364
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The ‘mainstream’ in contemporary Europe: a bi-dimensional and operationalisable conceptualisation

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Akkerman, Agnes, Cas Mudde, and Andrej Zaslove (2014). ‘How Populist Are the People? Measuring Populist Attitudes in Voters’, Comparative Political Studies, 47:9, 1324–53.
  • Akkerman, Tjitske, Sarah De Lange, and Matthijs Rooduijn, eds. (2016a). Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties in Western Europe: Into the Mainstream? London: Routledge.
  • Akkerman, Tjitske, Sarah De Lange, and Matthijs Rooduijn (2016b). ‘Inclusion and Mainstreaming? Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties in the New Millennium’, in Tjitske Akkerman, Sarah De Lange, and Matthijs Rooduijn (eds.), Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties in Western Europe: Into the Mainstream? London: Routledge, 1–28.
  • Akkerman, Tjitske, Sarah De Lange, and Matthijs Rooduijn (2016c). ‘Into the Mainstream? A Comparative Analysis of the Programmatic Profiles of Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties in Western Europe over Time’, in Tjitske Akkerman, Sarah De Lange, and Matthijs Rooduijn (eds.), Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties in Western Europe: Into the Mainstream? London: Routledge, 31–52.
  • Albertazzi, Daniele, and Duncan McDonnell (2015). Populists in Power. London: Routledge.
  • Albertazzi, Daniele, and Davide Vampa, eds. (2021). Populism and New Patterns of Political Competition in Western Europe. London: Routledge.
  • Brown, Katy, Aurelien Mondon, and Aaron Winter (2023). ‘The Far Right, the Mainstream and Mainstreaming: Towards a Heuristic Framework’, Journal of Political Ideologies, 28:2, 162–79.
  • Crulli, Mirko, and Lorenzo Viviani (2022). ‘Turning to the Right? The Impact of the “Long Crisis Decade” (2008-2019) on Right-Wing Populist Vote and Attitudes in Europe’, Partecipazione e Conflitto, 15:2, 482–99.
  • De Vries, Catherine E., and Sara B. Hobolt (2012). ‘When Dimensions Collide: The Electoral Success of Issue Entrepreneurs’, European Union Politics, 13:2, 246–68.
  • De Vries, Catherine E., and Sara B. Hobolt (2020). ‘Challenger Parties and Populism’, LSE Public Policy Review, 1:1, 1–8.
  • Donovan, Todd (2019). ‘Authoritarian Attitudes and Support for Radical Right Populists’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 29:4, 448–64.
  • Döring, Holger, Constantin Huber, and Philip Manow (2022). ‘Parliaments and Governments Database (ParlGov): Information on Parties, Elections and Cabinets in Established Democracies’, Development version. https://www.parlgov.org/about/
  • Ferrín, Mónica, and Hanspeter Kriesi, eds. (2016). How Europeans View and Evaluate Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Fieldhouse, Edward, Jane Green, Geoffrey Evans, Jonathan Mellon, and Prosser Christopher (2020). ‘British Election Study Internet Panel Wave 17’. https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-8202-2
  • Hawkins, Kirk A., Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, and Ioannis Andreadis (2020). ‘The Activation of Populist Attitudes’, Government and Opposition, 55:2, 283–307.
  • Hawkins, Kirk A., Scott Riding, and Cas Mudde (2012). Measuring Populist Attitudes. Political concepts working paper series: Committee on Concepts and Methods, 1–35.
  • Heinisch, Reinhard (2003). ‘Success in Opposition – Failure in Government: Explaining the Performamce of Right-Wing Populist Parties in Public Office’, West European Politics, 26:3, 91–130.
  • Hobolt, Sara B., and James Tilley (2016). ‘Fleeing the Centre: The Rise of Challenger Parties in the Aftermath of the Euro Crisis’, West European Politics, 39:5, 971–91.
  • Hutter, Swen, and Hanspeter Kriesi, eds. (2019). European Party Politics in Times of Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hutter, Swen, Hanspeter Kriesi, and Guillem Vidal (2018). ‘Old versus New Politics: The Political Spaces in Southern Europe in Times of Crises’, Party Politics, 24:1, 10–22.
  • Kallis, Aristotle (2015). ‘When Fascism Became Mainstream: The Challenge of Extremism in Times of Crisis’, Fascism, 4:1, 1–24.
  • Kirchheimer, Otto (1966). ‘The Transformation of the Western European Party Systems’, in J. LaPalombara and M. Weiner (eds.) Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 177–200.
  • Marcos-Marne, Hugo, Homero Gil de Zúñiga, and Porismita Borah (2022). ‘What Do We (Not) Know about Demand-Side Populism? A Systematic Literature Review on Populist Attitudes’, European Political Science, 22:3, 293–307.
  • Meguid, Bonnie (2005). ‘Competition between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success’, American Political Science Review, 99:3, 347–59.
  • Meguid, Bonnie (2008). Party Competition between Unequals: Strategies and Electoral Fortunes in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Meny, Yves, and Yves Surel (2002). ‘The Constitutive Ambiguity of Populism’, in Y. Meny and Y. Surel (eds.), Democracies and the Populist Challenge. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–21.
  • Moffitt, Benjamin (2022). ‘How Do Mainstream Parties “Become” Mainstream, and Pariah Parties “Become” Pariahs? Conceptualizing the Processes of Mainstreaming and Pariahing in the Labelling of Political Parties’, Government and Opposition, 57:3, 385–403.
  • Mondon, Aurelien, and Aaron Winter (2020). Reactionary Democracy: How Racism and the Populist Far Right Became Mainstream. London: Verso.
  • Mudde, Cas (2004). ‘The Populist Zeitgeist’, Government and Opposition, 39:4, 541–63.
  • Mudde, Cas (2007). Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mudde, Cas (2019). The Far Right Today. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Pop-Eleches, Grigore (2010). ‘Throwing out the Bums: Protest Voting and Unorthodox Parties after Communism’, World Politics, 62:2, 221–60.
  • Rooduijn, Matthijs (2014). ‘Vox Populismus: A Populist Radical Right Attitude among the Public?’, Nations and Nationalism, 20:1, 80–92.
  • Rooduijn, Matthijs (2016). ‘Closing the Gap? A Comparison of Voters for Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties and Mainstream Parties over Time’, in Tjitske Akkerman, Sarah De Lange, and Matthijs Rooduijn (eds.), Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties in Western Europe: Into the Mainstream? London: Routledge, 53–69.
  • Rooduijn, Matthijs, Andrea L. P. Pirro, Daphne Halikiopoulou, Caterina Froio, Stijn Van Kessel, Sarah L. De Lange, Cas Mudde, and Paul Taggart (2023). ‘The PopuList: A Database of Populist, Far-Left, and Far-Right Parties Using Expert-Informed Qualitative Comparative Classification (EiQCC)’, British Journal of Political Science, 1–10.
  • Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal, and Paul Taggart (2022). ‘The Populist Radical Right and the Pandemic’, Government and Opposition, 1–21.
  • Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal, and Steven M. Van Hauwaert (2020). ‘The Populist Citizen: Empirical Evidence from Europe and Latin America’, European Political Science Review, 12:1, 1–18.
  • Schulz, Anne, Philipp Müller, Christian Schemer, Dominique Stefanie Wirz, Martin Wettstein, and Werner Wirth (2018). ‘Measuring Populist Attitudes on Three Dimensions’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 30:2, 316–26.
  • Taggart, Paul (2000). Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Vampa, Davide, and Daniele Albertazzi (2021). ‘Conclusion’, in Daniele Albertazzi and Davide Vampa (eds.), Populism and New Patterns of Political Competition in Western Europe. London: Routledge, 269–88.
  • Van Hauwaert, Steven M., and Stijn van Kessel (2018). ‘Beyond Protest and Discontent. A Cross-National Analysis of the Effect of Populist Attitudes and Issue Positions on Populist Party Support’, European Journal of Political Research, 57:1, 68–92.
  • Vezzoni, Cristiano, et al. (2023). ‘Itanes 2022 – Italian National Election Study 2022 (Release 01, July 2023)’,
  • Vittori, Davide, and Leonardo Morlino (2021). ‘Populism and Democracy in Europe’, in Daniele Albertazzi and Davide Vampa (eds.), Populism and New Patterns of Political Competition in Western Europe. London: Routledge, 19–49.
  • Zulianello, Mattia (2020). ‘Varieties of Populist Parties and Party Systems in Europe: From State-of-the-Art to the Application of a Novel Classification Scheme to 66 Parties in 33 Countries’, Government and Opposition, 55:2, 327–47.