Beyond Pessimism: Why the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Will Not Collapse

Bibliography

• Albin, Cecilia, Justice and Fairness in International Negotiation (Cambridge: CUP 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Allison, Graham. ‘Nuclear Disorder’, Foreign Affairs 89/1 (Feb. 2010), 74–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Art, Robert J., ‘A Defensible Defense: America’s Grand Strategy after the Cold War’, International Security 15/4 (Spring 1991), 5–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, Michael D. (ed.), To Supply or to Deny: Comparing Nonproliferation Export Controls in Five Key Countries (The Hague: Kluwer Law International 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Beckley, Michael, ‘China’s Century? Why America’s Edge Will Endure’, International Security 36/3 (Dec. 2011), 41–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellany, Ian, ‘Nuclear Non-Proliferation and the Inequality of States’, Political Studies 25/4 (Dec. 1977), 594–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betts, Richard K., Nuclear Blackmail and Nuclear Balance (New York: Brookings Institution Press 1987).
   Google Scholar
• Betts, Richard K., ‘Paranoids, Pygmies, Pariahs and Nonproliferation Revisited’, in Zachary Davis and Benjamin Frankel (eds), The Proliferation Puzzle: Why Nuclear Weapons Spread (and What Results) (London: Frank Cass 1993), 100–24.
   Google Scholar
• Betts, Richard K., ‘Universal Deterrence or Conceptual Collapse? Liberal Pessimism and Utopian Realism’, in Victor A. Utgoff (ed.), The Coming Crisis: Nuclear Proliferation, US Interests, and World Order (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 2000), 51–86.
   Google Scholar
• Bosch, Miguel Marin, ‘The Non-Proliferation Treaty and Its Future’, in Laurence Boisson de Chazournes and Philippe Sands (eds), International Law, the International Court of Justice and Nuclear Weapons (Cambridge: CUP 1999), 375–89.
   Google Scholar
• Brands, Hal, ‘Non-Proliferation and the Dynamics of the Middle Cold War: The Superpowers, the MLF, and the NPT’, Cold War History 7/3 (Aug. 2007), 389–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie, Bernard, Frederick Sherwood Dunn, Arnold Wolfers, Percy Ellwood Corbett, and William Thornton Rickert Fox, The Absolute Weapon: Atomic Power and World Order (New York: Harcourt, Brace 1946).
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Stephen G. and William C. Wohlforth, World Out of Balance: International Relations and the Challenge of American Primacy (Princeton UP 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Stephen G., G. John Ikenberry, and William C. Wohlforth, ‘Don’t Come Home, America: The Case Against Retrenchment’, International Security 37/3 (Dec. 2012), 7–51.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, Hedley, ‘Rethinking Non-Proliferation’, International Affairs 51/2 (April 1975), 175–89.
   Google Scholar
• Bunn, George, ‘The Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty: History and Current Problems’, Arms Control Today 33/10 (Dec. 2003), 4–10.
   Google Scholar
• Busby, Joshua William, ‘Bono Made Jesse Helms Cry: Jubilee 2000, Debt Relief, and Moral Action in International Politics’, International Studies Quarterly 51/2 (June 2007), 247–75.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Richard. Fatal Choice: Nuclear Weapons and the Illusion of Missile Defense (Council on Foreign Relations 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Carranza, Mario E., ‘Can the NPT Survive? The Theory and Practice of US Nuclear Non-proliferation Policy after Sept. 11’, Contemporary Security Policy 27/3 (Dec. 2006), 489–525.
   Google Scholar
• Chayes, Abram, and Antonia Handler Chayes, ‘On Compliance’, International Organization 47/2 (Spring 1993), 175–205.
   Google Scholar
• Coe, Andrew and Jane Vaynman, ‘Collusion and the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime’, Working Paper (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Cortell, Andrew P. and James W. Davis, ‘How Do International Institutions Matter? The Domestic Impact of International Rules and Norms’, International Studies Quarterly 40/4 (Dec. 1996), 451–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, Campbell, ‘American Power Preponderance and the Nuclear Revolution’, Review of International Studies 35/1 (Jan. 2009), 27–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, Campbell, and Jan Ruzicka, ‘The Nonproliferation Complex’, Ethics & International Affairs 27/3 (Fall 2013), 329–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daalder, Ivo and Jan Lodal, ‘Logic of Zero – Toward a World Without Nuclear Weapons’, Foreign Affairs 87/6 (Nov. 2008), 80–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daase, Christopher, ‘Der Anfang Vom Ende Des Nuklearen Tabus: Zur Legitimitätskrise Der Weltnuklearordnung’, Zeitschrift Für Internationale Beziehungen 10/1 (June 2003), 7–41.
   Google Scholar
• Dai, Xinyuan, International Institutions and National Policies (Cambridge: CUP 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Zachary, ‘The Realist Nuclear Regime’, Security Studies 2/3 (Sept. 1993), 79–99.
   Google Scholar
• Deudney, Daniel, ‘Unipolarity and Nuclear Weapons’, in G. John Ikenberry, Michael Mastanduno and William C. Wohlforth (eds), International Relations Theory and the Consequences of Unipolarity (Cambridge: CUP 2011), 282–316.
   Google Scholar
• Dhanapala, Joyantha, ‘Fulfill and Strengthen the Bargain’, Arms Control Today 38/5 (June 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Dinstein, Yoram, War, Aggression and Self-Defence (Cambridge: CUP 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Dombey, Norman. ‘The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty: Aims, Limitations and Achievements’. New Left Review 52/4 (July 2008), 39-66.
   Google Scholar
• Drezner, Daniel W., ‘Military Primacy Doesn’t Pay (Nearly as Much as You Think)’, International Security 38/1 (July 2013), 52–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte, Sergio. ‘Keeping the NPT Together: A Thankless Job in a Climate of Mistrust’, Nonproliferation Review 13/1 (March 2006), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, Lewis A., ‘Four Decades of Nuclear Nonproliferation: Some Lessons from Wins, Losses, and Draws’, Washington Quarterly 13/3 (Summer 1990), 5–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, Lewis A., ‘High Noon for the NPT’, Arms Control Today 25/6 (July 1995).
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, William, ‘Nuclear Proliferation: The Failure of the Review Conference’, Survival 17/6 (Nov. 1975), 262–9.
   Google Scholar
• Evera, Stephen van, Causes of War: Power and the Roots of Conflict (Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Falk, Richard, ‘Nuclear Weapons Proliferation as a World Order Problem’, International Security 1/3 (Jan. 1977), 79–93.
   Google Scholar
• Feaver, Peter D. and Emerson M.S. Niou, ‘Managing Nuclear Proliferation: Condemn, Strike, or Assist?’, International Studies Quarterly 40/2 (June 1996), 209–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields, Jeffrey R. (ed.), State Behavior and the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime (Atlanta: Univ. of Georgia Press forthcoming 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Fields, Jeffrey and Jason S. Enia, ‘The Health of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime: Returning to a Multidimensional Evaluation’, Nonproliferation Review 16/2 (July 2009), 173–96.
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, Martha and Kathryn Sikkink, ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’, International Organization 52/4 (Autumn 1998), 887–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel, Benjamin, ‘The Brooding Shadow: Systemic Incentives and Nuclear Weapons Proliferation’, Security Studies 2/3–4 (1993), 37–78.
   Google Scholar
• Fuhrmann, Matthew, ‘Taking a Walk on the Supply Side’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 53/2 (April 2009), 181–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuhrmann, Matthew and Jeffrey D. Berejikian, ‘Disaggregating Noncompliance: Abstention Versus Predation in the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 56/3 (April 2012), 355–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garthoff, Raymond L. (ed.), The Great Transition: American-Soviet Relations and the End of the Cold War (New York: Brookings Institution Press 1994).
   Google Scholar
• Gavin, Francis J., ‘Blasts from the Past: Proliferation Lessons from the 1960s’, International Security 29/3 (Jan. 2005), 100–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavin, Francis J., ‘Nuclear Proliferation and Non-Proliferation During the Cold War’, in Melvyn P. Leffler and Odd Arne Westad (eds), The Cambridge History of the Cold War, Vol. 2 (Cambridge: CUP 2012), 395–416.
   Google Scholar
• Gavin, Francis J., Nuclear Statecraft: History and Strategy in America’s Atomic Age (Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, Tim, Atlantiker Gegen Gaullisten: Außenpolitischer Konflikt Und Innerparteilicher Machtkampf in Der CDU/CSU 1958–1969 (Munich: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Gheorghe, Eliza, ‘Atomic Maverick: Romania’s Negotiations for Nuclear Technology, 1964–1970’, Cold War History 13/3 (April 2013), 373–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilpin, Robert, War and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: CUP 1983).
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, Charles L., ‘The Flawed Case for Nuclear Disarmament’, Survival 40/1 (Spring 1998), 112–28.
   Google Scholar
• Glennon, Michael J., ‘How International Rules Die’, Georgetown Law Journal 93/3 (March 2005), 939–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, Thomas, Disarmament Sketches: Three Decades of Arms Control and International Law (Seattle: Univ. of Washington Press 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Grand, Camille, The Non-Proliferation Treaty in an Era of Proliferation Crises (Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Grotto, Andrew, ‘Why Do States That Oppose Nuclear Proliferation Resist New Nonproliferation Obligations: Three Logics of Nonproliferation Decision-Making’, Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law 18/1 (Winter 2010), 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, Marianne, ‘The Future of the NPT’, Australian Journal of International Affairs 59/3 (Sept. 2005), 301–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Kai, ‘Undermining Adversaries: Unipolarity, Threat Perception, and Negative Balancing Strategies after the Cold War’, Security Studies 21/2 (2012), 154–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfer, Laurence R., ‘Terminating Treaties’, in Duncan Hollis (ed.), The Oxford Guide to Treaties, (Oxford: OUP 2012), 634–49.
   Google Scholar
• Horovitz, Liviu, ‘Why Do They Want American Nukes: Central and Eastern European Positions Regarding US Nonstrategic Nuclear Weapons’, European Security 23/1 (Feb. 2014), 73–89.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, Michael, ‘The Spread of Nuclear Weapons and International Conflict: Does Experience Matter?’ Journal of Conflict Resolution 53/2 (Jan. 2009), 234–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huth, Paul K., Extended Deterrence and the Prevention of War (New Haven, CT: Yale UP 1991).
   Google Scholar
• Hymans, Jacques E.C. The Psychology of Nuclear Proliferation: Identity, Emotions and Foreign Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge UP 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, Ursula, ‘The Ambivalent Neutral’, Nonproliferation Review 19/2 (July 2012), 267–92.
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, Robert, The Meaning of the Nuclear Revolution: Statecraft and the Prospect of Armageddon (Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP 1989).
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, Robert, ‘International Primacy: Is the Game Worth the Candle?’ International Security 17/4 (April 1993), 52–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Lyndon Baines, The Vantage Point: Perspectives of the Presidency, 1963–1969 (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston 1971).
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, Alastair Iain, ‘How New and Assertive is China’s New Assertiveness?’ International Security 37/4 (April 2013), 7–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyner, Daniel H., ‘What If Iran Withdraws from the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty?’ ESIL Reflections 1/5 (Dec. 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, Shashank and Michael Stephens, ‘An Uncertain Future: Regional Responses to Iran’s Nuclear Programme’, Whitehall Report 4 (London: Royal United Services Institute Dec. 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, Robert Gordon, Arms Control During the Pre-Nuclear Era: The United States and Naval Limitation Between the Two World Wars (New York: Columbia UP 1994).
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, Chaim D. and Robert A. Pape, ‘Explaining Costly International Moral Action: Britain’s Sixty-Year Campaign Against the Atlantic Slave Trade’, International Organization 53/4 (Autumn 1999), 631–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert O., ‘The Big Influence of Small Allies’, Foreign Policy No. 2 (Spring 1971), 161–82.
   Google Scholar
• Kmentt, Alexander, ‘How Divergent Views on Nuclear Disarmament Threaten the NPT’, Arms Control Today 43/10 (Dec. 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Knopf, Jeffrey W., ‘Nuclear Disarmament and Nonproliferation: Examining the Linkage Argument’, International Security 37/3 (Dec. 2012), 92–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knopf, Jeffrey W. (ed.), Security Assurances and Nuclear Nonproliferation (Stanford UP 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Krause, Joachim, ‘Enlightenment and Nuclear Order’, International Affairs 83/3 (May 2007), 483–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroenig, Matthew, ‘Exporting the Bomb: Why States Provide Sensitive Nuclear Assistance’, American Political Science Review 103/1 (Feb. 2009), 113–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroenig, Matthew, ‘Force or Friendship? Explaining Great Power Nonproliferation Policy’, Security Studies 23/1 ( March 2014), 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroenig, Matthew, ‘Beyond Optimism and Pessimism: The Differential Effects of Nuclear Proliferation’, Managing the Atom Working Paper Series (Cambridge: Harvard Kennedy School Nov. 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Laumulin, Murat, ‘Nuclear Politics and the Future Security of Kazakhstan’, Nonproliferation Review 1/2 (Winter 1994), 61–5.
   Google Scholar
• Layne, Christopher, ‘The Unipolar Illusion: Why New Great Powers Will Rise’, International Security 17/4 (April 1993), 5–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levite, Ariel E., ‘Never Say Never Again: Nuclear Reversal Revisited’, International Security 27/3 (Jan. 2003), 59–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, Patricia M., ‘A Middle East Free of Nuclear Weapons: Possible, Probable or Pipe-dream?’ International Affairs 89/2 (March 2013), 433–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MccGwire, Michael, ‘The Rise and Fall of the NPT: An Opportunity for Britain’, International Affairs 81/1 (Jan. 2005), 115–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahbubani, Kishore, ‘The Impending Demise of the Postwar System’, Survival 47/4 (July 2006), 7–18.
   Google Scholar
• March, James G. and Johan P. Olsen, Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics (New York: The Free Press 1989).
   Google Scholar
• Marwell, Gerald and Pamela Oliver, The Critical Mass in Collective Action (Cambridge: CUP 1993).
   Google Scholar
• Mastny, Vojtech, ‘Was 1968 a Strategic Watershed of the Cold War?’ Diplomatic History 29/1 (Jan. 2005), 149–77.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, Paul, ‘Saving the NPT: Time to Renew Treaty Commitments’, Nonproliferation Review 16/3 (Nov. 2009), 463–72.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Nicholas L., ‘Nuclear Dominos: A Self-Defeating Prophecy?’ Security Studies 23/1 ( March 2014), 33–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Steven E., ‘Proliferation, Disarmament and the Future of the Non-Proliferation Treaty’, in Sverre Lodgaard and Bremer Maerli (eds), Nuclear Proliferation and International Security (New York: Routledge 2007), 50–69.
   Google Scholar
• Monroe, Kristen R., Adam Martin, and Priyanka Ghosh, ‘Politics and an Innate Moral Sense: Scientific Evidence for an Old Theory?’ Political Research Quarterly 62/3 (Sept. 2009), 614–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteiro, Nuno P., ‘Unrest Assured: Why Unipolarity Is Not Peaceful’, International Security 36/3 (Winter 2011), 9–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhatzhanova, Gaukhar, ‘Rough Seas Ahead: Issues for the 2015 NPT Review Conference’, Arms Control Today 44/3 (April 2014), 20–6.
   Google Scholar
• Mukhatzhanova, Gaukhar and William C. Potter, Nuclear Politics and the Non-Aligned Movement (London: Routledge 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Harald, ‘Between Power and Justice: Current Problems and Perspectives of the NPT Regime’, Strategic Analysis 34/2 (March 2010), 189–201.
   Google Scholar
• Myrdal, Alva, The Game of Disarmament : How the United States and Russia Run the Arms Race (Manchester UP 1977).
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, Iver B. and Erik F. Øverland, ‘International Relations and Policy Planning: The Method of Perspectivist Scenario Building’, International Studies Perspectives 5/3 (2004), 258–77.
   Google Scholar
• Nuti, Leopoldo, ‘Negotiating with the Enemy and Having Problems with the Allies: The Impact of the Non-proliferation Treaty on Transatlantic Relations’, in Jussi Hanhimäki, Georges-Henri Soutou, and Basil Germond (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Transatlantic Security (New York: Routledge 2010), 89–102.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, Joseph S., ‘Maintaining a Nonproliferation Regime’, International Organization 35/1 (Winter 1981), 15–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, Joseph S., ‘NPT: The Logic of Inequality’, Foreign Policy No. 59 (July 1985), 123–31.
   Google Scholar
• Pape, Robert A., ‘Soft Balancing Against the United States’, International Security 30/1 (Summer 2005), 7–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, T.V., ‘Systemic Conditions and Security Cooperation: Explaining the Persistence of the Nuclear Non-proliferation Regime’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 16/1 (Nov. 2003), 135–54.
   Google Scholar
• Perkovich, George, ‘Bush’s Nuclear Revolution: A Regime Change in Nonproliferation’, Foreign Affairs 82/2 (April 2003), 2–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkovich, George, ‘The End of the Nonproliferation Regime?’ Current History 105/694 (Nov. 2006), 355–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posen, Barry R., ‘US Security Policy in a Nuclear‐armed World or What If Iraq Had Had Nuclear Weapons?’ Security Studies 6/3 (Spring 1997), 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Posen, Barry R., ‘Command of the Commons: The Military Foundation of US Hegemony’, International Security 28/1 (Summer 2003), 5–46.
   Google Scholar
• Posen, Barry R., ‘Pull Back’, Foreign Affairs 92/1 (Feb. 2013), 116–28.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, William C., ‘India and the New Look of US Nonproliferation Policy’, Nonproliferation Review 12/2 (July 2005), 343–54.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, William C., ‘The NPT and the Sources of Nuclear Restraint’, Daedalus 139/1 (Jan. 2010), 68–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, William C. and Gaukhar Mukhatzhanova, ‘Divining Nuclear Intentions: A Review Essay’, International Security 33/1 (Summer 2008), 139–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, William C. and Gaukhar Mukhatzhanova (eds), Forecasting Nuclear Proliferation in the 21st Century: A Comparative Perspective (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford UP 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Power, Paul F., ‘The Mixed State of Non-Proliferation: The NPT Review Conference and Beyond’, International Affairs 62/3 (July 1986), 477–91.
   Google Scholar
• Price, Richard, ‘Nuclear Weapons Don’t Kill People, Rogues Do’, International Politics 44/2 (2007), 232–49.
   Google Scholar
• Quester, George H., ‘The Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and the International Atomic Energy Agency’, International Organization 24/2 (April 1970), 163–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathbun, Nina Srinivasan, ‘The Role of Legitimacy in Strengthening the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime’, Nonproliferation Review 13/2 (July 2006), 227–52.
   Google Scholar
• Rauf, Tariq and Rebecca Johnson, ‘After the NPT’s Indefinite Extension: The Future of the Global Nonproliferation Regime’, Nonproliferation Review 3/1 (Fall 1995), 28–42.
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, Mitchell B., ‘The Nuclear Tipping Point: Prospects for a World of Many Nuclear Weapons States’, in Kurt M. Campbell, Robert J. Einhorn, and Mitchell B. Reiss (eds), The Nuclear Tipping Point: Why States Reconsider Their Nuclear Choices (New York: Brookings Institution Press 2004), 3-17.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, Condoleezza and Philip D. Zelikow, Germany Unified and Europe Transformed: A Study in Statecraft (Boston: Harvard UP 1995).
   Google Scholar
• Rockwood, Laura, ‘The IAEA’s Strengthened Safeguards System’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law 7/1 (June 2002), 123–36.
   Google Scholar
• Rublee, Maria Rost, ‘Taking Stock of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime: Using Social Psychology to Understand Regime Effectiveness’, International Studies Review 10/3 (Sept. 2008), 420–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagan, Scott D., ‘The Causes of Nuclear Weapons Proliferation’, Annual Review of Political Science 14 (June 2011), 225–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagan, Scott D. and Kenneth Waltz, The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A Debate Renewed (New York: Norton 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Sarotte, Mary E., 1989: The Struggle to Create Post-Cold War Europe (Princeton UP 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Scheinman, Lawrence, ‘Does the NPT Matter?’, in Joseph F. Pilat and Robert E. Pendley (eds), Beyond 1995: The Future of the NPT Regime (New York: Plenum 1990), 53–64.
   Google Scholar
• Schell, Jonathan, ‘The Folly of Arms Control’, Foreign Affairs 79/5 (Sept. 2000), 22–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelling, Thomas C., Micromotives and Macrobehavior (New York: Norton 1978).
   Google Scholar
• Seaborg, Glenn T., and Benjamin S. Loeb, Stemming the Tide: Arms Control in the Johnson Years (Lexington MA: Lexington Books 1987).
   Google Scholar
• Sechser, Todd S. and Matthew Fuhrmann, ‘Crisis Bargaining and Nuclear Blackmail’, International Organization 67/1 (Jan. 2013), 173–95.
   Google Scholar
• Selden, Zachary, ‘Balancing Against or Balancing With? The Spectrum of Alignment and the Endurance of American Hegemony’, Security Studies 22/2 (2013), 330–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selvage, Douglas, The Warsaw Pact and Nuclear Nonproliferation 1963–1965, Working Paper, Cold War International History Project (Washington DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars April 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Shaker, Mohamed Ibrahim, The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty: Origin and Implementation, 1959–1979, Vol. 2 (New York: Oceana 1980).
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, David A., ‘Social Networks and Collective Action’, American Journal of Political Science 53/1 (Jan. 2009), 122–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, John and Darryl Howlett, ‘The NPT Renewal Conference: Stumbling toward 1995’, International Security 19/1 (Summer 1994), 41–71.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Roger K., ‘Opaque Proliferation and the Fate of the Non‐Proliferation Regime’, Journal of Strategic Studies 13/3 (May 1990), 92–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, Jed C., ‘The Nonproliferation Regime: Managing the Impending Crisis’, Journal of Strategic Studies 8/4 (Dec. 1985), 7–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solingen, Etel, Nuclear Logics: Contrasting Paths in East Asia and the Middle East (Princeton UP 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Stein, Jana von, ‘The Engines of Compliance’, in Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack (eds), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (Cambridge: CUP 2012), 477–501.
   Google Scholar
• Swango, Dane, ‘The United States and the Role of Nuclear Cooperation and Assistance in the Design of the NPT’, International History Review ( Forthcoming 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Tannenwald, Nina, ‘Justice and Fairness in the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime’, Ethics & International Affairs 27/3 (Fall 2013), 299–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thayer, Bradley A., ‘The Causes of Nuclear Proliferation and the Utility of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime’, Security Studies 4/3 (Spring 1995), 463–519.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Daniel C., The Helsinki Effect: International Norms, Human Rights, and the Demise of Communism (Princeton UP 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Alexander, ‘Coercive Enforcement of International Law’, in Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack (eds), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (Cambridge: CUP 2012), 502–23.
   Google Scholar
• Vamvoukos, Athanassios, Termination of Treaties in International Law: The Doctrines of Rebus Sic Stantibus and Desuetude (Oxford: OUP 1985).
   Google Scholar
• Verdier, Daniel, ‘Multilateralism, Bilateralism, and Exclusion in the Nuclear Proliferation Regime’, International Organization 62/3 (July 2008), 439–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, William, ‘Nuclear Enlightenment and Counter-enlightenment’, International Affairs 83/3 (May 2007), 431–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, Jim, Learning from Past Success: The NPT and the Future of Non-Proliferation (Stockholm: Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Walt, Stephen M., ‘Alliances in a Unipolar World’, World Politics 61/1 (Jan. 2009), 86–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltz, Kenneth N., ‘The Emerging Structure of International Politics’, International Security 18/2 (Fall 1993), 44–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Way, Christopher and Karthika Sasikumar, ‘Leaders and Laggards: When and Why Do Countries Sign the NPT?’ Working Paper 16 (Montreal: Research Group in International Security 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, Susan B., ‘Delegate Perspectives on the 1995 NPT Review and Extension Conference’, Nonproliferation Review 2/3 (Spring 1995), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Wesley, Michael, ‘It’s Time to Scrap the NPT’, Australian Journal of International Affairs 59/3 (Sept. 2005), 283–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohlstetter, Albert, ‘Spreading the Bomb Without Quite Breaking the Rules’, Foreign Policy No. 25 (Winter 1976), 88–179.
   Google Scholar
• Yew, Yvonne, ‘Diplomacy and Nuclear Non-Proliferation: Navigating the Non-Aligned Movement’ (Harvard Kennedy School Discussion Paper June 2011).
   Google Scholar