References
- Aziz MA, McKenzie JC, Wilson JS, Cowie RJ, Ayeni SA, Dunn BK. The human cadaver in the age of biomedical informatics. Anatomical Record 2002; 269: 20–32
- Braunack-Mayer AJ. Should medical students act as surrogate patients for each other?. Medical Education 2001; 35: 681–686
- Chang EH, Power DV. Are medical students comfortable carrying out peer examinations on each other?. Academic Medicine 2000; 75: 384–389
- Dinsmore CE, Daughery S, Zeitz HJ. Teaching and learning gross anatomy: dissection, prosection, or ‘both of the above’?. Clinical Anatomy 1999; 12: 110–114
- Dyer GS, Thorndike ME. Quidne mortui vivos docent? The evolving purpose of human dissection in medical education. Academic Medicine 2000; 75: 969–979
- Heylings DJA. Anatomy 1999–2000: the curriculum and who teaches it. Medical Education 2002; 36: 702–710
- Jones DG. Reassessing the importance of dissection: a critique and elaboration. Clinical Anatomy 1997; 10: 123–127
- McLachlan JC, Bligh J, Bradley P, Searle J. Teaching anatomy without cadavers. Medical Education 2004; 38: 418–424
- MitChell BS, Stephens CR. Teaching anatomy as a multimedia experience. Medical Education 2004; 38: 911–912
- Nnodim JO, Ohanaka EC, Osuji CU. A follow-up comparative study of two modes of learning human anatomy: by dissection and from prosections. Clinical Anatomy 1996; 9: 258–262
- O’neill PA, Larcombe C, Duffy K, Dorman TL. Medical students' willingness and reactions to learning basic skills through examining fellow students. Medical Teacher 1998; 20: 433–437
- Petersen A. Sexing the body: representations of sex differences in Gray's Anatomy, 1858 to the present. Body and Society 1998; 4: 1–15
- Rees CE, Bradley P, McLachlan JC. Exploring medical students' attitudes towards peer physical examination. Medical Teacher 2004; 26: 86–88
- Stillman PL, Ruggill JS, Sabers DL. The use of live models in the teaching of gross anatomy. Medical Education 1978; 12: 114–116