Local responses in restrictive national policy contexts: welfare provisions for non-removed rejected asylum seekers in Amsterdam, Stockholm and Vienna

References

• Ambrosini, M., and P. Boccagni. 2015. “Urban Multiculturalism Beyond the ‘Backlash’: New Discourses and Different Practices in Immigrant Policies Across European Cities.” Journal of Intercultural Studies 36 (1): 35–53. doi: 10.1080/07256868.2014.990362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ataç, I. 2019. “Deserving Shelter: Conditional Access to Accommodation for Rejected Asylum Seekers in Austria, the Netherlands, and Sweden.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 17 (1): 44–60. doi: 10.1080/15562948.2018.1530401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ataç, I., and S. Rosenberger. 2019. “Social Policies as a Tool of Migration Control.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 17 (1): 1–10. doi: 10.1080/15562948.2018.1539802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauder, H., and D. A. Gonzalez. 2018. “Municipal Responses to ‘Illegality’: Urban Sanctuary Across National Contexts.” Social Inclusion 6 (1): 124–134. doi: 10.17645/si.v6i1.1273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campomori, F., and T. Caponio. 2017. “Immigrant Integration Policymaking in Italy: Regional Policies in a Multi-Level Governance Perspective.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 83 (2): 303–321. doi: 10.1177/0020852315611238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuadra, C. B. 2015. “Encounters With Irregular Migrants in Social Work – ‘Collateral Damage’ and Reframing of Recognizability in Swedish Public Social Services.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 13 (3): 302–320. doi: 10.1080/15562948.2015.1037518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Graauw, E. 2015. “Polyglot Bureaucracies: Nonprofit Advocacy to Create Inclusive City Governments.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 13 (2): 156–178. doi: 10.1080/15562948.2015.1030809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delvino, N. 2017. European Cities and Migrants with Irregular Status: Municipal Initiatives for the Inclusion of Irregular Migrants in the Provision of Services. Report for the ‘City Initiative on Migrants with Irregular Status in Europe’. Oxford: COMPAS, University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• EMN. 2016. Returning Rejected Asylum Seekers: Challenges and Good Practices. Common Template of EMN Focussed Study 2016.
   Google Scholar
• European Committee of Social Rights. 2014. CEC v. The Netherlands, Complaint No. 90/2013.
   Google Scholar
• Filomeno, F. A. 2017. Theories of Local Immigration Policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Guiraudon, V. 2004. “Immigration Reform in Comparative Perspectives: Sunshine and Shadow Politics in the United States and Europe.” In Transatlantic Policymaking in an Age of Austerity: Diversity and Drift, edited by M. Levin and M. Shapiro, 131–157. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hepburn, E., and R. Zapata-Barrero. 2014. The Politics of Immigration in Multi-Level States: Governance and Political Parties. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kos, S., M. Maussen, and J. Doomernik. 2015. “Policies of Exclusion and Practices of Inclusion: How Municipal Governments Negotiate Asylum Policies in the Netherlands.” Territory, Politics, Governance 4 (3): 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leerkes, A. 2016. “Back to the Poorhouse? Social Protection and Social Control of Unauthorised Immigrants in the Shadow of the Welfare State.” Journal of European Social Policy 26 (2): 140–154. doi: 10.1177/0958928716637139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippert, R. K., and S. Rehaag, eds. 2013. Sanctuary Practices in International Perspectives: Migration, Citizenship and Social Movements. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg, A., and M. Spång. 2017. “Deportability Status as Basis for Human Rights Claims: Irregularised Migrants’ Right to Health Care in Sweden.” Nordic Journal of Human Rights 35 (1): 35–54. doi: 10.1080/18918131.2017.1285953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz, F. 2018. “Non-removable Returnees Under Union Law: Status Quo and Possible Developments.” European Journal of Migration and Law 20 (1): 28–52. doi: 10.1163/15718166-12340019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls, W. J. 2006. “Associationalism from Above: Explaining Failure Through France’s Politique de la Ville.” Urban Studies 43 (10): 1779–1802. doi: 10.1080/00420980600838135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oomen, B., and M. Baumgärtel. 2018. “Frontier Cities: The Rise of Local Authorities as an Opportunity for International Human Rights Law.” European Journal of International Law 29 (1): 607–630. doi: 10.1093/ejil/chy021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PICUM. 2014. Housing and Homelessness of Undocumented Migrants in Europe: Developing Strategies and Good Practices to Ensure Access to Housing and Shelter. Report, Brussels: PICUM.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberger, S., and S. Koppes. 2018. “Claiming Control: Cooperation with Return as a Condition for Social Benefits in Austria and the Netherlands.” Comparative Migration Studies 6: 1. doi: 10.1186/s40878-018-0085-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schapendonk, M. 2016. Reorganizing the provision of social support to homeless aliens in the Netherlands: A Bourdieusian perspective on the meaning of aliens’ welfare rights. Radboud University Nijmegen: Master Thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, M. 2015. “Paradigmatic Pragmatism and the Politics of Diversity.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 38 (7): 1120–1136. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2014.992925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholten, P. 2013. “Agenda Dynamics and the Multi-level Governance of Intractable Policy Controversies: the Case of Migrant Integration Policies in the Netherlands.” Policy Sciences 46 (3): 217–236. doi: 10.1007/s11077-012-9170-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoukens, P., and S. Buttiens. 2017. “Social Protection of Non-removable Rejected Asylum-Seekers in the EU: A Legal Assessment.” European Journal of Social Security 19 (4): 313–334. doi: 10.1177/1388262717744708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, S. 2014. The Sunshine and Shadow Politics of Irregular Migrants in Europe. Oxford: COMPAS.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, S. 2017. “Multi-level Governance of an Intractable Policy Problem: Migrants with Irregular Status in Europe.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (12): 2034–2052. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2017.1341708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, S., and N. Delvino. 2019. “Municipal Activism on Irregular Migrants: The Framing of Inclusive Approaches at the Local Level.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 17 (1): 27–43. doi:10.1080/15562948.2018.1519867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squire, V., and J. Bagelman. 2012. “Taking not Waiting: Space, Temporality and Politics in the City of Sanctuary Movement.” In Migration and Citizenship: Migrant Activism and the Politics of Movement, edited by P. Nyers and K. Rygiel, 146–164. London, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Red Cross. 2016. Lägesrapport 2016. Konsekvenser av ändringen i lagen om mottagande av asylsökande m.fl. (LMA), https://www.redcross.se/globalassets/press-och-opinion/rapporter/roda-korset_lagesrapport_-lma-2016.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Triandafyllidou, A. 2010. “Irregular Migration in Europe in the Early 21st Century.” In Irregular Migration in Europe. Myths and Realities, edited by A. Triandafyllidou, 1–21. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Utlåtande 2017:222 RVI (Dnr 150-2129/2016). Reviderade riktlinjer för handläggning av ekonomiskt bistånd. Förslag från socialnämnden. https://insynsverige.se/documentHandler.ashx?did=1906580.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Leun, J. 2003. Looking for Loopholes: Processes of Incorporation of Illegal Immigrants in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Meeteren, M. 2014. Irregular Migrants in Belgium and the Netherlands: Aspirations and Incorporation. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Leun, J., and H. Bouter. 2015. “Gimme Shelter: Inclusion and Exclusion of Irregular Immigrants in Dutch Civil Society.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 13 (2): 135–155. doi:10.1080/15562948.2015.1033507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List of interviews cited
   Google Scholar
• Interview 1. Head of facility and case worker at NGO in Stockholm, 23.01.2017.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 2. High level bureaucrat at a Swedish association of local authorities, 02.02.2017.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 3. High level bureaucrat at the Swedish national migration agency, 26.01.2017.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 4. High level bureaucrat at a Swedish association of local authorities, 22.03.2017.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 5. High level bureaucrat in the Stockholm social policy administration, 20.03.2017.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 6. Team leader at the Swedish Church, 03.02.2017.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 7. High level bureaucrat at the Swedish national migration agency, 21.03.2017.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 8. City lawyer in Malmö, 30.03.2017.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 9. Team leader and case worker at NGO in Stockholm, 01.02.2017.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 10. High level bureaucrat at the Swedish national migration agency, 21.03.2017.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 11. Chairperson at NGO in Stockholm, 31.01.2017.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 12. Project leader at NGO in Stockholm, 23.03.2017.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 13. High level bureaucrat at the Swedish national migration agency, 27.01.2017.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 14. Case worker at a NGO in Stockholm, 05.01.2018.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 15. Team leader and case worker at an NGO in Vienna, 24 October 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 16. Legal and social counseler at an NGO in Vienna, 22 December 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 17. Case worker at an NGO in Vienna, 10 November 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 18. Team leader and case worker at an NGO in Vienna, 29 September 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 19. Team leader and case worker at an NGO in Vienna, 27 September 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 20. Head of legal counseling for asylum seekers at an NGO in Lower Austria, 21 November 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 21. High level bureaucrat at Viennese Welfare Agency, 3 October 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 22. Minister for integration and environment in the province of Upper Austria, 6 June 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 23. Team leader at an NGO in Amsterdam which offers shelter, 23 March 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 24. Member in the city council of Amsterdam, 20 April 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 25. Program officer of a health-related NGO in Amsterdam, 14 April 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 26. Policy officer migration, Municipality of Amsterdam, 29 Mar 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 27. Social counsellor at an NGO in Amsterdam which offers shelter, 3 February 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 28. Program officer of a health-related NGO in Amsterdam, 10 February 2017.
   Google Scholar