US cyber deterrence: Practice guiding theory

Bibliography

• Adams, James, ‘Virtual Defense’, Foreign Affairs 80/3 (2001), 98. doi:10.2307/20050154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arquilla, John, ‘Twenty Years of Cyberwar’, Journal of Military Ethics 12/1 (2013), 80–87. doi:10.1080/15027570.2013.782632
   Google Scholar
• Arquilla, John and David Ronfeldt, ‘Cyberwar is Coming!’, Comparative Strategy 12/2 (1993), 141–65. doi:10.1080/01495939308402915
   Google Scholar
• Arquilla, John and David Ronfeldt, The Advent of Netwars (Santa Monica CA: Rand 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Arquilla, John and David Ronfeldt eds., Networks and Netwar (Santa Monica CA: RAND 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Barzashka, Ivanka, ‘Are Cyber-Weapons Effective?’, RUSI Journal 158/2 (2014), 48–56.
   Google Scholar
• Beeker, Kevin, Robert Mills, Michael Grimaila, and Michael Haas, ‘Operationally Responsive Cyberspace’, in A. Lowther (ed.), Thinking about Deterrence (Alabama: Maxwell Air Force Base (AFB) 2013), 17–36.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Trevor, Katy Holloway, and David Farrington, ‘Does Neighborhood Watch Reduce Crime?’, Journal of Experimental Criminology 2/4 (2006), 437–458.
   Google Scholar
• Betz, David and Tim Stevens, Cyberspace and the State (London: Adelphi (IISS) 51: 242 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Bing, Chris, ‘National Security Council Delays Publication of Cyber Strategy over Inclusion of “Offensive” Measures’, CyberScoop, 15 May 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Bing, Chris, ‘White House Official: Paul Nakasone Nominated for NSA Director’, Cyber Scoop, 13 Feb. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Blank, Stephen, ‘Can Information Warfare Be Deterred?’, Defense Analysis 17/2 (2001), 121–38. doi:10.1080/07430170120064212
   Google Scholar
• Braga, Anthony and David Weisburd, ‘The Effects of Focused Deterrence Strategies on Crime’, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 49 (2012), 323–58. doi:10.1177/0022427811419368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, Ben, The Cybersecurity Dilemma (New York NY: Oxford UP 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Clark, David C. and Susan Landau, ‘Untangling Attribution’, Harvard Law School National Security Journal 2 (2011), 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, Richard and Robert Knake, Cyber War (New York NY: Ecco Press 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, Richard, ‘Anonymity and Traceability in Cyberspace’, University of Cambridge Technical Report # 653, (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Cordesman, Anthony and Justin Cordesman, Cyberthreats, Information Warfare, and Critical Infrastructure Protection (Westport CT: Praeger 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Paul, ‘Deterrence, Influence, Cyber Attack, and Cyberwar’, Rand Working Paper, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Defense Information Systems Agency News, ‘Norton Assumes Command of JFHQ-DODIN and Directorship of DISA’, 1 Feb. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Deibert, Ronald and Rafal Rohozinkis, ‘Risking Security’, International Political Sociology 4 (2010). doi:10.1111/j.1749-5687.2009.00088.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deibert, Ronald, Rafal Rohozinski, and Masashi Crete-Nishihata, ‘Cyclones in Cyberspace’, Security Dialogue 43/1 (2012), 3–24. doi:10.1177/0967010611431079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Defence Videos, ‘Shanahan Speaks at Naval Conference’, 6 Feb. 2018. https://www.defense.gov/Videos/videoid/583404/, minute 29–33 (accessed Jan. 2019).
   Google Scholar
• DoD Defense Science Board, Resilient Military Systems and the Advanced Cyber Threat, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• DoD Defense Science Board, Task Force on Cyber Deterrence report, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn Cavelty, Myriam, ‘From Cyber-Bombs to Political Fallout’, International Studies Review 15 (2013), 105–22. doi:10.1111/misr.12023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmott, Robin, ‘NATO Mulls ‘Offensive Defense’ with Cyber Warfare Rules’, Reuters, 30 Nov. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, Johan and Giampiero Giacomello, ‘The Information Revolution, Security, and International Relations’, International Political Science Review 27/3 (2006), 221–44. doi:10.1177/0192512106064462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrington, David, Martin Gill, Sam Waples, and Javier Argomaniz, ‘The Effects of Closed-Circuit Television on Crime’, Journal of Experimental Criminology 3 (2007), 21–38. doi:10.1007/s11292-007-9024-2
   Google Scholar
• Farwell, James and Rafal Rohozinski, ‘Stuxnet and the Future of Cyber War’, Survival 53/1 (2011), 23–40. doi:10.1080/00396338.2011.555586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnemore, Martha, ‘Cultivating International Cyber Norms’, in K. Lord and T. Sharp (eds.), America’s Cyber Future: Security and Prosperity in the Information Age (Washington DC: Center for New America 2011), 87–101.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, Lawrence, Deterrence (Cambridge: Polity Press 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, Charles, ‘Deterrence of Cyber Attacks and US National Security’, George Washington University working paper (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, Will, ‘Cyber Deterrence’, Strategic Studies Quarterly 4/3 (2010), 102–135.
   Google Scholar
• Government of the United States of America, National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Government of the United States of America, National Military Strategy for Cyberspace Operations, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Government of the United States of America, Cyber Space Policy Review, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Government of the United States of America, Cybersecurity National Action Plan, 2016
   Google Scholar
• Government of the United States of America, National Cyber Strategy of the United States of America, September 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Government of the United States of America, Report to the President’s Commission on Critical Infrastructure Protection, Critical Foundations: Protecting America’s Infrastructures, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Guerette, Rob and Kate Bowers, ‘Assessing the Extent of Crime Displacement and Diffusion of Benefits’, Criminology 47/4 (2009), 1331–68. doi:10.1111/(ISSN)1745-9125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guitton, Clement and Elaine Korzak, ‘The Sophistication Criterion for Attribution’, RUSI Journal 158/4 (2013), 62–68. doi:10.1080/03071847.2013.826509
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, Lene and Helen Nissenbaum, ‘Digital Disaster, Cyber Security, and the Copenhagen School’, International Studies Quarterly 53 (2009), 1155–75. doi:10.1111/isqu.2009.53.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harknett, Richard, ‘Information Warfare and Deterrence’, Parameters ( Autumn 1996), 93–107.
   Google Scholar
• Harknett, Richard, John Callaghan, and Rudi Kauffman, ‘Leaving Deterrence Behind’, Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 7/1 (2010). doi:10.2202/1547-7355.1636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homeland Security Presidential Directive No. 7, Directive on Critical Infrastructure, Prioritization, and Protection, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Iasiello, Emilio, ‘Is Cyber Deterrence an Illusory Course of Action?’, Journal of Strategic Security 7/1 (2014), 54–67. doi:10.5038/1944-0472
   Google Scholar
• Jabbour, Kamale and E. Paul Ratazzi, ‘Deterrence in Cyberspace’, in A. Lowther (ed.), Thinking about Deterrence (Alabama: Maxwell Air Force Base (AFB) 2013), 37–50.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, Kesan and Carol Hayes, ‘Thinking through Active Defense in Cyberspace’, Illinois Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper, No. 10–11 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, Robert, Richard Ned Lebow, and Janice Gross Stein, Psychology and Deterrence (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press 1985).
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, Ryan, ‘After Widespread Outcry, Georgia Governor Vetoes ‘Hack Back’ Bill’, State Scoop, 8 May 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel, Thinking, Fast and Slow (Toronto Canada: Random House 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, Fred, Dark Territory (New York City NY: Simon and Schuster 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Kello, Lucas, ‘The Meaning of the Cyber Revolution’, International Security 38/2 (2013), 7–40. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kello, Lucas, The Virtual Weapon (London: Yale UP 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Knopf, Jeffrey, ‘Terrorism and the Fourth Wave in Deterrence Research’, in A. Wenger and A. Wilner (eds.), Deterring Terrorism: Theory and Practice (Stanford: Stanford UP 2012), 21–45.
   Google Scholar
• Korns, Stephen and Josh Kastenberg, ‘Georgia’s Cyber Left Hook’, Parameters 38/4 ( Winter 2009), 60–76.
   Google Scholar
• Kugler, Richard, ‘Deterrence of Cyber Attacks’, in F. Kramer, S. Starr, and L. Wentz (eds.), Cyberpower and National Security (Washington DC: Potomac Press 2009), 309–342.
   Google Scholar
• Lebovic, James, Deterring International Terrorism and Rogue States (London: Routledge 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Lebow, Richard Ned and Janice Gross Stein, ‘Rational Deterrence Theory: I Think, Therefore I Deter’, World Politics 41/2 (1989), 208–24. doi:10.2307/2010408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, Mike, ‘China Is ‘Leading Suspect’ in Massive Hack of US Government Networks’, ABC News, 25 June 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, James, ‘Cross-Domain Deterrence and Credible Threats’, CSIS Working Paper (July 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Libicki, Martin, Conquest in Cyberspace (Cambridge: Cambridge UP 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Libicki, Martin, Cyberdeterrence and Cyberwar (Santa Monica CA: Rand 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Libicki, Martin, ‘Pulling Punches in Cyberspace’, in National Research Council (2010). Proceedings of a Workshop on Deterring Cyberattacks: Informing Strategies and Developing Options for U.S. Policy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12997.
   Google Scholar
• Libicki, Martin, ‘Cyberwar as a Confidence Game’, Strategic Studies Quarterly 5/1 (2011), 132–147.
   Google Scholar
• Libicki, Martin, Cyberspace in Peace and War (Annapolis MA: Naval Institute Press 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Libicki, Martin, ‘Can Denial Deter in Cyberspace?’, in A. Wilner and A. Wenger (eds.), Deterrence by Denial (Under Review 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Liff, Adam, ‘Cyberwar: A New “Absolute Weapon?”’, Journal of Strategic Studies 35/3 (2012), 401–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Herbert, ‘Laying an Intellectual Foundation for Cyberdeterrence’, in J. Kruger et. al. (ed.), The Secure Information Society (London: Springer-Verlag 2013), 17–53.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, John and Erik Gartzke, ‘Cross-Domain Deterrence Project’, http://deterrence.ucsd.edu/ ( accessed Jan. 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, Jon, ‘Stuxnet and the Limits of Cyber Warfare’, Security Studies 22/3 (2013), 365–404. doi:10.1080/09636412.2013.816122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, Jon, ‘Tipping the Scales’, Journal of Cybersecurity 1/1 (2015), 53–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, Jon and Erik Gartzke eds., Cross-Domain Deterrence (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Lohrmann, Dan, 'Hack Back Law', Government Technology, 22 Sept 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Long, Jerry, ‘Mark and Alex Wilner, Delegitimizing al-Qaida: Defeating an “Army Whose Men Love Death”’, International Security 39/1 (2014), 126–64. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotrionte, Catherine, ‘State Sovereignty and Self-Defense in Cyberspace’, Emory International Law Review 26 (2012), 825–919.
   Google Scholar
• Lukasik, Stephen, ‘A Framework for Thinking about Cyber Conflict and Cyber Deterrence with Possible Declaratory Policies for These Domains’, in Workshop Proceedings Deterring Cyber Attacks (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Lupovici, Amir, ‘The Emerging Fourth Wave of Deterrence Theory’, International Studies Quarterly 54 (2010), 705–32. doi:10.1111/isqu.2010.54.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupovici, Amir, ‘Cyber Warfare and Deterrence’, Military and Strategic Affairs 3/3 (2011), 49–62.
   Google Scholar
• Lupovici, Amir, ‘The “Attribution Problem” and the Social Construction of “Violence”’, International Studies Perspectives 17/3 (2016), 332–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupvici, Amri, The Power of Deterrence (Cambridge: Cambridge UP 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Lyngaas, Sean, ‘Pentagon, DHS Agree to Framework for Joint Cyberdefense’, CyberScoop, 14 Nov. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Lyngaas, Sean, ‘US Looks to Restart Talks on Global Cyber Norms’, CyberScoop, Oct. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Lyngaas, Sean, ‘White House Announces Federal Cyber Strategy, Vows to Go on Offensive’, CyberScoop, 20 Sept. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Lyngass, Sean, ‘PPD-20 Elimination Opens Arguments over How US Should Conduct Offensive Hacking Operations’, CyberScoop, 16 Aug. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Mandel, Robert, Optimizing Cyberdeterrence (Washington DC: Georgetown UP 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Marks, Joseph, ‘Many Top Cybersecurity Posts Remain Empty – And Not on Purpose’, DefenseOne, 10 Nov. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, Joseph, ‘Trump Acknowledges Russian Hacking, Points to Poor Defenses’, NextGov, 11 Jan. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzotta, Ben, ‘Leverage in Cyberspace, without Deterrence’, Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, Montreal, QC, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, Mike, ‘Cyberwar Is the New Atomic Age’, New Perspectives Quarterly 26/3 (2009), 72–77. doi:10.1111/npqu.2009.26.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, Patrick, ‘Applicability of Traditional Deterrence Concepts and Theory to the Cyber Realm’, in Proceedings of a Workshop on Deterring Cyberattacks (Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Nakashima, Ellen, ‘White House Cybersecurity Official to Return to NSA’, The Washington Post, 16 Apr. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, Joseph, ‘Cyber Power’, Belfer Center, Harvard Kennedy School Working Paper, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, Joseph, ‘Deterrence and Dissuasion in Cyberspace’, International Security 41/3 (2017), 44–71. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of the Director of National Intelligence, The National Counterintelligence Strategy of the United States of America, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, T. V., Patrick M. Morgan, and James J. Wirtz eds., Complex Deterrence: Strategy in the Global Age (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Payne, Keith, Deterrence in the Second Nuclear Age (Lexington: University of Kentucky 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Pellerin, Cheryl, ‘Rogers Discusses near Future of U.S. Cyber Command’, DoD News, 24 Feb. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Rattray, Greg, Chris Evans, and Jason Healey, ‘American Security in the Cyber Commons’, in Denmark and Mulvenon (eds.), Contested Commons (Washington, DC: Center for a New American Security 2010), 137–176.
   Google Scholar
• Ravindranath, Mohana, ‘Many CFO Act Federal Agencies are Still Being Lead by Acting Chief Information Officers’, Nextgov, 17 Nov. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Reuters, ‘Trump Scraps Cyber Czar Post after First Appointee Leaves: White House’, 15 May 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Rid, Thomas, ‘Deterrence beyond the State: The Israeli Experience’, Contemporary Security Policy 33/1 (2012), 124–47. doi:10.1080/13523260.2012.659593
   Google Scholar
• Rid, Thomas, ‘More Attacks, Less Violence’, Journal of Strategic Studies 36/1 (2013), 139–42. doi:10.1080/01402390.2012.742012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rid, Thomas and Ben Buchanan, ‘Attributing Cyber Attacks’, Journal of Strategic Studies 38/1–2 (2015), 4–37. doi:10.1080/01402390.2014.977382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera, Jason, ‘Achieving Cyberdeterrence and the Ability of Small States to Hold Large States at Risk’, 7th International Conference on Cyber Conflict (NATO CCD COE), Tallinn, Estonia, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Michael, ‘Statement before the Senate Committee on Armed Services’, Mar. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, Paul, ‘The Organization of the United States Government and Private Sector for Achieving Cyber Deterrence’, in National Research Council (2010). Proceedings of a Workshop on Deterring Cyberattacks: Informing Strategies and Developing Options for U.S. Policy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12997.
   Google Scholar
• Sanger, David, ‘US Wrestles with How to Fight Back against Cyberattacks’, New York Times, 30 July 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, Thomas, Arms and Influence (New Haven CT: Yale UP 1966).
   Google Scholar
• Schmidle, Nicholas, ‘The Digital Vigilantes Who Hack Back’, New Yorker, 7 May 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Schneier, Bruce, ‘Botnets of Things’, MIT Technology Review, Mar./Apr. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, Adam, ‘The Top Five Cyber Policy Developments of 2015’, Council on Foreign Relations blog, 4 Jan. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Shachtman, Noah, ‘26 Years after Gibson, Pentagon Defines “Cyberspace”’, Wired, 23 May 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, Travis, ‘Theorizing Cyber Coercion: The 2014 North Korean Operation against Sony’, Journal of Strategic Studies 40/7 (2017), 898–926. doi:10.1080/01402390.2017.1307741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shear, Michael and Julie Hirschfeld Davis, ‘Trump, on YouTube, Pledges to Create Jobs’, New York Times, 21 Nov. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Shoorbajee, Zaid, ‘Google and Microsoft Ask Georgia Governor to Veto “Hack Back” Bill’, CyberScoop, 27 Apr. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P.W. and Allan Friedman, ‘Cult of the Cyber Offensive’, Foreign Policy, Jan. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, Anne-Marie, The Chessboard & The Web (New Haven CT: Yale UP 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Sobelman, Daniel, ‘Learning to Deter’, International Security 41/3 (2016/17), 151–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterner, Eric, ‘Retaliatory Deterrence in Cyberspace’, Strategic Studies Quarterly 5/1 ( Spring 2011), 62–80.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, Tim, ‘A Cyberwar of Ideas?’, Contemporary Security Policy 33/1 (2012), 148–70. doi:10.1080/13523260.2012.659597
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, Benjamin ed., Modern Warfare, Intelligence and Deterrence (Hoboken NJ: The Economist and Wiley 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Tor, Uri, ‘’Cumulative Deterrence’ as a New Paradigm for Cyber Deterrence’, Journal of Strategic Studies 40/1/2 (2015), 92–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trujillo, Clorinda, ‘The Limits of Cyberspace Deterrence’, Joint Force Quarterly 75/4 (2014), 43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Trump, Donald J., ‘Cybersecurity’, Presidential Campaign Website, 2016, https://www.donaldjtrump.com/policies/cyber-security (accessed Jan. 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Tsagourias, Nicholas, ‘Cyber Attacks, Self-Defence and the Problem of Attribution’, Journal of Conflict & Security Law 17 (2012), 229–44. doi:10.1093/jcsl/krs019
   Google Scholar
• UK National Cyber Security Centre, ‘Advisory: Russian State-Sponsored Cyber Actors Targeting Network Infrastructure Devices’, 16 Apr. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• UK National Cyber Security Centre, ‘Joint US-UK Statement on Malicious Cyber Activity Carried Out by Russian Government’, 16 Apr. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• UN General Assembly, ‘Group of Governmental Experts on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security’, Seventieth Session, Item 93, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• US Cyber Command News Release, ‘All Cyber Mission Force Teams Achieve Initial Operating Capability’, 24 Oct. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• US Cyber Command News Release, ‘DoD’s Network Defense Headquarters Achieves Full Operational Capability’, 31 Jan. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Defence, Department of Defence Cyber Strategy (Summary), Sept. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Defense, Nuclear Posture Review, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Defense, Cyberspace Policy Report, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Defense, Strategy for Operating in Cyberspace, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Defense, DoD Cyber Strategy, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Defense, Nuclear Posture Review, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Homeland Security, National Infrastructure Protection Plan, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Homeland Security, ‘Statement by Secretary Jeh Johnson on the Designation of Election Infrastructure as a Critical Infrastructure Subsector’, 6 Jan. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of State, Office of the Coordinator for Cyber Issues, ‘Recommendations to the President on Deterring Adversaries and Better Protecting the American People from Cyber Threats’, 31 May 2018.
   Google Scholar
• US Senate Confirmation Hearing, ‘Advanced Policy Questions for James Mattis’, 12 Jan. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Waterman, Shaun, ‘Bossert Promises New National Cybersecurity Strategy’, CyberScoop, 24 Oct. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, Andreas and Alex Wilner eds., Deterring Terrorism (Stanford: Stanford UP 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Wheller, David and Gregory Larsen, ‘Techniques for Cyber Attack Attribution’, Institute for Defense Analyses (P-3792), (2003).
   Google Scholar
• The White House, National Plan for Information Systems Protection: An Invitation to a Dialogue, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• The White House, ‘Comprehensive National Cybersecurity Initiative’, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• The White House, International Strategy for Cyberspace, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• The White House, ‘Press Briefing on the Attribution of the WannaCry Malware Attack to North Korea’, 19 Dec. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• The White House, ‘Remarks by Homeland Security Advisor Thomas P. Bossert at Cyber Week 2017’, 26 June 2017.
   Google Scholar
• The White House, Statement by President Donald J. Trump on the Elevation of Cyber Command, 18 Aug. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• The White House, Executive Order 13231, Critical Infrastructure Protection in the Information Age, Oct. 2001.
   Google Scholar
• The White House, Executive Order 13636, Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• The White House, Executive Order 13800, Strengthening the Cybersecurity of Federal Networks and Critical infrastructure, 11 May 2017.
   Google Scholar
• The White House, National Security Presidential Directive No. 54, Cybersecurity Policy, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Wilner, Alex, ‘Deterring the Undeterrable: Coercion, Denial, and Delegitimization in Counterterrorism’, Journal of Strategic Studies 34/1 (2011), 3–37. doi:10.1080/01402390.2011.541760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilner, Alex, ‘Apocalypse Soon? Deterring Nuclear Iran and Its Terrorist Proxies’, Comparative Strategy 31/1 (2012), 18–40. doi:10.1080/01495933.2012.647539
   Google Scholar
• Wilner, Alex, ‘Contemporary Deterrence Theory Counterterrorism: A Bridge Too Far?’, NYU Journal of International Law and Politics 47/2 (2015), 439–462.
   Google Scholar
• Wilner, Alex, Deterring Rational Fanatics (Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Wilner, Alex, ‘The Dark Side of Extended Deterrence: Thinking through the State Sponsorship of Terrorism’, Journal of Strategic Studies 40/1 (2017), 410–437.
   Google Scholar
• Wilner, Alex and Andreas Wenger eds., Deterrence by Denial: Theory, Practice, and Empiricism (Under Review Winter 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Wilner, Wilner, ‘Cyber Deterrence and Critical Infrastructure Protection’, Comparatvie Strategy 36/4 (2017), 309–318.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, Kevin and Mark Stout, ‘Saddam’s Perceptions and Misperceptions’, Journal of Strategic Studies 33/1 (2010), 5–41. doi:10.1080/01402391003603433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Writz, James, ‘The Cyber Pearl Harbour’, Intelligence and National Security 32/6 (2017), 758–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yannakogeorgos, Panayotis and Adam Lowther, ‘The Prospects for Cyber Deterrence’, in P. Yannakogeorgos and A. Lowther (eds.), Conflict and Cooperation in Cyberspace (New York NY: Taylor & Francis 2010), 49–80.
   Google Scholar