I Will Follow: Smart Power and the Management of Wartime Alliances

Bibliography

• Adelman, Jonathan R., ‘ Introduction,’ in Jonathan R. Adelman (ed.), Hitler and his Allies in World War II (New York: Routledge 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Allen, R. G. D. ‘Mutual Aid Between the US and the British Empire,’ Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 109/33 (1946), 250.
   Google Scholar
• Arreguin-Toft, Ivan, How the Weak Win Wars: A Theory of Asymmetric Conflict (New York: CUP 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Auerswald, David P. and Stephen M. Saideman, NATO in Afghanistan: Fighting Together, Fighting Alone ( Princeton UP 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Bensahel, Nora, The Counterterror Coalitions: Cooperation with Europe, NATO, and the European Union (Santa Monica, CA: RAND 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Stephen G. and William Wohlforth, World Out of Balance: International Relations and the Challenge of American Primacy ( Princeton UP 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Stephen G. G., John Ikenberry, and William C. Wohlforth, ‘Don’t Come Home America: The Case Against Retrenchment,’ International Security 37/3 ( Winter 2012/ 13), 7–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchill, Winston S., The Second World War, Vol. 3: The Grand Alliance (Boston: Houghton Mifflin 1950).
   Google Scholar
• Colman, Jonathan and J.J. Widen, ‘The Johnson Administration and the Recruitment of Allies in Vietnam, 1964–1968,’ History 94/316 (Oct. 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, Timothy W., ‘Preventing Enemy Coalitions: How Wedge Strategies Shape Power Politics,’ International Security 35/4 ( Spring 2011), 156, 158, 159–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, Martha, ‘Coercive Diplomacy and the Response to Terrorism,’ in Robert J. Art and Patrick M. Cronin (eds), The United States and Coercive Diplomacy (Washington DC: United States Institute of Peace Press 2003), 335–342.
   Google Scholar
• CSIS Commission on Smart Power: A Smarter, More Secure America (Washington DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Foreign Relations of the United States, 1944, Vol. 2: General Economic and Social Matters (Washington DC: US Government Printing Office 1969).
   Google Scholar
• Foreign Relations of the United States, 1944, Vol. 7: The American Republics (Washington DC: US Government Printing Office 1967).
   Google Scholar
• Foreign Relations of the United States, 1945, Vol. 5: Europe (Washington DC: US Government Printing Office 1967).
   Google Scholar
• Foreign Relations of the United States, 1964–1968, Vol. 6: Vietnam, Jan.–Aug. 1968 (Washington DC: US Government Printing Office 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Fearon, James D., ‘Rationalist Explanations for War,’ International Organization 49/3 (Summer 1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hathaway, Robert M., Ambiguous Partnership: Britain and America, 1944–1947 (New York: Columbia UP 1981).
   Google Scholar
• Herring, George C., Jr, Aid to Russia 1941–1946: Strategy, Diplomacy, and the Origins of the Cold War (New York: Columbia UP 1973).
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, Albert O., Exit, Voice, and Loyalty- Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States (Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP 1970).
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. John, Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order (Princeton UP 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Izumikawa, Yasuhiro, ‘To Coerce or Reward? Theorizing Wedge Strategies in Alliance Politics,’ Security Studies 22/3 (2013), 498–531.
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, Robert, Perception and Misperception in International Politics ( Princeton UP 1976).
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, Robert, ‘Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma,’ World Politics 30/2 (Jan. 1978).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jervis, Robert, The Logic of Images in International Relations (New York: Columbia UP 1989).
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky, ‘Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk,’ Econometrica 47 (1979), 263–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasner, Stephen D., Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials, Investments, and US Foreign Policy (Princeton UP 1978).
   Google Scholar
• Kreps, Sarah, ‘When Does the Mission Determine the Coalition? The Logic of Multilateral Intervention and the Case of Afghanistan,’ Security Studies 17 (2008), 531–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreps, Sarah E., Coalitions of Convenience: United States Military Interventions After the Cold War (New York: OUP 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Kristol, William and Robert Kagan, ‘Toward a Neo-Reaganite Foreign Policy,’ Foreign Affairs 75/4 ( July/Aug. 1996), 18–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kux, Dennis, Disenchanted Allies: The United States and Pakistan 1947–2000 (Washington DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press 2001), 256–358.
   Google Scholar
• Layne, Christopher, ‘From Preponderance to Offshore Balancing: America’s Future Grand Strategy,’ International Security 22/1 ( Sept. 1997), 1–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebow, Richard Ned, ‘The Long Peace’ in Richard Ned Lebow and Thomas Risse-Kappen (eds), International Relations Theory and the End of the Cold War the End of the Cold War, and the Failure of Realism (New York: Columbia UP 1996), 26–33.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, Jack S., ‘ Psychology and Foreign Policy Decision-Making,’ in Leonie Huddy, David O. Sears, and Jack S. Levy (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology ( New York: OUP 2013), 314–16.
   Google Scholar
• Lipson, Charles, Reliable Partners: How Democracies Made a Separate Peace ( Princeton UP 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Mack, Andrew, ‘Why Big Nations Lose Small Wars: The Politics of Asymmetric Conflict,’ World Politics 27/2 (Jan. 1975), 175–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, William H., America, Britain, and Russia: Their Co-operation and Conflict 1941–1946 (New York: Johnson Reprints Corp. 1970).
   Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, John J., ‘Imperial By Design,’ The National Interest 111 ( Jan./Feb. 2011), 16–34
   Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, updated ed. (New York: Norton 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Migdalovitz, Carol, Iraq: Turkey, the Deployment of US Forces, and Related Issues, Congressional Research Service Report RL31794, 2 May 2003. Obtained from Wikileaks Document Release, <http://wikileaks.org/wiki/CRS-RL31794>.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, Joseph S. Jr, ‘Power and Foreign Policy,’ Journal of Political Power 4/1 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Nye Joseph S. Jr, The Future of Power (New York: Public Affairs 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Overy, Richard, Why the Allies Won (New York: Norton 1995).
   Google Scholar
• Pilster, Ulrich, ‘Are Democracies the Better Allies? The Impact of Regime Type on Military Coalition Operations,’ International Interactions 37/1 ( Jan.–March 2011), 59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posen, Barry R., Restraint: A New Foundation for US Grand Strategy (Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, Evan N., ‘Strange Bedfellows? US Bargaining Behavior with Allies of Convenience,’ International Security 35/3 ( Winter 2010/ 11), 147.
   Google Scholar
• Riedel, Bruce, Deadly Embrace: Pakistan, America, and the Future of Global Jihad (Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press 2011), 72.
   Google Scholar
• ‘[Letter from] Roosevelt to Churchill, No. 219, November 19, 1942,’ in Francis L. Loewenheim, Harold D. Langley, and Manfred Jonas (eds), Roosevelt and Churchill: Their Secret Wartime Correspondence (New York: E.P. Dutton 1975).
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, Michael, ‘A Comedy of Errors: American-Turkish Diplomacy and the Iraq War,’ Turkish Policy Quarterly 4/1 (Spring 2005), 3–4.
   Google Scholar
• Schweller, Randall L., ‘Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In,’ International Security 19/1 (Summer 1994), 104–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweller, Randall L., ‘Managing the Rise of Great Powers: History and Theory,’ in Alastair Iain Johnston and Robert S. Ross, Engaging China: The Management of an Emerging Power (New York: Routledge 1999), 21–3.
   Google Scholar
• Stoler, Mark A., Allies in War: Britain and America Against the Axis Powers 1940–1945 (London: Hodder Arnold 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Tullock, Gordon, Autocracy (Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers 1987).
   Google Scholar
• The US Army and Marine Corps Counterinsurgency Field Manual ( Univ. of Chicago Press 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. Harrison, ‘What Was Bipolarity?’ International Organization 47/1 (Winter 1993), 77–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walt, Stephen M., The Origins of Alliances (Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP 1987).
   Google Scholar
• Walt, Stephen M., Taming American Power: The Global Response to US Primacy (New York: Norton 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Weitsman, Patricia A., Waging War: Alliances, Coalitions, and Institutions of Interstate Violence (Stanford UP 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Yarhi-Milo, Keren, ‘In the Eye of the Beholder: How Leaders and Intelligence Communities Assess the Intentions of Adversaries,’ International Security 38/1 (Summer 2013), 7–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar