Advanced search
Publication Cover
Medical Teacher Volume 42, 2020 - Issue 10
Submit an article Journal homepage
482
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The use of BEME reviews in the medical education literature

Tanya Horsleya Research Unit, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Ottawa, Canada;b School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CanadaCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
,
Yvonne Steinertc Institute of Health Sciences Education and Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, CanadaView further author information
,
Karen Leslied Centre for Faculty Development and Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, CanadaView further author information
,
Anna Oswalde Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, CanadaView further author information
,
Farah Friesenf Centre for Faculty Development, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto at St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, CanadaView further author information
&
Rachel H. Ellawayg Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, CanadaView further author information
Pages 1171-1178 | Published online: 08 Aug 2020

References

  • Al-Zahrani BS, Al-Misfer MF, Al-Hazmi AM. 2015. Knowledge, Attitude, Practice And Barriers Of Effective Communication Skills During Medical Consultation Among General Practitioners National Guard Primary Health Care Center,Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. ME-JFM. 13(4):4–17.
  • Anauati MV, Galiani S, Gálvez RH. 2015. Quantifying the life cycle of scholarly articles across fields of economic research. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2523078.
  • BEME 2018. A BEME review: definition and description [Internet]. [accessed 2018 May 15]. https://www.bemecollaboration.org/What+is+a+BEME+Review/.
  • BEME 2019. The BEME collaboration [Internet]. [accessed 2019 Sep 16]. https://www.bemecollaboration.org/About+BEME/.
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research. 2012. Guide to knowledge translation planning at CIHR: integrated and end-of-grant approaches. Ottawa: CIHR.
  • Dauphinee WD, Wood-Dauphinee S. 2004. The need for evidence in medical education: the development of best evidence medical education as an opportunity to inform, guide, and sustain medical education research. Acad Med. 79(10):925–930.
  • Diem A, Wolter SC. 2013. The use of bibliometrics to measure research performance in education sciences. Res High Educ. 54(1):86–114.
  • Doja A, Horsley T, Sampson M. 2014. Productivity in medical education research: an examination of countries of origin. BMC Med Educ. 14:243.
  • Ellaway RH. 2014. Challenges of synthesizing medical education research. BMC Med. 12:193–196.
  • Harden RM, Grant J, Buckley G, Hart IR. 1999. BEME Guide No. 1: best evidence medical education. Med Teach. 21(6):553–562.
  • Horsley T, Regehr G. 2018. When are two interventions the same? Implications for reporting guidelines in education. Med Educ. 52(2):141–143.
  • Kilminster S. 2012. Systematic reviews: do they raise more questions than they answer? Med Educ. 46(11):1026–1027.
  • Kitson A, Harvey G, McCormack B. 1998. Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework. Qual Health Care. 7(3):149–158.
  • Maggio LA, Thomas A, Chen HC, Ioannidis JPA, Kanter SL, Norton C, Tannery NH, Artino AR. 2018. Examining the readiness of best evidence in medical education guides for integration into educational practice: a meta-synthesis. Perspect Med Educ. 7(5):292–301.
  • Ng S, Leslie K, Baker L. 2017. Re-positioning faculty development as knowledge mobilization for health professions education. Perspect Med Educ. 6(4):273–276.
  • Onyura B, Légaré F, Baker L, Reeves S, Rosenfield J, Kitto S, Hodges B, Silver I, Curran V, Armson H, et al. 2015. Affordances of knowledge translation in medical education: a qualitative exploration of empirical knowledge use among medical educators. Acad Med. 90(4):518–524.
  • Price DJ. 1965. Networks of scientific papers. Science. 149(3683):510–515.
  • RANDOM.ORG 2018. Random.org: true random number service [Internet]. [accessed 2018 May 15]. https://www.random.org.
  • Rycroft-Malone J, Harvey G, Seers K, Kitson A, McCormack B, Titchen A. 2004. An exploration of the factors that influence the implementation of evidence into practice. JCN. 13(8):913–924.
  • Sampson M, Horsley T, Doja A. 2013. A bibliometric analysis of evaluative medical education studies: characteristics and indexing accuracy. Acad Med. 88(3):421–427.
  • Shojania KG, Sampson M, Ansari MT, Ji J, Doucette S, Moher D. 2007. How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysis. Ann Intern Med. 147(4):224–233.
  • Thomas A, Gruppen L, van der Vleuten C, Chilingaryan G, Amari F, Steinert Y. 2019. Use of evidence in health professions education: attitudes, practices, barriers and supports. Med Teach. 41(9):1012–1022.
  • Thomas A, Lubarsky S, Durning SJ, Young ME. 2017. Knowledge syntheses in medical education: demystifying scoping reviews. Acad Med. 92(2):161–166.
  • Thomas A, Steinert Y. 2014. Knowledge translation and faculty development: from theory to practice. In: Steinert Y, editor. Faculty development in the health professions. Innovation and change in professional education. Vol. 11. New York: Springer; p. 399–418.
  • Vale CL, Rydzewska LHM, Rovers MM, Emberson JR, Gueyffier F, Stewart LA, Cochrane IPD Meta-analysis Methods Group 2015. Uptake of systematic reviews and meta-analyses based on individual participant data in clinical practice guidelines: descriptive study. BMJ. 350:h1088.
  • van Wesel M. 2016. Evaluation by citation: trends in publication behavior, evaluation criteria, and the strive for high impact publications. Sci Eng Ethics. 22(1):199–225.
  • Varpio L, Bell R, Hollingworth G, Jalali A, Haidet P, Levine R, Regehr G. 2012. Is transferring an educational innovation actually a process of transformation? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 17(3):357–367.
  • Wallace J, Byrne C, Clarke M. 2014. Improving the uptake of systematic reviews: a systematic review of intervention effectiveness and relevance. BMJ Open. 4(10):e005834.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.