Religious Education, Big Ideas and the study of religion(s) and worldview(s)

References

• Asad, T. 1993. Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore, London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumfield, V., and S. Higgins. 2008. ‘Child and the Curriculum in the 21st Century: The Relationship between Enquiry and Inquiry in the Classroom’. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, New York, March 24–28.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J., A. Brown, and R. Cocking, eds. 2001. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K. M. 2002. “Writing about “The Other,” Revisited.” In Personal Knowledge and Beyond, edited by J. V. Spickard, S. Landres, and M. B. McGuire, 127–133. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, J., and G. E. Marcus. 1986b. “Introduction.” In Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, edited by J. Clifford and G. E. Marcus, 1–26. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, J. 1988. The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth Century Ethnography, Literature and Art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, J., and G. E. Marcus, eds. 1986a. Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conroy, J. C., D. Lundie, R. A. Davis, V. Baumfield, L. P. Barnes, T. Gallagher, T. Gallagher, K. Lowden, N. Bourque, and K. Wenell. 2013. Does Religious Education Work? A Multidimensional Investigation. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, H. L. 2002. Concept-Based Curriculum and Instruction: Teaching beyond the Facts. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Freathy, G. 2016. The RE-searchers Approach: A Quick Start Guide with Exemplar Units of Work and Activities. Exeter: University of Exeter.
   Google Scholar
• Freathy, G., and R. Freathy. 2016. ‘RE-searchers’. Available at: http://www.reonline.org.uk/re-searchers/[Accessed 22nd June 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Freathy, G., R. Freathy, J. Doney, K. Walshe, and G. Teece. 2015. The RE-searchers: A New Approach to Primary Religious Education. Exeter: University of Exeter.
   Google Scholar
• Freathy, R., and G. Freathy. 2013a. “RE-searchers: A Dialogic Approach to RE in Primary Schools.” REsource 36 (1): 4–7.
   Google Scholar
• Freathy, R., and G. Freathy. 2013b. “FORUM: Initiating Children into Hermeneutical Discourses in Religious Education: A Response to Rachel Cope and Julian Stern.” Journal for the Study of Spirituality 3 (2): 156–167. doi:10.1179/2044024313Z.00000000013.
   Google Scholar
• Freathy, R., J. Doney, G. Freathy, K. Walshe, and G. Teece. 2017. “Pedagogical Bricoleurs and Bricolage Researchers: The Case of Religious Education.” British Journal of Educational Studies 65 (4): 425–443. doi:10.1080/00071005.2017.1343454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GA (Geographical Association) 2017: ‘Using Key Concepts and Big Ideas to Plan Curriculum Sequences for the Where Will I Live Project?’ Available online at: http://www.geography.org.uk/projects/wherewillilive/resources/keyconcepts/#top [Accessed 7th June].
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, A. W. 2002a. “As the Other Sees Us: On Reciprocity and Mutual Reflection in the Study of Native American Religions.” In Personal Knowledge and Beyond, edited by J. V. Spickard, S. Landres, and M. B. McGuire, 225–236. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. 2002b. “An Inconstant Profession: The Anthropological Life in Interesting Times.” Annual Review of Anthropology 31: 1–19. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlen, W., ed. 2010. Principles and Big Ideas of Science Education. Trieste: IAP.
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, W., ed. 2015. Working with Big Ideas of Science Education. Trieste: IAP.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. 1990. “A Critical Look at Practical Work in School Science.” School Science Review 70 (256): 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Hufford, D. J. 1995. “The Scholarly Voice and the Personal Voice: Reflexivity in Belief Studies.” Western Folklore 54: 57–76. doi:10.2307/1499911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. L. 2002. “Transitional Identities: Self, Other, and the Ethnographic Process.” In Personal Knowledge and Beyond, edited by J. V. Spickard, S. Landres, and M. B. McGuire, 88–99. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E., and M. M. J. Fischer. 1986. Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McTighe, J., and E. Seif. 2011. ‘A Summary of Underlying Theory and Research Base for Understanding by Design.’ Available online at: https://jaymctighe.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/UbD-Research-Base.pdf [Accessed 7th June 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H. F., and R. Land. 2003. “Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge: Linkages to Ways of Thinking and Practising.” In Improving Student Learning: Theory and Practice - Ten Years On, edited by C. Rust, 412–424. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrop, H. 2004. “Fostering Constructivist Communities of Learners in the Amalgamated Multi‐Discipline of Social Studies.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 36 (2): 141–158. doi:10.1080/0022027032000142500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulin, D. 2009. “A Too Liberal Religious Education? A Thought Experiment for Teachers and Theorists.” British Journal of Religious Education 31 (2): 153–165. doi: 10.1080/01416200802661126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OFSTED. 2010. ‘Transforming Religious Education.’ Available online at: http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/1121/1/Transforming%20religious%20education.pdf [Accessed 16th June 2017].
   Google Scholar
• OFSTED. 2013. ‘Religious Education: Realising the Potential.’ Available online at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/religious-education-realising-the-potential [Accessed 17th June 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Quality Assurance Agency. 2014. Subject Benchmark Statement: Theology and Religious Studies. Gloucester: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Quigley, A. 2013. ‘Designing a New Curriculum – What are Your ‘Big Ideas’?’ Available online at: http://www.theconfidentteacher.com/2013/11/designing-new-curriculum-big-ideas/[Accessed 7th June 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Reader, J., and R. Freathy. 2016. “Technology and Education: Theoretical Reflections Exemplified in Religious Education.” Journal of Beliefs and Values 37 (3): 320–333. doi:10.1080/13617672.2016.1232570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, R. 2009. Holding Together: Equalities, Difference and Cohesion: Guidance for School Improvement Planning. Stoke on Trent: Derbyshire County Council and Trentham Books.
   Google Scholar
• Said, E. W. 1978. Orientalism. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S., and M. G. Sherin. 2004. “Fostering Communities of Teachers as Learners: Disciplinary Perspectives.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 36 (2): 135–140. doi:10.1080/0022027032000135049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrower, J. 1999. Religion: The Classical Theories. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G. 2010. ‘What is a Big Idea?’ Available online at: https://www.authenticeducation.org/ae_bigideas/article.lasso?artid=99 [Accessed 7th June 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G., and J. McTighe. 1998. Understanding by Design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, M. M. 2002. “Dancing on the Fence: Researching Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Christians.” In Personal Knowledge and Beyond, edited by J. V. Spickard, S. Landres, and M. B. McGuire, 47–60. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wintersgill, B., ed. 2017. Big Ideas for Religious Education. Exeter: University of Exeter.
   Google Scholar