Adopting restriction: how coalition governments respond to radical right parties

References

• Abou-Chadi, Tarik (2016a). ‘Niche Party Success and Mainstream Party Policy Shifts – How Green and Radical Right Parties Differ in Their Impact’, British Journal of Political Science, 46:2, 417–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abou-Chadi, Tarik (2016b). ‘Political and Institutional Determinants of Immigration Policies’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42:13, 2087–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abou-Chadi, Tarik, and Werner Krause (2020). ‘The Causal Effect of Radical Right Success on Mainstream Parties’ Policy Positions: A Regression Discontinuity Approach’, British Journal of Political Science, 50:3, 829–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abou-Chadi, Tarik, and Matthias Orlowski (2016). ‘Moderate as Necessary: The Role of Electoral Competitiveness and Party Size in Explaining Parties’ Policy Shifts’, Journal of Politics, 78:3, 868–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, James, Michael Clark, Lawrence Ezrow, and Garrett Glasgow (2004). ‘Understanding Change and Stability in Party Ideologies: Do Parties Respond to Public Opinion or to past Election Results?’, British Journal of Political Science, 34:4, 589–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, James, Michael Clark, Lawrence Ezrow, and Garrett Glasgow (2006). ‘Are Niche Parties Fundamentally Different from Mainstream Parties? The Causes and the Electoral Consequences of Western European Parties’ Policy Shifts, 1976-1998’, American Journal of Political Science, 50:3, 513–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, Staffan, Torbjorn Bergman, and Svante Ersson (2014). The European Representative Democracy Data Archive, Release 3. Main Sponsor: Riksbankens Jubileumsfond.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, Dan, John Duggan, and Francesco Squintani (2009). ‘The Case for Responsible Parties’, American Political Science Review, 103:4, 570–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bischof, Daniel, and Markus Wagner (2019). ‘Do Voters Polarize When Radical Parties Enter Parliament?’, American Journal of Political Science, 63:4, 888–904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, Eric C., and Mark N. Franklin (1973). ‘Aspects of Coalition Payoffs in European Parliamentary Democracies’, American Political Science Review, 67:2, 453–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, Eric C., and John P. Frendreis (1980). ‘Allocating Coalition Payoffs by Conventional Norm: An Assessment of the Evidence from Cabinet Coalition Situations’, American Journal of Political Science, 24:4, 753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brug, Wouter van der, and Joost Van Spanje (2009). ‘Immigration, Europe and the ‘New’ Cultural Dimension’, European Journal of Political Research, 48:3, 309–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian (1987). ‘The Internal Analysis of Election Programmes’, in David Robertson, Derek Hearl, and Ian Budge (eds.), Ideology, Strategy and Party Change: Spatial Analyses of Post-War Election Programmes in 19 Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 15–38.
   Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian (1994). ‘A New Spatial Theory of Party Competition: Uncertainty, Ideology and Policy Equilibria Viewed Comparatively and Temporally’, British Journal of Political Science, 24:4, 443–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian, and Hans-Dieter Klingemann (2001). Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments, 1945–98. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bustikova, Lenka (2014). ‘Revenge of the Radical Right’, Comparative Political Studies, 47:12, 1738–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Converse, Philip E. (1964). ‘The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics’, in David E. Apter (ed.) Ideology and Its Discontents. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins (1986). ‘Electoral Politics as a Redistributive Game’, Journal of Politics, 48:2, 370–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dancygier, Rafaela M. (2010). Immigration and Conflict in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DEMIG (2018). DEMIG POLICY, Version 1.3, Online Edition. www.migrationdeterminants. eu.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, Catherine E., and Sara Hobolt (2020). Political Entrepreneurs: The Rise of Challenger Parties in Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Döring, Holger, and Philip Manow (2018). Parliaments and Governments Database (ParlGov): Information on Parties, Elections and Cabinets in Modern Democracies. Version Stable 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, Anthony (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Eder, Nikolaus, Marcelo Jenny, and Wolfgang C. Müller (2017). ‘Manifesto Functions: How Party Candidates View and Use Their Party’s Central Policy Document’, Electoral Studies, 45, 75–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enelow, James M., and Melvin J. Hinich (1984). The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ezrow, Lawrence, Catherine De Vries, Marco Steenbergen, and Erica Edwards (2011). ‘Mean Voter Representation and Partisan Constituency Representation: Do Parties Respond to the Mean Voter Position or to Their Supporters?’, Party Politics, 17:3, 275–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folke, Olle (2014). ‘Shades of Brown and Green: Party Effects in Proportional Election Systems’, Journal of the European Economic Association, 12:5, 1361–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, William A. (1961). ‘A Theory of Coalition Formation’, American Sociological Review, 26:3, 373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grofman, Bernard (1982). ‘A Dynamic Model of Protocoalition Formation in Ideological N-Space’, Behavioral Science, 27:1, 77–90.
   Google Scholar
• Han, Kyung Joon (2015). ‘The Impact of Radical Right-Wing Parties on the Positions of Mainstream Parties regarding Multiculturalism’, West European Politics, 38:3, 557–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, Sara, and James Tilley (2016). ‘Fleeing the Centre: The Rise of Challenger Parties in the Aftermath of the Euro Crisis’, West European Politics, 39:5, 971–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, Marc Morje (2010). ‘The Impact of the Far Right on Citizenship Policy in Europe: Explaining Continuity and Change’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36:5, 735–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, Darren, Lee-Hong Seah, Diane Hite, and Tim Haab (2004). ‘Telephone Presurveys, Self-Selection, and Non-Response Bias to Mail and Internet Surveys in Economic Research’, Applied Economics Letters, 11:4, 237–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Heemin, and Richard C. Fording (1998). ‘Voter Ideology in Western Democracies, 1946-1989’, European Journal of Political Research, 33:1, 73–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert, and Anthony J. McGann (1997). The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Ann Arbour: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klüver, Heike, and Hanna Bäck (2019). ‘Coalition Agreements, Issue Attention, and Cabinet Governance’, Comparative Political Studies, 52:13–14, 1995–2031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüver, Heike, Hanna Bäck, and Svenja Krauss (2023). Coalition Agreements as Control Devices: Coalition Governance in Western and Eastern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klüver, Heike, and Jae-Jae Spoon (2016). ‘Who Responds? Voters, Parties and Issue Attention’, British Journal of Political Science, 46:3, 633–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, Werner, and Miku Matsunaga (2023). ‘Does Right-Wing Violence Affect Public Support for Radical Right Parties? Evidence from Germany’, Comparative Political Studies, 56:14, 2269–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss, Svenja (2018). ‘Stability through Control? The Influence of Coalition Agreements on the Stability of Coalition Cabinets’, West European Politics, 41:6, 1282–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, Hanspeter, Edgar Grande, Romain Lachat, Martin Dolezal, Simon Bornschier, and Timotheos Frey (2006). ‘Globalization and the Transformation of the National Political Space: Six European Countries Compared’, European Journal of Political Research, 45:6, 921–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laakso, Markku, and Rein Taagepera (1979). ‘Effective Number of Parties a Measure with Application to West Europe’, Comparative Political Studies, 12:1, 3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, Michael (1998). ‘Models of Government Formation’, Annual Review of Political Science, 1:1, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, Will, Kenneth Benoit, Slava Mikhaylov, and Michael Laver (2011). ‘Scaling Policy Preferences from Coded Political Texts’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 36:1, 123–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Lanny W., and Georg Vanberg (2014). ‘Parties and Policymaking in Multiparty Governments: The Legislative Median, Ministerial Autonomy, and the Coalition Compromise’, American Journal of Political Science, 58:4, 979–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGann, Anthony J., and Herbert Kitschelt (2005). ‘The Radical Right in the Alps: Evolution of Support for the Swiss SVP and Austrian FPÖ’, Party Politics, 11:2, 147–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meguid, Bonnie (2005). ‘Competition between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success’, American Political Science Review, 99:3, 347–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, Thomas M. (2013). Constraints on Party Politics. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moury, Catherine (2011). ‘Coalition Agreement and Party Mandate: How Coalition Agreements Constrain the Ministers’, Party Politics, 17:3, 385–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moury, Catherine, and Arco Timmermans (2013). ‘Inter-Party Conflict Management in Coalition Governments: Analyzing the Role of Coalition Agreements in Belgium, Germany, Italy and The Netherlands’, Politics and Governance, 1:2, 117–31.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas (1999). ‘The Single-Issue Party Thesis: Extreme Right Parties and the Immigration Issue’, West European Politics, 22:3, 182–97.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas (2007). Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Wolfgang C., and Kaare Strom (2003). Coalition Governments in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, Mogens N. (1979). ‘The Dynamics of European Party Systems: Changing Patterns of Electoral Volatility’, European Journal of Political Research, 7:1, 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickup, Mark, and Sara B. Hobolt (2015). ‘The Conditionality of the Trade-off between Government Responsiveness and Effectiveness: The Impact of Minority Status and Polls in the Canadian House of Commons’, Electoral Studies, 40, 517–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, G. Bingham (2000). Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, G. Bingham, and Guy D. Whitten (1993). ‘A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking account of the Political Context’, American Journal of Political Science, 37:2, 391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosser, Christopher, and Jonathan Mellon (2018). ‘The Twilight of the Polls? A Review of Trends in Polling Accuracy and the Causes of Polling Misses’, Government and Opposition, 53:4, 757–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roodujin, Matthijs, Stijn van Kessel, Caterina Froio, Andrea Pirro, Sarah de Lange, Daphne Halikiopoulou, Paul Lewis, Cas Mudde, and Paul Taggart (2019). ‘The PopuList: An Overview of Populist, Far Right, Far Left and Eurosceptic Parties in Europe.’ http://www.popu-list.org.
   Google Scholar
• Rydgren, Jens (2008). ‘Immigration Sceptics, Xenophobes or Racists? Radical Right-Wing Voting in Six West European Countries’, European Journal of Political Research, 47:6, 737–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saalfeld, Thomas (2008). ‘Institutions, Chance and Choices: The Dynamics of Cabinet Survival in the Parliamentary Democracies of Western Europe (1945-99),’ in Müller Wolfgang C, Strøm Kaare and Bergman Torbjörn (eds.). Cabinets and Coalition Bargaining: The Democratic Life Cycle in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 327–68.
   Google Scholar
• Schain, Martin A (2006). ‘The Extreme-Right and Immigration Policy-Making: Measuring Direct and Indirect Effects’, West European Politics, 29:2, 270–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schermann, Katrin, and Laurenz Ennser-Jedenastik (2014). ‘Explaining Coalition-Bargaining Outcomes: Evidence from Austria, 2002-2008’, Party Politics, 20:5, 791–801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofield, Norman, and Michael Laver (1985). ‘Bargaining Theory and Portfolio Payoffs in European Coalition Governments 1945-83’, British Journal of Political Science, 15:2, 143–64.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, Gijs, Catherine E. de Vries, and Barbara Vis (2013). ‘Why Do Parties Change Position? Party Organization and Environmental Incentives’, Journal of Politics, 75:2, 464–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somer-Topcu, Zeynep (2009). ‘Timely Decisions: The Effects of past National Elections on Party Policy Change’, Journal of Politics, 71:1, 238–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, Stuart N., and Christopher Wlezien (2010). Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion, and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spoon, Jae-Jae, and Heike Klüver (2019). ‘Party Convergence and Vote Switching: Explaining Mainstream Party Decline across Europe’, European Journal of Political Research, 58:4, 1021–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stimson, James A., Michael B. Mackuen, and Robert S. Erikson (1995). ‘Dynamic Representation’, American Political Science Review, 89:3, 543–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, Donald E. (1963). ‘Spatial Models of Party Competition’, American Political Science Review, 57:2, 368–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strøm, Kaare, and Wolfgang C. Müller (1999). ‘The Keys to Togetherness: Coalition Agreements in Parliamentary Democracies’, Journal of Legislative Studies, 5:3–4, 255–82.
   Google Scholar
• Strøm, Kaare, Wolfgang C. Müller, and Torbjörn Bergman (2008). Cabinets and Coalition Bargaining: The Democractic Life Cycle in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tavits, Margit (2007). ‘Principle vs. Pragmatism: Policy Shifts and Political Competition’, American Journal of Political Science, 51:1, 151–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavits, Margit (2008). ‘The Role of Parties’ past Behaviour in Coalition Formation’, American Political Science Review, 102:4, 495–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, Robert (2001). ‘The Programme to Policy Linkage: The Fulfilment of Election Pledges on Socio-Economic Policy in The Netherlands, 1986-1998’, European Journal of Political Research, 40:2, 171–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Spanje, Joost (2010). ‘Contagious Parties: Anti-Immigration Parties and Their Impact on Other Parties’ Immigration Stances in Contemporary Western Europe’, Party Politics, 16:5, 563–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkens, Andrea Werner Krause, Pola Lehmann, Theres Matthieß, Nicolas Merz, Sven Regel, and Bernhard Weßels (2018). The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2018b.
   Google Scholar
• Warwick, Paul V., and James N. Druckman (2001). ‘Portfolio Salience and the Proportionality of Payoffs in Coalition Governments’, British Journal of Political Science, 31:4, 649.
   Google Scholar
• Warwick, Paul V., and James N. Druckman (2006). ‘The Portfolio Allocation Paradox: An Investigation into the Nature of a Very Strong but Puzzling Relationship’, European Journal of Political Research, 45:4, 635–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Michelle Hale (2006). The Impact of Radical Right-Wing Parties in West European Democracies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
   Google Scholar