Rediscovering US Military Strategy: A Role for Doctrine

Bibliography

• Alberts, David S., John J. Gartska, and Frederick P. Stein, Network Centric Warfare: Developing and Leveraging Information Superiority (Washington: C4ISR Cooperative Research Program, 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Arreguin-Toft, Ivan, How the Weak Win Wars: A Theory of Asymmetric Conflict (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Bigelow, John, The Principles of Strategy: Illustrated Mainly from American Campaigns, 2nd edn (New York: J.B. Lippincott, 1894).
   Google Scholar
• Clausewitz, Carl von, On War, trans. Michael Howard and Peter Paret (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, 1986).
   Google Scholar
• Clausewitz, Carl von, Vom Kriege, 19th edn (Bonn: Ferd. Dümmlers, 1989).
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, Arthur L., Strategy (Kansas City: Hudson-Kimberly, 1904).
   Google Scholar
• CNO Strategic Studies Group XIV, The International Security Environment to the Year 2005 (Newport, RI: Naval Institute, 1995).
   Google Scholar
• Cordesman, Anthony H., The Lessons of Afghanistan: War Fighting, Intelligence, and Force Transformation (Washington: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Cornish, Edward, Futuring: The Exploration of the Future (Bethesda, MD: World Future Society, 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Cornish, Edward, The Study of the Future: An Introduction to the Art and Science of Understanding and Shaping Tomorrow’s World (Washington: World Future Society, 1984).
   Google Scholar
• Department of Defense, ‘Military Support for Stability, Security, Transition, and Reconstruction (SSTR) Operations,’ Department of Defense Directive No. 3000.05, Washington, 28 November 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Deptula, David, ‘Effects-Based Operations: Changes in the Nature of Warfare’ (Arlington, VA: Aerospace Education Foundation, 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Echevarria II, Antulio J., ‘After Afghanistan: Lessons for NATO’s Future Wars’, RUSI Journal 159/3 (2014), 20–23.
   Google Scholar
• Echevarria II, Antulio J., ‘American Operational Art, 1917–2008,’ in John Andreas Olsen and Martin van Creveld (eds), The Evolution of Operational Art: From Napoleon to the Present (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Echevarria II, Antulio J., Military Strategy: A Very Short Introduction (New York: Oxford University Press, forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Echevarria II, Antulio J., Reconsidering the American Way of War: US Military Practice from the Revolution to Afghanistan (Washington: Georgetown University Press, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Engelbrecht, Jr, Joseph A., Lt Col Robert L. Bivins, Maj Patrick M. Condray, Maj Merrily D. Fecteau, Maj John P. Geis II, Maj Kevin C. Smith, Alternative Futures for 2025: Security Planning to Avoid Surprise (Maxwell AFB, AL: Air University, 1996).
   Google Scholar
• English, John A., ‘The Operational Art: Developments in the Theories of War,’ in B.J.C. McKercher and Michael A. Hennessy (eds), The Operational Art: Developments in the Theories of War (Westport, CT: Praeger, 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Fiebeger, G. J., Elements of Strategy (West Point, NY: US Military Academy, 1917).
   Google Scholar
• Findley, Michael G. and Scott Edwards, ‘Accounting for the Unaccounted: Weak-Actor Social Structure in Asymmetric Wars,’ International Studies Quarterly 51/3 (2007), 583–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, Lawrence, ‘Frostbitten: Decoding the Cold War, 20 Years Later,’ Foreign Affairs 89/2 (2010), 136–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gompert, David C., Richard L. Kugler and Martin C. Libiki, Mind the Gap: Promoting a Transatlantic Revolution in Military Affairs (Washington: National Defense University, 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Colin, The Strategy Bridge: Theory for Practice (Oxford: Oxford University, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Grimmett, Richard R., ‘Instances of Use of U.S. Armed Forces Abroad 1798–2007,’ RL 32170, Congressional Research Service, Washington, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hamley, Edward B., The Operations of War Explained and Illustrated, 5th edn (Edinburgh: Blackwood, 1889).
   Google Scholar
• Haney, Eric L., Beyond Shock and Awe: Warfare in the 21st Century (New York: Berkley Caliber, 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Heilbroner, Robert, Visions of the Future: The Distant Past, Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995).
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, Rolf, ‘Blitzkrieg, the Revolution in Military Affairs and Defense Intellectuals,’ Journal of Strategic Studies 33/4 (2010), 625–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloman, Kimberly, ‘Complex Adaptive Systems Theory and Military Transformation,’ in Yin Shan and Ang Yang (eds), Applications of Complex Adaptive Systems (Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Joint Chiefs of Staff, Joint Publication 3-0, Doctrine for Joint Operations (Washington, 1995).
   Google Scholar
• Joint Chiefs of Staff, Joint Publication 3-07, Joint Doctrine for Military Operations Other than War (Washington, 1995).
   Google Scholar
• Jomini, Antoine-Henri, The Art of War, trans. G.H. Mendell and W.P. Craighill (Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott, 1862).
   Google Scholar
• Kaldor, Mary, New and Old Wars (Cambridge: Polity, 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Kilcullen, David, ‘Countering Global Insurgency,’ Journal of Strategic Studies 28/4 (2004), 597–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox, MacGregor and Williamson Murray (eds), The Dynamics of Military Revolution, 1300–2050 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Licklider, Roy, ‘The Power of Oil: The Arab Oil Weapon and the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Canada, Japan, and the United States,’ International Studies Quarterly 32 (1988): 205–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowther, Adam, Americans and Asymmetric Conflict: Lebanon, Somalia, and Afghanistan (Westport, CT: Praeger Security International, 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Lykke, Arthur F., Jr, ‘Toward an Understanding of Military Strategy,’ in Art Lykke (ed.), Military Strategy: Theory and Application (Carlisle, PA: US Army War College, 1993).
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, Andrew W., ‘Some Thoughts on Military Revolutions,’ ONA Memorandum for US Secretary of Defense, 27 July 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Mattis, James N., ‘USJFCOM Commander’s Guidance for Effects-Based Operations,’ Parameters 38/3 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, John J., ‘Why We Will Soon Miss the Cold War,’ Atlantic Monthly 266/2 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Nitzschke, Stephen G., ‘Vietnam: A Complex Adaptive Perspective,’ 1997, <http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/1997/Nitzschke.htm>.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, William A., ‘The Emerging US System of Systems,’ in Martin Libicki and Stuart Johnson (eds), Dominant Battlespace Knowledge: The Winning Edge (Washington: National Defense University, 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Owens, William A., Lifting the Fog of War (New York: Farrar, 2000).
   Google Scholar
• Paul, T.V., Asymmetric Conflicts: War Initiation by Weaker Powers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).
   Google Scholar
• Rescher, Nicholas, Predicting the Future: An Introduction to the Theory of Forecasting (Albany: SUNY Press, 1998).
   Google Scholar
• Stone, John, Military Strategy: The Politics and Technique of War (London: Continuum, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Tangredi, Sam J., Futures of War: Toward a Consensus View of the Future Security Environment, 2010-2035 (Newport, RI: Alidade Press, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Toffler, Alvin, Powershift: Knowledge, Wealth, and Violence at the Edge of the 21st Century (New York: Bantam, 1990).
   Google Scholar
• Ullman, Harlan and James P. Wade, Shock and Awe: Achieving Rapid Dominance (Washington: Center for Advanced Concepts and Technology, 1996).
   Google Scholar
• US Army Training and Doctrine Command, Knowledge & Speed (Fort Monroe, VA, 1996).
   Google Scholar
• US Joint Forces Command, ‘Rapid Decisive Operations White Paper,’ Norfolk, VA, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• US Institute of Peace, The QDR in Perspective: Meeting America’s National Security Needs in the 21^st Century (Washington, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• US Under Secretary of Defense (Policy), Maintaining U.S. Military Superiority (Newport, RI: Office of the Secretary of Defense, Net Assessment, 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Van Creveld, Martin, The Transformation of War (New York: Free Press, 1991).
   Google Scholar