Party preferences and institutional transformation: revisiting France’s relationship with NATO (and the common wisdom on Gaullism)

Bibliography

• Andréani, Gilles, ‘La France et l’OTAN après la guerre froide’, Politique étrangère 63 (1998), 77–92. doi:10.3406/polit.1998.4726
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, Rick, ‘NATO Gives Members Response Flexibility’, Washington Post, 4 June 1996, p. A14.
   Google Scholar
• Balladur, Edouard, Deux Ans à Matignon (Paris: Plon 1995).
   Google Scholar
• Barry, Charles, ‘NATO’s Combined Joint Task Forces in Theory and Practice’, Survival 38/1 (1996), 81–97. doi:10.1080/00396339608442832
   Google Scholar
• Beach, Derek, ‘The unseen hand in treaty reform negotiations: The role and influence of the Council Secretariat’, Journal of European Public Policy 11/3 (2004), 408–39. doi:10.1080/rjpp13501760410001100279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, Jacqueline, ‘Ambiguity and Uncertainty in International Organizations: A History of Debating IMF Conditionality’, International Studies Quarterly 56 (2012), 674–88. doi:10.1111/isqu.2012.56.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boniface, Pascal, ‘NATO’s enlargement, France’s dilemmas’, in David Haglund (ed.), Will NATO go East? (Kingston: Queens UP 1996), 181–95.
   Google Scholar
• Boniface, Pascal, ‘The NATO Debate in France’, Paper presented at Enlargement: The National Debates over Ratification Conference, 7 October 1997, <http://www.nato.int/acad/conf/enlarg97/boniface.htm#27>.
   Google Scholar
• Bozo, Frédéric, La France et l’OTAN. De la guerre froide au nouvel ordre européen (Paris: Masson 1991).
   Google Scholar
• Bozo, Frédéric, ‘France, Gaullism, and the Cold War’, in Melvyn P. Leffler and Odd Arne Westad (eds.), Cambridge History of the Cold War Vol. 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge UP 2010)
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, Alastair, ‘NATO Reintegration: Causing a Stir in France’s Domestic Debate’, RUSI Newsbrief, 20 Mar 2009. <https://rusi.org/publication/newsbrief/nato-reintegration-causing-stir-frances-domestic-debate>.
   Google Scholar
• Chagnollaud, Dominique and Jean-Louis Quermonne, La Ve République. II. Le pouvoir exécutif et l’administration (Paris: Flammarion 2000).
   Google Scholar
• Chevallier, Jean-Jacques, Guy Carcassonne, and Olivier Duhamel, Histoire de la Ve République. 1958-2007 12th ed. (Paris: Dalloz 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Chirac, Jacques, Speech on European security and defence by Mr Jacques Chirac, President of the French Republic, to the Presidential Committee of the WEU Assembly at the Elysée Palace (Paris 30 May 2000ʹ). <http://www.assembly-weu.org/en/documents/sessions_ordinaires/rpt/2000/1699.html>.
   Google Scholar
• Cogan, Charles G., The Third Option. The Emancipation of European Defense, 1989-2000 (Westport: Praeger 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Coudurier, Hubert, Le monde selon Chirac. Les coulisses de la diplomatie francaise (Paris: Calmann-Lévy 1998).
   Google Scholar
• Ministère de la Défense, Livre Blanc sur la Défense (1994). <http://lesrapports.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/BRP/944048700/0000.pdf>.
   Google Scholar
• Ministère de la Défense, White Paper on Defence and National Security (2013). <http://www.rpfrance-otan.org/White-Paper-on-defence-and>.
   Google Scholar
• London Declaration, Declaration on a transformed North Atlantic Alliance issued by the Heads of State and Government participating in the meeting of the North Atlantic Council (“The London Declaration”) (London 6 July 1990). <http://www.nato.int/docu/basictxt/b900706a.htm>.
   Google Scholar
• Delafon, Gilles and Thomas Sancton, Dear Jacques, cher Bill. Au cœur de l’Elysée et de la Maison Blanche 1995-1999 (Paris: Plon 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, Karl W., et al., Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience (Princeton: Princeton UP 1957)
   Google Scholar
• Economist, ‘Riling NATO’, 19 June 1997. <http://www.economist.com/node/597679>.
   Google Scholar
• Erlanger, Steven, ‘Sarkozy Assures Libyan Rebel Leader’, New York Times 24 August 2011. <http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/25/world/europe/25sarkozy.html>.
   Google Scholar
• Fabius, Laurent, Sarkozy wins French NATO re-entry vote. (2009). <http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europe/03/17/france.nato/>.
   Google Scholar
• Fackler, Martin, ‘Tensions Between Japan and South Korea Complicate Picture for U.S.’, New York Times 20 December 2012. <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/21/world/asia/japan-and-south-korea-tensions-complicate-us-efforts-on-security.html>.
   Google Scholar
• Fitchett, Joseph, ‘France is Miffed at NATO Plans for Rapid Force’, International Herald Tribune 5 June 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Gallis, Paul. ’NATO’s Decision-Making Procedure’, CRS Report for Congress RS21510, Washington, DC, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, John, ‘Ideology: A Definitional Analysis’, Political Research Quarterly 50/4 (1997), 957–94. doi:10.1177/106591299705000412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, Philip H., A Certain Idea of France. French Security Policy and Gaullist Legacy (Princeton: Princeton UP 1993).
   Google Scholar
• Grant, Robert P., ‘France’s New Relationship with NATO’, Survival 38/1 (1996), 58–80. doi:10.1080/00396339608442831
   Google Scholar
• Haas, Ernst, Beyond the Nation-State: Functionalism and International Organization (Stanford: Stanford UP 1964).
   Google Scholar
• Haftendorn, Helga, Robert O. Keohane, and Celeste Wallander, (eds.), Imperfect Unions: Security Institutions over Time and Space (NY: Oxford UP 1999)
   Google Scholar
• Heuser, Beatrice, ‘Mitterrand’s Gaullism: Cold War Policies for the Post-Cold War World?’, in Antonio Varsori (ed.), Europe 1945-1990: The end of an era? (New York: St.Martin’s Press 1994), 346–69.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, Stanley., Decline or Renewal? France since the 1930s (New York: Viking Press 1974).
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, Stephanie C., European Security in NATO’s Shadow. Party Ideologies and Institution Building (Cambridge: Cambridge UP 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Howorth, Jolyon, ‘France and European Security 1944–94:Re-readingthe Gaullist “Consensus”’, in Tony Chafer and Brian Jenkins (eds.), France. From the Cold War to the New World Order (Houndsmills and London: Macmillan Press 1996), 17–38.
   Google Scholar
• Irondelle, Bastien and Frédéric Mérand, ‘France’s return to NATO: The death knell for ESDP?’, European Security 19/1 (2010), 29–43. doi:10.1080/09662839.2010.499362
   Google Scholar
• Jarreau, Patrick, Laurent Mauduit, and Jean Louis Saux, ‘Entretien avec le president du RPR’, Le Monde, 10 Dec 1997. <http://discours.vie-publique.fr/notices/983000214.html>.
   Google Scholar
• Jospin, Lionel, ‘Evolution générale de la politique de défense de la France’, Défense Nationale 11 (1998), 5–20.
   Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, Peter J., (ed.), The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia UP 1996)
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert O., After Hegemony. Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton: Princeton UP 1984).
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert O. and Celeste A. Wallander, ‘Security in an Era Without Enemies. Expansion will mark the end of wars among Europeans. The alliance becomes one of security management’, Los Angeles Times, 6 May 1998, p. B7.
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, Andrew and Jocelyn A.J. Evans, The French party system (Manchester: Manchester UP 2003), 121–36.
   Google Scholar
• Koremenos, Barbara, ‘Contracting around International Uncertainty’, American Political Science Review 99 (2005), 549–65. doi:10.1017/S0003055405051877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamy, Jean-Michel, ‘Otan et intégration de l’Est: La leçon de Washington’, Les Echos, 9 Jul 1997, p. 56.
   Google Scholar
• Lemaitre, Philippe, ‘La réunion des ministres de la défense de l’Alliance atlantique a Séville. La distribution des roles au sein de l’OTAN entre Américains et Européens se fait attendre’, Le Monde, 29 Sept. 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Lionel, Jospin, Déclaration de M. Lionel Jospin, Premier ministre, sur la politique de défense de la France, notamment l’élaboration d’un nouveau modèle d’armée, la contribution de la France à la paix dans le monde et le partenariat avec l’Afrique, la coopération en matière de sécurité et de défense au niveau européen, 4 Sept. 1997. <http://discours.vie-publique.fr/notices/973145084.html>.
   Google Scholar
• Manifesto, Parti Socialiste, Propositions pour la France. Texte adopté à la Convention National du Parti Socialiste (Köln: Comparative Party manifesto research group, Zentralarchiv für Empirische Sozialforschung an der Universität zu Köln 1988).
   Google Scholar
• Manifesto, Parti Socialiste, Changeons d’avenir. Nos engagements pour la France (Köln: Comparative Party manifesto research group, Zentralarchiv für Empirische Sozialforschung an der Universität zu Köln 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucelli, Colette, France and Germany at Maastricht. Politics and Negotiations to Create the European Union (New York and London: Garland Publishing, Inc. 1997).
   Google Scholar
• McCalla, Robert B., ‘NATO’s persistence after the Cold War’, International Organization 50/3 (1996), 445–75. doi:10.1017/S0020818300033440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, John J., ‘Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War’, International Security 15/1 (1990), 5–56. doi:10.2307/2538981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon, Anand, ‘The “Consensus” on Defence Policy and the End of the Cold War: Political Parties and the Limits of Adaptation’, in Tony Chafer and Brian Jenkins (eds.), France. From the Cold War to the New World Order (Houndsmills and London: Macmillan Press 1996), 155–68.
   Google Scholar
• Menon, Anand, France, NATO and the Limits of Independence, 1981-97: The Politics of Ambivalence (Houndsmill: Palgrave 2000).
   Google Scholar
• Missiroli, Antonio, The Impact of the Lisbon Treaty on ESDP’, Policy Briefing for the European Parliament, Policy Department External Policies (2008) <http://www.statewatch.org/news/2008/feb/ep-esdp-lisbon.pdf>.
   Google Scholar
• Moïsi, Dominique, ‘De Mitterrand à Chirac’, Politique étrangère 60/4 (1995/96), 849–55. doi:10.3406/polit.1995.4463
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, Andrew, The Choice for Europe. Social Purpose and State Power From Messina to Maastricht (Ithaca: Cornell UP 1998).
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, Andrew, ‘Charles de Gaulle and Europe: The New Revisionism’, Journal of Cold War Studies 14/1 (2012), 53–77. doi:10.1162/JCWS_a_00192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NATO Strategic Concept, The Alliance’s Strategic Concept. Approved by the Heads of State and Government participating in the meeting of the North Atlantic Council Washington D.C. 23 and 24 April 1999, <http://www.nato.int/docu/pr/1999/p99-065e.htm>.
   Google Scholar
• Newhouse, John, De Gaulle and the Anglo-Saxons (New York: Viking Press 1970).
   Google Scholar
• Paolini, J., ‘The Gaullist model revisited: Long-range strategic vision and short-term political implementation in French defence policy’, French Politics and Society 7 (1989), 16–23.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, Craig, ‘Showing Ideas as Causes: The Origins of the European Union’, International Organization 56/1 (2002), 47–84. doi:10.1162/002081802753485133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RPR-UDF Party Manifesto, Un nouvel élan pour la France. Plate-former d’union RPR-UDF (Köln: Comparative Party manifesto research group, Zentralarchiv für Empirische Sozialforschung an der Universität zu Köln 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Pertusot, Vivien, ‘Defence and Foreign Policy under President-Elect Francois Hollande’, RUSI Analysis, 6 May 2012.<https://www.ifri.org/en/publications/editoriaux/actuelles-de-lifri/defence-and-foreign-policy-under-president-elect-francois>.
   Google Scholar
• Pouliot, Vincent, ‘Multilateralism as an End in Itself’, International Studies Perspectives 12 (2011), 18–26. doi:10.1111/insp.2011.12.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Press-Barnathan, Galia, ‘Managing the Hegemon: NATO under Unipolarity’, Security Studies 15/2 (2006), 271–309. doi:10.1080/09636410600829554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riding, Alan, ‘French and Germans Plan an Army Corps Despite NATO Fears’, The New York Times, 23 May 1992, p. 56.
   Google Scholar
• Robin, Gabriel, ‘A quoi sert l’OTAN?’, Politique étrangère 60/1 (1995), 171–80. doi:10.3406/polit.1995.4393
   Google Scholar
• Ross, George, Stanley Hoffmann, and Sylvia Malzacher, (eds.), The Mitterrand Experiment: Continuity and Change in Modern France (Cambridge: Polity 1987)
   Google Scholar
• Sarkozy, Nicolas, ‘Discours de clôture du président’, Paris, 11 Mar 2009. <http://archive.wikiwix.com/cache/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ambafrance-no.org%2FIMG%2Fpdf%2F11_1_.03__Conclusion_colloque_Defense_Otan.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Sarkozy, Nicolas, ‘Discours Place de la Concorde’, Paris, 15 Apr 2012. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEL9e-ajhSs>.
   Google Scholar
• Schurmann, Franz, Ideology and Organization in Communist China 2nd ed. (Berkeley: University of California Press 1973)
   Google Scholar
• Schweller, Randall L., ‘Unanswered Threats: A Neoclassical Realist Theory of Underbalancing’, International Security 29/2 (2004), 159–201. doi:10.1162/0162288042879913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shake, Kori, A. Bloch Lainé, and C. Grant, ‘Amaya Bloch-Lainé and Charles Grant, ‘Building a European Defence Capability’’, Survival 41/1 (1999), 20–40. doi:10.1080/713660050
   Google Scholar
• Sloan, Stanley R., NATO, the European Union, and the Atlantic Community, The Transatlantic Bargain Reconsidered (Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Parti Socialiste, Intervention de François Hollande – motion de censure 8 April 2008, <http://discours.parti-socialiste.fr/2008/04/08/intervention-de-francois-hollande-motion-de-censure-mardi-8-avril-2008/>.
   Google Scholar
• Parti Socialiste, ‘Pour l’indépendance de la politique étrangère de la France’, Archives des communiqués du PS 10 February 2009. <http://presse.parti-socialiste.fr/2009/02/10/pour-l%E2%80%99independance-de-la-politique-etrangere-de-la-france/>.
   Google Scholar
• Parti Socialiste, Les Conséquences réelles de la décision de réintégrer le commandement intégré de l’OTAN devront être sérieusement évaluées, 24 March 2012. <http://www.parti-socialiste.fr/communiques/les-consequences-reelles-de-la-decision-de-reintegrer-le-commandement-integre-de-lotan>.
   Google Scholar
• Thies, Wallace J., Why NATO Endures (Cambridge: Cambridge UP 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Alexander, ‘Coercion Through IOs: The Security Council and the Logic of Information Transmission’, International Organization 60/1 (2006), 1–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Védrine, Hubert, Report for the President of the French Republic on the Consequences of France’s Return to NATO’s Integrated Military Command, on the Future of Transatlantic Relations, and the Outlook for the Europe of Defence (2012), <http://www.rpfrance-otan.org/The-Vedrine-report>.
   Google Scholar
• Wallander, Celeste A., ‘Institutional Assets and Adaptability: NATO After the Cold War’, International Organization 540 (2000), 705–35. doi:10.1162/002081800551343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warwick, Paul V., ‘Economic Trends and Government Survival in West European Parliamentary Democracies’, American Political Science Review 86/4 (1992), 875–87. doi:10.2307/1964341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Robin M., ‘Change and Stability in Values and Value Systems: A Sociological Perspective’, in Milton Rokeach (ed.), Understanding Human Values. Individual and Societal (New York: The Free Press 1979), 15–46.
   Google Scholar
• Yost, David S., ‘France in the New Europe’, Foreign Affairs 69/5 (1990), 107–28. doi:10.2307/20044604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yost, David S., ‘France and West European defence identity’, Survival 33/4 (1991), 327–51. doi:10.1080/00396339108442601
   Google Scholar
• Yost, David S., ‘France’s Nuclear Dilemmas’, Foreign Affairs 75/1 (1996), 108–18. doi:10.2307/20047471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar