Institutional overlap and the survival of intergovernmental organisations

References

• Abbott, Kenneth W., and Benjamin Faude (2021). ‘Choosing Low-Cost Institutions in Global Governance’, International Theory, 13:3, 397–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott, Kenneth W., Jessica F. Green, and Robert O. Keohane (2016). ‘Organizational Ecology and Institutional Change in Global Governance’, International Organization, 70:2, 247–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott, Kenneth W., and Duncan Snidal (2009). ‘The Governance Triangle: Regulatory Standards Institutions and the Shadow of the State’, in W. Mattli and N. Woods (eds.), The Politics of Global Regulation. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 44–88.
   Google Scholar
• Alter, Karen J., and Sophie Meunier (2009). ‘The Politics of International Regime Complexity’, Perspectives on Politics, 7:1, 13–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alter, Karen J., and Kal Raustiala (2018). ‘The Rise of International Regime Complexity’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 14:1, 329–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avant, Deborah D., Martha Finnemore, and Susan K. Sell (2010). Who Governs the Globe? New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, Michael W., and Jörn Ege (2016). ‘Bureaucratic Autonomy of International Organizations’ Secretariats’, Journal of European Public Policy, 23:7, 1019–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckert, Jens (2010). ‘Institutional Isomorphism Revisited: Convergence and Divergence in Institutional Change’, Sociological Theory, 28:2, 150–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betts, Alexander (2013). ‘Regime Complexity and International Organizations: UNHCR as a Challenged Institution’, Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 19:1, 69–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann, Felix (2019). Power, Preferences, and Complexity: Explaining Institutional Order in the European Defense Policy Complex. LMU Munich.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, Frank, and Bernd Siebenhüner (2009). Managers of Global Change: The Influence of International Environmental Bureaucracies. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, Rafael (2008). ‘Towards a Theory of Inter-Organizational Networking. The Euro-Atlantic Security Institutions Interacting’, The Review of International Organizations, 3:2, 151–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann, Rafael, and Joachim A. Koops (2017). The Palgrave Handbook of Inter-Organizational Relations in World Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Boehmer, Charles, Erik Gartzke, and Timothy Nordstrom (2004). ‘Do Intergovernmental Organizations Promote Peace?’, World Politics, 57:1, 1–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhmelt, Tobias, and Gabriele Spilker (2016). ‘The Interaction of International Institutions from a Social Network Perspective’, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16:1, 67–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borzyskowski, Inken von, and Felicity Vabulas (2022). ‘When is Withdrawal from International Organizations Deadly?’, APSA 2022 Annual Meeting, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, Marc L. (2007). ‘Overlapping Institutions, Forum Shopping, and Dispute Settlement in International Trade’, International Organization, 61:4, 735–61.
   Google Scholar
• Búzás, Zoltán I., and Erin R. Graham (2020). ‘Emergent Flexibility in Institutional Development: How International Rules Really Change’, International Studies Quarterly, 64:4, 821–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Xun (2009). ‘Networks of Intergovernmental Organizations and Convergence in Domestic Economic Policies’, International Studies Quarterly, 53:4, 1095–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, Richard (2022). ‘Bargain down or Shop around? Outside Options and IMF Conditionality’, The Journal of Politics, 84:3, 1791–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, Richard (2021). ‘Pool or Duel? Cooperation and Competition among International Organizations’, International Organization, 75:4, 1133–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, Christina L. (2009). ‘Overlapping Institutions in Trade Policy’, Perspectives on Politics, 7:1, 25–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debre, Maria, and Hylke Dijkstra (2021). ‘Institutional Design for a Post-Liberal Order: Why Some International Organizations Live Longer than Others’, European Journal of International Relations, 27:1, 311–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, Hylke (2019). Who Gets to Live Forever? An Institutional Theory on the Life and Death of International Organizations. Maastricht: Maastricht University.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, Hylke, and Maria Debre (2022). ‘The Death of Major International Organizations: When Institutional Stickiness is Not Enough’, Global Studies Quarterly, 2:4, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell (1983). ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’, American Sociological Review, 48:2, 147–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingwerth, Klaus, and Philipp Pattberg (2009). ‘World Politics and Organizational Fields: The Case of Transnational Sustainability Governance’, European Journal of International Relations, 15:4, 707–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drezner, Daniel W. (2009). ‘The Power and Peril of International Regime Complexity’, Perspectives on Politics, 7:1, 65–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, Mette (2015). ‘Varieties of Cooperation: Government Networks in International Security’, in Miles Kahler (ed.), Networked Politics: Agency, Power, and Governance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 193–227.
   Google Scholar
• Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, Mette (2020). ‘Death of International Organizations. The Organizational Ecology of Intergovernmental Organizations, 1815–2015’, The Review of International Organizations, 15:2, 339–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, Mette (2021). ‘What Kills International Organisations? When and Why International Organisations Terminate’, European Journal of International Relations, 27:1, 281–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, Mette, and Oliver Westerwinter (2022). ‘The Global Governance Complexity Cube: Varieties of Institutional Complexity in Global Governance’, The Review of International Organizations, 17:2, 233–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faude, Benjamin (2020). ‘Breaking Gridlock: How Path Dependent Layering Enhances Resilience in Global Trade Governance’, Global Policy, 11:4, 448–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, John R., and Michael T. Hannan (1977). Organizational Ecology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gehring, Thomas, and Benjamin Faude (2014). ‘A Theory of Emerging Order within Institutional Complexes: How Competition among Regulatory International Institutions Leads to Institutional Adaptation and Division of Labor’, The Review of International Organizations, 9:4, 471–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genschel, Philipp (2002). ‘The Dynamics of Inertia: Institutional Persistence and Change in Telecommunications and Health Care’, Governance, 10:1, 43–66.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Julia (2018). ‘Life, Death, or Zombie? The Vitality of International Organizations’, International Studies Quarterly, 62:1, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, Julia (2020). ‘Life, Death, Inertia, Change: The Hidden Lives of International Organizations’, Ethics & International Affairs, 34:1, 33–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, Julia, René Lindstädt, and Jonathan B. Slapin (2017). ‘The Dynamics of Enlargement in International Organizations’, International Interactions, 43:4, 619–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhill, Brian, and Yonatan Lupu (2017). ‘Clubs of Clubs: Fragmentation in the Network of Intergovernmental Organizations’, International Studies Quarterly, 61:1, 181–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber, Lloyd (2000). Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Miles Kahler, and Alexander H. Montgomery (2009). ‘Network Analysis for International Relations’, International Organization, 63:3, 559–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., and Alexander H. Montgomery (2006). ‘Power Positions: International Organizations, Social Networks, and Conflict’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50:1, 3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haftel, Yoram Z., and Stephanie C. Hofmann (2019). ‘Rivalry and Overlap: Why Regional Economic Organizations Encroach on Security Organizations’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 63:9, 2180–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haftel, Yoram Z., and Tobias Lenz (2022). ‘Measuring Institutional Overlap in Global Governance’, The Review of International Organizations, 17:2, 323–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, Nina (2016). Displacement, Development and Climate Change: International Organizations Moving beyond Their Mandates. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hannan, Michael T., and John Freeman (1984). ‘Structural Inertia and Organizational Change’, American Sociological Review, 49:2, 149–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heldt, Eugénia C., Patrick A. Mello, Anna Novoselova, and Omar Ramon Serrano Oswald (2022). ‘Persistence against the Odds: How Entrepreneurial Agents Helped the UN Joint Inspection Unit to Prevail’, Global Policy, 13:2, 235–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henneberg, Ingo, and Friedrich Plank (2020). ‘Overlapping Regionalism and Security Cooperation: Power-Based Explanations of Nigeria’s Forum-Shopping in the Fight against Boko Haram’, International Studies Review, 22:3, 576–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henning, C. Randall (2019). ‘Regime Complexity and the Institutions of Crisis and Development Finance’, Development and Change, 50:1, 24–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henning, C. Randall (2017). Tangled Governance: International Regime Complexity, the Troika, and the Euro Crisis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henning, C. Randall, and Tyler Pratt (2022). ‘Hierarchy and Differentiation in ­International Regime Complexes: A Theoretical Framework for Comparative ­Research’, Review of International Political Economy, 30:6, 2178–205.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, Stephanie C. (2009). ‘Overlapping Institutions in the Realm of International Security: The Case of NATO and ESDP’, Perspectives on Politics, 7:1, 45–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, Stephanie C. (2011). ‘Why Institutional Overlap Matters: CSDP in the European Security Architecture’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 49:1, 101–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, Stephanie C. (2019). ‘The Politics of Overlapping Organizations: Hostage-Taking, Forum-Shopping and Brokering’, Journal of European Public Policy, 26:6, 883–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, Tobias Lenz, and Gary Marks (2019). Theory of International Organization: A Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance, Volume IV. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huikuri, Tuuli-Anna (2023). ‘Constraints and Incentives in the Investment Regime: How Bargaining Power Shapes BIT Reform’, The Review of International Organizations, 18:2, 361–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram, Paul, and Magnus Thor Torfason (2010). ‘Organizing the In-between: The Population Dynamics of Network-Weaving Organizations in the Global Interstate Network’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 55:4, 577–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IsDB (2023). IsDB and AUC Sign a Memorandum of Understanding to Ensure Strategic Collaboration and Engagement at the Highest Political Level. Available at https://www.isdb.org/news/isdb-and-auc-sign-a-memorandum-of-understanding-to-ensure-strategic-collaboration-and-engagement-at-the-highest-political-level (accessed 17 February 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Kahler, Miles (2021). The Arc of Complex Global Governance: From Organization to Coalition. doi:10.33774/apsa-2020-8dpq3.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, Judith (2009). ‘The More the Merrier? The Effects of Having Multiple International Election Monitoring Organizations’, Perspectives on Politics, 7:1, 59–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert O., and David G. Victor (2011). ‘The Regime Complex for Climate Change’, Perspectives on Politics, 9:1, 7–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koremenos, Barbara (2016). The Continent of International Law: Explaining Agreement Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kucik, Jeffrey, Lauren Peritz, and Sergio Puig (2022). ‘Legalization and Compliance: How Judicial Activity Undercuts the Global Trade Regime’, British Journal of Political Science, 53:1, 221–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipscy, Phillip Y. (2017). Renegotiating the World Order: Institutional Change in International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Littoz-Monnet, Annabelle (2014). ‘The Role of Independent Regulators in Policy Making: Venue-Shopping and Framing Strategies in the EU Regulation of Old Wives Cures’, European Journal of Political Research, 53:1, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littoz-Monnet, Annabelle (2021). ‘Expanding without Much Ado: International Bureaucratic Expansion Tactics in the Case of Bioethics’, Journal of European Public Policy, 28:6, 858–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin, Jean Frédéric (2020). ‘Concentration despite Competition: The Organizational Ecology of Technical Assistance Providers’, The Review of International Organizations, 15:1, 75–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (2023). The Partnership of International Organisations for Effective International Rulemaking. Available at https://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/The-partnership-in-a-nutshell-flyer.pdf (accessed 15 January 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Panke, Diana, and Sören Stapel (2018). ‘Exploring Overlapping Regionalism’, Journal of International Relations and Development, 21:3, 635–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panke, Diana, and Sören Stapel (2023). ‘Towards Increasing Regime Complexity? Why Member States Drive Overlaps between International Organisations’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 25:4, 633–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pevehouse, Jon C., Timothy Nordstrom, Roseanne McManus, and Anne S. Jamison (2021). ‘Tracking Organizations in the World: The Correlates of War IGO Version 3.0 Datasets’, Journal of Peace Research, 57:3, 492–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouliot, Vincent (2016). ‘Hierarchy in Practice: Multilateral Diplomacy and the Governance of International Security’, European Journal of International Security, 1:1, 5–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raustiala, Kal, and David G. Victor (2004). ‘The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources’, International Organization, 58:2, 277–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinalda, Bob (2020). International Secretariats: Two Centuries of International Civil Servants and Secretariats. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reinsberg, Bernhard, and Oliver Westerwinter (2021). ‘The Global Governance of International Development: Documenting the Rise of Informal Organizations and Identifying Underlying Theoretical Explanations’, The Review of International Organizations, 16:1, 59–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinsberg, Bernhard, and Oliver Westerwinter (2023). ‘Institutional Overlap in Global Governance and the Design of Intergovernmental Organizations’, The Review of International Organizations, 18:4, 693–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittberger, Volker, Bernhard Zangl, Andreas Kruck, and Hilke Dijkstra (2019). International Organization. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Roger, Charles (2022). ‘The Coral Reefs of Global Governance: How Formal IOs Make Informality Work’, Journal of European Integration, 44:5, 657–75.
   Google Scholar
• Roger, Charles, and Sam Rowan (2023). ‘The New Terrain of Global Governance: Mapping Membership in Informal International Organizations’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 67:6, 1248–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosendal, G. Kristin (2001). ‘Impacts of Overlapping International Regimes: The Case of Biodiversity’, Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 7:1, 95–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, Anne (2003). ‘An Estimator for Some Binary-Outcome Selection Models without Exclusion Restrictions’, Political Analysis, 11:2, 111–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schemeil, Yves (2013). ‘Bringing International Organization in Global Institutions as Adaptive Hybrids’, Organization Studies, 34:2, 219–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanks, Cheryl, Harold K. Jacobson, and Jeffrey H. Kaplan (1996). ‘Inertia and Change in the Constellation of International Governmental Organizations, 1981–1992’, International Organization, 50:4, 593–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiran, Myriam, and Patrick Shea (2022). ‘Survival Analysis in International Relations’, in R. Joseph Huddleston, Thomas Jamieson, and Patrick James (eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in International Relations. Bloomsbury: Edward Elgar Publishing, 468–88.
   Google Scholar
• Sommerer, Thomas, and Jonas Tallberg (2019). ‘Diffusion across International Organizations: Connectivity and Convergence’, International Organization, 73:2, 399–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, Randall W. (2011). Controlling Institutions: International Organizations and the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tallberg, Jonas, Thomas Sommerer, Theresa Squatrito, and Christer Jönsson (2014). ‘Explaining the Transnational Design of International Organizations’, International Organization, 68:4, 741–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urpelainen, Johannes, and Thijs Van de Graaf (2015). ‘The International Renewable Energy Agency: A Success Story in Institutional Innovation?’, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 15:2, 159–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vabulas, Felicity, and Duncan Snidal (2013). ‘Organization without Delegation: Informal Intergovernmental Organizations (IIGOs) and the Spectrum of Intergovernmental Arrangements’, The Review of International Organizations, 8:2, 193–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerwinter, Oliver (2021). ‘Transnational Public-Private Governance Initiatives in World Politics: Introducing a New Dataset’, The Review of International Organizations, 16:1, 137–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, Oran R. (1996). ‘Institutional Linkages in International Society: Polar Perspectives’, Global Governance, 2:1, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaccaria, Giuseppe (2022). ‘You’re Fired! International Courts, Re-Contracting, and the WTO Appellate Body during the Trump Presidency’, Global Policy, 13:3, 322–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar