A Revolution Too Far? US Defence Innovation, Europe and NATO’s Military-Technological Gap

Bibliography

• Adams, Gordon and Guy Ben-Ari, Transforming European Militaries: Coalition Operations and the Technology Gap (Abingdon: Routledge 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Art, Robert J., ‘To What Ends Military Power?’, International Security 4/4 (1980), 3–35.
   Google Scholar
• Ayoub, Kareem and Kenneth Payne, ‘Strategy in the Age of Artificial Intelligence’, Journal of Strategic Studies (2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrie, Douglas, ‘Libya’s Lessons: The Air Campaign’, Survival 54/6 (2012), 57–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, Tai Ming, ‘The Chinese Defense Economy’s Long March from Imitation to Innovation’, Journal of Strategic Studies 34/3 (2011), 325–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cimbala, Steven J., Clausewitz and Chaos: Friction in War and Military Policy (Westport CT: Praeger 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Congressional Budget Office, ‘Growth in DoD’s Budget from 2000 to 2014’, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Coonen, Steven J., ‘The Widening Military Capabilities Gap between the United States and Europe: Does It Matter?’, Parameters 36/3 (2006), 67–84.
   Google Scholar
• Dombrowski, Peter and Eugene Gholz, Buying Military Transformation: Technological Innovation and the Defense Industry (New York: Columbia University Press 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, Theo and Sten Rynning, ‘NATO’s Transformation Gaps: Transatlantic Differences and the War in Afghanistan,’ Journal of Strategic Studies 33/5 (2010), 673–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedberg, Jr, Sydney J., ‘People, no tech: DepSecDef work on 3rd Offset, JICSPOC’, Breaking Defense, 9 February 2016, <http://breakingdefense.com/2016/02/its-not-about-technology-bob-work-on-the-3rd-offset-strategy/>.
   Google Scholar
• Galbreath, David J., ‘Western European Armed Forces and the Modernisation Agenda: Following or Falling Behind?’, Defence Studies 14/4 (2014), 394–413.
   Google Scholar
• Gat, Azar, ‘Ideology, National Policy, Technology and Strategic Doctrine between the World Wars’, Journal of Strategic Studies 24/3 (2001), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gates, Robert, ‘The Security and Defence Agenda (Future of NATO)’, speech delivered by Secretary of Defense, Brussels, 10 June 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Giegerich, Bastian, ‘NATO’s Smart Defence: Who’s Buying?’, Survival 54/3 (2013), 69–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gompert, David C., Richard L. Kugler and Martin C. Libicki, Mind the Gap: Promoting a Transatlantic Revolution in Military Affairs (Washington: National Defense University Press 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Colin, Strategy for Chaos: Revolutions in Military Affairs and the Evidence of History (London: Frank Cass 2002).
   Google Scholar
• The Guardian, ‘Fighter jet flies with 3D printed parts’, 6 January 2014, <http://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/jan/06/fighter-jet-flies-with-3d-printed-parts>.
   Google Scholar
• Hallams, Ellen and Benjamin Schreer, ‘Towards a “Post-American” Alliance? NATO Burden-Sharing after Libya’, International Affairs 88/2 (2012), 313–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, F.G., ‘“Hybrid Threats”; Neither Omnipotent nor Unbeatable’, Orbis 54/3 (2010), 441–55.
   Google Scholar
• Jungdahl, Adam M. and Julia M. Macdonald, ‘Innovation Inhibitors in War: Overcoming Obstacles in the Pursuit of Military Effectiveness’, Journal of Strategic Studies 38/4 (2015), 467–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapstein, Ethan B., ‘Allies and Armaments’, Survival 44/2 (2002), 141–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, Anthony, The Transformation of Europe’s Armed Forces: From the Rhine to Afghanistan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Kollars, Nina, ‘Military Innovation’s Dialectic: Gun Trucks and Rapid Acquistion,’ Security Studies 23/4 (2014), 787–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kott, Alexander, David Alberts, Amy Zalman, Paulo Shakarian, Fernando Maymi, Cliff Wang and Gang Qu, ‘Visualizing the Tactical Ground Battlefield in the Year 2050: Workshop Report’, US Army Research Laboratory, June 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Krolik, Jeffrey, ‘Upward Falling Payloads (UFP)’, DARPA, 17 December 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Kronvall, Olof, ‘Transformation: The Key to Victory?’, in Karl Erik Haug and Ole Jørgen Maaø (eds), Conceptualising Modern War (London: Hurst 2011), 259–88.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, Jon R., ‘Reinventing the Revolution: Technological Visions, Counterinsurgent Criticism, and the Rise of Special Operations’, Journal of Strategic Studies 36/3 (2013), 422–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahnken, Thomas G., ‘China’s Anti-access Strategy in Historical and Theoretical Perspective’, Journal of Strategic Studies 34/3 (2011), 299–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinage, Robert, ‘Toward a New Offset Strategy: Exploiting U.S. Long-Term Advantages to Restore U.S. Global Power Projection Capability’, Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Mattelaer, Alexander, ‘How Afghanistan has Strengthened NATO’, Survival 53/6 (2012), 127–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta, Aaron, ‘For NATO, a cloudy future’, DefenceNews, 23 May 2015, <http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/air-space/isr/2015/05/23/nato-combat-cloud-future-mercier-shaffer-interoperable-f35-typhoon-rafale-network/70893364/>.
   Google Scholar
• Posen, Barry R., The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany Between the World Wars (New York: Cornell University Press 1984).
   Google Scholar
• Reppy, Judith, ‘Dual-Use Technology: Back to the Future?’, in Ann R. Markusen and Sean S. Costigan (eds), Arming the Future: A Defence Industry for the 21st Century (New York: Council on Foreign Relations 1999), 269–81.
   Google Scholar
• Saab Group, ‘Innovation in Every Fibre’, 6 August 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Scharre, Paul, Robotics on the Battlefield Part II: The Coming Swarm (Washington: Center for a New American Security 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Shimko, Keith L., The Iraq Wars and America’s Military Revolution (New York: Cambridge University Press 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Simón, Luis, ‘Assessing NATO’s Eastern European “Flank”’, Parameters 44/3 (2014), 67–79.
   Google Scholar
• Simón, Luis and Daniel Fiott, ‘Europe after the U.S. Pivot’, Orbis 58/3 (2014), 413–28.
   Google Scholar
• Sloan, Elinor C., The Revolution in Military Affairs: Implications for Canada and NATO (Montreal: McGill–Queen’s University Press 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Ron, Military Economics: The Interaction of Power and Money (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Sperling, James, ‘Capabilities Traps and Gaps: Symptom or Cause of a Troubled Transatlantic Relationship?’, Comparative Security Policy 25/3 (2004), 452–78.
   Google Scholar
• Strachan, Hew, The Direction of War: Contemporary Strategy in Historical Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Szoldra, Paul, ‘What the world will be like in 30 years, according to the US government’s top scientists’, Tech Insider, 10 December 2015, <http://www.techinsider.io/darpa-world-predictions-2015-12>.
   Google Scholar
• Terriff, Terry and Frans Osinga, ‘The Diffusion of Military Transformation to European Militaries’, in Terry Terriff, Frans Osinga and Theo Farrell (eds), A Transformation Gap? American Innovations and European Military Change (Stanford CA: Stanford University Press 2010), 187–210.
   Google Scholar
• Thieme, Don, ‘NATO Renewed: Building the New Transatlantic Strategic Alliance’, RUSI Journal 159/3 (2014), 40–45.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, Rod, ‘The Changing Nature of Modern Warfare’, RUSI Journal 160/4 (2015), 40–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonelson, Alan, ‘NATO Burden-Sharing: Promises, Promises’, Journal of Strategic Studies 23/3 (2000), 31–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Government Accountability Office, ‘Key Factors Drive Transition of Technologies, but Better Training and Data Dissemination Can Increase Success’, Report GAO-16-5, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• US Joint Chiefs of Staff, ‘The National Military Strategy of the United States of America 2015’, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Webber, Mark, Ellen Hallams and Martin A. Smith, ‘Repairing NATO’s Motors’, International Affairs 90/4 (2014), 773–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R.D., ‘Is the West’s Reliance on Technology the Panacea for Future Conflict or Its Achilles’ Heel?,’ Defence Studies 1/2 (2001), 38–56.
   Google Scholar
• Work, Robert, ‘The Third Offset Strategy and America’s Allies and Partners’, speech by the Deputy Secretary of Defense at the Royal United Services Institute, London, 10 September 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Work, Robert, ‘The Third U.S. Offset Strategy and Its Implications for Partners and Allies’, speech by the Deputy Secretary of Defense at the Willard Hotel, Washington, 28 January 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Yost, David S., ‘The NATO Capabilities Gap and the European Union,’ Survival 42/4 (2000), 97–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yost, David S., ‘The U.S.–European Capabilities Gap and the Prospects for ESDP’, in Jolyon Howorth and John T.S. Keeler (eds), Defending Europe: The EU, NATO and the Quest for European Autonomy (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2003), 81–106.
   Google Scholar