Dual-use distinguishability: How 3D-printing shapes the security dilemma for nuclear programs

Bibliography

• Acton, James., ‘On the Regulation of Dual-Use Nuclear Technology’, in ed. Elisa Harris, Governance of Dual-Use Technologies: Theory and Practice (Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences 2016), 8–59.
   Google Scholar
• Adcock, Robert and David Collier, ‘Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research’, American Political Science Review 95/3 (September 2001), 529–46. doi:10.1017/S0003055401003100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman, Dan and Nicholas L. Miller, ‘Red Lines in Nuclear Nonproliferation’, The Nonproliferation Review 24/3–4 (May 4 2017), 315–42. doi:10.1080/10736700.2018.1433575
   Google Scholar
• Altmann, Jürgen and Frank Sauer, ‘Autonomous Weapon Systems and Strategic Stability’, Survival 59/5 (September 3 2017), 117–42. doi:10.1080/00396338.2017.1375263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajema, Natasha E. “Countering WMD in the Digital Age: Breaking down Bureaucratic Silos in a Brave New World.” War on the Rocks (blog), May 13, 2019. https://warontherocks.com/2019/05/countering-wmd-in-the-digital-age-breaking-down-bureaucratic-silos-in-a-brave-new-world/.
   Google Scholar
• Baliga, Sandeep and Tomas Sjöström., ‘Strategic Ambiguity and Arms Proliferation’, Journal of Political Economy 116/6 (December 1 2008), 1023–57. doi:10.1086/595016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bas, Muhammet A. and Andrew J. Coe, ‘Arms Diffusion and War’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 56/4 (August 1 2012), 651–74. doi:10.1177/0022002712445740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beardsley, Kyle and Victor Asal, ‘Nuclear Weapons Programs and the Security Dilemma’, in eds. Matthew Fuhrmann and Adam Stulberg, The Nuclear Renaissance and International Security (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press 2013), 265–87
   Google Scholar
• Brimley, Shawn, Ben FitzGerald, and Kelley Sayler. “Disruptive Technology and U.S. Defense Strategy.” Disruptive Defense Papers. Washington, DC: Center for New American Security, September 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Brito, Dagobert L. and Michael D. Intriligator, ‘The Economic and Political Incentives to Acquire Nuclear Weapons’, Security Studies 2/3–4 (June 1 1993), 285–310. doi:10.1080/09636419309347527
   Google Scholar
• Brockmann, Kolja and Sibylle Bauer. “3D Printing and Missile Technology Controls.” Background Paper. Stockholm, Sweden: SIPRI, November 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Brockmann, Kolja and Robert Kelley, The Challenge of Emerging Technologies to Non-Proliferation Efforts: Controlling Additive Manufacturing and Intangible Transfers of Technology (Stockholm, Sweden: SIPRI April 2018)
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Thomas et al. “Could 3D Printing Change the World? Technologies, Potential, and Implications of Additive Manufacturing.” Strategic Foresight Report. Washington, DC: Atlantic Council, October 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Cardwell, Diane and Jonathan Soble. “Westinghouse Files for Bankruptcy, in Blow to Nuclear Power.” The New York Times, March 29, 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/29/business/westinghouse-toshiba-nuclear-bankruptcy.html.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, Austin., Secret Wars: Covert Conflict in International Politics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 2018)
   Google Scholar
• Coe, Andrew J. and Jane Vaynman, ‘Collusion and the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime’, The Journal of Politics 77/4 (October 1 2015), 983–97. doi:10.1086/682080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner, Brett P., Guha P. Manogharan, Ashley N. Martof, Lauren M. Rodomsky, Caitlyn M. Rodomsky, Dakesha C. Jordan, and James W. Limperos, ‘Making Sense of 3-D Printing: Creating a Map of Additive Manufacturing Products and Services’, Additive Manufacturing Inaugural Issue 1–4 (October 1 2014), 64–76. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2014.08.005
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, Toby, Wyatt Hoffman, Ariel E Levite, Li Bin, George Perkovich, and Tong Zhao, Toward a Nuclear Firewall: Bridging the NPT’s Three Pillars (Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace 2017)
   Google Scholar
• Debs, Alexandre and Nuno P. Monteiro, ‘Known Unknowns: Power Shifts, Uncertainty, and War’, International Organization 68/1 (2014), 1–31. doi:10.1017/S0020818313000192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evera, Stephen Van, Causes of War (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press 1999)
   Google Scholar
• Fuhrmann, Matthew., Atomic Assistance: How Atoms for Peace Programs Cause Nuclear Insecurity (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Fuhrmann, Matthew. “The Logic of Latent Nuclear Deterrence.” SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, September 8, 2017. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3052231.
   Google Scholar
• Fuhrmann, Matthew and Benjamin Tkach, ‘Almost Nuclear: Introducing the Nuclear Latency Dataset’, Conflict Management and Peace Science 32/4 (September 1 2015), 443–61. doi:10.1177/0738894214559672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, Ben and Allan Dafoe, ‘How Does the Offense-Defense Balance Scale?’, Journal of Strategic Studies (2019), 736–763. doi:10.1080/01402390.2019.1631810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartzke, Erik and Jon R. Lindsay, ‘Weaving Tangled Webs: Offense, Defense, and Deception in Cyberspace’, Security Studies 24/2 (April 3 2015), 316–48. doi:10.1080/09636412.2015.1038188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershenfeld, Neil., ‘How to Make Almost Anything: The Digital Fabrication Revolution’, Foreign Affairs 91 (November 1 2012), 42–57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gheorghe, Eliza., ‘Proliferation and the Logic of the Nuclear Market’, International Security 43/4 (April 1 2019), 88–127. doi:10.1162/isec_a_00344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, Charles L., ‘The Security Dilemma Revisited’, World Politics 50/1 (1997), 171–201. doi:10.1017/S0043887100014763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, Charles L., Rational Theory of International Politics: The Logic of Competition and Cooperation (Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press 2010)
   Google Scholar
• Hammes, T.X. “3-D Printing Will Disrupt the World in Ways We Can Barely Imagine.” War on the Rocks, December 28, 2015. https://warontherocks.com/2015/12/3-d-printing-will-disrupt-the-world-in-ways-we-can-barely-imagine/.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, Wyatt and Tristan A. Volpe, ‘Internet of Nuclear Things: Managing the Proliferation Risks of 3-D Printing Technology’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 74/2 (March 4 2018), 102–13. doi:10.1080/00963402.2018.1436811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, Michael C., The Diffusion of Military Power: Causes and Consequences for International Politics (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press 2010)
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, Michael C., ‘Coming Next in Military Tech’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 70/1 (January 1 2014), 54–62. doi:10.1177/0096340213516743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, Michael C., ‘When Speed Kills: Autonomous Weapons Systems, Deterrence, and Stability’, Journal of Strategic Studies (2019), 764–788. doi:10.1080/01402390.2019.1621174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jervis, Robert., ‘Cooperation under the Security Dilemma’, World Politics 30/2 (1978), 167–214. doi:10.2307/2009958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jervis, Robert., ‘Dilemmas About Security Dilemmas’, Security Studies 20/3 (July 1 2011), 416–23. doi:10.1080/09636412.2011.599189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jervis, Robert L., The Logic of Images in International Relations (New York NY: Columbia University Press 1970)
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, Trevor, Troy D. Smith, and J. Luke Irwin, Additive Manufacturing in 2040 (Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation 2018). https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PE283.html
   Google Scholar
• King, W. E., A. T. Anderson, R. M. Ferencz, N. E. Hodge, C. Kamath, S. A. Khairallah, and A. M. Rubenchik, ‘Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing of Metals; Physics, Computational, and Materials Challenges’, Applied Physics Reviews 2/4 (December 1 2015), 041304. doi:10.1063/1.4937809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroenig, Matthew and Tristan Volpe, ‘3-D Printing the Bomb? the Nuclear Nonproliferation Challenge’, The Washington Quarterly 38/3 (July 3 2015), 7–19. doi:10.1080/0163660X.2015.1099022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühn, Ulrich. “Can We Still Regulate Emerging Technologies?” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. May 9, 2019. https://carnegieendowment.org/2019/05/09/can-we-still-regulate-emerging-technologies-pub-79125.
   Google Scholar
• Laureijs, Rianne E., Jaime Bonnín Roca, Sneha Prabha Narra, Colt Montgomery, Jack L. Beuth, and Erica R. H. Fuchs, ‘Metal Additive Manufacturing: Cost Competitive Beyond Low Volumes’, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 139/4 (May 10 2017), 081010–081010–19. doi:10.1115/1.4035420
   Google Scholar
• Litwak, Robert S., ‘Living with Ambiguity: Nuclear Deals with Iran and North Korea’, Survival 50 (March 2008), 91–118. doi:10.1080/00396330801899496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn-Jones, Sean M., ‘Offense-Defense Theory and Its Critics’, Security Studies 4/4 (June 1 1995), 660–91. doi:10.1080/09636419509347600
   Google Scholar
• McNulty, Connor, Neyla Arnas, and Thomas Campbell, ‘Toward the Printed World: Additive Manufacturing and Implications for National Security’, Defense Horizons 73 (September 2012), 1–16
   Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, John J. and Stephen M. Walt, ‘Leaving Theory Behind: Why Simplistic Hypothesis Testing Is Bad for International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations 19/3 (September 1 2013), 427–57. doi:10.1177/1354066113494320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta, Rupal N. and Rachel Elizabeth Whitlark, ‘The Benefits and Burdens of Nuclear Latency’, International Studies Quarterly 61/3 (September 1 2017), 517–28. doi:10.1093/isq/sqx028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Steven E., ‘Cyber Threats, Nuclear Analogies? Divergent Trajectories in Adapting to New Dual-Use Technologies’, in eds. George Perkovich and Ariel E. Levite, Understanding Cyber Conflict: Fourteen Analogies (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press 2017), 161–79
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, Alexander H., ‘Stop Helping Me: When Nuclear Assistance Impedes Nuclear Programs’, in eds. Adam N. Stulberg and Matthew Fuhrmann, The Nuclear Renaissance and International Security (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press 2013), 177–202
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, Alexander H. and Adam Mount, ‘Misestimation: Explaining US Failures to Predict Nuclear Weapons Programs’, Intelligence and National Security 29/3 (2014), 357–86. doi:10.1080/02684527.2014.895593
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, Evan Braden, ‘Breaking Out of the Security Dilemma: Realism, Reassurance, and the Problem of Uncertainty’, International Security 31/2 (October 1 2006), 151–85. doi:10.1162/isec.2006.31.2.151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narang, Vipin., ‘Strategies of Nuclear Proliferation: How States Pursue the Bomb’, International Security 41/3 (2016), 110–50. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurkin, Tate., ‘Disruptive Impact: Technological Revolutions Raise Nuclear Risks’, IHS Jane’s Intelligence Review (May 2016), 30–34
   Google Scholar
• Parent, Joseph M. and Sebastian Rosato, ‘Balancing in Neorealism’, International Security 40/2 (November 21 2015), 51–86. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Prevent, Counter, and Respond—A Strategic Plan to Reduce Global Nuclear Threats.” Report to Congress. Washington, DC: National Nuclear Security Administration, November 2017. https://nnsa.energy.gov/sites/default/files/nnsa/inlinefiles/fy18npcr_final_november_2017.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Roff, Heather M., ‘The Frame Problem: The AI ‘Arms Race’ Isn’t One’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 75/3 (May 4 2019), 95–98. doi:10.1080/00963402.2019.1604836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagan, Scott D., ‘Why Do States Build Nuclear Weapons?: Three Models in Search of a Bomb’, International Security 21/3 (1996), 54–86. doi:10.2307/2539273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagan, Scott D., ‘Nuclear Latency and Nuclear Proliferation’, in eds. William Potter and Gaukhar Mukhatzhanova, Forecasting Nuclear Proliferation in the 21st Century: Volume 1 the Role of Theory (Stanford CA: Stanford Security Studies 2010), 80–101
   Google Scholar
• Sagan, Scott D., ‘The Causes of Nuclear Weapons Proliferation’, Annual Review of Political Science 14/1 (2011), 225–44. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-052209-131042
   Google Scholar
• Sang-Hun, Choe. “Scandal in South Korea over Nuclear Revelations.” The New York Times, August 3, 2013. https://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/04/world/asia/scandal-in-south-korea-over-nuclear-revelations.html.
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, Thomas C, Arms and Influence (New Haven CN: Yale University Press 1966)
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, Jacquelyn., ‘The Capability/Vulnerability Paradox and Military Revolutions’, Journal of Strategic Studies (2019), 841–863. doi:10.1080/01402390.2019.1627209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, Clare. “ROSATOM Announces New Additive Manufacturing Subsidiary.” 3DPrint.com, February 13, 2018. https://3dprint.com/203531/rosatom-am-subsidiary/.
   Google Scholar
• Sechser, Todd S., Neil Narang, and Caitlin Talmadge, ‘Emerging Technologies and Strategic Stability in Peacetime, Crisis, and War’, Journal of Strategic Studies (2019), 727–735. doi:10.1080/01402390.2019.1626725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, Ian, Dominic Williams, and Nick Gillard. “Examining Intangible Technology Controls - Part 2: Case Studies.” Project Alpha. London, UK: King’s College London, June 2016. https://projectalpha.eu/examining-intangible-controls/.
   Google Scholar
• Talmadge, Caitlin., ‘Emerging Technology and Intra-War Escalation Risks: Evidence from the Cold War, Implications for Today’, Journal of Strategic Studies (2019), 864–887. doi:10.1080/01402390.2019.1631811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, Shiping., ‘The Security Dilemma: A Conceptual Analysis’, Security Studies 18/3 (September 18 2009), 587–623. doi:10.1080/09636410903133050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Technology and Innovation Enablers for Superiority in 2030.” Defense Science Board Report. Washington, DC: Department of Defense, October 2013. https://www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/reports/2010s/DSB2030.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Volpe, Tristan A., ‘Atomic Inducements: The Case for ‘Buying Out’ Nuclear Latency’, The Nonproliferation Review 23/3–4 (July 3 2016), 481–93. doi:10.1080/10736700.2016.1246103
   Google Scholar
• Volpe, Tristan A., ‘Atomic Leverage: Compellence with Nuclear Latency’, Security Studies 26/3 (July 3 2017), 517–44. doi:10.1080/09636412.2017.1306398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Heather., ‘Asymmetric Arms Control and Strategic Stability: Scenarios for Limiting Hypersonic Glide Vehicles’, Journal of Strategic Studies (2019), 789–813. doi:10.1080/01402390.2019.1627521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohlstetter, Albert., Perspective on Nuclear Energy (Santa Monica, CAP: RAND Corporation January 10 1968). https://www.rand.org/about/history/wohlstetter/DL16568/DL16568.html
   Google Scholar