What is a military innovation and why it matters

Bibliography

• Adamsky, Dima, The Culture of Military Innovation: The Impact of Cultural Factors on the Revolution in Military Affairs in Russia, the US (Israel Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2010)
   Google Scholar
• Adamsky, Dima and Kjell Inge Bjerga eds, Contemporary Military Innovation: Between Anticipation and Adaptation (London: Routledge, 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Angevine, Robert G, ‘Innovation and Experimentation in the US Navy: The UPTIDE Antisubmarine Warfare Experiments, 1969–1972’, Journal of Strategic Studies 28/1 Feb. 2005, 77–105. 10.1080/01402390500032070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antulio, J. Echevarria, II, ‘Restoring the Primacy of Battle: U.S. Military Theory and the RMA’, Contemporary Military Innovation: Between Anticipation and Adaptation, eds.Dima Adamsky and Kjell Inge Bjerga. London: Routledge, 2012, 51–62
   Google Scholar
• Armacost, Michael H, The Politics of Weapons Innovation: The Thor-Jupiter Controversy (New York: Columbia UP, 1969)
   Google Scholar
• Avant, Deborah D, Political Institutions and Military Change: Lessons from Peripheral Wars (Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP, 1994)
   Google Scholar
• Avant, Deborah, ‘Political Institutions and Military Effectiveness: Contemporary United States and United Kingdom’, in Risa Brooks and Elizabeth A. Stanley (eds.), Creating Military Power: The Sources of Military Effectiveness (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2007), 80–105
   Google Scholar
• Bacevich, Andrew J, The Pentomic Era: The US Army between Korea And (Vietnam Washington, DC: National Defense UP, 1986)
   Google Scholar
• Beard, Edmund, Developing the ICBM: A Study in Bureaucratic Politics (New York: Columbia UP, 1976)
   Google Scholar
• Bergerson, Frederic A, The Army Gets an Air Force (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins UP, 1980)
   Google Scholar
• Berman, Lazar, ‘Capturing Contemporary Innovation: Studying IDF Innovation against Hamas and Hizballah’, Journal of Strategic Studies 35/1 (feb 2012), 121–47. 10.1080/01402390.2011.608933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betz, David and Anthony Cormack, ‘Hot War, Cold Comfort: A Less Optimistic Take on the British Military in Afghanistan.’, RUSI Journal 154/4 (2009), 26–29. 10.1080/03071840903216445
   Google Scholar
• Bickel, Keith B, Mars Learning: The Marine Corps’ Development of Small Wars Doctrine, 1915–1940 Boulder, CO: Westview, 2000
   Google Scholar
• Bjerga, Kjell Inge and Torunn Laugen Haaland, ‘Doctrinal Innovation in a Small State’, in Dima Adamsky and Kjell Inge Bjerga (eds.), Contemporary Military Innovation: Between Anticipation and Adaptation (London: Routledge, 2012), 83–106
   Google Scholar
• Bradin, James W, From Hot Air to Hellfire: The History of Army Attack Aviation (Novato, CA: Presidio Press, 1994)
   Google Scholar
• Builder, Carl H, The Masks of War: American Military Styles in Strategy and Analysis (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins UP, 1989)
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Douglas, The Warthog and the Close Air Support Debate (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 2004)
   Google Scholar
• Catignani, Sergio, ‘Getting COIN at the Tactical Level in Afghanistan: Reassessing Counter-Insurgency Adaptation in the British Army’, Journal of Strategic Studies 35/4 (2012), 513–39. 10.1080/01402390.2012.660625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, Tai Ming, ‘The Chinese Defense Economy’s Long March from Imitation to Innovation’, Journal of Strategic Studies 34/3 (June 2011), 325–54 10.1080/01402390.2011.574976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffey, Rod A. Doctrinal Orphan or Active Partner? A History of US Army Mechanized Infantry Doctrine MA Thesis, US Army Command and General Staff College, 2000
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Eliot A, ‘A Revolution in Warfare’, Foreign Affairs 75/2 (1996), 37–54. 10.2307/20047487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cote, Owen R “The Politics of Innovative Military Doctrine: The US Navy and Fleet Ballistic Missiles” PhD diss., MIT, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Vincent, The Politics of Innovation. Patterns in Navy Cases (Denver: University of Denver, 1967)
   Google Scholar
• Downie, Richard Duncan, Learning from Conflict: The U.S. Military in Vietnam, El Salvador and the Drug War (London: Praeger, 1998)
   Google Scholar
• Engel, Gregory A, ‘Cruise Missiles and the Tomahawk’, in Bradd C. Hayes and Douglas V. Smith (eds.), The Politics of Naval Innovation (Newport, RI: Strategic Research Dept., Center for Naval Warfare Studies, U.S. Naval War College, 1994), 16–41
   Google Scholar
• Evangelista, Matthew, Innovation and the Arms Race: How the United States and the Soviet Union Develop New Military Technologies (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1988)
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, Theo, ‘Culture and Military Power’, Review of International Studies 24/3 071998, 407–16. 10.1017/S0260210598004070
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, Theo, ‘Figuring Out Fighting Organisations: The New Organisational Analysis in Strategic Studies’, The Journal of Strategic Studies 19/1 (March 1996), 122–35. 10.1080/01402399608437629
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, Theo, ‘World Culture and the Irish Army, 1922–1942’, in Theo Farrell and Terry Terriff (eds.), The Sources of Military Change: Culture, Politics, Technology (Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2002), 69–90
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, Theo, ‘Global Norms and Military Effectiveness: The Army in Early Twentieth-Century Ireland’, in Risa Brooks and Elizabeth A. Stanley (eds.), Creating Military Power: The Sources of Military Effectiveness (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2007), 136–57
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, Theo, ‘Improving in War: Military Adaptation and the British in Helmand Province, Afghanistan, 2006-09’, Journal of Strategic Studies 33/4 2010, 567–94. 10.1080/01402390.2010.489712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, Theo, ‘Improving in War: Military Adaptation and the British in Helmand, 2006-2009’, in Dima Adamsky and Kjell Inge Bjerga (eds.), Contemporary Military Innovation: Between Anticipation and Adaptation (London: Routledge, 2012), 107–29
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, Theo and Terry Terriff, The Sources of Military Change: Culture, Politics, Technology (Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2002)
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, Meir, On Flexibility: Recovery from Technological and Doctrinal Surprise on the Battlefield (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2011)
   Google Scholar
• Fleck, James, ‘Learning by Trying: The Implementation of Configurational Technology’, in Donald Mackenzie and Judy Wajcman (eds.), The Social Shaping of Technology (Open University Press, 1999), 244–57
   Google Scholar
• Foley, Robert T, ‘A Case Study in Horizontal Military Innovation: The German Army, 1916-1918’, Journal of Strategic Studies 35/6 (Dec. 2012,: 799–827 10.1080/01402390.2012.669737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, Robert T, Stuart Griffin, and Helen Mccartney, ‘’Transformation in Contact’: Learning the Lessons of Modern War,’ International Affairs 87/2 2011, 253–70. 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.00972.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaudlip, Fred W “Vision to Victory – Space, Mahan, and Mitchell: The Role of the Visionary in Cross-Organizational Innovation’, MA thesis, US Air Command and Staff College, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Giese, Jon F “Military Innovation: Sources of Change for United States Special Operations Forces’, MA thesis, US Naval Postgraduate School, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Giordano, Eric R “The US Army and Non-Traditional Missions: Explaining Divergence in Doctrine and Practice in the Post-Cold War Era’, PhD diss., Tufts University, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, Emily O, ‘The Spread of Western Military Models to Ottoman Turkey and Meiji Japan’, in Theo Farrell and Terry Terriff (eds.), The Sources of Military Change: Culture, Politics, Technology (Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2002), 41–67
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, Emily O, ‘International Competition and Military Effectiveness: Naval Air Power, 1919-1945’, Creating Military Power: The Sources of Military Effectiveness, eds.Risa Brooks and Elizabeth A. Stanley. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2007, 158–85
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, Emily O. and Richard B Andres, ‘Systemic Effects of Military Innovation and Diffusion,’ Security Studies 8/4 Summer 1999, 79–125. 10.1080/09636419908429387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, Emily O. and Leslie C Eliason, The Diffusion of Military Technology and Ideas (California: Stanford University Press, 2003)
   Google Scholar
• Grauer, Ryan, ‘Moderating Diffusion: Military Bureaucratic Politics and the Implementation of German Doctrine in South America, 1885–1914’, World Politics 67/2 2015, 268–312. 10.1017/S0043887115000027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, Stuart, ‘Iraq, Afghanistan and the Future of British Military Doctrine: From Counterinsurgency to Stabilization, ‘International Affairs 87/2 2011, 317–33. 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.00975.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudmundsson, Bruce I, Stormtroop Tactics: Innovation in the German Army, 1914-1918 (West Port, CT: Praeger, 1995)
   Google Scholar
• Haworth, W. Blair, The Bradley and How It Got that Way: Technology, Institutions, and the Problem of Mechanized Infantry in the United States Army (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1999)
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, Bradd C. and Douglas V. Smith, The Politics of Naval Innovation (Newport, RI: Strategic Research Dept., Center for Naval Warfare Studies, U.S. Naval War College, 1994)
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, Rolf, ‘Blitzkrieg, the RMA and Defense Intellectuals’, in Dima Adamsky and Kjell Inge Bjerga (eds.), Contemporary Military Innovation: Between Anticipation and Adaptation (London: Routledge, 2012), 175–87
   Google Scholar
• Høiback, Harald, ‘What Is Doctrine?’, in Dima Adamsky and Kjell Inge Bjerga (eds.), Contemporary Military Innovation: Between Anticipation and Adaptation (London: Routledge, 2012), 20–37
   Google Scholar
• Hone, Thomas C., Douglas V. Smith, and Roger C. Easton, ‘Aegis - Evolutionary or Revolutionary Technology’, in Bradd C. Hayes and Douglas V. Smith (eds.), The Politics of Naval Innovation (Newport, RI: Strategic Research Dept., Center for Naval Warfare Studies, U.S. Naval War College, 1994), 42–73
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, Michael C, The Diffusion of Military Power: Causes and Consequences for International Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010)
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, Thomas Alexander, Over Lord: General Pete Quesada and the Triumph of Tactical Air Power in World War II (New York: Free Press, 1995)
   Google Scholar
• Itai, Brun and Carmit Valensi, ‘The Revolution in Military Affairs of the ‘Other Side’, in Dima Adamsky and Kjell Inge Bjerga (eds.), Contemporary Military Innovation: Between Anticipation and Adaptation (London: Routledge, 2012), 107–29
   Google Scholar
• Jungdahl, Adam M. and Julia M. Macdonald, ‘Innovation Inhibitors In War: Overcoming Obstacles In The Pursuit Of Military Effectiveness’, Journal of Strategic Studies 38/4 2015, 467–99. 10.1080/01402390.2014.917628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kier, Elizabeth, Imagining War: French and British Military Doctrine between the Wars (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997)
   Google Scholar
• King, Anthony, ‘Understanding the Helmand Campaign: British Military Operations in Afghanistan’, International Affairs 86/2 2010, 311–32. 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2010.00884.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollars, Nina A, ‘War’s Horizon: Soldier-Led Adaptation in Iraq and Vietnam’, Journal of Strategic Studies 38/4 2015, 529–53. 10.1080/01402390.2014.971947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krepinevich, Andrew F., Jr, The Army and Vietnam (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1986)
   Google Scholar
• Lebovic, James H, Foregone Conclusions: US Weapons Acquisition in the Post-Cold War Transition (Boulder, Colorado: Westview, 1996)
   Google Scholar
• Lock-Pullan, Richard, US Intervention Policy and Army Innovation: From Vietnam to Iraq (New York, NY: Routledge, 2006)
   Google Scholar
• Lupfer, Timothy T, The Dynamics of Doctrine: The Changes in German Tactical Doctrine during the First World War (Fort Leavenworth, Kansas: Combat Studies Institute, U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, 1981)
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, Donald A, Inventing Accuracy: An Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile Guidance (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993)
   Google Scholar
• Mahnken, Thomas G, Uncovering Ways of War: U.S. Intelligence and Foreign Military Innovation, 1918-1941 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2002), 44–47
   Google Scholar
• Mahnken, Thomas G, ‘China’s Anti-Access Strategy in Historical and Theoretical Perspective’, Journal of Strategic Studies 34/3 (June 2011), 299–323. 10.1080/01402390.2011.574971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, Raphael D, ‘Adaptation in the Israel-Hizballah Conflict: The Institutionalization of Lesson- Learning in the IDF’, Journal of Strategic Studies 38/4 2015, 500–28. 10.1080/01402390.2014.923767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquis, Susan L, Unconventional Warfare Rebuilding US Special Operations Forces (Washington, DC: Brookings Inst. Press, 1997)
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, David Harrison. Taming the Electric Chameleon: War, Offense-Defense Theory, and the Revolution in Military Affairs PhD diss., University of Maryland, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• McNaugher, Thomas L, The M16 Controversies: Military Organizations and Weapons Acquisition (New York: Praeger, 1984)
   Google Scholar
• Milner, Marc, ‘Convoy Escorts: Tactics, Technology, and Innovation in the Royal Canadian Navy, 1939–1943’, Military Affairs 48/1 (Jan 1984), 19–25. 10.2307/1988343
   Google Scholar
• Moy, Timothy D., War Machines Transforming Technologies in the U.S. Military, 1920-1940 College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 2001
   Google Scholar
• Mullins, Robert E “Sharpening the Trident: The Decisions of 1889 and the Creation of Modern Seapower’, PhD diss., King’s College London, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, Williamson, Adaptation in War: With Fear of Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011)
   Google Scholar
• Nagl, John A., Counterinsurgency Lessons from Malaya and Vietnam: Learning to Eat Soup with a Knife (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2002)
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, Suzanne C. Preparing for War: The Dynamics of Peacetime Military Reform PhD diss., Harvard University, 2003
   Google Scholar
• Oudshoorn, Nelly E. and Trevor J. Pinch, How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003)
   Google Scholar
• Peter Rosen, Stephen, ‘The Impact of the Office of Net Assessment on the American Military in the Matter of Revolution in Military Affairs’, in Dima Adamsky and Kjell Inge Bjerga (eds.), Contemporary Military Innovation: Between Anticipation and Adaptation (London: Routledge, 2012), 39–50
   Google Scholar
• Pollpeter, Kevin, ‘Upward and Onward: Technological Innovation and Organizational Change in China’s Space Industry” Journal of Strategic Studies 34/3 (June 2011), 405–23. 10.1080/01402390.2011.574983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posen, Barry R, The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany between the World Wars (Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press, 1986)
   Google Scholar
• Reiter, Dan, ‘Nationalism and Military Effectiveness, Post-Meiji Japan’, in Risa Brooks and Elizabeth A. Stanley (eds.), Creating Military Power: The Sources of Military Effectiveness (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2007), 27–54
   Google Scholar
• Risa, Brooks and Elizabeth A. Stanley, Creating Military Power: The Sources of Military Effectiveness. (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2007)
   Google Scholar
• Roland, Alex, ‘Comparing Military Revolutions” Paper presented at The Joint Center for International and Security Studies - Securities Studies Conference on the Revolution in Military Affairs, Monterey, CA, Aug. 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, Stephen Peter, Winning the Next War: Innovation and the Modern Military (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1994)
   Google Scholar
• Russell, James A, Innovation, Transformation, and War: Counterinsurgency Operations in Anbar and Ninewa Provinces, Iraq, 2005-2007 (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2010)
   Google Scholar
• Russell, James A, ‘Innovation in the Crucible of War: Counterinsurgency Operations in Anbar and Ninewa, Iraq, 2005-2007’, in Dima Adamsky and Kjell Inge Bjerga (eds.), Contemporary Military Innovation: Between Anticipation and Adaptation (London: Routledge, 2012), 153–74
   Google Scholar
• Sapolsky, Harvey M, The Polaris System Development: Bureaucratic and Programmatic Success in Government (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971)
   Google Scholar
• Serena, Chad C, A Revolution in Military Adaptation: The US Army in the Iraq War (Washington, D.C: Georgetown Univ. Press, 2011)
   Google Scholar
• Sinno, Abdulkader H, Organizations at War in Afghanistan and Beyond (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2008)
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Douglas V, ‘Who’s That Tall Dark Stranger There?’, in Bradd C. Hayes and Douglas V. Smith (eds.), The Politics of Naval Innovation (Newport, RI: Strategic Research Dept., Center for Naval Warfare Studies, U.S. Naval War College, 1994), 74–84
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, Brian R, ‘The Future Nature of Conflict: A Critique of “The American Revolution in Military Affairs” in the Era of Jointery’, Defense Analysis 14/2 (Aug 01, 1998), 91. 10.1080/07430179808405754
   Google Scholar
• Terriff, Terry, ‘U.S. Ideas and Military Change in NATO, 1989-1994’, in Theo Farrell and Terry Terriff (eds.), The Sources of Military Change: Culture, Politics, Technology (Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2002), 91–116
   Google Scholar
• Theo, Farrell, Frans P. B. Osinga, and James Avery Russell, Military Adaptation in Afghanistan Stanford CA: Stanford security studies, 2013
   Google Scholar
• Toffler, Alvin and Heidi Toffler, War and Anti-War: Making Sense of Todays Global Chaos (London: Warner Books, 1995)
   Google Scholar
• van Creveld, and L. Martin, Technology and War: From 2000 B.C. To the Present (New York: The Free Press, 1989)
   Google Scholar
• Vickers, Michael G, ‘The Revolution in Military Affairs and Military Capabilities’, War in the Information Age: New Challenges for U.S. Security, eds.Robert L. Pfaltzgraff and Richard H. Shultz. Washington, D.C: Brasseys, 1997, 29–47
   Google Scholar
• Zisk, Kimberly Marten, Engaging the Enemy: Organization Theory and Soviet Military Innovation, 1955-1991 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993)
   Google Scholar