrg/index.html (accessed 15 September 2023).
   Google Scholar
• ZAAR (n.d.-b). ‘Satzung der Stiftung für Arbeitsbeziehungen und Arbeitsrecht (StAR)’, available at https://www.zaar.uni-muenchen.de/download/zaar/satzung.pdf (accessed 15 September 2023).
   Google Scholar
• ZAAR (n.d.-c). ‘Stiftung für Arbeitsbeziehungen und Arbeitsrecht (StAR)’, available at https://www.zaar.uni-muenchen.de/zaar/struktur/star/index.html (accessed 15 September 2023).
   Google Scholar