Impact of sociodemographic characteristics of applicants in multiple mini-interviews

References

• Ahmed A, Qayed KI, Abdulrahman M, Tavares W, Rosenfeld J. 2014. The multiple mini-interview for selecting medical residents: first experience in the Middle East region. Med Teach. 36:703–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albanese M. 2013. The possible impact of the MMI and GPA on diversity. Acad Med. 88:152–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asi M, Beaulieu D. [Internet]. 2013. Arab Households in the United States: 2006–2010; [cited 2016 Oct 9]. Available from: http://www.census.gov/prod/2013pubs/acsbr10-20.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Aspinall PJ. 2003. Who is Asian? A category that remains contested in population and health research. J Public Health Med. 25:91–97.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada. [Internet]. 2014. Canadian Medical Education Statistics. [cited 2016 Oct 9]. Available from: www.afmc.ca/pdf/CMES2014-Complete-Optimized.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour ME, Sandy JR. 2014. Multiple mini interviews for selection of dental students: influence of gender and starting station. J Dent Educ. 78:589–596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt JS, Kramer SE, Chosen ST. 2013. Academic differences among male and female candidates applying for obstetrics and gynecology residency: the experience of one program. J Surg Educ. 70:439–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 3:77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman A. 2006. Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qual Res. 6:97–113.
   Google Scholar
• DeVito JA. 2013. The interpersonal communication book. Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Dowell J, Lynch B, Till H, Kumwenda B, Husbands A. 2012. The multiple mini-interview in the U.K. context: 3 years of experience at Dundee. Med Teach. 34:297–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Says F, Ayuob N, Fahmy AR, El Fayez F, Hasanian M, El Deek B. 2013. Experience of establishment of multiple mini structure interview as part of student admission policy at Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, 2011–2012. Med Teach. 35:S74–S77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eva KW, Macala C. 2014. Multiple mini-interview test characteristics: 'tis better to ask candidates to recall than to imagine. Med Educ. 48:604–613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eva KW, Rosenfeld J, Reiter HI, Norman GR. 2004. An admissions OSCE: the multiple mini-interview. Med Educ. 38:314–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank JR, Snell L, Sherbino J, editors. 2015. CanMEDS 2015 physician competency framework. Ottawa: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; p. 29.
   Google Scholar
• Giddings LS, Grant BM. 2009. Mixed methods research for nursing and the health sciences. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. Chapter 7, From rigour to trustworthiness: validating mixed methods; p. 119–134.
   Google Scholar
• Grbic D, Jones DJ, Case ST. 2015. The role of socioeconomic status in medical school admissions: validation of a socioeconomic indicator for use in medical school admissions. Acad Med. 90:953–960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green J, Thorogood N. 2013. Qualitative methods for health research. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin B, Hu W. 2015. The interaction of socio-economic status and gender in widening participation in medicine. Med Educ. 49:103–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris S, Owen C. 2007. Discerning quality: using the multiple mini-interview in student selection for the Australian National University Medical School. Med Educ. 41:234–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecker K, Donnon T, Fuentealba C, Hall D, Illanes O, Morck DW, Muelling C. 2009. Assessment of applicants to the veterinary curriculum using a multiple mini-interview method. J Vet Med Educ. 36:166–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerant A, Fancher T, Fenton JJ, Fiscella K, Sousa F, Franks P, Henderson M. 2015. How medical school applicant race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status relate to multiple mini-interview-based admissions outcomes: findings from one medical school. Acad Med. 90:1667–1674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerant A, Griffin E, Rainwater J, Henderson M, Sousa F, Bertakis KD, Fenton JJ, Franks P. 2012. Does applicant personality influence multiple mini-interview performance and medical school acceptance offers? Acad Med. 87:1250–1259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly ME, Dowell J, Husbands A, Newell J, Flynn SO, Kropmans T, Dunne FP, Murphy AW. 2014. The fairness, predictive validity and acceptability of multiple mini interview in an internationally diverse student population- a mixed methods study. BMC Med Educ. 14:267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr M, Hissbach J. 2014. Multiple mini-interviews: same concept, different approaches. Med Educ. 48:1157–1175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krumpal I. 2013. Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: a literature review. Qual Quant. 47:2025–2047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liaison Committee on Medical Education. [Internet]. 2016. Functions and Structure of a Medical School; [cited 2016 Oct 9]. Available from: http://lcme.org/wp-content/uploads/filebase/standards/2016-17_Functions-and-Structure_2016-09-20.docx.
   Google Scholar
• Mahon KE, Henderson MK, Kirch DG. 2013. Selecting tomorrow's physicians: the key to the future health care workforce. Acad Med. 88:1806–1811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathers J, Parry J. 2009. Why are there so few working-class applicants to medical schools? Learning from the success stories. Med Educ. 43:219–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maudsley G. 2011. Mixing it but not mixed-up: mixed methods research in medical education (a critical narrative review). Med Teach. 33:e92–e104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McVeigh TP, Dunne FP. 2014. Gender differences in undergraduate medicine in Galway: a tale of two curricula. Ir J Med Sci. 183:103–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgenstern H. 1982. Uses of ecologic analysis in epidemiologic research. Am J Public Health. 72:1336–1344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustajoki M, Forsén T, Kauppila T. 2015. The association between patient-reported pain and doctors’ language proficiency in clinical practice. Pain Res Treat. 2015:7.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Minority Health – U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. [Internet]. 2014. Profile: Asian Americans; [cited 2016 Oct 9]. Available from: http://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/omh/browse.aspx?lvl=3&lvlid=63.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver T, Hecker K, Hausdorf PA, Conlon P. 2014. Validating MMI scores: are we measuring multiple attributes? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 19:379–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pampalon R, Hamel D, Gamache P, Philibert MD, Raymond G, Simpson A. 2012. An area-based material and social deprivation index for public health in Québec and Canada. Can J Public Health. 103:S17–S22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park YS, Kim BS. 2008. Asian and European American cultural values and communication styles among Asian American and European American college students. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 14:47–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips SP, Austin EB. 2009. The feminization of medicine and population health. JAMA. 301:863–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powis D, Hamilton J, McManus I. 2007. Widening access by changing the criteria for selecting medical students. Teach Teach Educ. 23:1235–1245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghavan M, Martin BD, Burnett M, Aoki F, Christensen H, Mackalski B, Young DG, Ripstein I. 2013. Multiple mini-interview scores of medical school applicants with and without rural attributes. Rural Remote Health. 13:2362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees EL, Hawarden AW, Dent G, Hays R, Bates J, Hassell AB. 2016. Evidence regarding the utility of multiple mini-interview (MMI) for selection to undergraduate health programs: A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 37. Med Teach. 38:443–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter HI, Lockyer J, Ziola B, Courneya CA, Eva K. 2012. Should efforts in favor of medical student diversity be focused during admissions or farther upstream? Acad Med. 87:443–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renaud J-S, Cantat A, Lakhal S, Bourget M, St-Onge C. 2016. Sélection des candidats en médecine: validité prédictive des mini entrevues multiples en contexte francophone [Admission process of applicants in medicine: predictive validity of Multiple Mini Interviews in a French-speaking context]. Pédagogie Médicale. [Ahead of print] Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2016026.
   Google Scholar
• Risager K. 2012. The routledge handbook of language and intercultural communication. London: Routledge. Chapter 6, Linguaculture and transnationality: the cultural dimensions of language; p. 101–115.
   Google Scholar
• Roter DL, Hall JA. 2004. Physician gender and patient-centered communication: a critical review of empirical research. Annu Rev Public Health. 25:497–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith H, Chen J, Liu X. 2008. Language and rigour in qualitative research: problems and principles in analyzing data collected in Mandarin. BMC Med Res Methodol. 8:44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St-Onge C, Côté DJ, Brailovsky C. 2009. Utilisation du Mini Entrevues Multiples en contexte francophone: étude de généralisabilité [Using multiple mini-interviews in a French-speaking context: generalisability study]. Mes Eval Educ. 32:49–69.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada. [Internet]. 2016. Table 2: Visible minority population and top three visible minority groups, selected census metropolitan areas, Canada, 2011; [cited 2016 1 October]. Available from: https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/as-sa/99-010-x/2011001/tbl/tbl2-eng.cfm.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor CA, Green KE, Spruce A. 2015. Evaluation of the effect of socio-economic status on performance in a Multiple Mini Interview for admission to medical school. Med Teach. 37:59–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson D. 1995. Language, identity, and the nationalist impulse: Quebec. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 538:69–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uijtdehaage S, Doyle L, Parker N. 2011. Enhancing the reliability of the multiple mini-interview for selecting prospective health care leaders. Acad Med. 86:1032–1039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. [Internet]. 2014. Composition of macro geographical (continental) regions, geographical sub-regions, and selected economic and other groupings; [cited 2016 Oct 9]. Available from: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49regin.htm.
   Google Scholar
• van Nes F, Abma T, Jonsson H, Deeg D. 2010. Language differences in qualitative research: is meaning lost in translation? Eur J Ageing. 7:313–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson I, Harding D, Yeomans N, Griffin B. 2009. Lack of biases in the MMI. Med Teach. 31:959–960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolf K, Cave J, Greenhalgh T, Dacre J. 2008. Ethnic stereotypes and the underachievement of UK medical students from ethnic minorities: qualitative study. BMJ. 337:a1220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar