Western strategy’s two logics: Diverging interpretations

Bibliography

• Arreguín-Toft, Ivan, ‘How the Weak Win Wars: A Theory of Asymmetric Conflict’, International Security 26/1 ( Summer 2001), 93–128. doi:10.1162/016228801753212868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayson, Robert, Thomas Schelling and the Nuclear Age: Strategy as Social Science (London: Frank Cass 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Beaufre, André, An Introduction to Strategy R.H. Barry trans. (London: Faber and Faber 1965).
   Google Scholar
• Betts, Richard K., ‘Is Strategy an Illusion?’, International Security 25/2 ( Fall 2000), 5–50. doi:10.1162/016228800560444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blainey, Geoffrey, The Causes of War (New York: The Free Press 1988).
   Google Scholar
• Bram, Steven J., Game Theory and Politics (Mineola: Dover Publications 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh, M.L. ‘It’s Time to End the Tyranny of Ends, Ways, and Means’, Modern War Institute, 24 Jul 2017. https://mwi.usma.edu/time-end-tyranny-ends-ways-means/, accessed 6 December 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, Justin, Gambling and War: Risk, Reward, and Chance in International Conflict (Annapolis: Naval Institute Press 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Echevarria, Antulio J., II. ‘Is Strategy Really A Lost Art?’, Strategic Studies Institute Op-Ed, 13 Sept 2013, http://ssi.armywarcollege.edu/index.cfm/articles//Is-Strategy-Really-A-Lost-Art/2013/09/13, accessed 5 December 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Echevarria, Antulio J., II., Military Strategy: A Very Short Introduction (New York: Oxford UP 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Elkus, Adam, ‘Beyond Strategy as a Means to an End’, Infinity Journal 3/4 ( Winter 2014), 11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, Lawrence, ‘Defining War’, in Julian Lindley-French and Yves Boyer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of War (Oxford: Oxford UP 2012), 17–29.
   Google Scholar
• Gallop, Max, ‘More Dangerous than Dyads: How a Third Party Enables Rationalist Explanations for War’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 29/3 (2017), 353–81. doi:10.1177/0951629816682884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, Colin S., Modern Strategy (Oxford: Oxford UP 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Colin S., Schools for Strategy: Teaching Strategy for 21st Century Conflict (Carlisle: Strategic Studies Institute 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Colin S., The Strategy Bridge: Theory for Practice (Oxford: Oxford UP 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Colin S., Perspectives on Strategy (Oxford: Oxford UP 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Colin S., ‘So What! the Meaning of Strategy’, Infinity Journal 6/1 ( Winter 2018), 4–7.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, Basil Liddell, Strategy (New York, NY: Meridian 1991).
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, Daniel, (ed.), Moltke on the Art of War: Selected Writings (Novata: Presidio Press 1993).
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, Wayne P., Jr., ‘The Strategy-Tactics Relationship’, in Colin S. Gray and Roger W. Barnett (eds.), Seapower and Strategy (Annapolis: Naval Institute Press 1989), 47–73.
   Google Scholar
• Jablonsky, David, ‘Strategy and the Operational Level of War: Part I’, Parameters 27/1 ( Spring 1987), 65–76.
   Google Scholar
• Jablonsky, David, ‘Why Is Strategy Difficult?’, in J. Boone Bartholomees Jr. (ed.), U.S. Army War College Guide to National Security Issues, Volume 1: Theory of War and Strategy (Carlisle: Strategic Studies Institute 2012), 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Jullien, François, The Propensity of Things: Toward a History of Efficacy in China Janet Lloyd, trans. (New York: Zone Books 1995).
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, Justin and Mike Brennan, Alien: How Operational Art Devoured Strategy (Carlisle: Strategic Studies Institute 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Kiszely, John, ‘Thinking about the Operational Level’, The RUSI Journal 150/6 (2005), 38–43. doi:10.1080/03071840509441983
   Google Scholar
• Luttwak, Edward N., ‘The Operational Level of War’, International Security 5/3 ( Winter 1980–1981), 61–79. doi:10.2307/2538420
   Google Scholar
• Luttwak, Edward N., Strategy: The Logic of War and Peace (Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard UP 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Lykke, Arthur F., Jr., ‘Defining Military Strategy’, Military Review 69/5 (May 1989), 2–8.
   Google Scholar
• Mahnken, Thomas G., Competitive Strategies for the 21st Century: Theory, History, and Practice (Stanford: University of Stanford Press 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Neil, ‘Strategy as Mutually Contingent Choice: New Behavioral Lessons from Thomas Schelling’s the Strategy of Conflict’, SAGE Open 6/2 ( Apr–Jun 2016), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meiser, Jeffrey W., ‘Ends + Ways + Means = (Bad) Strategy’, Parameters 46/4 ( Winter 2016–2017), 81–91.
   Google Scholar
• Milevski, Lukas, ‘Whence Derives Predictability in Strategy?’, Infinity Journal 2/4 ( Fall 2012), 4–7.
   Google Scholar
• Milevski, Lukas, ‘Grand Strategy and Operational Art: Companion Concepts and Their Implications for Strategy’, Comparative Strategy 33/4 (Sept 2014), 342–53. doi:10.1080/01495933.2014.941723
   Google Scholar
• Milevski, Lukas, ‘Choosing Strategy: Its Meaning and Significance in Context’, Infinity Journal 6/2 ( Summer 2018), 12–16.
   Google Scholar
• Niou, Emerson M.S. and Peter C. Ordeshook, Strategy and Politics: An Introduction to Game Theory (Abingdon: Routledge 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Paparone, Christopher R., ‘Beyond Ends-Based Rationality: A Quad-Conceptual View of Strategic Reasoning for Professional Military Education’, in Gabriel Marcella (ed.), Teaching Strategy: Challenge and Response (Carlisle: Strategic Studies Institute 2010), 309–340.
   Google Scholar
• Paret, Peter and Daniel Moran, (eds.), Carl Von Clausewitz: Two Letters on Strategy (Fort Leavenworth: US Army Command and General Staff College 1984).
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, Thomas C., The Strategy of Conflict (Cambridge: Harvard UP 1980).
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, Thomas C., Arms and Influence (New Haven: Yale UP 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Rupert, ‘Epilogue’, in John Andreas Olsen and Martin van Creveld (eds.), The Evolution of Operational Art: From Napoleon to the Present (Oxford: Oxford UP 2010), 226–44.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, John, ‘Beyond Clausewitz: Better Ways of Thinking Strategically’, Comparative Strategy 36/5 (2017), 468–78. doi:10.1080/01495933.2017.1379840
   Google Scholar
• Strachan, Hew, ‘The Lost Meaning of Strategy’, Survival 47/3 (Jul 2005), 33–54. doi:10.1080/00396330500248102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strachan, Hew, ‘Strategy or Alibi? Obama, McChrystal and the Operational Level of War’, Survival 52/5 (Sept 2010), 157–82. doi:10.1080/00396338.2010.522104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strachan, Hew, ‘Strategy in the Twenty-First Century’, in Hew Strachan and Sibylle Scheipers (eds.), The Changing Character of War (Oxford: Oxford UP 2011), 503–23.
   Google Scholar
• Svechin, Aleksandr A., Strategy Kent D. Lee ed. (Minneapolis: East View Information Services 1991).
   Google Scholar
• von Clausewitz., Carl, On War Michael Howard and Peter Paret, eds. and trans. (Princeton: Princeton UP 1984).
   Google Scholar
• Whitt, Jacqueline E. ‘Wrong and Useful: Models and Metaphors for Strategy’, USAWC War Room, 11 Aug 2017, https://warroom.armywarcollege.edu/articles/wrong-useful-models-metaphors-strategy/, accessed 6 December 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Wylie, J.C., Military Strategy: A General Theory of Power Control (Annapolis: Naval Institute Press 1989).
   Google Scholar
• Yarger, Harry R., Strategy and the National Security Professional: Strategic Thinking and Strategy Formulation in the 21st Century (Westport: Praeger Security International 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Zabecki, David T., The German 1918 Offensives: A Case Study in the Operational Level of War (London: Routledge 2006).
   Google Scholar