Red Teaming the Rebalance: The Theory and Risks of US Asia Strategy

Bibliography

• Albright, David and Corey Gay, “Taiwan: Nuclear Nightmare Averted,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 54/1 (1998), 54–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angell, Norman, The Great Illusion (New York: Cosimo Classics 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Barma, Nazneen, Ely Ratner, and Steven Weber, “Welcome to the world without the West,” National Interest, 12 November 2014, <http://nationalinterest.org/feature/welcome-the-world-without-the-west-11651>.
   Google Scholar
• Bitzinger, Richard, “Military Modernization in Asia,” in Thomas G. Mahnken and Dan Blumenthal (eds), Strategy in Asia: Past, Present, and Future (Palo Alto CA: Stanford University Press 2014), 162–84.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, Dennis C., “Military Power Projection in Asia,” in Ashley Tellis, Mercy Kuo, and Andrew Marble (eds), Strategic Asia 2008–9: Challenges and Choices (Seattle WA: National Bureau of Asian Research 2008), 390–420.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Kurt and Brian Andrews, Explaining the U.S. “Pivot” to Asia (London: Chatham House 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Caporaso, James A., “International Relations Theory and Multilateralism: The Search for Foundations,” International Organization 46/3 (1992), 599–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlisle, Herbert, “PACAF Strategy in the Asia–Pacific Region,” presentation at CSIS, Washington, 5 May 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Cha, Victor D., “Powerplay: Origins of the U.S. Alliance System in Asia,” International Security 34/3 (2010), 158–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakravorti, Bhaskar, “China’s new development bank is a wake-up call for Washington,” Harvard Business Review, 20 April 2015, <https://hbr.org/2015/04/chinas-new-development-bank-is-a-wake-up-call-for-washington>.
   Google Scholar
• Clinton, Hillary R., “America’s Pacific Century,” Foreign Policy 189/1 (2011), <http://foreignpolicy.com/2011/10/11/Americas-pacific-century/>.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Michael and Andrew O’Neil, “Doubts Down Under: American Extended Deterrence, Australia, and the 1999 East Timor Crisis,” International Relations of the Asia–Pacific 15/1 (2015), 27–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donilon, Tom, “The United States and the Asia–Pacific in 2013,” remarks delivered at the Asia Society, New York, 11 March 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, Michael W., “Three Pillars of the Democratic Peace,” American Political Science Review 99/3 (2005), 463–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedberg, Aaron L., “Ripe for Rivalry: Prospects for Peace in a Multipolar Asia,” International Security 18/3 (1993), 5–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, Evelyn, “Great Powers and Hierarchical Order in Southeast Asia: Analyzing Regional Security Strategies,” International Security 32/3 (2007/8), 113–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, Evelyn, The Struggle for Order: Hegemony, Hierarchy, and Transition in Post-Cold War East Asia (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Greenert, Jonathan, “The Navy’s Rebalance to Asia: Challenges and Opportunities,” presentation at CSIS, Washington, 15 May 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Grieco, Joseph M., “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism,” International Organization 42/3 (1988), 485–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagel, Chuck, “Developing a Third, Game-Changing Offset Strategy,” keynote address at the Southeastern New England Defense Industry Alliance, Newport, RI, 3 September 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Haggard, Stephan, “Institutions and Growth in East Asia,” Studies in Comparative International Development 38/4 (2004), 53–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersman, Rebecca C.K. and Robert Peters, “Nuclear U-Turns: Learning from South Korean and Taiwanese Rollback,” Nonproliferation Review 13/3 (2006), 539–53.
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. John, Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of America’s World Order (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Van, “Power, Trust, and Network Complexity: Three Logics of Hedging in Asian Security,” International Relations of the Asia–Pacific 14/3 (2014), 331–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, Van, “Raindrops Keep Falling on My Nuclear Umbrella,” Foreign Policy (2015). <http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/05/18/raindrops-keep-falling-on-my-nuclear-umbrella-us-japan-south-north-korea/>.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Van, “The Rise and Persistence of Strategic Hedging across Asia: A System-Level Analysis,” in Ashley Tellis, Abraham Denmark, and Greg Chaffin (eds), Strategic Asia 2014– 15:U.S. Alliances and Partnerships at the Center of Global Power (Seattle: National Bureau of Asian Research 2014), 316–42.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Van, Rival Reputations: Coercion and Credibility in U.S.–North Korea Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Van, Drone Warfare on the Korean Peninsula: Paradigm Shift or Paradigm Risk? (Washington: Korea Economic Institute of America 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, Robert, Perception and Misperception in International Politics (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press 1976).
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, Robert, The Logic of Images in International Relations (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press 1970).
   Google Scholar
• Kang, David C., Crony Capitalism: Corruption and Development in South Korea and the Philippines (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, Peter J., Robert O. Keohane, and Stephen D. Krasner, “International Organization and the Study of World Politics,” International Organization 52/4 (1988), 645–85.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert O., After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the International Political Economy (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press 1984).
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert O., “International Institutions: Two Approaches,” International Studies Quarterly 32/4 (1988), 379–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert O. and Lisa L. Martin, “The Promise of Institutionalist Theory,” International Security 20/1 (1995), 39–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert O. and Joseph S. Nye, Jr, “Power and Interdependence,” Survival 15/4 (1973), 158–65.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert O. and Joseph S. Nye, Jr, Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition (Boston: Little, Brown 1977).
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Yong-soo, “GI pullout harms US national interest,” Korea Herald, 26 September 1978, 5.
   Google Scholar
• Krasner, Stephen D., “Sovereignty: An Institutional Perspective,” Comparative Political Studies 21/1 (1988), 66–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiber, Keir, “Grasping the Technological Peace: The Offense–Defense Balance and International Security,” International Security 25/1 (2000), 71–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipset, Seymour Martin, “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy,” American Political Science Review 53/1 (1959), 69–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locklear III, Samuel J., “A Combatant Commander”s View on the Asia–Pacific Rebalance: The Patch-Work Quilt,” speech to the Asia Society, New York, 6 December 2012
   Google Scholar
• Lord, Kristin, The Perils and Promise of Global Transparency (New York: SUNY Press 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Manning, Robert A., “The Asian Paradox: Toward a New Architecture,” World Policy Journal 10/3 (1993), 55–64.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, Gary and Larry J. Diamond (eds), Reexamining Democracy: Essays in Honor of Seymour Martin Lipset (Newbury Park CA: Sage 1992).
   Google Scholar
• Meirsheimer, John J., “Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War,” International Security 15/1 (1990), 5–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meirsheimer, John J., “The False Promise of International Institutions,” International Security 19/3 (1994), 5–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, Evan Braden, “Contested Primacy in the Western Pacific: China’s Rise and the Future of U.S. Power Projection,” International Security 38/4 (2014), 115–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, Barrington, Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy (Boston: Beacon 1966).
   Google Scholar
• Murauskaite, Egle, “North Korea’s cyber capabilities: deterrence and stability in a changing strategic environment,” 38 North, 12 September 2014, <http://38north.org/2014/09/emurauskaite091214/>.
   Google Scholar
• Panetta, Leon, “The U.S. Rebalance toward the Asia–Pacific,” remarks delivered at the 11th International Institute of Strategic Studies Asian Security Summit, Shangri-La Dialogue, Singapore, 2 June 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Perlez, Jane, “U.S. opposing China’s answer to World Bank,” New York Times, 9 October 2014, <http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/10/world/asia/chinas-plan-for-regional-development-bank-runs-into-us-opposition.html?_r=0>.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Global Attitudes Project, “Ch. 4: How Asians View Each Other,” in Global Opposition to US Surveillance and Drones but Limited Harm to America’s Image (Washington DC: Pew Research Center 2014), 37–41.
   Google Scholar
• Ponnudurai, Parameswaran, “Will China use Russian-style tactics to settle territorial disputes in Asia?” Radio Free Asia, 20 April 2014, <http://www.rfa.org/english/commentaries/east-asia-beat/ukraine-04202014053612.html>.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, James, “China’s Unilateral Sanctions,” Washington Quarterly 35/4 (2012), 121–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhee, Sang-Woo Deterrence and Dialogue: The Korean Peninsula after the Cheonan Incident (Tokyo: National Institute for Defense Studies 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Ruggie, John Gerard, “International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order,” International Organization 36/2 (1982), 379–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russett, Bruce, Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press 1994).
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, Glenn H., “The Security Dilemma in Alliance Politics,” World Politics 36/4 (1984), 461–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solis, Mireya, “The Geopolitical Importance of the Trans-Pacific Partnership: At Stake, a Liberal Economic Order,” Order from Chaos, 13 March 2015, <http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/order-from-chaos/posts/2015/03/13-geopolitical-importance-transpacific-partnership>.
   Google Scholar
• Sutter, Robert G., Michael E. Brown, Timothy J.A. Adamson, Mike M. Mochizuki, and Deepa Ollapally, Balancing Acts: The U.S. Rebalance and Asia–Pacific Stability (Washington: George Washington University Elliott School of International Affairs and Sigur Center for Asian Studies 2013).
   Google Scholar
• US Department of State, “GIST Initiative Launches Innovation and Entrepreneurship Programs,” media note, Washington, 18 June 2011.
   Google Scholar
• US DoD, Asia–Pacific Maritime Security Strategy (Washington: Office of the Secretary of Defense 2015).
   Google Scholar
• US DoD, Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership: Priorities for ^21st Century Defense (Washington: US GPO 2012).
   Google Scholar
• US Office of the Secretary of Defense, Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2013 (Washington: US GPO 2013).
   Google Scholar
• US Office of the Secretary of Defense, Military and Security Developments of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (Washington: US GPO 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, Kenneth N., “The Emerging Structure of International Politics,” International Security 18/2 (1993), 44–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisiger, Alex and Keren Yarhi-Milo, “Revisiting Reputation: How Past Actions Matter in International Politics,” International Organization 69/2 (2015), 473–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Work, Robert, “A Technological Edge over Our Adversaries,” remarks at the National Defense University, Washington, 5 August 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo, Andrew, China, Japan, Korea Trilateral Cooperation: Implications for Northeast Asian Politics and Order (Seoul: East Asia Institute 2013).
   Google Scholar