Red lines: Enforcement, declaration, and ambiguity in the Cuban Missile Crisis

Bibliography

• Altman, Dan, ‘Advancing without Attacking: The Strategic Game around the Use of Force’, Security Studies 27/1 (2018), 58–88. doi:10.1080/09636412.2017.1360074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman, Dan and Nicholas Miller, ‘Red Lines in Nuclear Nonproliferation’, The Nonproliferation Review 24/3–4 (2017), 315–42. doi:10.1080/10736700.2018.1433575
   Google Scholar
• Apple, R. W., Jr., ‘Allow Miscalculation, Open the Way to War’, New York Times, 24 April 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Associated Press, ‘Premier’s Letter Avoids Admitting U.S. Charges’, New York Times, 27 October 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Axelrod, Robert, The Evolution of Cooperation (New York: Basic Books 1984).
   Google Scholar
• Baum, Matthew A., ‘Going Private: Public Opinion, Presidential Rhetoric, and the Domestic Politics of Audience Costs in US Foreign Policy Crises’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 48/5 (2004), 603–31. doi:10.1177/0022002704267764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach, Derek and Rasmus B. Pedersen, Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Beard, David, ‘“There Will Be Costs” – The Text of Obama’s Statement on Ukraine’, Washington Post, 28 February 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Beavers, Olivia, ‘Former Obama National Security Adviser Blasts Decisions in Syria as a “Colossal Mistake”’, The Hill, 19 February 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Andrew and Jeffrey T. Checkel, eds., Process Tracing (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, Wyn, Jeffrey W. Knopf, and Matthew Moran, ‘The Obama Administration and Syrian Chemical Weapons: Deterrence, Compellence, and the Limits of the “Resolve Plus Bombs” Formula’, Security Studies 29/5 (2020), 797–831. doi:10.1080/09636412.2020.1859130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brands, Hal and David Palkki, ‘“Conspiring Bastards”: Saddam Hussein’s Strategic View of the United States’, Diplomatic History 36/3 (2012), 625–59. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7709.2012.01045.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, Austin, Secret Wars: Covert Conflict in International Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Central Intelligence Agency. CIA Documents on the Cuban Missile Crisis, 1962 (Washington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency 1992).
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, Thomas J., ‘Threats, Assurances, and the Last Chance for Peace: The Lessons of Mao’s Korean War Telegrams’, International Security 17/1 (1992), 122–54. doi:10.2307/2539160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumings, Bruce, The Origins of the Korean War, Volume II (Princeton: Princeton University Press 1990).
   Google Scholar
• Fearon, James D., ‘Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes’, American Political Science Review 88/3 (1994), 577–92. doi:10.2307/2944796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel, Max, ‘U.S. Is Prepared for Any Moves against Its Bases by Russians’, New York Times, 22 October 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Fursenko, Aleksandr and Timothy J. Naftali, One Hell of a Gamble: Khrushchev, Castro, and Kennedy, 1958-1964 (New York: W. W. Norton & Company 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, John, Case Study Research: Principles and Practices (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Guzansky, Yoel, ‘Thin Red Lines: The Syrian and Iranian Contexts’, Strategic Assessment 16/2 (2013), 23–33.
   Google Scholar
• Haass, Richard and David Sacks, ‘American Support for Taiwan Must Be Unambiguous’, Foreign Affairs, 2 September 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Haass, Richard N., War of Necessity, War of Choice: A Memoir of Two Iraq Wars (New York: Simon and Schuster 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, Frank P. and John Mitton, Fighting for Credibility: US Reputation and International Politics (Toronto: University of Toronto Press 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Helprin, Mark, ‘Hollow Talk in the South China Sea’, Wall Street Journal, 15 August 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Hoagl, Jim, ‘… and the Tale of a Transcript’, Washington Post, 17 September 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Ioffe, Julia, ‘How Russia Saw the Red Line Crisis’, The Atlantic, 11 March 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, Herman, On Escalation: Metaphors and Scenarios (New Brunswick, N.J: Transaction Publishers 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Katagiri, Azusa and Eric Min, ‘The Credibility of Public and Private Signals: A Document-Based Approach’, American Political Science Review 113/11 (2019), 156–72. doi:10.1017/S0003055418000643
   Google Scholar
• Kertzer, Joshua D., Resolve in International Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Kertzer, Joshua D., Jonathan Renshon, and Keren Yarhi-Milo, ‘Are Red Lines Red Herrings?’, Working Paper, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Khrushchev, Sergei N., Memoirs of Nikita Khrushchev, Volume 3. Trans. George Shriver (University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Khrushchev, Sergei N., Nikita Khrushchev and the Creation of a Superpower (University Park: Penn State University Press 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Kurizaki, Shuhei, ‘Efficient Secrecy: Public versus Private Threats in Crisis Diplomacy’, American Political Science Review 101/3 (2007), 543–58. doi:10.1017/S0003055407070396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebovic, James H., ‘Red Lines and Green Lights: Iran, Nuclear Arms Control, and Nonproliferation’, Strategic Studies Quarterly 10/1 (2016), 10–42.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, Danielle L., Reputation for Resolve: How Leaders Signal Determination in International Politics (Ithaca: Cornell University Press 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Mandell, Mark, ‘Obama’s Thick Red Line on Syria’, BBC News, 22 August 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Matray, James I., ‘Dean Acheson’s Press Club Speech Reexamined’, Journal of Conflict Studies 22/1 (2002), 28–55.
   Google Scholar
• McManus, Roseanne W., Statements of Resolve: Achieving Coercive Credibility in International Conflict (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Melhem, Hisham, ‘How Obama’s Syrian Chemical Weapons Deal Fell Apart’, The Atlantic, 10 April 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, Jonathan, Reputation and International Politics (Ithaca: Cornell University Press 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Mikoyan, Sergo A., The Soviet Cuban Missile Crisis: Castro, Mikoyan, Kennedy, Khrushchev, and the Missiles of November. Ed. Svetlana Savranskaya (Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center Press 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Jake, ‘John McCain Blames Obama’s ‘Feckless’ Foreign Policy for Ukraine Crisis’, CBS News, 3 March 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, T. Clifton, Navin Bapat, and Valentin Krustev, ‘The Threat and Imposition of Economic Sanctions, 1971—2000’, Conflict Management and Peace Science 26/1 (2009), 92–110. doi:10.1177/0738894208097668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narang, Vipin, Nuclear Strategy in the Modern Era: Regional Powers and International Conflict (Princeton: Princeton University Press 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Nomikos, William G. and Nicholas Sambanis, ‘What Is the Mechanism Underlying Audience Costs? Incompetence, Belligerence, and Inconsistency’, Journal of Peace Research 56/4 (2019), 575–88. doi:10.1177/0022343319839456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pape, Robert A., Bombing to Win: Air Power and Coercion in War (Ithaca: Cornell University Press 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Press, Daryl G., Calculating Credibility: How Leaders Assess Military Threats (Ithaca: Cornell University Press 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Pressman, Jeremy, ‘September Statements, October Missiles, November Elections: Domestic Politics, Foreign Policy Making, and the Cuban Missile Crisis’, Security Studies 10/3 (2001), 80–114. doi:10.1080/09636410108429438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinlan, Michael, ‘Deterrence and Deterrability’, Contemporary Security Policy 25/1 (2004), 11–17. doi:10.1080/1352326042000290470
   Google Scholar
• Renshon, Jonathan, Allan Dafoe, and Paul Huth, ‘Leader Influence and Reputation Formation in World Politics’, American Journal of Political Science 62/2 (2018), 325–39. doi:10.1111/ajps.12335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovner, Joshua, ‘Ambiguity Is a Fact, Not a Policy’, War on the Rocks, 22 July 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Sagan, Scott D., ‘The Commitment Trap: Why the United States Should Not Use Nuclear Threats to Deter Biological and Chemical Weapons Attacks’, International Security 24/4 (2000), 85–115. doi:10.1162/016228800560318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelling, Thomas C., The Strategy of Conflict (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1960).
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, Thomas C., Arms and Influence (New Haven: Yale University Press 1966).
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, Tobias, and Theresa Lütkefend, Nowhere to Hide: The Logic of Chemical Weapons Use in Syria. (Berlin: Global Public Policy Institute). (2019). https://www.gppi.net/media/GPPi_Schneider_Luetkefend_2019_Nowhere_to_Hide_Web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, Kenneth A., Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Sechser, Todd S. and Matthew Fuhrmann, ‘Crisis Bargaining and Nuclear Blackmail’, International Organization 67/1 (2013), 173–95. doi:10.1017/S0020818312000392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, Casey and Michael J. Tougias, Above and Beyond: John F. Kennedy and America’s Most Dangerous Cold War Spy Mission (New York: PublicAffairs 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, Glenn H. and Paul Diesing, Conflict among Nations: Bargaining, Decision Making, and System Structure in International Crises (Princeton: Princeton University Press 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, Jack and Erica D. Borghard, ‘The Cost of Empty Threats: A Penny, Not A Pound’, American Political Science Review 105/3 (2011), 437–56. doi:10.1017/S000305541100027X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tertrais, Bruno, ‘Drawing Red Lines Right’, The Washington Quarterly 37/3 (2014), 7–24. doi:10.1080/0163660X.2014.978433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tertrais, Bruno, The Diplomacy of ‘Red Lines’ (Paris: Fondation pour la Recherche Stratégique 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Tomz, Michael, ‘Domestic Audience Costs in International Relations: An Experimental Approach’, International Organization 61/4 (2007), 821–40. doi:10.1017/S0020818307070282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trachtenberg, Marc, ‘Audience Costs: An Historical Analysis’, Security Studies 21/1 (2012), 3–42. doi:10.1080/09636412.2012.650590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trager, Robert F., Diplomacy: Communication and the Origins of International Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Trager, Robert F. and Lynn Vavreck, ‘The Political Costs of Crisis Bargaining: Presidential Rhetoric and the Role of Party’, American Journal of Political Science 55/3 (2011), 526–45. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00521.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisiger, Alex and Keren Yarhi-Milo, ‘Revisiting Reputation: How past Actions Matter in International Politics’, International Organization 69/2 (2015), 473–95. doi:10.1017/S0020818314000393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widmer, Ted and Caroline Kennedy, Listening In: The Secret White House Recordings of John F. Kennedy (London: Hachette UK 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Zacher, Mark W., ‘The Territorial Integrity Norm: International Boundaries and the Use of Force’, International Organization 55/2 (2001), 215–50. doi:10.1162/00208180151140568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar