Roma communities, urban development and social bordering in the inner city of Budapest

References

• Brambilla, C. 2014. “Exploring the Critical Potential of the Borderscapes Concept.” Geopolitics 20 (1): 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breitung, W. 2011. “Borders and the City: Intra-urban Boundaries in Guangzhou (China).” Quaestiones Geographicae 30 (4): 55–61. doi: 10.2478/v10117-011-0038-5
   Google Scholar
• Brubaker, R. 2004. Ethnicity Without Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Certeau, M. 1980. L’ invention du Quotidien. 1. les arts de faire [The Invention of the Everyday. The Art of Doing Things]. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Egger, R. 2012. “Borders as Narratives.” In Transnational Spaces and Regional Localizations, edited by A. Pilch Ortega, and B. Schröttner, 105–116. Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Fayman, S., K. Keresztély, and K. Tomay. 2008. Le politiques de renouvellement urbain des villes d’Europe central illustrées pour le réhabilitation des quartiers existants: La ville de de Budapest en Hongrie [Politics of Urban Renewal in Central European Cities as Exemplified by the Rehabilitation of Existing Neighbourhoods: The Case of Budapest, Hungary]. Paris: Agence Nationale de l’Habitation.
   Google Scholar
• Gyáni, G. 1992. Bérkaszárnya és nyomortelep [Tenement and Slum]. Budapest: Magvető Könyvkiadó.
   Google Scholar
• György, E. 2009. “‘Nyócker’: Egy negyed mint reprezentációs hely” [Nyócker: A Neighbourhood as Representational Space]. Budapesti Negyed 17 (1): 149–161.
   Google Scholar
• Havas, G. 1989. “A cigány közösségek történeti típusairól” [Historical Typologies of Roma Communities]. Kultúra és Közösség 16 (4): 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Horváth, V., and Z. S. Pósfai. 2014. “Ma Magyarországon lakhatási válság van” [There is a Present Housing Crisis in Hungary]. Heti Világgazdaság March 21, 2014. http://hvg.hu/itthon/2 0 1 4 0 3 2 1 _Ma_Magyarorszagon_lakhatasi_valsag_van.
   Google Scholar
• van Houtum, H., O. T. Kramsch, and W. Zierhofer. 2005. Bordering Space. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Imre, A. 2009. Identity Games. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iossifova, D. 2015. “Borderland Urbanism: Seeing Between Enclaves.” Urban Geography 36 (1): 90–108. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2014.961365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junghaus, T. 2011. “A fehérség kritikai kutatása.” http://tranzit.blog.hu/2011/08/01/a_feherseg_kritikai_kutatasa_critical_whiteness_studies_i.
   Google Scholar
• Keresztély, K., and J. W. Scott. 2012. “Urban Regeneration in the Post-socialist Context: Budapest and the Search for a Social Dimension.” European Planning Studies 20 (7): 1111–1134. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.674346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kóczé, A., and N. Trehan. 2009. “Postcolonial Racism and Social Justice: The Struggle for the Soul of Romani Civil Rights Movement in the ‘New Europe’.” In Racism, Post-colonialism, edited by G. Huggan, 50–77. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kokalanova, A. 2009. “Dealing with Urban Borders The Example of the Border between the Fakulteta Segregated Ethnic Roma Settlement and the Rest of Sofia.” Paper presented at the International RC21 Conference 2013. http://www.rc21.org/conferences/berlin2013/RC21-Berlin-Papers-2/04-1-Kokalanova.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kolossov, V., and J. W. Scott. 2013. “Selected Conceptual Issues in Border Studies.” Belgeo. Revue belge de géographie 1: 1–19. http://belgeo.revues.org/10532.
   Google Scholar
• Kovács, Z. 2009. “Social and Economic Transformation of Historical Neighbourhoods in Budapest.” Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 100 (4): 399–416. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2009.00549.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramsch, O. T. 2002. “Reimagining the Scalar Topologies of Cross-Border Governance: Eu(ro) Regions in the Post-colonial Present.” Space and Polity 6 (2): 169–196. doi: 10.1080/1356257022000003617
   Google Scholar
• Ladányi, J. 1989. “Changing Patterns of Residential Segregation in Budapest.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 13 (4): 555–572. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.1989.tb00136.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladányi, J. 1992. “Gondolatok a Középső-Józsefváros Rehabilitációjának Társadalmi Összefüggéseiről.” Tér és Társadalom 3–4: 75–88.
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, M., and V. Molnár. 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology 28: 167–195. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarry, A. 2014. “Roma as a Political Identity: Exploring Representations of Roma in Europe.” Ethinicities 14 (6): 756–774. doi: 10.1177/1468796814542182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misetics, B. 2013. “The Criminalization of Homelessness in Hungary.” In Mean Streets. A Report on Criminalization of Homelessness in Europe, edited by S. Jones, 101–112. Brussels: Housing Rights Watch.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. 2003. The Right to the City. Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nugent, P. 2011. “Bourdieu and De Certeau at the Border Post: Trans-boundary Communities, Government Officials and Everyday Life in West Africa.” In Auf dem Boden der Tatsachen: Festschrift fur Thomas Bierschenk, edited by N. Schareika, E. Spies, and P.-Y. Le Meur, 361–376. Koln: Rudiger Koeppe Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Péliné, N. H. 1996. Az én kis életem [About My Little Life]. Budapest: T-Twins Kiadó.
   Google Scholar
• Rácz, J., F. Márványkövi, K. Melles, and V. Vadász. 2010. Út a túléléshez – Nyílt színi droghasználat és “belövőszobák” Budapesten Az ártalomcsökkentéssel kapcsolatos megfontolások [Road to survival – The Open Drug Scene and Shooting Galleries in Budapest. Recommendations for Harm Reduction]. Budapest: L’ Harmattan Kiadó.
   Google Scholar
• RESPECT. 2010. “Urban Reconstruction, Social Exclusion and the Roma in Bundapest.” Workshop at the Central European University, November 19. Report of the RESPECT project, funded by the Seventh Framework Programme. Budapest: Central European University.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, J. 2012. “Stigmatization, Space and Boundaries in De-Industrial Burnley.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 35 (4): 684–703. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2011.591406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. W. 2012. “European Politics of Borders, Border Symbolism and Cross-Border Cooperation.” In A Companion to Border Studies, edited by T. Wilson, and H. Donnan, 83–99. Hobolen: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Setét, J. 2013. “Akkor is cigány vagyok” [I am Still a Gypsy]. 2000 Irodalmi és társadalmi havilap 2013. 4. http://ketezer.hu/2013/10/akkor-is-cigany-vagyok-2/.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. 1996. The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. P. 2002. “Power in Place: Re-theorizing the Local and the Global.” In Understanding the City: Contemporary and Future Perspectives, edited by J. Eade, and C. Mele, 109–130. London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. P. 2005. “Power in Place. Contextualising Transnational Research.” City and Society 17 (1): 5–34. doi: 10.1525/city.2005.17.1.5
   Google Scholar
• Spierings, B. 2012. “Economic Flows, Spatial Folds and Intra-urban Borders: Reflections on City Centre Redevelopment Plans from a European Border Studies Perspective.” Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 103 (1): 110–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2011.00699.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szalai, J. 2000. “Az elismerés politikája és a ‘cigánykérdés’. A többségi-kisebbségi viszony néhány jelenkori problémájáról” [Politics of Recognition and the “Gypsy Question”. Contemporary Questions of Majority-Minority Relations].” In Cigánynak születni [Born as a Gyspy], edited by A. Horváth, E. Landau, and J. Szalai, 531–572. Budapest: Új Mandátum Könyvkiadó.
   Google Scholar
• Tosics, I. 2015. “Housing Renewal in Hungary. From Socialist Non-intervention, Through Individual Market Actions to Area-based Public Intervention.” In Renewing Europe’s Housing, edited by R. Turkington, and C. Watson, 161–187. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tremlett, A. 2014. “Making a Difference Without Creating a Difference: Super-diversity as a New Direction for Research on Roma Minorities.” Ethnicities 14 (6): 830–848. doi: 10.1177/1468796814542183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Váradi, M., and T. Virág. 2014. “Faces and Causes of Roma Marginalization. Experiences from Hungary.” In Faces and Causes of Roma Marginalization in Local Contexts: Hungary, Romania, Serbia, edited by J. Szalai, and V. Zentai, 35–65. Budapest: Central European University. http://pasos.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/cps-book-faces-and-causes-2014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vidra, Z. S., and J. Fox. 2014. “Mainstreaming of Racist Anti-Roma Discourses in the Media in Hungary.” Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies 12 (4): 437–455. doi: 10.1080/15562948.2014.914265
   Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. 2009. Punishing the Poor. The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurities. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, J., M. Silberman, and K. E. Till, eds. 2012. Walls, Borders, Boundaries: Spatial and Cultural Practices in Europe. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wimmer, A. 2008. “The Making and Unmaking of Ethnic Boundaries.” American Journal of Sociology 113 (4): 970–1022. doi: 10.1086/522803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2003. Case Study Research Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis, N. 2011. “Power, Intersectionality and the Politics of Belonging.” (FREIA's tekstserie; No. 75). Aalborg: Institut for Kultur og Globale Studier, Aalborg Universitet. doi:10.5278/freia.58024502.
   Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis, N. 2015. “Situated Intersectionality and Social Inequality.” Raisons Politiques 2: 91–100. doi: 10.3917/rai.058.0091
   Google Scholar
• Zolnay, J. 1993. “A lakástörvény és a tulajdonviszonyok” [Housing Legislation and Ownership]. Esély 6: 97–108.
   Google Scholar