Doctrine and Defence Transformation in Norway and Sweden

Bibliography

• Agrell, Wilhelm, Fredens illusioner: Det svenska nationella försvarets nedgång och fall [Peace illusions: The decline and fall of the Swedish national defence] (Stockholm: Atlantis, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Agrell, Wilhelm, Ett krig här och nu: Från svensk fredsoperation till upprorsbekämpning i Afghanistan 2001–2014 [A war here and now: From Swedish peace operation to counterinsurgency in Afghanistan 2001–2014] (Stockholm: Atlantis 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Allied Joint Doctrine for Counterinsurgency (COIN) – AJP-3.4.4 (Brussels: NATO, February 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, Morten Line, Norsk tillnærming til opprørsbekjempning: Illusjon eller realitet? [The Norwegian approach to counterinsurgency: Illusion or reality?], MA Thesis (Oslo: The Norwegian Defence University College, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Angstrom, Jan and Honig, Jan Willem, ‘Regaining Strategy: Small Powers, Strategic Culture, and Escalation in Afghanistan’, The Journal of Strategic Studies 35/5 (October 2012), 663–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyris, Chris and Schön, Donald A., Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice (New York: Addison-Wesley, 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Bekkestad, Erlend, Forsvarets fellesoperative doktrine – anvendelig verktøy eller støvsamler? [The Norwegian joint doctrine –useful tool or dust collector?], MA Thesis (Oslo: The Norwegian Defence University College, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, Niklas, Syfte och mening inom svensk doktrinutveckling [The purpose and meaning of Swedish doctrine development], BA Thesis (Stockholm: Swedish National Defence College, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Bjerga, Kjell Inge, ‘Militær tenkning mellom teori og praksis’ [Military thinking between theory and practice], in Tormod Heier (ed), Nytt landskap – nytt forsvar [New landscape – new defence force] (Oslo: Abstrakt, 2011), 164–211.
   Google Scholar
• Bjerga, Kjell Inge and Haaland, Torunn Laugen, ‘Development of Military Doctrine: The Particular Case of Small States’, The Journal of Strategic Studies, 33/4 (August 2010), 505–33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björeman, Carl, Försvarets förfall: Konsten att lägga ned försvaret utan att någon bryr sig [The degeneration of the Swedish defence: The art of abolishing the Swedish defence without anyone caring] (Stockholm: Santérus, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Crane, Conrad, ‘United States’, in Thomas Rid and Thomas Keany (eds): Understanding Counterinsurgency: Doctrine, Operations, and Challenges (London and New York: Routledge, 2010), 59–72.
   Google Scholar
• Echevarria II, Antulio J., ‘War’s Second Grammar’ (Carlisle, PA: US Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute: Op-Ed, October 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Edström, Håkan and Petersson, Magnus, ‘Akademisering på avvägar? Utbildning och forskning i krigsvetenskap på Försvarshögskolan’ [Failed academization? War Studies education and research at the Swedish National Defence College], Kungl. Krigsvetenskapsakademiens Handlingar och Tidskrift 2 (April/June 2013), 37–46.
   Google Scholar
• Ett användbart försvar [A useful defence], Prop. 2008/09:140 (Stockholm: Försvarsdepartementet [Swedish Ministry of Defence], 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, Theo and Terriff, Terry, ‘Introduction’, in Theo Farrell and Terry Terriff (eds), The Sources of Military Change: Culture, Politics, Technology (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2002), 7–13.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, Theo and Terriff, Terry, ‘Military transformation in NATO’, in Terry Terriff, Frans Osinga and Theo Farrell, A Transformation Gap? American Innovations and European Military Change (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2010), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, Theo and Rynning, Sten, ‘NATO’s Transformation Gaps: Transatlantic Differences and the War in Afghanistan’, The Journal of Strategic Studies, 33/5 (October 2010), 673–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FM 3–24, Counterinsurgency (Washington, DC: Department of the Army, February 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Försvarspolitisk inriktning – Sveriges försvar 2016–2020 [Sweden’s Defence Policy 2016–2020] (Stockholm: Försvarsdepartementet, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Heurlin, Bertel, ‘Forsvar og sikkerhed i Norden: Ligheder og forskelle hos de nordiske lande [Defence and Security in the Nordic Countries: Differences and Similarities in the Nordic Countries]’, in Bertel Heurlin (ed.), Nationen eller Verden? De nordiske landes forsvar i dag [The Nation or the World? The Defence Forces of the Nordic Countries Today] (Copenhagen: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag, 2007), 65–70.
   Google Scholar
• Høiback, Harald, ‘What is Doctrine’, The Journal of Strategic Studies 34/6 (2011), 879–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Høiback, Harald, Understanding Military Doctrine: A Multidisciplinary Approach (London: Routledge, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, Peter Viggo and Thruelsen, Peter Dahl, ‘Clear, Hold, Train: Denmark’s Military Operations in Helmand 2006–2010’, in Nanna Hvidt and Hans Mouritzen (eds), Danish Foreign Policy Yearbook 2011 (Copenhagen: DIIS, 2011), 78–100.
   Google Scholar
• Kier, Elizabeth, Imagining War: French and British Military Doctrine between the Wars (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Kronvall, Olof, Finally Eating Soup with a Knife? A Historical Perspective on the US Army’s 2006 Counterinsurgency Doctrine, Oslo Files 5 (Oslo: The Norwegian Institute for Defence Studies, 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Kronvall, Olof and Petersson, Magnus, ‘US and NATO COIN Doctrine – Logic, Contents and Implications’, Paper presented at the Annual ISA Convention in Montreal, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Neal, Derrick J., ‘Do We Really Understand What is Meant by Transformational Change for Defence?’, Defence Studies 6/1 (2006), 73–96.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard Loo (ed) Military Transformation and Strategy: Revolutions in Military Affairs and Small States (New York and London: Routledge, 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Oma, Ida Maria, Small States and Burden-sharing in Allied Operations Abroad: The Case of Norway in ISAF (Oslo: University of Oslo, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Petersson, Magnus, ‘Defense Transformation and Legitimacy in Scandinavia after the Cold War: Theoretical and Practical Implications’, Armed Forces & Society 37/4 (2011), 701–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersson, Magnus, ‘NATO and the EU ˮNeutralsˮ – Instrumental or Value Oriented Utility?’, in Håkan Edström, Janne Haaland Matlary and Magnus Petersson (eds) NATO: The Power of Partnerships (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011), 112–30.
   Google Scholar
• Petersson, Magnus, ‘NATO’s “Neutral” Partners Post ISAF. Back to the Future?’, in Johann Frank and Walter Matyas (eds) Strategie und Sicherheit 2013. Chancen und Grenzen europäischer militärischer Integration (Wien, Köln, Weimar: Böhlau Verlag, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Petersson, Magnus and Saxi, Håkon Lunde, ‘Shifted Roles: Explaining Danish and Norwegian Alliance Strategy 1949–2009’, The Journal of Strategic Studies 36/6 (2013), 761–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posen, Barry R., The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany between the World Wars (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984).
   Google Scholar
• Ringsmose, Jens, ‘Conducting Counterinsurgency by Alliance: Wave of the Future or Strategic End?’, in Karl Erik Haug and Ole Jørgen Maaø (eds), Conceptualising Modern War: A Critical Inquiry (London: C. Hurst & Co, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Roxborough, Ian, ‘From Revolution to Transformation: The State of the Field’, Joint Forces Quarterly 32/2 (Autumn 2002), 68–75.
   Google Scholar
• Schreer, Benjamin, ‘The Evolution of NATO’s Strategy in Afghanistan’, in Håkan Edström and Dennis Gyllensporre (eds), Pursuing Strategy: NATO Operations from the Gulf War to Gaddafi (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012), 139–56.
   Google Scholar
• Sloan, Elinor, Military Transformation and Modern Warfare: A Reference Handbook (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Strachan, Hew, ‘Strategy or Alibi: Obama McChrystal, and the Operational Level of War’, Survival 52/5 ( October November 2010), 157–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ucko, David: The New Counterinsurgency Era: Transforming the U.S. Military for Modern Wars (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2009).
   Google Scholar