Police patrols, fire alarms, or ambulance chasers? Parliamentary oversight of European monetary policy and banking supervision

References

• Akbik, Adina (2022a). The European Parliament as an Accountability Forum: Overseeing the Economic and Monetary Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akbik, Adina (2022b). ‘SSM Accountability: Lessons Learned for the Monetary Dialogues’, European Parliament Economic Governance Support Unit (EGOV), available at https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2022/699545/IPOL_IDA(2022)699545_EN.pdf (accessed 25 July 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Amtenbrink, Fabian, and Kees van Duin (2009). ‘The European Central Bank before the European Parliament: Theory and Practice after Ten Years of Monetary Dialogue’, European Law Review, 34:4, 561–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amtenbrink, Fabian, and Menelaos Markakis (2019). ‘Towards a Meaningful Prudential Supervision Dialogue in the Euro Area? A Study of the Interaction between the European Parliament and the European Central Bank in the Single Supervisory Mechanism’, European Law Review, 44:1, 3–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backović, Mihailo (2016). ‘A Theory of Ambulance Chasing’, available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.01204 (accessed 5 December 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Bagehot, Walter (1873). The English Constitution. 2nd ed. London: H.S. King.
   Google Scholar
• Balla, Steven J., and Christopher J. Deering (2013). ‘Police Patrols and Fire Alarms: An Empirical Examination of the Legislative Preference for Oversight’, Congress & the Presidency, 40:1, 27–40.
   Google Scholar
• Belke, Ansgar (2014). ‘Monetary Dialogue 2009–2014: Looking Backward, Looking Forward’, Intereconomics, 49:4, 204–11.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, Sheri, and Kathleen R. McNamara (1999). ‘Bank on Democracy: Why Central Banks Need Public Oversight’, Foreign Affairs, 78:2, 2–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Beyme, Klaus (2000). Parliamentary Democracy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, Benjamin (2017). Two Sides of the Same Coin? Independence and Accountability at the ECB. Berlin: Transparency International EU, available at https://transparency.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/TI-EU_ECB_Report_DIGITAL.pdf (accessed 11 January 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Buiter, Willem H. (1999). ‘Alice in Euroland’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 37:2, 181–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Michele, and Dermot Hodson (2019). ‘‘Reforming the European Parliament’s Monetary and Economic Dialogues: Creating Accountability through a Euro Area Oversight Subcommittee’, in Olivier Costa (ed.), The European Parliament in Times of EU Crisis: Dynamics and Transformations. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 343–64.
   Google Scholar
• Chiru, Mihail (2018). ‘The Electoral Value of Constituency-Oriented Parliamentary Questions in Hungary and Romania’, Parliamentary Affairs, 71:4, 950–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claeys, Grégory, and Marta Domínguez-Jiménez (2020). How Can the European Parliament Better Oversee the European Central Bank? European Parliament: In-depth analysis requested by the ECON Committee PE 652.747.
   Google Scholar
• Claeys, Grégory, Mark Hallerberg, and Olga Tschekassin (2014). ‘European Central Bank Accountability: How the Monetary Dialogue Could Be Improved’, Bruegel Policy Contribution, 2014/04, available at http://bruegel.org/2014/03/european-central-bank-accountability-how-the-monetary-dialogue-could-be-improved/ (accessed 18 October 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Collignon, Stefan, and Sebastian Diessner (2016). ‘The ECB’s Monetary Dialogue with the European Parliament: Efficiency and Accountability during the Euro Crisis?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 54:6, 1296–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, Mark, Adina Maricut-Akbik, and Ana Bobić (2019). ‘Reconciling Independence and Accountability at the European Central Bank: The False Promise of Proceduralism’, European Law Journal, 25:1, 75–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Haan, Jakob, and Sylvester C. W. Eijffinger (2000). ‘The Democratic Accountability of the European Central Bank: A Comment on Two Fairy-Tales’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 38:3, 394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diessner, Sebastian (2022). ‘The Promises and Pitfalls of the ECB’s “Legitimacy-as-Accountability” Towards the European Parliament Post-Crisis’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 28:3, 402–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eijffinger, Sylvester C. W., and Edin Mujagic (2004). ‘An Assessment of the Effectiveness of the Monetary Dialogue on the ECB’s Accountability and Transparency: A Qualitative Approach’, Intereconomics, 39:4, 190–203.
   Google Scholar
• Elgie, Robert (1998). ‘Democratic Accountability and Central Bank Independence: Historical and Contemporary, National and European Perspectives’, West European Politics, 21:3, 53–76.
   Google Scholar
• European Central Bank (2021). ‘Two Per Cent Inflation Target’, available at https://www.ecb.europa.eu/mopo/strategy/pricestab/html/index.en.html (accessed 6 December 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Fearon, James D. (1999). ‘Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types versus Sanctioning Poor Performance’, in Adam Przeworski, Susan C. Stokes, and Bernard Manin (eds.), Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 55–97.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrara, Federico M., Donato Masciandaro, Manuela Moschella, and Davide Romelli (2022). ‘Political Voice on Monetary Policy: Evidence from the Parliamentary Hearings of the European Central Bank’, European Journal of Political Economy, 74, 102143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontan, Clément, and David Howarth (2021). ‘The European Central Bank and the German Constitutional Court: Police Patrols and Fire Alarms’, Politics and Governance, 9:2, 241–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraccaroli, Nicolò, Alessandro Giovannini, and Jean-François Jamet (2018). ‘The Evolution of the ECB’s Accountability Practices during the Crisis’, ECB Economic Bulletin, 5, 47–71.
   Google Scholar
• Fraccaroli, Nicolò, Alessandro Giovannini, and Jean-François Jamet (2020). ‘Central Banks in Parliaments: A Text Analysis of the Parliamentary Hearings of the Bank of England, the European Central Bank and the Federal Reserve’, ECB Working Paper Series No 2442.
   Google Scholar
• Fraccaroli, Nicolò, Alessandro Giovannini, Jean-François Jamet, and Eric Persson (2022). ‘Ideology and Monetary Policy. The Role of Political Parties’ Stances in the European Central Bank’s Parliamentary Hearings’, European Journal of Political Economy, 74, 102207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromage, Diane, and Renato Ibrido (2018). ‘The “Banking Dialogue” as a Model to Improve Parliamentary Involvement in the Monetary Dialogue?’, Journal of European Integration, 40:3, 295–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gros, Daniel (2004). 5 Years of Monetary Dialogue. Brussels: European Parliament, available at https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=26318979c146097083a8ae3bc0d3a66ea5587396 (accessed 20 March 2024).
   Google Scholar
• Hadfield, Gillian K. (1994). ‘Weighing the Value of Vagueness: An Economic Perspective on Precision in the Law Symposium: Void for Vagueness’, California Law Review, 82:3, 541–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, Joseph P. (1964). Congressional Control of Administration. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Höhmann, Daniel, and Ulrich Sieberer (2020). ‘Parliamentary Questions as a Control Mechanism in Coalition Governments’, West European Politics, 43:1, 225–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howarth, David (2004). ‘The ECB and the Stability Pact: Policeman and Judge?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 11:5, 832–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jourdan, Stanislas, and Sebastian Diessner (2019). From Dialogue to Scrutiny: Strengthening the Parliamentary Oversight of the European Central Bank. Brussels: Positive Money Europe, available at https://www.positivemoney.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/2019_From-Dialogue-to-Scrutiny_PM_Web.pdf (accessed 17 February 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Kellermann, Michael (2016). ‘Electoral Vulnerability, Constituency Focus, and Parliamentary Questions in the House of Commons’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18:1, 90–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and Mathew D. McCubbins (1991). The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• ter Kuile, Gijsbert, Laura Wissink, and Willem Bovenschen (2015). ‘Tailor-Made Accountability Within the Single Supervisory Mechanism’, Common Market Law Review, 52:1, 155–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lastra, Rosa M. (2020). ‘Accountability Mechanisms of the Bank of England and of the European Central Bank’, European Parliament: Study Requested by the ECON Committee PE 652.744.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, Jack S. (2008). ‘Case Studies: Types, Designs, and Logics of Inference’, Conflict Management and Peace Science, 25:1, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacMahon, Arthur W. (1943). ‘Congressional Oversight of Administration: The Power of the Purse. I’, Political Science Quarterly, 58:2, 161–90.
   Google Scholar
• Maricut-Akbik, Adina (2020). ‘Contesting the European Central Bank in Banking Supervision: Accountability in Practice at the European Parliament’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 58:5, 1199–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Shane (2011). ‘Parliamentary Questions, the Behaviour of Legislators, and the Function of Legislatures: An Introduction’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 17:3, 259–70.
   Google Scholar
• Massoc, Elsa (2022a). ‘How Do Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) Hold the European Central Bank (ECB) Accountable? A Descriptive Quantitative Analysis of Three Accountability Forums (2014-2021)’, SSRN Electronic Journal, available at https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=4155627 (accessed 30 November 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Massoc, Elsa (2022b). How MEPs Hold the ECB Accountable. Ann Arbor: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR), available at https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/167901/version/V1/view (accessed 4 December 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Matland, Richard E. (1995). ‘Synthesizing the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-Conflict Model of Policy Implementation’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5:2, 145–74.
   Google Scholar
• McCubbins, Mathew D., and Thomas Schwartz (1984). ‘Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms’, American Journal of Political Science, 28:1, 165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mill, John Stuart (1861). Considerations on Representative Government. Web Edition. Adelaide: The University of Adelaide Library, available at https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/m/mill/john_stuart/m645r/ (accessed 26 February 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Norton, Philip (1993). Does Parliament Matter? Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Otjes, Simon, and Tom Louwerse (2018). ‘Parliamentary Questions as Strategic Party Tools’, West European Politics, 41:2, 496–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichstein, Kenneth J. (1965). ‘Ambulance Chasing: A Case Study of Deviation and Control within the Legal Profession’, Social Problems, 13:1, 3–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saalfeld, Thomas (2000). ‘Members of Parliament and Governments in Western Europe: Agency Relations and Problems of Oversight’, European Journal of Political Research, 37:3, 353–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Santen, Rosa, Luzia Helfer, and Peter van Aelst (2015). ‘When Politics Becomes News: An Analysis of Parliamentary Questions and Press Coverage in Three West European Countries’, Acta Politica, 50:1, 45–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schillemans, Thomas, and Madalina Busuioc (2015). ‘Predicting Public Sector Accountability: From Agency Drift to Forum Drift’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25:1, 191–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieberer, Ulrich (2011). ‘The Institutional Power of Western European Parliaments: A Multidimensional Analysis’, West European Politics, 34:4, 731–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strøm, Kaare (2000). ‘Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies’, European Journal of Political Research, 37:3, 261–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trichet, Jean-Claude (2011). ‘Monetary Dialogue with the President of the ECB, Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON)’, European Parliament, available at https://www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/174379/20110711ATT23762EN.pdf (accessed 23 January 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Vliegenthart, Rens, and Stefaan Walgrave (2011). ‘Content Matters: The Dynamics of Parliamentary Questioning in Belgium and Denmark’, Comparative Political Studies, 44:8, 1031–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiberg, Matti, and Antti Koura (1994). ‘The Logic of Parliamentary Questioning’, in Matti Wiberg (ed.), Parliamentary Control in the Nordic Countries: Forms of Questioning and Behavioural Trends. Helsinki: The Finnish Political Science Association, 19–43.
   Google Scholar
• Wyplosz, Charles, Stephen Nickell, and Martin Wolf (2006). ‘European Monetary Union: The Dark Sides of a Major Success’, Economic Policy, 21:46, 208–61.
   Google Scholar
• Zeitlin, Jonathan, and Filipe Brito Bastos (2020). SSM and the SRB Accountability at European Level: Room for Improvements? European Parliament: In-depth analysis requested by the ECON Committee, PE 645.747, available at https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2020/645747/IPOL_IDA(2020)645747_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar