The views of medical education stakeholders on guidelines for cultural diversity teaching

References

• Association of American Medical Schools (AAMC). Learning objectives for medical student education—guidelines for medical schools: Report I of the Medical School Objectives Project. Acad Med 1999a; 74: 13–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). Report III: Contemporary issues in medicine. Communication in medicine: Spirituality, cultural issues and end of life care. Medical School Objectives Project. Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC 1999b
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. Positively Diverse [online]. 2003, Available at: www.doh.gov.uk/positivelydiverse/bulletins.htm (accessed 31 January 2003
   Google Scholar
• Dogra N. The development and evaluation of a programme to teach cultural diversity to medical undergraduate students. Med Ed 2001; 35: 232–241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogra N. The Teaching and Learning of Cultural Diversity in Undergraduate Medical Education in the UK. University of Leicester, Leicester 2004
   Google Scholar
• Dogra N, Conning S, Gill PS, Spencer J, Turner M. Teaching of cultural diversity in medical schools in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland: Cross sectional questicnnaire survery. British Med J 19: 2005; 330: 403–404, Epub 2005 Jan 11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogra N, Karnik N. First-year medical students’ attitudes toward diversity and its teaching: An investigation at one US medical school. Acad Med 2003; 78: 1–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dye TD, Alderdice F, Roberge E, Jamison JQ. Attitudes toward clinical guidelines among obstetricians in Northern Ireland. Brit J Obstetr Gynaecol 2000; 107: 101–107
   Google Scholar
• Flores G, Lee M, Bauchner H, Kastner B. Pediatricians’ attitudes, beliefs, and practices regarding clinical practice guidelines: A national survey. Pediatrics 2000; 105: 496–501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gattellari M, Ward J, Solomon M. Implementing guidelines about colorectal cancer: A national survey of target groups Australia and New Zealand. J Surg 2001; 71: 147–153
   Google Scholar
• General Medical Council (GMC). Tomorrow's Doctors. General Medical Council, London 1993
   Google Scholar
• General Medical Council. Tomorrow's Doctors. General Medical Council, London 2003
   Google Scholar
• Grilli R, Penna A, Zola P, Liberati A. Physicians’ view of practice guidelines: A survey of Italian physicians. Soc Sci Med 1996; 43: 1283–1273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardern RD, Hampshaw S. What do accident and emergency medical staff think of practice guidelines?. Eur J Emerg Med 1997; 4: 68–71
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hayward RS, Guyatt GH, Moore KA, McKibbon KA, Carter AO. Canadian physicians’ attitudes about and preferences regarding clinical practice guidelines. Can Med Assoc J 1997; 156: 1715–1723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joffe H, Yardley L. Content and thematic analysis. Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology, DF Marks, I Yardley. Sage Publications, London 2004
   Google Scholar
• Kern DE, Branch WT, Jr, Jackson JL, Brady DW, Feldman MD, Levinson W, Lipkin M, Jr. Teaching the psychosocial aspects of care in the clinical setting: Practical recommendations. Acad Med 2005; 80: 8–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry S. Medical Education. British Medical Association Publishing, London 1993
   Google Scholar
• Mandin H, Dauphinee WD. Conceptual guidelines for developing and maintaining curriculum and examination objectives: The experience of the Medical Council of Canada. Acad Med 2000; 75: 1031–1037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens FM, van der Vleuten CPM, Grol RPTM, op‘t Root JMH, Crebolder HFJM, Rethans JJ. Educational objectives and requirements of an undergraduate clerkship in general practice: The outcome of a consensus procedure. Fam Pract 1997; 14: 153–159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mau W, Gulich M, Gutenbrunner C, Lampe B, Morfeld M, Schwarzkopf SR, Smolenski UC. Educational objectives in the new interdisciplinary subject ‘Rehabilitation, Physical Medicine, Naturopathic Techniques’ under the 9th Revision of the Licensing Regulations for Doctor: Consensus recommendations of the German Society for Rehabilitative Sciences and the German Society for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Rehabilitation (Stuttgart) 2004; 43: 337–347
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Metz CJM, Pels Rijcken-Van Erp Taalman Kip EH, Brandvan den Valkenburg BWM. Training of doctors: Blueprint 1994. Objectives of Undergraduate Medical Education in the Netherlands. Nijmegen University Press, Nijmegen 1994
   Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook2nd. Sage Publications, London 1994
   Google Scholar
• Minasian-Batamanian LC. Guidelines for developing an online strategy for your subject. Med Teach 2002; 24: 645–647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renvoize EB, Hampshaw SM, Pinder JM, Ayres P. What are hospitals doing about clinical guidelines?. Qual Health Care 1997; 6: 187–191
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robson C. Real World Research2nd. Blackwell, Oxford 2002
   Google Scholar
• Smith RC, Marshall-Dorsey AA, Osborn GG, Shebroe V, Lyles JS, Stoffelmayr BE, Van Egeren LF, Mettler J, Maduschke K, Stanley JM, Gardiner JC. Evidence-based guidelines for teaching patient-centered interviewing. Patient Educ Couns 2000; 39: 27–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strah M. Qualitative interviewing. Research Training for Social Scientists, Burton D. Sage Publications, London 2000
   Google Scholar