References
- Beckman TJ, Ghosh AK, Cook DA, Erwin PJ, Mandrekar JN. How reliable are assessments of clinical teaching? A review of the published instruments. J Gen Intern Med 2004; 19: 971–977
- Beckman TJ, Lee MC, Rohren CH, Pankratz VS. Evaluating an instrument for the peer review of inpatient teaching. Med Teach 2003; 25: 131–135
- Bowden J, Marton F. The University of Learning. Kogan Page Limited, London 2000
- Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for Behavioral Sciences. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 1987
- Collins A, Brown JS, Newman SE. Cognitive apprenticeship: teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser, LB Resnick. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Hillsdale, New Jersey 1989
- Copeland HL, Hewson MG. Developing and testing an instrument to measure the effectiveness of clinical teaching in an academic medical centre. Acad Med 2000; 75: 161–166
- Cottrell D, Kilminster S, Jolly B, Grant J. What is effective supervision and how does it happen? A critical incident study. Med Educ 2002; 36: 1042–1049
- Dolmans DHJM, Wolfhagen HAP, Essed GGM, Scherpbier AJJA, Van der Vleuten CPM. Students' perceptions of relationships between some educational variables in the out-patient setting. Med Educ 2002; 36: 735–741
- Elzubeir MA, Rizk DEE. Identifying characteristics that students, interns and residents look for in their role models. Med Educ 2001; 35: 272–277
- Grant J, Kilminster S, Jolly B, Cottrell D. Clinical supervision of SpRs: Where does it happen, when does it happen and is it effective?. Med Educ 2006; 37: 140–148
- Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Fourth Generation Evaluation. Sage Publications, London, Newbury Park 1989
- Harvey L, Green D. Defining quality. Assess Eval Higher Educ 1993; 18: 9–34
- Hojat M, Xu G. A visitor's guide to effect sizes. Statistical significance versus practical (clinical) importance of research findings. Adv Health Sci Educ 2004; 9: 241–249
- Kilminster SM, Jolly BC. Effective supervision in clinical practice settings: A literature review. Med Educ 2000; 34: 827–840
- Litzelman DK, Stratos GA, Marriott DJ, Lazaridis EN, Skeff KM. Beneficial and harmful effects of augmented feedback on physicians’ clinical-teaching performances. Acad Med 1998a; 73: 324–332
- Litzelman DK, Stratos GA, Marriott DJ, Skeff KM. Factorial validation of a widely disseminated educational framework for evaluating clinical teachers. Acad Med 1998b; 73: 688–695
- Spencer J. Learning and teaching in the clinical environment. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine. Br Med J 2003; 326: 591–594