Innovation Inhibitors in War: Overcoming Obstacles in the Pursuit of Military Effectiveness

Bibliography

• Adler, Emanuel, and Peter M. Haas, ‘Epistemic Communities, World Order, and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program’, International Organization 46/1 (Winter 1992), 367–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, Graham, ‘Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis’, American Political Science Review 63/3 (Sept. 1969), 689–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, Graham and Philip Zelikow, Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis (New York: Pearson 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Avant, Deborah, Political Institutions and Military Change: Lessons from Peripheral Wars (Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP 1994).
   Google Scholar
• Badsey, S.D., ‘The American Experience of Armour 1919–53’, in J. P. Harris and F.H. Toase (eds), Armoured Warfare (New York: St. Martin’s Press 1990).
   Google Scholar
• Baily, Charles, Faint Praise: American Tanks and Tank Destroyers during World War II (Hamden, CT: Archon Books 1983).
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, Hanson, ‘The German Blow-III: New German Tanks Prove Superior to Ours-Inquiry by Congress Urged’, New York Times, 5 Jan. 1945, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Barzilai-Nahon, Karine, ‘Gatekeeping: A Critical Review’, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 43/1 (2009), 433–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, Lazar, ‘Capturing Contemporary Innovation: Studying IDF Innovation against Hamas and Hizballah’, Journal of Strategic Studies 35/1 (Feb. 2012), 121–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddle, Tami, Rhetoric and Reality in Air Warfare: The Evolution of British and American Ideas about Strategic Bombing, 1914–1945 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Bilby, Joseph G., A Revolution in Arms: A History of the First Repeating Rifles (Yardley, PA: Westholme Publishing 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Boot, Max, War Made New: Technology and Warfare, and the Course of History, 1500 to Today (New York: Gotham Books 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Brodie, Bernard and Fawn M. Brodie, From Crossbow to H-Bomb: The Evolution of the Weapons and Tactics of Warfare (Bloomington, IN: Indiana UP 1973).
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, Robert V., Lincoln and the Tools of War (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill 1956).
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, Robert, Mobility, Shock, and Firepower: The Emergence of the US Army’s Armor Branch, 1917–1945 (Washington DC: US Army Center of Military History 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, Tai Ming, ‘The Chinese Defense Economy’s Long March from Imitation to Innovation’, Journal of Strategic Studies 34/3 (June 2011), 325–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coram, Robert, Boyd: The Fighter Pilot Who Changed the Art of War (New York: Little, Brown 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Creveld, Martin van, Technology and War: From 2000 B.C. to the Present (New York: The Free Press 1989).
   Google Scholar
• ‘ Death of a Myth’, Washington Post, 22 March 1945, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Dunham, Emory, The Tank Destroyer History: Study No. 29 (Washington DC: Historical Section – Army Ground Forces 1946).
   Google Scholar
• Earley, Gerald L., The Second United States Sharpshooters in the Civil War: A History and Roster (Jefferson, NC: McFarland 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Evangelista, Matthew, Innovation and the Arms Race (Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP 1988).
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, Theo, ‘Transnational Norms and Military Development: Constructing Ireland’s Professional Army’, European Journal of International Relations 7/63 (2001), 63–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, Theo, ‘World Culture and Military Power’, Security Studies 14/3 (2005), 448–88.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, Theo, ‘Improving in War: Military Adaptation and the British in Helmand Province, Afghanistan, 2006–09’, Journal of Strategic Studies 33/4 (2010), 567–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, Theo and Terry Terriff (eds), The Sources of Military Change (London: Lynne Rienner 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, Martha and Kathryn Sikkink, ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’, International Organization 52/4 (Autumn 1998), 887–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, Robert T., ‘A Case Study in Horizontal Military Innovation: The German Army, 1916–1918’, Journal of Strategic Studies 35/6 (Dec. 2012), 799–827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, Matthew Charles, ‘The British Army and the Politics of Rifle Development’, PhD dissertation, King’s College London, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Forty, George, United States Tanks of World War II in Action (Poole, UK: Blandford Press 1983).
   Google Scholar
• Gabel, Christopher, Seek, Strike, and Destroy: US Army Tank Destroyer Doctrine in World War II (Fort Leavenworth, KS: Combat Studies Institute 1985).
   Google Scholar
• Gabel, Christopher, ‘World War II Armor Operations in Europe’, in George Hofmann and Donn Starry (eds), Camp Colt to Desert Storm: The History of the US Armored Forces (Lexington: Univ. of Kentucky Press 1999).
   Google Scholar
• George, Alexander, ‘The “Operational Code”: A Neglected Approach to the Study of Political Leaders and Decision-Making’, International Studies Quarterly 13/2 (1969), 190–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, Judith and Robert Keohane, Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change (Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP 1993).
   Google Scholar
• Green, Constance McLaughlin, Harry Thomson, and Peter Roots, The Technical Services: The Ordnance Department: Planning Munitions for War (Green Book) (Washington DC: US Army Center of Military History 1990).
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield, Kent Roberts, Robert Palmer, and Bell Wiley, The Army Ground Forces: The Organization of Ground Combat Troops (Green Book) (Washington DC: US Army Center of Military History 1987).
   Google Scholar
• Grissom, Adam, ‘The Future of Military Innovation Studies’, Journal of Strategic Studies 29/5 (Oct. 2006), 905–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker, Barton C., ‘The Military and the Machine: An Analysis of the Controversy over Mechanization in the British Army, 1919–1939’, PhD dissertation, Univ. of Chicago, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Hallahan, William H., Misfire: The History of How America’s Small Arms Have Failed Our Military (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons 1994).
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, Ian, Tank Killing: Anti-Tank Warfare by Men and Machines (New York: Sarpedon 1996).
   Google Scholar
• House, Jonathan, Combined Arms Warfare in the Twentieth Century (Lawrence, KS: Univ. of Kansas Press 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Hurley, Alfred, Billy Mitchell: Crusader for Air Power (Bloomington, IN: Indiana UP 1975).
   Google Scholar
• Jarymowycz, Roman, Tank Tactics: From Normandy to Lorraine (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, Robert, Perception and Misperception in International Politics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP 1976).
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Clint, Civil War Blunders (Winston-Salem, NC: John F. Blair 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, David, Fast Tanks and Heavy Bombers: Innovation in the US Army, 1917–1945 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP 1998).
   Google Scholar
• Keck, Margaret and Kathryn Sikkink, Activists Beyond Borders (Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP 1998).
   Google Scholar
• Kier, Elizabeth, Imagining War: French and British Doctrine Between the Wars (Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, John, Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (New York: HarperCollins 1995).
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, Nicholas, Sir John Fisher’s Naval Revolution (Columbia: Univ. of South Carolina Press 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Lebovic, James, Foregone Conclusions: US Weapons Acquisition in the Post-Cold War Transition (Boulder, CO: Westview Press 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, K., ‘Frontiers in Group Dynamics II: Channels of Group Life; Social Planning and Action Research’, Human Relations 1/2 (1947), 143–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludeke, Alexander, Weapons of World War II (London: Parragon Books 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, Julia M., ‘Eisenhower’s Scientists: Policy Entrepreneurs and the Test-Ban Debate, 1954–58’, Foreign Policy Analysis (2013), doi:10.1111/fpa.12018.
   Google Scholar
• Mahnken, Thomas G., Uncovering Ways of War (Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Mahnken, Thomas G., ‘China’s Anti-Access Strategy in Historical and Theoretical Perspective’, Journal of Strategic Studies 34/3 (June 2011), 299–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahnken, Thomas G., and James R. FitzSimonds, ‘Revolutionary Ambivalence: Understanding Officer Attitudes Towards Innovation’, International Security 28/2 (2003), 112–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcot, Roy M., Spencer Repeating Firearms (Rochester, NY: Rowe Publications 1983).
   Google Scholar
• Mazarr, Michael, ‘The Iraq War and Agenda Setting’, Foreign Policy Analysis 3/1 (2007), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo, Lida, The Technical Services: The Ordnance Department: On Beachhead and Battlefront (Green Book) (Washington DC: US Army Center of Military History 1991).
   Google Scholar
• McAuley, John D., Civil War Breech Loading Rifles: A Survey (Lincoln, RI: Andrew Mowbray Inc. 1987).
   Google Scholar
• Mintrom, Michael, Policy Entrepreneurs and School Choice (Washington DC: Georgetown UP 2000).
   Google Scholar
• Mintrom, Michael and Phillipa Norman, ‘Policy Entrepreneurship and Policy Change’, The Policy Studies Journal 37/4 (2009), 649–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowbray, Stuart C. and Jennifer Heroux, Civil War Arms Makers and Their Contracts: a facsimile reprint of the Report by the Commission on Ordnance and Ordnance Stores, 1862 (Lincoln, RI: Andrew Mowbray Inc. 1998).
   Google Scholar
• Pollpeter, Kevin, ‘Upward and Onward: Technological Innovation and Organizational Change in China’s Space Industry’, Journal of Strategic Studies 34/3 (June 2011), 405–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posen, Barry R., The Sources of Military Doctrine (Ithaca, NY: Cornell UPs 1984).
   Google Scholar
• Price, Richard, ‘Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines’, International Organization 52/3 (Summer 1998), 613–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, Kenneth, Myth and the Greatest Generation: A Social History of Americans in World War II (New York: Routledge 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, Stephen P., ‘New Ways of War: Understanding Military Innovation’, International Security 13/1 (Summer 1988), 134–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, Stephen P., Winning the Next War (Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP 1991).
   Google Scholar
• Russell, James A., ‘Innovation in War: Counterinsurgency Operations in Anbar and Ninewa Provinces, Iraq, 2005–2007’, Journal of Strategic Studies 33/4 (Aug. 2010), 595–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, Elizabeth, Leaders At War: How Presidents Shape Military Interventions (Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Sword, Wiley, ‘Those Damned Michigan Spencers’, Man at Arms 19 (1997), 23–37.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, Spencer, Tanks: An Illustrated History of their Impact (Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO 2004).
   Google Scholar
• United States War Department, Armored Force Field Manual (17-32): The Tank Company, Light and Medium (Washington DC: Government Printing Office 1942).
   Google Scholar
• United States War Department, Tank Destroyer Field Manual (18-5): Organization and Tactics of Tank Destroyer Units (Washington DC: Government Printing Office 1942).
   Google Scholar
• Walter, John, The Rifle Story: An Illustrated History from 1776 to the Present Day (London: Greenhill Publishing 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Zaloga, Steven, Armored Thunderbolt: The US Army Sherman in World War II (Mechanicsburg, PA: Stackpole Books 2008).
   Google Scholar