http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5771-2354
References
- Adams PJ, Buetow S. 2014. The place of theory in assembling the central argument for a thesis or dissertation. Theory Psychol. 24:93–110.
- Diamond A, Ball C, Vorley T, Hughes T, Moreton R, Howe P, Nathwani T. 2014. The impact of doctoral careers. Leicester (UK): CFE Research.
- Gill D, Griffin A, Woolf K, Cave J. 2009. Twelve tips for studying medical education at doctoral level. Med Teach. 31:601–604.
- Lara Varpio MATM, Mylopoulos M. 2015. 21 qualitative research methodologies: embracing methodological borrowing, shifting and importing. In: Cleland J, During SJ. Researching medical education. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; p. 245.
- Leja JA, Wardley CS. 2002. Future trends in health care doctoral education. J Allied Health. 31:227–231.
- Lipson SK, Zhou S, Wagner B, III Beck K, Eisenberg D. 2016. Major differences: variations in undergraduate and graduate student mental health and treatment utilization across academic disciplines. J College Stud Psychother. 30:23–41.
- Neumann R, Tan KK. 2011. From PhD to initial employment: the doctorate in a knowledge economy. Stud High Educ. 36:601–614.
- Phillips EM, Pugh DS. 2000. How to get a PhD. A handbook for students and their supervisors. Maidenhead: Open University.
- Sandars J. 2015. The challenge of feedback-insights from non-medical educational research. Int J Med Educ. 6:1–3.
- Tekian A. 2014. Doctoral programs in health professions education. Med Teach. 36:73–81.
- Telio S, Ajjawi R, Regehr G. 2015. The “educational alliance” as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education. Acad Med. 90:609–614.
- van Schalkwyk SC, Murdoch-Eaton D, Tekian A, van der Vleuten C, Cilliers F. 2016. The supervisor’s toolkit: a framework for doctoral supervision in health professions education: AMEE guide no. 104. Med Teach. 38:429–442.