Military Innovation Studies: Multidisciplinary or Lacking Discipline?¹

References

• Adamsky, Dima, The Culture of Military Innovation: The Impact of Cultural Factors on the Revolution in Military Affairs in Russia, the US, and Israel (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Adamsky, Dmitry (Dima) and Kjell Inge Bjerga (eds), Contemporary Military Innovation: between anticipation and adaptation (London and NY: Routledge, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Allison, Graham, Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis (Boston, MA: Little Brown, 1971).
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, Chris, ‘Double-loop Learning in Organizations’, Harvard Business Review (1977).
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, Chris and Schön, Donald A. Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Avant, Deborah D., Political Institutions and Military Change: Lessons from Peripheral Wars (Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP, 1994).
   Google Scholar
• Bacevich, Andrew J., The Pentomic Era: the US Army between Korea and Vietnam (Washington, DC: National Defense UP, 1986).
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Huw, ‘Enmeshed in Insurgency: Britain’s Protracted Retreats from Iraq and Afghanistan’, Small Wars and Insurgencies 25/3 (June 2014), 501–21.
   Google Scholar
• Betz, David and Anthony Cormack, ‘Hot War, Cold Comfort: a less optimistic take on the British military in Afghanistan’, RUSI Journal 154/4 (2009), 26–9.
   Google Scholar
• Bjerga, Kjell Inge and Torunn Laugen Haaland, ‘Doctrinal Innovation in Small States’, in Adamsky and Bjerga (eds), Contemporary Military Innovation, 83–106.
   Google Scholar
• Boff, Jonathan, ‘Combined Arms during the Hundred Days Campaign, August-November 1918’, War in History 17/4 (2010), 459–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, Risa A. and Elizabeth A. Stanley (eds), Creating Military Power: The Sources of Military Effectiveness (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2007)
   Google Scholar
• Brun, Itai and Carmit Valensi, ‘The Revolution in Military Affairs of the “Other Side”’, in Adamsky and Bjerga (eds), Contemporary Military Innovation, 107–29.
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy, Robert M., ‘Prophets or Praetorians? The Utopian Paradox and the Powell Corollary’, Parameters ( Autumn 2003), 130–43.
   Google Scholar
• Catignani, Sergio, ‘Getting COIN at the Tactical Level in Afghanistan: Reassessing Counter-Insurgency Adaptation in the British Army’, Journal of Strategic Studies 35/4 (2012), 513–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catignani, Sergio, ‘Coping with Knowledge: Organizational Learning in the British Army’, Journal of Strategic Studies 37/1 (2013), 30–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cote, Owen R., The Politics of Innovative Military Doctrine: the US Navy and Fleet Ballistic Missiles (PhD thesis submitted to the Dept. of Political Science: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1996) available at http://dspace.mit.edu (DSpace@MIT).
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Huw, ‘The Instrumentalisation of History’, blog for Defence-in-Depth defenceindepth.co/2014/09/30/the-instrumentalisation-of-history/.
   Google Scholar
• Der Derian, James, Critical Practices in International Theory: Selected Essays (London: Routledge, 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Desch, Michael C., ‘Culture versus Structure in Post-9/11 Security Studies’, Strategic Insights IV/10 (Oct 2005), 8.
   Google Scholar
• Dibella, Anthony J., Edwin C. Nevis and Janet M. Gould, ‘Understanding Organizational Learning Capability’, Journal of Management Studies 33/3 (1996), 361–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doughty, Robert A., The Seeds of Disaster: the Development of French Army Doctrine, 1919-39, (Mechanicsburg, PA: Stackpole Books, 1985).
   Google Scholar
• Downie, Richard Duncan, Learning from Conflict: the U.S. Military in Vietnam, El Salvador, and the Drug War (Westport, CT: Praeger, 1998).
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, Tim, Milja Kurki and Steve Smith (eds), International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, Theo, John Duffield, Richard Price and Michael C. Desch, ‘Correspondence: ’Isms and Schisms: Culturalism versus Realism in Security Studies’, International Security, 24/1 (1999), 156–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, Theo G. and Terry Terriff, The Sources of Military Change: Culture, Politics, Technology (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, Theo, Norms of War: Cultural Beliefs and Modern Conflict (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, Theo, ‘The Dynamics of British Military Transformation’, International Affairs 84/4 (2008), 777–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, Theo, ‘Improving in War: Military Adaptation and the British in Helmand Province, Afghanistan, 2006-09’, Journal of Strategic Studies 33/4 (2010), 567–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, Theo, Frans Osinga, James A. Russell (eds), Military Adaptation in Afghanistan (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Fierke, K.M., Critical Approaches to International Security (London: Polity Press, 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, Meir, On Flexibility: Recovery from Technological and Doctrinal Surprise on the Battlefield, (Stanford, CA: Stanford, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Foley, Robert T., Stuart Griffin and Helen McCartney, ‘Transformation in Contact: Learning the Lessons of Modern War’, International Affairs 87/2 (2011), 253–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, Robert T., ‘A Case in Horizontal Military Innovation: the German Army, 1916-1918, Journal of Strategic Studies 35/6 (Dec 2012), 799–827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, Robert T., ‘Dumb Donkeys or Cunning Foxes? Learning in the British and German armies during the Great War’, International Affairs 90/2 (2014), 279–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, Lawrence. Deterrence (Cambridge: Polity, 2004).
   Google Scholar
• French, David, The British Way in Counter-insurgency, 1945-1967 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, Stuart, ‘Iraq, Afghanistan and the Future of British Military Doctrine: from Counterinsurgency to Stabilization’, International Affairs 87/2 (2011), 317–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grissom, Adam, ‘The Future of Military Innovation Studies’, Journal of Strategic Studies 29/5 (2006), 905–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halperin, Morton, Bureaucratic Politics and Foreign Policy (Washington, DC: Brookings Institute, 1974).
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, B. and D. Smith (eds), The Politics of Naval Innovation (Newport, Rhode Island: US Naval War College, 1994).
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, Francis G., Learning While Under Fire: Military Change in Wartime. PhD thesis, War Studies Department, King’s College London, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, Brian M., The Unchangeable War, RM-6278-2-ARPA (Santa Monica: RAND, 1970), 3.
   Google Scholar
• Kier, Elizabeth, ‘Culture and Military Doctrine: France between the Wars’, International Security 19/4 ( Spring 1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kier, Elizabeth, Imagining War: French and British Military Doctrine between the Wars (Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 1997).
   Google Scholar
• King, Anthony, ‘Understanding the Helmand Campaign: British Military Operations in Afghanistan’, International Affairs 86/2 (2010), 311–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, Charles, ‘The Decline of International Studies: Why Flying Blind is Dangerous’, Foreign Affairs (July/Aug 2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knopf, Jeffrey W., ‘The Fourth Wave in Deterrence Research’, Contemporary Security Policy 31/1 (2010), 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Kollars, Nina A., ‘War’s Horizon: Soldier-Led Adaptation in Iraq and Vietnam’, Journal of Strategic Studies 38/4 (2015), 529–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krepinevich, Andrew F., The Army in Vietnam (Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986).
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962).
   Google Scholar
• Lantis, Jeffrey S. and Darryl Howlett, ‘Strategic Culture’, in John Baylis, James J. Wirtz, Colin S. Gray (eds), Strategy and the Contemporary World, 4th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), 76–95.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, Barbara and James G. March, ‘Organizational Learning’, Annual Review of Sociology 14 (1988), 319–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquis, Susan L., Unconventional Warfare: Rebuilding US Special Operations Forces (Washington, DC: Brookings Institute, 1997).
   Google Scholar
• March, James G. and R. Weissinger-Baylon (eds), Ambiguity and Command: Organizational Perspectives on Military Decision Making (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger 1986).
   Google Scholar
• March, James G., The Pursuit of Organizational Intelligence: Decisions and Learning in Organizations (Malden, MA: Blackwell 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, Raphael D., ‘Adaptation in the Israel-Hizballah Conflict: the institutionalization of Lesson-Learning in the IDF’, Journal of Strategic Studies 38/4 (2015), 500–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, Williamson, Military Adaptation in War: with Fear of Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Nagl, John A., Learning to Eat Soup with a Knife: Counterinsurgency Lessons from Malaya and Vietnam (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, Suzanne C., Preparing for War: The Dynamics of Peacetime Military Reform, (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PhD dissertation, 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, Suzanne C., An Army Transformed: The U.S. Army’s Post-Vietnam Recovery and the Dynamics of Change in Military Organizations (US Army War College, Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute Letort Paper, 2010), 5–33.
   Google Scholar
• Porch, Douglas, Counterinsurgency: Exposing the Myths of the New Way of War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Posen, Barry R., The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany between the World Wars (Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP, 1984).
   Google Scholar
• Roach, Steven C., ‘Critical Theory’, in Dunne, Kurki and Smith (eds), International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, 171–86.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, Stephen P., Winning the Next War: Innovation and the Modern Military (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991).
   Google Scholar
• Russell, James A., Innovation, Transformation and War: Counterinsurgency Operations in Anbar and Ninewa Provinces, Iraq, 2005-2007 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Sapolsky, Harvey M., Polaris System and Development: Bureaucratic and Programmatic Success in Government (Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1972).
   Google Scholar
• Senge, Peter, The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization (New York: Doubleday, 1990).
   Google Scholar
• Serena, Chad C., A Revolution in Military Adaptation: The US Army in the Iraq War (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Sinno, A.H., Organizations at War in Afghanistan and Beyond (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Steve, ‘Introduction’ in Dunne, Kurki and Smith (eds), International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Somekh, Bridget and Cathy Lewin (eds), Research Methods in the Social Sciences (London: Sage, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Terriff, Terry, ‘Innovate or Die: Organizational Culture and the Origins of Maneuver Warfare in the U.S. Marine Corps’, Journal of Strategic Studies 29/3 (2006), 475–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wæver, Ole, ‘Still a Discipline after all these Debates?’, in Dunne, Kurki and Smith (eds), International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, 306–28.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, Barry D. and Williamson Murray, ‘Military Innovation in Peacetime’, in Williamson Murray and Allan R. Millett (eds), Military Innovation in the Interwar Period (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 369–415.
   Google Scholar