United in diversity? Religious categorization in the German 2011 census

References

• Allievi, Stefano. 2005. “How the Immigrant has Become Muslim. Public Debates on Islam in Europe.” Revue Européenne des Migrations Internationales 21 (2): 135–163. doi: 10.4000/remi.2497
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Benedict. 2006. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Revised ed. London, New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Asad, Talal. 1993. Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Azzaoui, Mounir. 2011. “Muslimische Gemeinschaften in Deutschland zwischen Religionspolitik und Religionsverfassungsrecht.” [Muslim Communities in Germany between Religious Policies and Constitutional Law.] In Politik und Islam, edited by Hendrik Meyer, and Klaus Schubert, 247–276. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Susan Leigh Star. 2000. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Mark. 2000. “Quantifying the Muslim Population in Europe: Conceptual and Data Issues.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 3 (2): 87–101. doi: 10.1080/136455700405163
   Google Scholar
• Brubaker, Rogers. 2013. “Categories of Analysis and Categories of Practice: A Note on the Study of Muslims in European Countries of Immigration.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 36 (1): 1–8. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2012.729674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BVerfG. 1983. Volkszählungsurteil [Census Act]. Bundesverfassungsgericht.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, Kathy. 2001. “Grounded Theory.” In Contemporary Field Research: Perspectives and Formulations, edited by Robert Emerson, 335–352. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chidester, David. 1996. Savage Systems: Colonialism and Comparative Religion in Southern Africa. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Bundesrat. 2009a. Ausschussprotokoll 29. Januar: 784. Sitzung Ausschuss für Arbeit & Sozialpolitik, 189. Sitzung Ausschuss für Familie & Senioren [Report January 29: Session 784 Committee for Work & Social Policy, Session 189 Committee for Family & Elders]. Berlin: Deutscher Bundesrat.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Bundesrat. 2009b. Ausschussprotokoll 29. Januar: 873. Sitzung Ausschuss für Innere Angelegenheiten [Report January 29: Session 873 Committee for Internal Affairs]. Berlin: Deutscher Bundesrat.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Bundesrat. 2009c. Plenarprotokoll: Stenographischer Bericht 854. Sitzung [Parliamentary Debates: Stenographic Record Session 854]. Berlin: Deutscher Bundesrat.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Bundesrat. 2009d. Plenarprotokoll: Stenographischer Bericht 858. Sitzung. [Parliamentary Debates: Stenographic Record Session 858]. Berlin: Deutscher Bundesrat.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Bundestag. 1985. Beschlussempfehlung des Innenausschusses [Recommendations of the Committee of the Interior]. 10/3843. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Bundestag. 2009a. Innenausschuss: Wortprotokoll 90. Sitzung [Committe of the Interior: Verbatim Record Session 90]. 16/90. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Bundestag. 2009b. Ausschussprotokoll: Innenausschuss 91. Sitzung [Report: Committee of the Interior Session 91]. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Bundestag. 2009c. Beschlussempfehlung und Bericht des Innenausschusses [Recommendations and Report of the Committee of the Interior]. 16/12711. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Bundestag. 2009d. Plenarprotokoll: Stenographischer Bericht 218.Sitzung. [Parliamentary Debates: Stenographic Record Session 218]. 16/218. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag.
   Google Scholar
• Dubuisson, Daniel. 2003. The Western Construction of Religion: Myths, Knowledge, and Ideology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Egeler, Roderich. 2013. Pressekonferenz: Zensus 2011: Fakten zur Bevölkerung in Deutschland [Press Conference: Census 2011]. Berlin: Statistisches Bundesamt.
   Google Scholar
• Elrick, Jennifer, and Luisa Farah Schwartzman. 2015. “From Statistical Category to Social Category: Organized Politics and Official Categorizations of ‘Persons with a Migration Background’ in Germany.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 38 (9): 1539–1556. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2014.996240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escafré-Dublet, Angéline, and Patrick Simon. 2011. “Ethnic Statistics in Europe: The Paradox of Color-Blindness.” In European Multiculturalisms: Cultural, Religious and Ethnic Challenges, edited by Anna Triandafyllidou, 213–238. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faller Sullivan, Winnifred. 2005. The Impossibility of Religious Freedom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fetzer, Joel S., and J. Christopher Soper. 2005. Muslims and the State in Britain, France, and Germany. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, Timothy. 2000. The Ideology of Religious Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guilmoto, Christophe Z. 1998. “Le texte statistique colonial: À propos des classifications sociales dans l’Inde britannique.” Histoire & Mesure 13 (1–2): 39–57. doi: 10.3406/hism.1998.889
   Google Scholar
• Haan, Michael. 2005. “Numbers in Nirvana: How the 1872–1921 Indian Censuses Helped Operationalise ‘Hinduism’.” Religion 35 (1): 13–30. doi: 10.1016/j.religion.2005.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, Ian. 1985. “Making Up People.” In Reconstructing Individualism, edited by M. Sosna Heller, and D. E. Wellberry, 222–236. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, Dirk, Marc Swyngedouw, Laurie Hanquinet, Véronique Vandezande, Roger Andersson, Ana Paula Beja Horta, Maria Berger, et al. 2009. “The Challenge of Measuring Immigrant Origin and Immigration-Related Ethnicity in Europe.” Journal of International Migration and Integration 10 (1): 67–88. doi: 10.1007/s12134-009-0091-2
   Google Scholar
• Johansen, Birgitte, and Riem Spielhaus. 2012. “Counting Deviance: Revisiting a Decade’s Production of Surveys among Muslims in Western Europe.” Journal of Muslims in Europe 1 (1): 81–112. doi: 10.1163/221179512X644060
   Google Scholar
• Joppke, Christian. 2009. Veil: Mirror of Identity. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Joppke, Christian. 2013. “Double Standards? Veils and Crucifixes in the European Legal Order.” European Journal of Sociology 54 (01): 97–123. doi: 10.1017/S0003975613000040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kateb, Kamel. 1998. “La gestion statistique des populations dans l’empire colonial français.” Histoire & Mesure 13 (1–2): 77–111. doi: 10.3406/hism.1998.892
   Google Scholar
• Kertzer, David I., and Dominique Arel, eds. 2002. Census and Identity: The Politics of Race, Ethnicity, and Language in National Censuses. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laschet, Armin. 2009. “Der Staat darf die Religion nicht ignorieren.” [The state should not ignore religion.] Die Welt, March 23, https://www.welt.de/104268604.
   Google Scholar
• Loveman, Mara. 2014. National Colors: Racial Classification and the State in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mancini, Susanna. 2009. “The Power of Symbols and Symbols of Power: Secularism and Religion as Guarantors of Cultural Convergence.” Cardozo Law Review 30 (6): 2629–2668.
   Google Scholar
• Masuzawa, Tomoko. 2005. The Invention of World Religions: Or, How European Universalism Was Reserved in the Language of Pluralism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, Matthew B., A. Michael Huberman, and Johnny Saldaña. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mora, G. Cristina. 2014. Making Hispanics: How Activists, Bureaucrats, and Media Constructed a New American. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morning, Ann. 2008. “Ethnic Classification in Global Perspective: A Cross-National Survey of the 2000 Census Round.” Population Research and Policy Review 27 (2): 239–272. doi: 10.1007/s11113-007-9062-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morning, Ann, and Daniel Sabbagh. 2005. “From Sword to Plowshare: Using Race for Discrimination and Antidiscrimination in the United States.” International Social Science Journal 57 (183): 57–73. doi: 10.1111/j.0020-8701.2005.00531.x
   Google Scholar
• Özyürek, Esra. 2014. Being German, Becoming Muslim: Race, Religion, and Conversion in the New Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patalong, Frank. 2011. “Ungenauigkeit beim Zensus: Deutschland wird zum Staat der Gläubigen erhoben.” [An imprecise census: Germany is made into a state of believers.] SPIEGEL ONLINE, May 11. http://www.spiegel.de/panorama/gesellschaft/ungenauigkeit-beim-zensus-deutschland-wird-zum-staat-der-glaeubigen-erhoben-a-761665.html.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, Patrick. 2008. “The Choice of Ignorance: The Debate on Ethnic and Racial Statistics in France.” French Politics, Culture and Society 26 (1): 7–31. doi: 10.3167/fpcs.2008.260102
   Google Scholar
• Simon, Patrick. 2012. “Collecting Ethnic Statistics in Europe: A Review.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 35 (8): 1366–1391. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2011.607507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skrentny, John D. 2004. The Minority Rights Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Jonathan Z. 1998. “Religion, Religions, Religious.” In Critical Terms for Religious Studies, edited by Mark C. Taylor, 269–284. Chicago: The University Of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spielhaus, Riem. 2006. “Religion und Identität: Vom deutschen Versuch, ‘Ausländer’ zu ‘Muslimen’ zu machen.” [Religion and Identity: The attempt to transform ‘foreigners’ into ‘Muslims’.] International Politik 3: 28–37.
   Google Scholar
• Spielhaus, Riem. 2011. “Measuring the Muslim: About Statistical Obsessions, Categorisations and the Quantification of Religion.” Yearbook of Muslims in Europe 3: 695–715.
   Google Scholar
• Spielhaus, Riem, and Martin Herzog. 2015. Die rechtliche Anerkennung des Islams in Deutschland. [The legal recognition of Islam in Germany.] Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Swidler, Ann. 2001. “What Anchors Cultural Practices.” In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, edited by Theodore R. Schatzki, Karin Knorr Cetina, and Eike Von Savigny, 83–101. London, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tezcan, Levent. 2012. Das muslimische Subjekt: Verfangen im Dialog der Deutschen Islam Konferenz [The Muslim subject: Entangled in the Dialogue of the German Islam Conference]. Konstanz: Konstanz University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, Peter, Carlos López Beltrán, Eduardo Restrepo, and Ricardo Ventura Santos, eds. 2014. Mestizo Genomics: Race Mixture, Nation, and Science in Latin America. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weller, Paul. 2004. “Identity, Politics and the Future(s) of Religion in the UK: The Case of the Religion Questions in the 2011 Decennial Census.” Journal of Contemporary Religion 19 (1): 3–21. doi: 10.1080/1353790032000165096
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, Ruth, and Michal Krzyzanowski, eds. 2008. Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Yildiz, Yasemin. 2009. “Turkish Girls, Allah’s Daughters, and the Contemporary German Subject: Itinerary of a Figure.” German Life and Letters 62 (4): 465–481. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0483.2009.01475.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yurdakul, Gokce. 2008. From Guestworkers into Muslims: The Transformation of Turkish Immigrant Associations in Germany. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• ZensG2011. 2009. “Gesetz zur Anordnung des Zensus 2011 sowie zur Änderung von Statistikgesetzen.” [Law Mandating the Census 2011 and Changing Statistic Laws.] BGBI I: 1781.
   Google Scholar
• Zensuskommission. 2009. Stellungnahme der Zensuskommission zum Merkmalskatalog im Kabinettsentwurf des Zensusanordnungsgesetzes (ZensusG2011) [Position Statement of the Census Commission regarding the catalogue of survey characteristics]. Berlin: Zensuskommission 2011.
   Google Scholar